9 votes

Letter sent to US Attorney Ortiz, re indictment of Rudy Giuliani for evidence destruction on 9/11

The following is a letter and indictment sent to US Attorney for the District of Massachusetts Carmen Ortiz requesting she present evidence to a Special Grand Jury as required by 18 USC § 3332, which states that: "Any such attorney receiving information concerning such an alleged offense from any other person shall, if requested by such other person, inform the grand jury of such alleged offense, the identity of such other person, and such attorney’s action or recommendation.”

Giuliani will be in Worcester this Wednesday, 11/5. It is prefaced by a note to the 9/11 truth activist community.

All,

This is a copy of a fax I have sent to the office of US Attorney for the District of Massachusetts Carmen Ortiz, at fax number Fax: (617) 748-3974.

http://www.justice.gov/usao/districts/ma.html

I have also copied the following media contacts:

newstip@globe.com,
llamson@telegram.com,
newstips@telegram.com

If you would like you can add your signature by resending fax under separate cover. I used this free online fax tool: http://www.freepopfax.com/

Hitting the media contacts again wouldn't hurt, either.

[ACTIVIST]

---------------------------

PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL, PLEASE FORWARD IMMEDIATELY TO US ATTORNEY CARMEN ORTIZ, HEAD OF MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION

Dear US Attorney Carmen Ortiz,

This is to inform you that Mr. Rudolph Giuliani, former mayor of New
York City, will be in Worcester this Wed. November 5th, at the Hanover
Theater. Please see below a link describing his appearance.

http://thehanovertheatre.org/showinfo.php?id=62

As you know, immediately after September 11, 2001, Mr. Giuliani ,in
his capacity as mayor of NYC, did remove and destroy 99.5% of the
steel evidence from the building destruction at Ground Zero, according
to CUNY Fire Science Professor Glenn Corbett. As you also know,
destruction of evidence at a crime scene is a violation of 18 U.S.C. §
1519, which states that whosoever “alters, destroys, mutilates,
conceals, covers up, [or] falsifies” any “tangible object with the
intent to impede, obstruct, or influence” a criminal investigation,
“shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years,
or both.”

Therefore you have strong probable cause to either initiate an
investigation, or to present the evidence in the sample indictment
below to a Special Grand Jury in Massachusetts, as required by 8 USC §
3332 which states that:

“Any such attorney receiving information concerning such an alleged
offense from any other person shall, if requested by such other
person, inform the grand jury of such alleged offense, the identity of
such other person, and such attorney’s action or recommendation.”

The US Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, having been duly
informed, is requested to present above evidence to a Special Grand
Jury, by the below signed citizens of the Commonwealth.

Please convene a Special Grand Jury immediately and, upon return of an
indictment, do your duty to issue an arrest warrant for Mr. Giuliani,
which may be expeditiously executed on Wednesday night when Mr.
Giuliani will be in our fair city of Worcester. Of course, as is true
with all Americans, Mr. Giuliani must be read his rights and is
presumed innocent unless found guilty.

Sincerely,

[ACTIVIST]
Citizen, Taxpayer, and Registered Voter

----------------------------

SAMPLE INDICTMENT FOR MR. RUDOLPH GIULIANI

______________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

- v. -

RUDOLPH WILLIAM LOUIS GIULIANI

defendant

____________________________________

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

1. RUDOLPH WILLIAM LOUIS GIULIANI (HENCEFORTH “RUDOLPH GIULIANI”)
served as Mayor of New York City from January 1994 through December
2001.

2. The People of the United States of America were attacked on
September 11, 2001, in New York City and in Washington DC, resulting
in thousands of deaths of American citizens and other nationals.

3. These attacks resulted in the unprecedented complete and
catastrophic destruction of three major high-rise buildings, World
Trade Center One, World Trade Center Two, and World Trade Center
Seven. These steel-framed skyscrapers have been the only such
structures in history to collapse in seconds by means other than
controlled demolition.

4. The primary forensic evidence and physical record of the
destruction of a structure whose main support is its steel frame is
the remainders of the steel frame, including all bracketing
assemblies, gusset plates, trusses and both vertical beams and cross
pieces. The national standard recognized by the US Department of
Justice in the investigation of arson-related crimes is the National
Fire Protection Association Document 921, “Guide for Fire and
Explosion Investigations” (“NFPA 921.”) The NFPA 921 states at section
14.3, under “Preservation of the Fire Scene and Physical Evidence,”
that “the entire fire scene should be considered physical evidence and
should be protected and preserved” (“NFPA 921 Guide for Fire and
Explosion Investigations,” 2001 edition.) In the event that evidence
must be moved, section 16.5.2.1 states “Physical evidence should be
thoroughly documented before it is moved...The investigator should
strive to maintain a list of all evidence removed and of who removed
it.”

5. Furthermore, in a criminal case, NFPA 921 16.11.2 requires “that
the evidence be kept until the case is adjudicated.”

OVERT ACTS

6. On or about September 15, 2001, RUDOPH GIULIANI, acting on his
authority as duly elected Mayor of the City of New York, authorized
and contracted Bovis Lend Lease, AMEC Construction Management, Tully
Construction Company, and Turner Construction Company to “provide the
work necessary for removal and demolition services,” according to
letter contracts, in order to remove the forensic evidence from the
World Trade Center (henceforth “Ground Zero”) from the scene of the
attacks, and shipping it outside of police custody to scrap metal
companies in New York and New Jersey, including Metal Management
Northeast and Hugo Neu Schnitzer, both of New Jersey, and from there
was shipped outside of US jurisdiction to Baosteel Group in China.

7. The above facts in paragraph number 6 have been established by
discovery in US District Court, Southern District of New York, Judge
Alvin Hellerstein presiding. Judge Hellerstein determined that: "The
City also engaged private contractors for the recovery effort. On
September 15, 2001, FEMA confirmed that contracts could be awarded
without need for competitive bidding under the emergency conditions
existing after September 11. (Pls.’ J.A. Vol. 4, Ex. 53.) Requirements
for competitive bidding having been waived, and pursuant to the
Declarations of Emergency issued at the City, State and Federal
levels, the DDC engaged Bovis Lend Lease, AMEC Construction
Management, Tully Construction Company, and Turner Construction
Company to “provide the work necessary for removal and demolition
services.”

The “DDC” is the City of New York Department of Design and
Construction, the contracting authority acting under the Mayor.

8. Once outside US custody, the steel members comprising 99.5 percent
of the structural steel of the Twin Towers and Building Seven, was
destroyed by melting and rendered useless for any further forensic
examination.

9. Throughout the months-long process of evidence removal, prominent
members of the Fire Science community repeatedly objected, in public
and in private, that valuable evidence was being forever lost for
further investigation, especially given the unprecedented nature of
the structural failure of the three buildings. On January 1, 2002,
Bill Manning, editor-in-chief if Fire Engineering Magazine, wrote in a
column:

“For more than three months, structural steel from the World Trade
Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap. Crucial
evidence that could answer many questions about high-rise building
design practices and performance under fire conditions is on the slow
boat to China...” Dr. Frederick W. Mowrer, associate professor in the
Fire Protection Engineering Department at the University of Maryland,
told the New York Times on December 25, 2001: "I find the speed with
which potentially important evidence has been removed and recycled to
be appalling."

Glenn Corbett, a science professor at John Jay College, told a US
congressional committee on March 6, 2002, that the “lack of
significant amounts of steel for examination will make it difficult,
if not impossible, to make a definitive statement as to the cause and
chronology of the collapse.”

10. Nevertheless, RUDOLPH GIULIANI continued the removal of the
evidence, knowing, as a former federal prosecutor, absolutely and
without a doubt that all of it was rapidly being destroyed, and that
such destruction of evidence at an arson scene was a crime.

COUNT ONE

Spoliation of evidence at the scene of a crime of arson.

11. RUDOLPH GIULIANI, by ordering the removal of 99.5 percent of key
evidence of arson from Ground Zero and sending it to certain
destruction, willfully and knowingly engaged in felony destruction of
evidence under 18 U.S.C. § 1519, which states that whosoever “alters,
destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, [or] falsifies” any
“tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence” a
criminal investigation, “shall be fined under this title, imprisoned
not more than 20 years, or both.”

12. RUDOLPH GIULIANI, by ordering the removal of 99.5 percent of key
evidence of arson from Ground Zero and sending it to certain
destruction, willfully and knowingly engaged in felony destruction of
evidence under relevant statutes of the State of New York, which
regards the destruction of evidence in any capital crime to be a
felony.

13. RUDOLPH GIULIANI, by ordering the removal of 99.5 percent of key
evidence of arson from Ground Zero and sending it to certain
destruction, willfully and knowingly engaged in felony destruction of
evidence under relevant statutes of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
which regards the destruction of evidence in any capital crime to be a
felony.

JURISDICTION

14. Violations of federal law are subject to the jurisdiction of the
US Attorney for the US Department of Justice, District of
Massachusetts, Carmen Ortiz.

15. Local jurisdiction is established by common law for capital cases
and Jenkins v. Chief Justice of The District Court, 416 Mass. 221
[1993]: An officer in his own jurisdiction may make an arrest without
a warrant for a felony if the officer has probable cause to believe
the person to be arrested committed or is committing a felony. An
officer may also, without a warrant, arrest for a misdemeanor which
constitutes a breach of the peace, or for a misdemeanor where
warrantless arrest is allowed by statute. Whenever police effect a
warrantless arrest of a subject, it must be followed by a judicial
determination of probable cause within twenty-four hours of the
arrest, including weekends and holidays, based on explicit oath or
affirmation of the arresting officer, or based on the officers police
report. (Jenkins v. Chief Justice of The District Court, 416 Mass. 221
[1993]).

