21 votes

Amnesty International: drone strikes are war crimes & have broken internationl law

US officials responsible for the secret CIA drone campaign against suspected terrorists in Pakistan may have committed war crimes and should stand trial, a report by a leading human rights group warns. Amnesty International has highlighted the case of a grandmother who was killed while she was picking vegetables and other incidents which could have broken international laws designed to protect civilians.

"Amnesty International has serious concerns that this attack violated the prohibition of the arbitrary deprivation of life and may constitute war crimes or extrajudicial executions," the report said. It called for those responsible to stand trial.

...The USA appears to be exploiting the lawless and remote nature of the region to evade accountability for its violations," it said.

MORE ABOUT THE MURDERING CRIMINALS WHO CONTROL AMERICA:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/22/amnesty-us-offi...



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

George Carlin - Airport Security

Who cares bout "international law"? Its wrong & unconstitutional

...you want to take out an "enemy" in a foreign land? Get a letter of Marques and Reprisal... You want to bomb/invade a foreign nation? Get a Declaration of War from congress...

'International law' is not the reason it is illegal, nor the reason it is wrong...

Those who keep brining up a globalist solution to what they see as the US (or Israel's) wrongdoings, are going against everything Ron Paul has taught, and expose themselves as willing to sacrifice US sovereignty.

PEOPLE OPPOSING TYRANNY - Real Grass Roots!
Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?

...and how many years Too Late

does this UN "charity" take to tell us what we already know???
In coming from the "left".

SHUT UP, YOU STUPID CLOWN!

YOU'RE A DISGRACEFUL B.S.-YAPPING LOSER.

Did you ever hear Ron Paul say that to anyone?

If the debate was a contest about who could shout the loudest insult, you win. Other than that, I don't think Ron Paul would be impressed how you act behind his name with "Wins".

Jill Booth is higly intuitive and is way ahead of many here on a few issues, Maybe not this one for you, but no reason to shour insults.

No

Because Ron Paul doesn't have to personally deal with Trolls.

RonPaulWins

Do you know that Ron Paul ate lunch by himself because the trolls in the house ignored him and if they paid him any attention, they laughed at him.

Sometimes it would make me angry that Ron Paul didn't YELL back and tell those trolls, especially during presidential debates, what we really thought.. but he would always be nice anyways.

You don't have to deal with Jill Booth.. you have the freedom to deal with the folks you don't think are trolls and have happiness.

Thank you Granger.

ronpaulwins often has little outbursts.

here's BBC coverage:

Human Rights Watch & Amnesty International Report Label Obama Drone Strikes "WAR CRIMES!"

http://youtu.be/E3oYhqBJXEg
MOXNEWSd0tC0M
Published on Oct 22, 2013
October 22, 2013 BBC News
http://MOXNews.com

though, for those who may not be aware, Frenemy Watch, is not what they purport to be:

Frenemy Watch: Exec.Dir. Ken Roth of Human Rights Watch = WarWHORE; Says It's a "Conspiracy" that Rebels can Launch Chem.Attack!

Bombing for Peace: Syria strike better than nothing? (ft. Human Rights Watch CEO)

http://youtu.be/ooRICVYWHyQ
RT
Published on Sep 8, 2013

Chemical weapons have horrified mankind since their first widespread use almost a century ago. The world has come to recognize their use as a flagrant violation of international law. As the US once again beats the drums of war towards Syria, we ask how justified such an intervention is, given the conflicting evidence and the widespread opposition to it. Will a strike help stop the war, or will it drag the whole region into a more brutal and protracted conflict? To wrestle over these issues, Oksana is joined by Kenneth Roth, the Executive Director of Human Rights Watch.

Follow Oksana Boyko on Twitter http://twitter.com/OksanaBoyko_RT

Like RT on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
Follow RT on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_com
Follow RT on Google+ http://plus.google.com/+RT

RT (Russia Today) is a global news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first news channel to break the 1 billion YouTube views benchmark.

*** Not that I ever stopped looking at them with skepticism, and setting aside the fact that the man's criticism of Russia's own past crimes be not excused, especially when pointedly being questioned by an official Russian state govt TV network, that said, when an organization called "Human Rights Watch," whom on the surface, states that they would not take an official position (always prudent, unless you yourself can verify incidents that require evidence to prove its veracity) on the currently unfolding situation in Syria, but at the same time, its executive director Kenneth Roth is so adamant that there's not even a possibility that CIA-backed rebels could ever launch a false flag chemical attack, should be wholly disturbing to anyone who's ever donated or saw this group as some morally principled NGO (yes, no such thing, but for the sake of argument, y'all get the gist).

Well, to be fair, as it is the personal view of its executive director, which in no way equates to commonly held views among its rank and file, nor their donor base. Still, Kenneth Roth has headed the organization since 1993, and has already expressed his own personal bias, through HRW's activism or lack of it in the past already. Plus, looks like he's another closet, 'soft'-Likunik, but nevertheless, a full blown AIPAC-lackey.

As such, to those who may have donated to Human Rights Watch in the past, may want to be aware of it, maybe even stay away, and/or watch 'em like a hawk, as long as Ken Roth is still heading that outfit, IMHO.

Keep an eye on Oksana Boyko; she's been kicking ass and takin' names. She is what a fierce anchor/host should sound like. Well, should at least deploy similar type of questions, at bare minimum anyway.

Recently, Oksana also took Michio Kaku to task, rather nicely: Michio Kaku, famed Theoretical Physicist, All Theory, No Physics: How DARE You question the Official 9/11 FairyTale!

That said, like she'd ever take Putin to task, for his 'alleged' involvement in the assassination of a noted Russian journalist/ardent critic of Putin himself: Anna Politkovskay, or the soft-kill assassination of Alexander Litvinenko, or the fact that he DID in fact order 'his' FSB to deploy a REAL chemical warfare agent against 'his own' civilian population, 'to save them', and not to mention his alleged false flag...AGAINST HIMSELF, to boost his image.

Well, as with these things, always look to foreign press to get a sense of what's really going on in America, but look here, for criticism of outside countries.

lol.

Well...okay, so oversimplified and...not really. But, y'all get the gist. LOL...er.. .o/

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

that presenter is disgusting,

that presenter is disgusting, why care about killing people who've done nothing to you, huh.....we have plans, and those plans are more important than a single life, huh.........when others do it, obviously i care, we need to invade syria anyway, huh........

Because your mentality is to do as the "higher ups" tell you, you show us what your willing to do, and the "plan" of the "higher ups"....it is your CHARACTER, you are WEASELS, unwilling or too SCARED to speak up when that little voice is trying to get your attention, your mind is so warped, or so BOUGHT, that you dont see or ignore the fact that you are trying to argue that its ok to kill an inocent because that "very important person" said we should do it

YOU ARE PATHETIC, and if i am blunt, it is because that mentality OFFENDS me, it will not be FORGOTTEN, it will NOT be forgiven, and the more you do it, the less affect you think you will have, IT WONT WORK, because in the age of the internet, with so much more access to information and MULTIPLE examples of PROPAGANDA, people will eventually see you for what you are, and the "influence" msm AND government has over the people, they WILL start "reading between the lines"

You say "your not saying anything new", well i say to YOU "your not saying anything new"...you parrot one another so much its astounding, and when one says ONE incorrect, bad, or down right stupid, you ALL do, to show "solidarity", no thoghts, no critical thinking, just parrot and ASSUME your "masters" are correct

rant over

yup, compare the supposedly

non-state media BBC (even though they're clearly funded by the UK taxpayers), versus the openly Kremlin sponsored RT: I'd say, as far as propaganda goes, the Brits have mastered their Ed Bernays' craft, much more adroitly, plus, they've had longer time to practice it, since their Colonial imperial days, to even passing on propaganda INTO Russia, along with the CIA's Easter Europe campaign.

I don't think people have any idea how childishly obvious Faux-News propaganda is, if they've never seen any of BBC's political programs and talkshows for a long time: they've truly made propaganda an art form.

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

"they've truly made

"they've truly made propaganda an art form."

Im glad to see im not the only one who see's that about the bbc specifically.

In regard to ALL msm, seems like their current ongoing job right now, is to keep terrorism in the minds of the people, narrate peoples outrages, and "justify" unjustifyable

""justify" unjustifyable" - that they do,

all too well, these crazy bastards.

really though, seeing as how it's not even remotely near my constitution, I literally have no idea, regardless of how much imagined or real cachet or 'goodies' and access to delusionally 'powerful' people one may or may not gain, but how in the F'ng world, could anyone live with themselves, having to lie, day in and day out?

Hell, even WH press sec. have their limits: average 2yrs. these MSM scums do it for decades!

just how, do they do it? what do they exactly tell themselves?

hell, they may as well be Icke's 'lizard people.' 'cause these scumbags, truly are barely human!

yikes!

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul