46 votes

Goldman Sachs Has Chosen Our Next President

Thomas DiLorenzo @ LRC

Drum roll please . . . . . . . . . . it’s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hillary Clinton!, whom Goldman just paid $400,000 for two speeches.
Is there a more money-grubbing woman anywhere in America? There’s no one more greedy and obsessed with money than a socialist ideologue.

October 31, 2013

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Maybe not...

If they can accomplish there efforts to get rid of Article 2 section 1 of the constitution the next president will be Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Wow Goldman Sachs, Henry

Wow Goldman Sachs, Henry Kissinger, and George Soros in Hillary's corner!

Such ethics and integrity.

And the stupid masses will go along with it cause they are too stupid to know any better.

And banksters like Goldman will fund the Republican candidate that CAN NOT WIN, ie McCain...ie Mittens...

Warning: Danger Ahead!

Be Your Own Media!!!

Love Tom

But a little naive.


Government Sachs funds every President.

Hillary Clinton has power lust and money helps. This woman's only "qualification" for office is that she married Bill Clinton and did not divorce him so he could further his political career. The only reason she stayed with Bill was to remain close to power.

"One resists the invasion of armies; one does not resist the invasion of ideas" Victor Hugo

FiresofFreedom's picture

I dont even think hilary cared

If bill was playing peek a boo with a cigar in some random girls who haw, as you said, the only reason he married him was for power.

She cared because she gained leverage

Hillary gained leverage over Bill Clinton. In Bill's second term Hillary gained power over Democratic Party which was frantic over his sex scandals. If she had divorced Bill while he was in office the sh*t storm would have been massive. Remember this: if Monica had not gone public Al Gore would have definitely beat GW Bush in 2000.

Al Gore lost and it was Hillary Clinton who became the Democratic martyr. The best thing that every happened to Hillary Clinton's political career was Bill's infidelity. She played the stoic, shamed political wife perfectly and continues to reap the rewards.

"One resists the invasion of armies; one does not resist the invasion of ideas" Victor Hugo




Who can possibly defeat Hillary?

When it comes to the Democrats winning the next election, as long as the DOW is breaking new highs, as long as gold is held down, as long as Republicans give in to higher debt ceilings, as long as Obamacare is allowed to continue unabated, as long as those who receive government benefits out number those who pay for them, as long as the Fed keeps buying Mortgages and Treasuries, as long as we don't crash the economy, there is NO Republican that will win.

However, we will crash the economy. We will expose the problems that too much Leviathan brings. We will no longer be able to pay our debt when interest rates rise. Obamacare will fail miserably. Republicans will return to their old selves.

The question is, when?

So far, Republicans have failed miserably and it will be difficult to defeat Hillary unless we crash before the next election. The problem is, the Fed will be doing all they can with more and more QE to prevent any type of crash. It really comes down to, can the Fed prevent the crash? I don't think they can. My 2nd book, Illusions of Wealth, will dictate how to prepare. My 3rd book, We the Serfs! will predict what will occur next. Both will be out in time to make a difference.

Author of Buy Gold and Silver Safely
Next book: Illusions of Wealth - due out soon
Also writing book We the Serfs!

what if......

the people had a Transparency Vote Count. Something to show the accuracy when compared to the electronic machines. It would take time and money but the system merely could just ask each person who they voted for just to at least have track on the totals when being compared. Those who wanted to give their name could just to help more, just a thought.

Don't let headlines like these keep you down. Liberty is starting to get even more attention as the mainstream media continues its mudslinging against the reality of our economy. THIS IS OUR TIME, onward for Liberty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

kind people rock

They very well may have "schilary" as their Democratic Nominee

But she won't win.


One word...Benghazi.

~Good Night, And Good Luck~

oh yeah...

that's because people remember things and hold politicians accountable for their actions, right? LOL.

I use Blue Wave, but don't expect one of THEIR silly taglines.

