60 votes

Rachael Maddow Exposed - MSNBC Caught Framing Vets with Edited Video

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

About this shutdown

How come police are defending various buildings and denying access to them? Why don't they just go home?

I mean that is what should happen, they should all go on strike for not getting payed, all people that doesn't get payed should do that, its the most logical thing to do.

When demand rises for certain services then those services should get pushed on by congress and in term funded, that way you quickly see what services are needed the most and which are not needed at all. But restricting access, it makes no sense.

This goes with the territory.

I know that every MSM network has been caught in acts of blatant dishonesty, but MSNBC has always had a unique ability to be the most brazen of the bunch. This is about as juicy as the time they obscured the race of the man who was open-carrying his AR-15 in Arizona while Obama was giving a speech there with some video editing, literally trying to ignite racial tensions and boost their pathetic ratings.

If you follow MSNBC, your intelligence will be drastically affected, and not in a good way.

“My attitude toward progress has passed from antagonism to boredom. I have long ceased to argue with people who prefer Thursday to Wednesday because it is Thursday.” - G.K. Chesterton


For whatever reason I had this same Mad-cow crap spilled over me in a group outing last night.

The guy works for a local newspaper and began parroting and ranting on about racial tensions against Obama and how the Tea Party is slowly destroying the country. I couldn't even get a word in edge-wise as he spewed lie after lie about Christians, Republicans, Libertarians, and other things that didn't make sense. After seeing this video I know exactly where he got it from, can't wait to share it with him to reveal how idiotic he was.

Why would any thinking person even consider her?

She is a paid FCC licensed government info provider... might as well listen to static... just as entertaining and less lies.


Nobody cares what this openly lesbian commentator has to say. Nobody watches her show. She has zero credibility.
Back in the campaign she occasionally would say something nice about Ron Paul, but it appears to me she did that because she thought it would help divide the GOP.
As for the Marine with the Confederate flag, the flag is a symbol of resistance to unwanted government coercion.
Only leftist bigots like Maddow believe it is a purely white racist symbol because it makes it convenient for them; They can then say that anyone who opposes the centralization of political power must be racist.
The family living in the White House is multi-racial. The President would have been born free under the old slave system because his mother was white. His wife, the first lady, has a great-great-great grandfather who was a white Confederate soldier.
I know InfoWars likes to take pot shots at Miss Maddow since she has done a rant or two about Alex Jones. Since more people watch Jones, I think he is giving her free advertising.

[F]orce can only settle questions of power, not of right. - Clyde N. Wilson

Why do you feel the need to label her a lesbian?

What does her sexuality have to do with anything in the story?

Don't sound like you are very Libertarian.

Just sayin'.

because she pushes gayhood

like it's a special right.

I don't push heterosexuality at all, but gays push their gay agenda and YES they have one. It you feel you are a Libertarian, I'm not I'm a Constitutionalist (I would never be a freaking Libertarian open border globalist), then you should know better but to crush anybody pushing an agenda for their sexuality one way or another.

Gays are but a tiny crumb of the American population, yet it would seem because of the Gay agenda nearly 25% of the media is about being Gay. However, if you were a Christian you would be openly bashed and it's nowhere to be seen on mainstream television, most radio etc. I can absolutely guarantee that if the orginal poster had said "open Christian" you would not have come to the rescue.

I say Hell No, I'm sick of gay loving Christian bashing Haters and the whole backasswards society we have is going to be stopped because of the uproar out there and will be put back in the stupid can. The reason why have unending, unlimited wars controlled by big government and big business with corrupt politicians is because we have turned into a society with no morals, we murder the unborn by the tens of millions, we showcase death, we push dependency, and we endear personal confused identity.

Your children will get kicked out of school for using their fingers as guns, yet if a 17 year old boy thinks he is a girl he has the right to be in the girls restrooms and locker rooms. If your under 16 you can't drive a car, but you can have an abortion or go to your local CVS and buy day after abortion pills. You can buy a condom with your healthcare cards but not aspirin. The US Army is trying to make Christians a hate group, and if your had Chick fil a party at your
promotion party you could get reprimanded by the military. In public schools, if you feel you have to start the day with a prayer or are giving a valedictorian speech mentioning God you can't, but if it has to do with Islam or homosexuality you can.

That's "F"ed Up


Gays are all exactly the same. They all believe the same things and have the same agenda. They all want to destroy Christianity and turn all of our children into gays. I have heard them admit it, and it sounded super gay.
I know for a fact,they all have each others phone numbers and they gather regularly to suggest the best way to get "straights" to gay it up to promote their totally gay agenda. When are people going to wake up and realize the only way to have a free country is to force gays to be straight and force non-Christians to become Christians. We MUST dictate a moral code and outline what "normal" behavior entails. Perhaps sending those who do not qualify as normal to "adjustment" classes in order to get them "straightened" up (for their own bebefit, of course). I think joeinmo has something here.
Why allow these freaks to be so free when they are just going to be "weirdos"? We cant possibly achieve a society of individual freedom, until we define what an individual has to be and then enforce that definition.

I'd rather have a bottle in front o' me than a frontal lobotomy



So what your saying is lets turn what you consider freedom, specifically sexual freedom, which honestly nobody gives a damn about into the super end all for turning the country into a shithole. No thanks.

Are there Christian gays, are there gays who are pro life, are there gays that are fiscally responsible - absolutely but that's not what we are talking about.

We are talking about taking away rights from one group and giving them to another, we are talking about making special protected classes.

We now have "hate crimes", so if you commit a crime of let's say assault on a listed minority then it's a hate crime, no no no its a crime. The crime was assault, it should be a colorblind crime and penalty.

Maddow is a divider of the people, the way her ilk keep power is to divide and put people in classes and sub categories.

I am ProLife, if you are a ProLifer you know the vast percentage of those aborted in the United States are minorities, yet Pro Lifers are deemed hate groups?

African American, Mexican American, Asian American, Gay American, MuslimAmerican, Native American, are all ways to divide rather than bring together the fact that we are just American. Why is it that just Spanish is on food items, signs books etc., and not Chinese, Polish, Latin, or any other language? Why do you have Ugh FoxLatino and not FoxMandarin?

It's because dividing and subdividing America or perhaps the Balkanization is a way to keep power for the government and global corporations and from the people. Because if we are against each other they win.

Yes, clearly the takeaway

Yes, clearly the takeaway message here is that nobody should listen to Maddow because she's a lesbian.


Why would you add "openly lesbian" to your characterization of Maddow? Is it relevant? Are you trying to tell our "openly lesbian" allies something? What? I don't understand your point.

The freedom to be openly lesbian is a right that many would join the freedom movement to preserve and defend. Are you trying to split the movement?

I don't get it.

What do you think? http://consequeries.com/

She is openly lesbian.

That is a fact. It is relevant because her sexuality colors her politics and influences the way she makes her arguments. That, however, is not the reason to disregard what she says. That can be ignored because she lies. She has a history of lying. The fact nobody watches her MSNBC show demonstrates she has no credibility and limited entertainment value.
I find it funny that calling Miss Maddow a "bi-otch" gets no reaction, but noting something she, herself, says she is gets people's panties in a bunch.
The fact that she is a homosexual is irrelevant, but that she openly identifies herself as such is, in my opinion, relevant.
The take-away is ignore her. Giving her exposure on the forum is of little positive value.

[F]orce can only settle questions of power, not of right. - Clyde N. Wilson

What a Disgrace

I think the only qualifications to be a "news reporter" are that you must have no conscience and be willing to read whatever is on the teleprompter.

Jefferson's picture


U.S. Reps were protesting?

"Because of the shutdown that these folks made happen."

Oh, I didn't realize there were members of the U.S. Congress present at this protest. Surely she wouldn't be implying that "these folks" were responsible for the shutdown due to the fact that they may or may not be associated with the (now meaningless) Tea Party. I'm sure she also wouldn't emphasize their POSSIBLE Tea Party membership rather than their DEFINITE U.S. Military service.

Finally, I'm certain that none of my post is intended to be the least bit sarcastic.

Of course

Ted Cruz and Sara Palin showed up.

At the moment, the "Tea Party" are the only ones championing our ideals and controlling the narrative in Washington. They are more significant than people realize, and it is mostly because they have pre-conceived notions. Tomorrow is a new day.

Ron brought the Liberty movement together, Rand is expanding the crap out of it! :)

You know I thought Palin was

You know I thought Palin was a complete idiot and a joke until I actually watched her TV show. Its brilliant actually, the whole show is really just a tourism infomercial for Alaska. I wonder how much money she brought into the state from people coming to visit after the first season.

We all share this eternally evolving present moment- The past and future only exist as inconsequential mental fabrications.

I'm sorry

But there needs to be a clear up on the definition African-American because it really bothers me.

Please correct me if i'm mistaken, but Obama is not African-American in the traditional sense. By traditional sense i mean he does not have a lineage that traces back to the slaves in the USA.

His dad was from Kenya and his mother who was from the US (the only other option that could potentially qualify him as an African-American) was white. The idea that his mum has a history of African-American descent - as they like to suggest - means it was just as likely one of the other former presidents did and that's just absolute non-sense.

To quote from wikipedia: "Ancestry.com announced on July 30, 2012, after using a combination of old documents and yDNA analysis, that Dunham's mother **MAY** have been descended from African John Punch, who was an indentured servant/slave in seventeenth-century colonial Virginia."

If it was possibly true they would have conclusively said it was true, but it's so far from the truth they have to concede he only "may" have a history. And the only reason why they say this is because they NEED the narrative that Obama has a history with slavery when he does not.

I'm not even from America, but i think that if you associate anyone who has an African lineage with the term African-American you dilute the heritage of the American slaves and the trials and tribulations they went through.

There needs to be a term that reserves the right of those who had a history in the US slave period to claim it as there own. Maybe there needs to be a new way to referring to African-Americans who had a history of slavery in the US?

But the idea that Obama has a history with slavery and the confederate flag means something to him personally is just false. It means as much to him as it means to any northern white person because the part of him that is American is white, not black. Yes it does mean something to his kids and that is because they have a history there, but that is through the mom.

On the other hand...

..in re a coherent definition of "African-American":

Insofar as the latest evidence seems to suggest that the origins of all of humanity are African (according to the Leakeys' work in and around the Olduvai Gorge), then the term is actually redundant. Every human is derived from African ancestors, therefore, EVERY American is an African-American.

dynamite anthrax supreme court white house tea party jihad
West of 89
a novel of another america



Tweeting occasionally as himself @cudnoski on the twitter.

Cyril's picture

What a miserable, despicable creature of deceit.

What a miserable, despicable creature of deceit.



Let's revisit 10 years from now these records of yours that you're leaving, Rachel, okay?

Shall we? I promise you that you'll find them interesting, looking back.

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

Fox and CNN have been caught

Fox and CNN have been caught in lies, too. It is disgusting that this happens in our country.

I cant wait to see Greenwald

I cant wait to see Greenwald expose her with pure and simple honesty, because quite frankly, what maddow is, she "sounds good"(average joe), speaks fast (percieved inteligence), but she has no substance, no integrity, half their job is to hide that, glenn seems to naturally expose it

Doesnt have to be glenn, but with him, its usually a sure thing, bless him

Ben Swann or Amber Lyon would mop the floor w/ Maddow

Either of them could easily dissect this, but I would love a dual analysis from these two; discussing how wrong Maddow's attempt at journalism was here, and on how many levels!

Greenwald's great, and I agree with your breakdown of Ms. Madness. She's smart enough to sound articulate, until you listen and watch carefully enough to catch her artful trickery.

Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them. - Frederick Douglass


Abby Martin!!


She deserves a lot more respect for showing up the likes of Madnow!

Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them. - Frederick Douglass

The shutdown that "these people" caused?!

If I didn't see it myself, I wouldn't believe it. Game-over, man! She's waay too smart to just blurt that out by accident. This is getting creepy. There are no humans left in MSM. I feel like that woman greeting Donald Sutherland at the end of Invasion of the Body Snatchers. This is a sad day for Journalism.

Three deliberate lies in one, run-on sentence

Twice, MSnbc Madness stated that, "They weren't getting paid", making the police out to be benevolent idealists who were willing to be there and risk their very lives, out of the goodness of their hearts, and to serve the greater good.

I assert that more probably, "that through no fault of their own", their pay was considerably more than usual for that kind of duty, but, oh, well; you've got to expect the elite to pay big bucks for such an open and brazen a betrayal of the People's Trust, in broad daylight; in front of God, (their oaths), and all those witnesses with cameras!

Fortunately, there are comparatively few people who fully believe Maddow's assertion that "these (Tea Party, gun-loving, knuckle-dragger-type), people caused", this violent, hateful, racist, attack on war-memorials, and the White House itself; but ratings don't much matter when you're doing business for GE, eh?

Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them. - Frederick Douglass

guy waving stars and bars looks like same MSNBC employee who

helped attack Alex Jones.

Second image, man is wearing a bicycle helmet.


That was my immediate

That was my immediate reaction too. MSNCB was focusing on just that one person.