REQUIREMENT FOR U.S. ATTORNEY TO PRESENT EVIDENCE TO GRAND JURY

16. 18 USC § 3332 states that “Any such attorney receiving
information concerning such an alleged offense from any other person
shall, if requested by such other person, inform the grand jury of
such alleged offense, the identity of such other person, and such
attorney’s action or recommendation.” The US Attorney for the District
of Massachusetts, having been duly informed, is requested to present
above evidence to a Special Grand Jury.

MISPRISION OF A FELONY

17. 18 U.S.C. §4 states that: “Whoever, having knowledge of the
actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United
States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same
to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the
United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
than three years, or both.”

DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS, NOVEMBER 2, 2013

------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------

RELATED ARTICLE IN DIGITAL JOURNAL:

"The case against Rudy Giuliani for evidence destruction on 9/11"

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/361304



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I was going to encourage you

to write more letters, but then I saw you believed you were writing an "indictment" but apparently, aware that you were perhaps doing something illegal, you called it a "sample indictment." It will probably be used as liner for the gubernatorial birdcage, but still, it makes you look like a kook.

Consider this post a 'sample indictment' for wanton fake law idiocy

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

It's called a "sample indictment" because it's a model

for a real one, which only a prosecutor or a grand jury can write. I didn't think that was complicated.

The contents of that sample are not "kooky," but based on law and evidence as airtight as it gets. Please address the post and spare us your stupid opinions on what "makes" one look "kooky." This is obviously an avenue to generate yet more political pressure for 9/11 truth, and one that could have some teeth to it if someone would use it. I didn't think that was complicated either.

Release the Sandy Hook video.

indicia of kookiness

not realizing there is something called governmental immunity

not realizing there are legitimate reasons to remove damaged building debris

not realizing that the government is already aware of what happened

believing that quoting conspiracy theorists is somehow strengthening your 'case'

believing that your opinion about what percentage of things removed is somehow valid or persuasive.

believing that the DA will say "heck, these guys did my job for me"

need I go on?

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

I hope this "indictment"

has some teeth.

But I have a hunch a judge will throw on some boxing gloves and punch those teeth out.

Look, I want the criminals of 9/11 behind bars as bad as anyone, but it won't happen unless we have millions of people behind this movement.

Millions in the streets. Millions CALLING or EMAILING or WRITING to their Congressman, DEMANDING to open a new investigation.

We need some commerce to halt, is basically what I"m getting at.

If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.

Judges are obliged to follow the law.

That is all.

Release the Sandy Hook video.

Follow or interpret?

I think you're forgetting about the Supreme, Appellate, and Appeal COurts. They like to make "monumental decisions" to further their careers.

Of course, not all Judges are the same.

If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.

don't hold your breath

it doesnt.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

Exactly.

Stopping commerce is literally stopping TPTB. If you do that, it will piss them off and they will use whatever arm of government necessary to flush you out.

If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.

huh?

I am completely not following what you're suggesting. Stopping commerce? No, they'll just throw your butt in jail and that's it.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

You and I are on the same page.

WHat I mean is, if you try and mess with any type of Commerce system, you will be, like you said, thrown in jail.

If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.

Nice!

A move well worth repeating in more districts, naturally.

What would the Founders do?

This looks like a template for dogging Rudy

at his public appearances. Sooner or later it will make the news!

Release the Sandy Hook video.

hoping that anyone who lives in Worcester will go see Rudy

tomorrow night and ask him a few questions...

Release the Sandy Hook video.

The wheels of Justice grind slowly,

but at least they are still grinding.
Power to this, and to the people who are fighting for an open, honest investigation into the events surrounding 9/11.

the wheels of justice

aren't moved at all by this. Just telling you that thing called the truth.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

The case is bullet proof. The authorities can look

...the other way, pretend they see nothing. The one thing they cannot do is say how this is not felony evidence destruction, pure and simple, point-by-point according to the letter of the law. That means Rudy will have to be looking over his shoulder lest an honest DA be elected or appointed at any time, who will state the obvious.

Politically, what is interesting about the case is that even 9/11 deniers should want this case pursued, if for no other reason than Rudy destroyed the evidence that would have "shut the Truthers up."

Release the Sandy Hook video.

what case?

you wrote a pretend indictment. That isn't a "case" and there is nothing to look at other than a list of allegations. What's your angle here, are you going to start asking for people to give you money to do this stuff, or is it a ploy for some kind of fame on the small stage?

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein