4 votes

Good While It Lasted; Oksana Boyko just lost Me: goes O'Reilly vs Principally Consistent Daniel Hannan, for Adversarial Sakes

Purely adversarial, for adversarial sakes. Please observe:

United, not EUnionised? ft. MEP Daniel Hannan

Published on Aug 1, 2013

When the going gets tough, the tough get going? Oksana is joined by British MEP and Eurosceptic Daniel Hannan to discuss the growing support for the UK's exit from the EU, as well Britain's special relationship with the US and their almost indistinguishable foreign policies.

** While her 'interviews' are still interesting and mostly entertaining to watch, and she clearly knows how to grill those that clearly deserve it, her empty rhetorical argumentative points become fully revealed here.

She's putting Hannan, a man who's been principally consistent against unnecessary intervention abroad, on the defensive for the collective actions of past UK politicians as a whole.

To Hannan's credit, he was a total gentleman; never called Oksana or her questions stupid, silly, or obnoxious, and could've ended the whole interview & utterly p0wnzed her with:

Um, Oksana, ever heard of Bolsheviks, Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin? Have you read your own history beyond Putin's talking points in the last 2minutes?

Though, of course, I've always caveat-ed that she'll always defend Russia, as she's a predictable nationalist collectivist; not like she'll openly criticize her boss, Putin:

That said, like she'd ever take Putin to task, for his 'alleged' involvement in the assassination of a noted Russian journalist/ardent critic of Putin himself: Anna Politkovskay, or the soft-kill assassination of Alexander Litvinenko, or the fact that he DID in fact order 'his' FSB to deploy a REAL chemical warfare agent against 'his own' civilian population, 'to save them', and not to mention his alleged false flag...AGAINST HIMSELF, to boost his image.

Equally interesting, was the following interview with Christopher Monckton:

Warming up to warming?

Published on Aug 8, 2013

Global warming or global sham? Real emergency or conspiracy to hike taxes? Controversial climate sceptic Lord Christopher Monckton joins Oksana to untangle the politics behind climate science.

** Christopher totally p0wnzed her on facts. Loved that he educated her on the simple difference between CO vs CO2 and pollutant particulates as part of emissions as being the REAL issue, NOT carbon dioxide.

That said, sad, but also glad, to have found out the truth about his real views on intervention abroad; had no idea he was an apologist for Iraq invasion. Sad. But alas never personally put too much stock in a guy who goes by a "Lord," to begin with. Still, sad knowing that he's an ally on exposing the UNA21 con, but not on factual history of the Iraq invasion.

C'est la vie.

Still, grab a bowl of popcorn, and check those two videos out, y'all!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I get that English is not her

I get that English is not her first language. Regardless of that, she has a hideous voice.

sharkhearted's picture

This was a very enlightening clip

As much as I hate to admit it, she's right.

Granted...a spokesperson for Russia (how is she to be believed?), a principality which has abundantly and psychopathically contributed to the sordid "democide" statistics over the last century...even so despite the bloody stain of Stalin Lenin Kruschev....despite all that....she HAS A POINT...and is SPOT ON for grilling Daniel Hannan on the "special relationship" between the US and the UK.

She is basically tearing apart the Illuminati Veil before the listener's eyes.

Note the quote in there where Hannan attributes the Taliban for the Twin Towers disaster.

The Taliban??? Really???

I mean...you can't make this stuff up.

The GOOD news is that Daniel Hannan, once he wakes up from his Winston Churchill brainwashing and conditioning...and once he realizes that the UK (and the USA) has been complicit in the most odious, diabolical, and murderous schemes in all of human history combined...once those blinders are off, it is GAME ON.

Give him some space and some time to figure this stuff out.

It takes a while for the BRAINWASHING to wear off. (From personal experience lol)

Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

yep, hear ya; I agree with you that she was spot on, but

nevertheless, she obviously took it out on the wrong man.

It'd be like her grilling Dr. Paul for 'voting' for the wars and intervention...that he never voted for, such actions which he has always principally consistently, vehemently opposed.

right idea, right indignant angst, wrong man blamed.

plus, it's obvious from the way she conducted the interview, she did it purely to be adversarial, and not to get at any real conclusion, nor put someone in a hot seat, whom, truly deserved to be grilled or roasted like a South Carolinian barbecue.

now, had Tony Blair been in that seat? certainly. but Hannan? no way.

Daniel Hannan, or the likes of George Galloway (whom while I agree with his non-interventionist views, but am utterly against his socialist policies along with his utterly snide dismissal of 9/11 Truth, be that as it may) are the last people who deserve this type of grilling, simply because they're not responsible for the collective stupidity of their govt peers who did voted for those illegal warcrimes.

Hannan is definitely one of the good ones, and an ally, across the Atlantic; if you enjoyed the above, you'll definitely dig this:

Daniel Hannan | Occupy Wall Street Debate | Oxford Union

Published on Jan 11, 2013

Daniel Hannan MEP gives his opposing opinion to the motion of "The House would Occupy Wall Street".
SUBSCRIBE for more speakers ► http://is.gd/OxfordUnion
Facebook @ http://fb.me/theoxfordunion
Twitter @ http://www.twitter.com/OxfordUnion
Oxford Union Website @ http://www.oxford-union.org/

Daniel Hannan opens by saying that the bailouts were a crime that will one day be seen as a generational offence. He highlights that he, along with 3 other elected politicians, was the only one opposed to the bailouts along with 87% of the British Public. It's wrong to clobber the little guy in order to reward the corporates.

He says that he is opposed because the occupy Wall Street crowd were occupying the wrong place. He says there is a world of difference between being pro business and pro market.

He challenges 3 propositions; The Idea that we are living through a failure of capitalism, the banking collapse was caused by a lack of regulation and the idea that we're in this financial mess because of our greed.

Filmed on Thursday 22nd November 2012


The Union is the world's most prestigious debating society, with an unparalleled reputation for bringing international guests and speakers to Oxford. It has been established for 189 years, aiming to promote debate and discussion not just in Oxford University, but across the globe.

Cornel West | Occupy Wall Street Debate | Oxford Union

Published on Jan 11, 2013

Cornel West gives his commanding proposition to the motion of "This House would Occupy Wall Street"

Full set: http://www.youtube.com/user/OxfordUnion/search?query=occupy+...

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul





Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul