-2 votes

Is THIS why DC police murdered Miriam Carey and kidnapped her child?

[Note to moderators. This is another article from Dr. Georgi Stankov I for which I am posting all of the relevant paragraphs and removing any religious references. Furthermore, I welcome comments from readers who have obtained information which may refute any of the portion which I have posted. Thanks.]

by Georgi Stankov, October 16, 2013

As already reported last week in several articles by myself, the monster Obama not only ordered on October 8th the detonation of a nuclear bomb in Charleston, South Carolina as a black op to proclaim martial law and establish a full-fledged dictatorship in the USA in the face of imminent state default, but also lured his lover Miriam Carey to Washington and then ordered his killer squads to execute her in front of the Senate and the whole American nation on October 3rd.

But this spree killer did not stop here. Now Obama has evidently ordered the CIA to let his child, 14-month-old Erica Francis (I previously reported a son in my articles due to initially false information of the mass media) disappear, so that most probably she must have already been killed.

As previously mentioned, Obama first met Ms, Carey on 18 May 2011 when he traveled to New London, Connecticut to address the graduating class of the US Coast Guard Academy, and while aboard Air Force One was treated by the employer of his lover Miriam Carey for a minor emergency dental issue; the latter is a former high-ranking US Naval officer, Dr. Brian Evans of Advanced Periodontics located in Hamden, Connecticut.

This first meeting of Ms. Carey with Obama as a dentist assistant ended up in an extramarital relationship and a girl, being Obama’s child, was born in August 2012, From what we know so far, it appears that Obama attempted to force her lover to abort, but Ms Carey refused to do so because of her Christian beliefs.

Due to her refusal, a CIA operative and believed to be close friend to Obama, Eric Francis, was assigned as her “monitor” and “conduit” to the President through a Connecticut shell company named HOOD CT, whose location is listed as a P.O Box and whose only email contact is listed as miriam@hoodct.com, the name of the assassinated mother of Obama’s child.

The establishment of CIA shell companies like HOOD CT is a common practice within that US spy agency and allows their agents to receive vast sums of money through unreported US government purchases to support their operations, and in the case of email, allows these communications to escape the scrutiny of “prying eyes.” In this particular case, HOOD CT company was established by the CIA to funnel money to Ms. Carey, while the email address was her way to contact Obama, and the only means he used to contact her.

As to the mysterious CIA agent Eric Francis, he was first acquainted with Obama in the 1980’s and was responsible for obtaining for the President an US Social Security Card from Connecticut even though Obama had never lived in that State! According to US media reports about the murky CIA agent Francis, whose age has been given as 52 and 54, he was the only source to the American media, insinuating that Ms Carey has had mental issues and was believing Obama was “spying on her.”

Apart from owing HOOD CT, CIA agent Francis was also the purported owner of a bar named Hartford Blueprint and a founding member of the West Indian Social Club, with both of these enterprises being located in Hartford, Connecticut. However a search of the Hartford Blueprint and West Indian Social Club shows that the former does not exist, and that the latter has recently closed down its website for “construction,” but as recently as this past November held an “Election Night Celebration!” on behalf of Obama.

As I already reported last week, it was highly suspicious, and most revealing that Obama’s killer squads, after executing Ms Carey in a cold-blooded manner, refused to allow her family (mother, grandmother, sisters) to see the baby Erica, whom they had all helped raise, and, instead gave custody of this child to the murky and still incognito CIA agent Francis.

Ms Carey’s sister, Valerie, in protesting the handing over of the baby Erica to CIA agent Francis noted in a document filed in a Connecticut Court that: “The alleged father has not been present in Erica Francis’ life physically for the past two months nor has he provided financial support. The respondent Eric Francis has not disclosed his home address to the Carey family.”

The Carey family’s attorney, Eric Sanders, further called Miriam Carey an innocent victim and said the police report contradicts much of what was originally reported in the days following Carey’s death, including reports that she had rammed security gates and hit an officer. “She didn’t run anybody over and she certainly didn’t crash into no gate,” Sanders said in an interview last Friday. I reported last week on this case that there are videos available on the Internet that show how a police car deliberately crashes into security gates without any apparent reason and without the presence of the assassinated victim near-by.

Not surprisingly, the long arm of the spree killer Obama arranged that Attorney Sanders was arrested yesterday under “trumped up charges” for his defiance of the Obama’s regime, questioning the propaganda version of the events surrounding Ms Carey’s assassination and releasing to the press the truthful information contained in what are called “Top Secret reports”.

The chain of Obama’s crimes does not end here. Stamford’s Superior Court Judge Jane Emons denied this past Friday Ms Carey’s family emergency plea for access to the baby Erica leaving this young child in the custody of her mysterious, and “non-supportive supposed father”, CIA agent Francis.

And as Miriam Carey was laid to rest yesterday by her family and friends, one has every right to ask this most pertinent question: “Will the same fate befall baby Erica, whose mother was stolen from her by Obama’s assassins, and whose life is now “shrouded in mystery” by the White House and its prestitutes, while the facts speak a clear language even to a normal reader and journalist like myself, scrutinizing the events across the pond.

read more (with reservations) http://www.stankovuniversallaw.com/2013/10/brand-new-spree-k...




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

First thoughts, this theory is bat sh_t crasy!

Why does the father have to be Obama? He's as queer as a 3 dollar bill and not in a gay way. He enjoys killing people, lots of people.

I initially thought she came to DC to see the father of her child and still do. Why else would she drive hundreds of miles to DC with a young child and, when it was closed? But Obama as the father? I don't think so.

"A vote for the lesser of two evils is a vote to keep things the same", Buckminster Fuller..
A choice for liberty is always a choice for liberty.

CRAP THREAD with fantasy

CRAP THREAD with fantasy crap. Should work for hollywood with this crap.

Ron Paul 2016

So, I should put away the Popcorn?

I will tell you exactly why I have not been a good neighbor.
I am fully "bugged" out. well, putting the finishing touches on it anyhow.....

;)

Hmm...

Did I miss the nuclear something? A nuclear bomb went off? Was supposed to go off? Is there any real evidence cited here? I couldn't read the whole thing.

Please...

What nonsense. The only way that child is obama's is if he had this woman artificially inseminated --only to insist on an abortion, which she refused due to her "christian beliefs" (apparently having an affair with a married man doesn't go against her "christian beliefs"), so he has her killed? Come on.

He has never been linked to any woman before michelle, and it makes me laugh that anyone could think their marriage is anything but a sham. I'm sure he has extra-marital sex all the time, but not with women.

This article does give me some comfort though, in that it makes the "obama tried to nuke charleston" story less likely to be true, as they seem to come from the same source.

Although I also question the

Although I also question the truthfulness of this story, you make a mistake to think that someone could have an affair but not want to have an abortion "due to her Christian beliefs". There are plenty of women who have affairs and get pregnant by them, but won't have an abortion.

Of course it shows that they aren't completely consistent in their beliefs, but many people aren't consistent, and certainly not perfect in their behavior. It's the nature of seduction and "giving in to their lusts" that lead someone into having an affair. They don't affirmatively decide to do that in the same way that they affirmatively decide to get an abortion.

Abortion is usually a more sober decision than how someone "decides to have an affair".

Of course...

but I don't see where I made a mistake. It was just a parenthetical comment noting the very inconsistency you speak of in your reply. It doesn't prove or disprove the story and is not my basis for doubting the story.

Of course there are women who have affairs but refuse to have an abortion, but probably not as many who would be hypocritical enough to say it is because of their christian beliefs. They might just say it is wrong (and it is), or that they may be a homewrecker, but not a killer.

You're right to be suspicious

You're right to be suspicious because of this detail in the story, because it is a relatively few people nationwide that would say such a thing.

However, hypocrisy and incredibly inconsistent thinking about many things is quite common. There are even people who will cite their religious beliefs about one thing but not another; they might not even include sexual mores as part of their "Christian beliefs", but still consider abortion to be immoral. I have heard very much this sentiment from self-proclaimed Christians before. There is a trend among many Americans who consider themselves Christian to "tolerate" immoral sexual behavior but still view abortion to be killing a human life.

But do you understand what I mean about how an affair can happen with less clear decision making compared to the decision process of an abortion? The motivation is different and the thinking, emotions and psychological process is quite different. That is the same kind of human element that we think of in economic and regulatory issues; misaligned incentives that mislead people psychologically into doing something that they regret (the affair).

I'm not just hammering one small point, there is a real opportunity here to see real human nature vs. what is consistent and logically expected behavior in a theoretical situation. It's a big part of what has gone wrong with government interposing itself so deeply into our society.

I thought obama was gay...

I thought obama was gay...

He is.

The person who wrote this article just hasn't figured that out yet.

“My attitude toward progress has passed from antagonism to boredom. I have long ceased to argue with people who prefer Thursday to Wednesday because it is Thursday.” - G.K. Chesterton

Fail

Sorcha Faal strikes again!

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1716.htm

Every time I see one of these "Too weird to be true" stories, I go straight to this website and ..BOOM!..there it is. Much of Stankov's article is verbatim.

WOW!!!

...if this is true...

Whatever, screw the down-votes.

Thanks for sharing. You never know WTF is going on.

It's always interesting to hear these radical things because no one really knows, and who knows what pieces may fall into place. It may not be true and it may have some truth to parts of it. Why not at least entertain the possibilities?

Just so happens I looked up the dentist, and the attorney 'Sanders', and the story holds up on that account. Sanders was arrested under a Federal warrant issued by a federal bankruptcy judge. You don't have to be a lawyer to see someone getting arrested under a bankruptcy judge's approval, as shady. This did happen recently, seemingly right after the family of Miriam hired attorney Sanders.

I keep hearing people on DP say nothing can be true because some guy named Sorcha Faal has something to say about something somewhere along the line. Who is this guy? I knew at one point, but forgot because it hasn't seemed to matter whatsoever.

PEOPLE OPPOSING TYRANNY - Real Grass Roots!
Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?

Sorcha Faal is a ficticious Russian Psychic who tells of doom an

The person behind Sorcha Faal is a known con-man named David Booth. His website is whatdoesitmean.com , with the intentional purpose of telling frightening stories to people and conning them into buying his pamphlets ($20 for 12 pages or so as some of his customers claim)and products for 'survival'(cardboard tube water filter with a sock in it for purifying urine) for the coming catastrophe.

Yeah,.. I know, "Caveat Emptor" but he is still a liar. Some say he is CIA Psyops disinformation agent but I think he just a scammer.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/re...

A little research will debunk much of his outlandish claims, such as the words of a supposed expert on nuclear weapons.
http://www.dailypaul.com/302625#comment-3230889

Yeah he could be occasionally right. My problem with this story is, where is the proof Eric Francis was a CIA Agent?

Well,

a good disinfo piece has got to have some truth in it. If someone is willing to research each aspect of a questionable story that is fine but take everything with a grain of salt.

Sometimes people --and this happens a lot with newly awakened-- who used to beleieve all the lies told to them by mainstream media, just turn around and fall for anything that comes from an alternative source.

Don't believe everything, or anything, just because it comes from alternative media. Don't disbelieve it either, but do think, analyze, and question.

I hope you're not lumping me in w/ the "newly awakened"...

With today's MSM, and politics, it's darn near impossible not to take everything with a grain of salt.

Anyone who has been "awakened" for any period of time, must be routinely practicing discretion and taking all information w/ a grain of salt.

It is precisely because I have been 'awake' for a very long time, and have learned things others would not allow themselves to believe, that allows me to conceive of the possibility of a story like this being true.

All information should be taken with a grain of salt. Like I said, I looked up some of the 'facts' presented in this article, and those claims did hold true.

Is this story true? I have no idea. But could it be? Sure, why not?

PEOPLE OPPOSING TYRANNY - Real Grass Roots!
Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?

nah

I wasn't lumping you in, just speaking generally.