Good While It Lasted; Oksana Boyko just lost Me: goes O'Reilly vs Principally Consistent Daniel Hannan, for Adversarial SakesSubmitted by AnCapMercenary on Mon, 10/21/2013 - 21:21
Purely adversarial, for adversarial sakes. Please observe:
United, not EUnionised? ft. MEP Daniel Hannan
Published on Aug 1, 2013
When the going gets tough, the tough get going? Oksana is joined by British MEP and Eurosceptic Daniel Hannan to discuss the growing support for the UK's exit from the EU, as well Britain's special relationship with the US and their almost indistinguishable foreign policies.
** While her 'interviews' are still interesting and mostly entertaining to watch, and she clearly knows how to grill those that clearly deserve it, her empty rhetorical argumentative points become fully revealed here.
She's putting Hannan, a man who's been principally consistent against unnecessary intervention abroad, on the defensive for the collective actions of past UK politicians as a whole.
To Hannan's credit, he was a total gentleman; never called Oksana or her questions stupid, silly, or obnoxious, and could've ended the whole interview & utterly p0wnzed her with:
Um, Oksana, ever heard of Bolsheviks, Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin? Have you read your own history beyond Putin's talking points in the last 2minutes?
Though, of course, I've always caveat-ed that she'll always defend Russia, as she's a predictable nationalist collectivist; not like she'll openly criticize her boss, Putin:
That said, like she'd ever take Putin to task, for his 'alleged' involvement in the assassination of a noted Russian journalist/ardent critic of Putin himself: Anna Politkovskay, or the soft-kill assassination of Alexander Litvinenko, or the fact that he DID in fact order 'his' FSB to deploy a REAL chemical warfare agent against 'his own' civilian population, 'to save them', and not to mention his alleged false flag...AGAINST HIMSELF, to boost his image.
Equally interesting, was the following interview with Christopher Monckton:
Warming up to warming?
Published on Aug 8, 2013
Global warming or global sham? Real emergency or conspiracy to hike taxes? Controversial climate sceptic Lord Christopher Monckton joins Oksana to untangle the politics behind climate science.
** Christopher totally p0wnzed her on facts. Loved that he educated her on the simple difference between CO vs CO2 and pollutant particulates as part of emissions as being the REAL issue, NOT carbon dioxide.
That said, sad, but also glad, to have found out the truth about his real views on intervention abroad; had no idea he was an apologist for Iraq invasion. Sad. But alas never personally put too much stock in a guy who goes by a "Lord," to begin with. Still, sad knowing that he's an ally on exposing the UNA21 con, but not on factual history of the Iraq invasion.
C'est la vie.
Still, grab a bowl of popcorn, and check those two videos out, y'all!