21 votes

Native American Man to Anti-Illegal Immigration Protesters: ‘You’re All F@%ing Illegal!’

Native American Man to Anti-Illegal Immigration Protesters: ‘You’re All F@%ing Illegal!’

The truth clearly has the power to break up a crowd of incognizant Arizona Sand Cutters. I gotta give it to this man, that is a bold and courageous stand he took.

http://disinfo.com/2013/10/native-american-man-anti-illegal-...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Not illegals

That man is wrong, so wrong. Last time I checked I was born here and this is my home, just as it is his.

Man, you should see all the

Man, you should see all the illegal aliens and all their bambino's being bused in and strollered up and down the streets in my neighborhood for some candy right now...It looks like the gawd damned Indy 500 out there...They aren't getting any of my candy....lights out !...Ha!

"If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin."
Samuel Adams

To which I'd reply...

...yeah, that's absolutely true. Didn't work out too well for you, did it? Thanks for proving our point.

Let me be clear, this is nothing against foreigners as people, but I take immense issue with foreign cultures and viewpoints coming in, ESPECIALLY when they're coming in from welfare states that make the U.S. look like a bastion of freedom.

Makes me wonder

If we supposably have 15 million illegal immigrants (some say its double that), why did they come here in the first place? Ok, I know the many answers to that question. But if they were so depressed and trodden down, with no way to fight back on their own homeland, will they join us in fighting against our tyrannical govt?

In other words, why didn't they stay and fight on their homeland? Are they chicken? or they really don't understand what freedom is because they never had it to begin with? So our government is less tyrannical than theirs, so they can tolerate it better? How bad will it have to get before they leave here for another country?

The illegals will keep running from one country to another, but sometime you'd think they'd stand and fight, don't you?

The native Indians did stay and fight our govt. They lost, but are still here. Some were jailed and put in concentration camps, but they are still here. I'm sure some fled to Canada and Mexico, but for the most part they stayed.

I guess we not only have to stand up against a tyrannical govt. but we have to deal with the illegals who aren't gonna help us either.

They've never had a taste of freedom like we have, and only know how to be good little slaves. We can't depend on them. They are only here to take the resources but have no loyalty to this country, or theirs either apparently. They'll probably slit our throats if the government tells them too... Oh crap, aren't they doing that now anyway?!

Now I've just made myself mad upon this realization. I always knew it, but now sitting here typing it, it becomes clearer.

We need to tell the illegals to either go home and fight for freedom in their country, or stand with us to keep freedom here.

In my humble opinion, illegals are wussies. They have no loyalities to anyone or country besides themselves. They are leaches. They wouldn't stay and fight in their own country and they are dragging us down here.

most of the

guatemalans at my job have a 10 year plan.
apparently that's enough to retire in guatemala.

"The two weakest arguments for any issue on the House floor are moral and constitutional"
Ron Paul

"Guatemalans Living Abroad"

Why not? They get food assistance, free health care, free education, pay no taxes, earn better wages than back home, make zero investment in US infrastructure (monetarily, psychologically, physically, or otherwise), send their money back home, and HEY! now John McCain wants to make them automatic voting citizens, to boot. We have lots of those from many places.

That's Why Immigration has been de-Regulated

Our "leaders" don't want us unified...

Nations are composed of PEOPLE with common ethnicity, history, interests, language, religion, tradition, values, etc. That's WHY, in the past, immigration was relatively slow and regulated. And, immigrants were told that they were required to adapt to the value systems of the nations they JOINED.

Countries, on the other hand, are POLITICAL entities, units of GEOGRAPHY.

The United States is a nation, We The People, AND a country...a NATION-STATE.

That is why TODAY any strong NATION with any semblance of internal unity and representative government, as opposed to easily controlled and corrupted centralized systems, is being overwhelmed by a RAPID, MASSIVE unregulated influx of hostile immigrants, who have NO LOVE for the existing national bonds of the nations they are entering.
That is why TODAY existing NATIONS are told that they are required to adapt to the needs of the invading immigrants.

Before long, the US, and most European nation-states, will no longer possess national unity. We will be COUNTRIES, political and geographical entities, composed of DIVERSE, combative groups with NO COMMON INTEREST, no common LANGUAGE, no common MORALITY, and no common HISTORY...

The UNITY of our NATIONS is being destroyed by an agenda to subvert our sovereignties to the United Nations Assembly, and the tyranny of a handful of tyrants in international halls of FINANCE and INDUSTRY.

That's why Vladimir Putin said, "Any minority, from anywhere, if it wants to live in Russia, to work and eat in Russia, should speak Russian, and should respect the Russian laws...and we will not grant them special privileges, or try to change our laws to fit their desires...We better learn from the suicides of America, England, Holland and France, if we are to survive as a nation..."

And, that is why when ANYONE, who speaks out against massive rapid immigration or amnesty is DEMONIZED and called racistsupremacistnaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

Well I see similar sentiment

Well I see similar sentiment echo-ed by Israel sympathizers. But they get a down-vote most of the time :O

Foundation of the American Union,

. . . patterned after the EU, will come from an amalgamation of the US and Mexico, so that there is no legal autonomy of the United States. Open borders and an influx of illegal immigration is the first step toward that.

IF, as many believe . ..

the CIA has supported the Mexican drug cartels, the Mexicans who suffer from it (and many do) are safer hiding in the sheriff's office (USA) than in the world of drug wars, aided and abetted by the CIA.

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

Natives are masters of patience

We were here for 26,000 years and know that in the relatively short time of a couple hundred years the newcomers have now just about done themselves in. By the way it is going we will have it back very soon.

If I disappear from a discussion please forgive me. My 24-7 business requires me to split mid-sentence to serve them. I am not ducking out, I will be back later to catch up.

Hey -

Give me a teepee and a squaw, and I'll be more than happy to hunt and fish all day long.

Squaw?

That term is waaaay old. That is like saying bi^c#. If you want to keep your scalp, don't use that word around an NDN woman. For realz.

You've got to think -

Was it a Native or a Caucasian who twisted the context of squaw? hahaha In Native context it means wife, and I'll be damned if I let some supremacist dialectic dictate what it means to me now.

Being that I can't recall ever using that word before, though, I will take your warning with some salt. Thanks.

Yup. Worse actually.

The meaning is between cunt and whore basically.

There is nothing strange about having a bar of soap in your right pocket, it's just what's happening.

Be careful what you accept as meaning -

Take care with what you accept as the meaning of something. Remember that it was not the Native man who made the meaning of "his wife" into something like "dirty whore". The same thing was done - and continues to be done - to Dr. Paul's supporters: we're crazy, racist, terrorists, et cetera. If you give up the ownership of your lexical understanding, you give up your reason as well.

Reminds me of this Ralph

I read this a few years back and book marked it. It is the attempt of a native woman to say that it is not an insult. But you have to go read the second part titled "Notice" to see how much trouble she got in for trying to do this. lol

http://www.nativeweb.org/pages/legal/squaw.html

If I disappear from a discussion please forgive me. My 24-7 business requires me to split mid-sentence to serve them. I am not ducking out, I will be back later to catch up.

Would be...

Would be a pretty rough life wouldn't it? lol. This is what it will take to survive, simplicity and minimalism.

If I disappear from a discussion please forgive me. My 24-7 business requires me to split mid-sentence to serve them. I am not ducking out, I will be back later to catch up.

Question

Look at how much a less than one minute and thirty second video made people flustered and agitated, regardless of your love or hate of the video.

This got more comments than 80% of the posts here on Daily Paul, even more than the "most viewed posts". Serious question: Why is that?

I agree with his sentiment, not the context.

All of the early naturalization laws upheld by the US were severely xenophobic and exclusively for Caucasians. However, we live in a different cultural landscape today - the illegality of peoples drawing from national resources and demanding entitlements is a critical factor in the destruction of our economic welfare.

huh--

constant wars overseas and the Federal Reserve have impoverished America, and the social programs--

should never have been started in the first place.

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

I agree.

It is empire-building and the fiat system that have destroyed a vast portion of the economy, but every contributing factor is critical - especially an open-border policy that disestablishes autonomy. That is a support system for both fiat and empire.

Ya... what about the tribes of White Indian Natives ?

There were tribes of white Indian natives some with blond hair & blue eyes, in North America, Mexico, and South America, prior to Columbus.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madoc
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Amazonian_Indians

____

"Take hold of the future or the future will take hold of you." -- Patrick Dixon

Prior to infiltration from Europeans. Genes and mutations

Just because they look that way does not mean their bloodline has been tainted. You see full blood Indians and Africans with red hair and lighter eyes. And albinoism happens in all races.

Recently a blond/blue eyed child was taken from a Roma couple

in Ireland amid fears that "Gypsies" had once again begun stealing chilren.

Rom are usually swarthy and dark eyed.

The child was returned after DNA tests confirmed the child was theirs.

Recent news.

There is nothing strange about having a bar of soap in your right pocket, it's just what's happening.

What about them?

What about them?

Are They Illegal too ?

And why will it matter when everyone is living in cardboard box cities and our economy has turned into despotism?

____

"Take hold of the future or the future will take hold of you." -- Patrick Dixon

This is silly

Well then the entire U.S. and its constitution are illegal because we essentially just declared ourselves free and sovereign from British rule.

The Indians are not the only conquered people. This has been going on since time began. Populations rise and fall, its sad but it happens and the U.S. isn't the only place that it has happened.

"Once you become knowledgeable, you have an obligation to do something about it."- Ron Paul

A conquered people

don't get to make the rules.

Bottom line, I don't want to be a conquered people like the previous natives and have to live by other foreigner's rules.

Who was here first is irrelevant. It is who is in control that makes the rules. And unfettered immigration will only do to us what was done to the previous people in control. Controlling the flow of legal and illegal immigration is necessary for self preservation.

Now if the new immigrants were of a type of people that embraced liberty and less government I may have a different opinion. Clearly this is not the case so it is an act of preserving individual liberty to not allow people into our political system that would degrade our liberty.