I understand why you feel

I understand why you feel like giving up. I felt defeat today when I tried talking to one of my liberal friends today. I tried explaining to her why abortion is morally wrong...because it is most done because the woman isn't "ready" yet. In essence, it is used as birth control . I explained the statistics that only a small percent of abortions are done because of rape, incest, or health of mother.

My friend replied that she didn't see it that way and I am entitled to my opinion.

I told her that it doesn't matter how you WANT to see things...facts are facts.

That conversation didn't end well. These libs refuse to see the truth. They WANT to be blindfolded because the truth is inconvenient.

It's exhausting.

Right on, lets all give up.

Now I know how to fit in here with this post, LOL.

kind people rock

The hideous witch could be

The hideous witch could be dead of old age by then.

Check out Drudge Report's picture for that link

Nope, She's Not a Bankster Puppet: Hillary Clinton paid $400,000 for TWO speeches, by GoldmanSUX!
The Drudge Report's accompanying photo:

Hillary Clinton’s Lucrative Goldman Sachs Speaking Gigs

Keeping close to the investment world, Clinton also made visits to private-equity firms KKR in July and the Carlyle Group in September.

By Alec Torres
October 30, 2013 3:25 PM

Hillary Clinton spoke at two separate Goldman Sachs events on the evenings of Thursday, October 24 and Tuesday, October 29. As both Politico and the New York Times report, Clinton’s fee is about $200,000 per speech, meaning she likely netted around $400,000 for her paid gigs at Goldman over the course of six days.

Last Thursday, Clinton spoke for the AIMS Alternative Investment Conference hosted by Goldman Sachs, a closed event exclusively for Goldman clients. AIMS is an annual conference that explores the latest strategies and products available to financial advisers. At the event, Clinton offered what one attendee described to me as “prepared remarks followed by questions.”

On Tuesday, Clinton spoke at the Builders and Innovators Summit, devoted to discussing entrepreneurship and how to help innovators expand and grow their businesses. According to Politico, Clinton conducted a question-and-answer session with Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein. Goldman Sachs declined to comment on the subject of her remarks or why Mrs. Clinton in particular was invited to the events.

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul


You can't so naive as to think that Goldman Sachs is going to control Hillary with a mere 400k. They will dump millions into Democrat coffers.
They will also choose 2 Presidents.One from the Red team and one from the Blue team and no matter which team wins they will win.Remember when both Obama and McCain came off the campaign trail to DC to make sure Bush's 700 billion bailout passed? Both were in the tank for Sachs.
OUR GUY WAS THE ONLY ONE NOT ON THE PAYROLL! That's why he had to be destroyed.Please don't insult our Socialist friends by calling her a Socialist. Do you think an elitist such as her wants to see the means of production controlled by the working class?


GS would never pay $$$ to their political opponents.

You've got it wrong. Hillary Clinton is not a "socialist ideologue". She is a Corporatist, Elitist, Neocon-Warmongering profiteer. Understand the difference.

True socialists (like Bernie Sanders) want to restrict the power and the control of Corporations (including Goldman Sachs), and make things more fair with more opportunities for all the non-rich people (ordinary people) and help the destitute survive.

But Hillary Clinton is a puppet acting on behalf of Goldman Sachs, and the War Establishment and the Insurance Companies. She ain't no "socialist" -- she's a Corporatist.

And this is exactly why Goldman Sachs is paying her $400,000 dollars -- to protect their private interests .. and not to help the masses, or to create a more level playing field.

You would never see Goldman Sachs pay $400,000 to an actual real socialist like Bernie Sanders, as it would be a total waste of their money. The fact that she's on their payroll proves that private profiteering and not "socialism" is her agenda.

Why am I seeing pro-socilism

Why am I seeing pro-socilism posts here?

No, true socialism stifles innovation by removing incentive for people to innovate and advance society. This allows wealth and power to be centralized because someone has to stifle the demand to "get ahead". Hillary Clinton prays for socialism.

Though the rest of your post about her being elitist is correct.

"Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito."

The enemy of my enemy...

..can be a valuable temporary ally.

As long as fascists rule and socialists oppose them, then we should accept their help.

It's like hitch-hiking from Connecticut. You want to get to Colorado, and the first guy who picks you up wants to go to Oregon. Great, go part way with him.

dynamite anthrax supreme court white house tea party jihad
to be continued

Hillary Clinton prays for War and Goldman Sachs

Corporate Profiteers are not socialists.

Socialists are not Corporate Profiteers.

Hillary Clinton isn't praying for "socialism". She is aligned with Goldman Sachs, War Profiteers, Insurance Companies, and Wall Street.

A socialist would restrict private power, not be its paid spokesman.

Sen. Bernie Sanders is a socialist, and wants to audit the Fed (which is a private group). Hillary Clinton wants the Fed to continue to have unlimited and secret control. Very different things......

your take is retarded

Socialists leaders are profiteers using the corporation called government. Garden variety socialists like Sanders are the proverbial useful idiots.

Nothing wrong with a private company promoting its own interests. The problem arises when government, under socialist logic, has assumed too much power over society. That power--socialism-based power--is what private companies like GS are looking to purchase.

Spoken like a Goldman Sachs lawyer...

The Rothschilds and Goldman Sachs are merely "promoting their own interests" ... and this is fine with you? You want these filthy crooks and robbers to win?

Oh lord, you are 180-degrees backasswards wrong (or more likely a Goldman Sachs spokesman yourself).

It is these private interests that have hijacked public representation away from the people and in the service of fattening their own pockets.

The government does not run the Corporations (socialism).

The Corporations buy off our Elections and run the government and all the money goes into the hands of the private Banks, and profiteering War Industry (and the Insurance and pharmaceutical Companies).

The fact that Goldman Sachs and Wall Street (not government people!!!) are the determinants of who will be the next President, clearly proves the point here that we are indeed ruled by the Corporations -- who are the owners of this sick Country.

You should do your homework and look up the definition of Corporatism. That's what we have here.

You should also listen to George Carlin: The American Dream

you is ignorant

You say yourself that GS and Wall Street are seeking to purchase *government power*. Get it?

No organization except government can control and terrorize people with impunity. You're not worrying about GS or any other organization except in the context of how they can use government against you.

Corporatism can't exist without government. Goldman Sachs, as it is now, couldn't exist without government.

You should do your homework and look up the definition of doing your homework. It means understanding what you're discussing. It also means having a better source of information than a Carlin bit that everyone's heard.


Without a system of laws and rules (enforced), there is nothing that could possibly stop the rich and powerful from totally ruling over us.

The Rothschilds have totally dominated and controlled the money supply of every nation on the planet, regardless of what type of government or lack of government (3rd world) was ever in place -- not because of too many laws, but because there was no specific laws agreed to for stopping them.

Only a strong government (Andrew Jackson) would have stopped them (as Andrew Jackson proved when he used government power to cast out the 2nd US Rothschilds Bank).

Only a weak, passive, "do nothing" government (everything we've had since Andrew Jackson) did not.

Once O-bomba jumps on the campaign trail for her...

...it's all over.

Besides, the republicans won't nominate anyone near a liberty candidate anyway, so I couldn't care less what happens.


"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul



"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul

I wonder why Ted Cruz

isn't standing with Rand & his bill to audit his wife... I mean the Fed !

Ron Swanson

How appropriate that

How appropriate that America's premier witch would be crowned empress in waiting on Halloween.

You'd almost think it was planned that way.

I must be willing to give up what I am in order to become what I will be. Albert Einstein

If The People Don't Wake Up, You Can Forget About Honest

elections ever again.

"My people parish for lack of knowledge" (Insight) ~ Christ Jesus

TwelveOhOne's picture

BOOM! Loving the typo

"Perish" is to die; "parish" is a church community. So, because they lack knowledge, the people join together to form a parish, so that they can share their knowledge. You are correct, very insightful.

I love you. I'm sorry. Please forgive me. Thank you.
http://fija.org - Fully Informed Jury Association
http://jsjinc.net - Jin Shin Jyutsu (energy healing)