23 votes

What the... Hacktivist Group "ANONymous" just 'PasteBin.com'-ed Warning: Imminent False Flag Attack vs LA scheduled for Nov 15!

Developing...

CitiBank & SWAT drill...
444 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, California 90015

9/11 Style Attack in LA May Be Imminent, Anonymous Warns
DNA / November 14, 2013

Anonymous has indicated that they have information which leads them to believe that a false flag event similar to the twin tower attacks in New York is in the works for the Citi Bank building. The chief tenant of that building at this time is Freddie Mac.


Spectators gathered to watch as SWAT team members engaged with actors pretending to be terrorists. PHOTO: Reuters, via DailyMail

The world renowned hacker activist group “Anonymous” issued one of their civic-minded warnings yesterday on behalf of the people of Los Angeles. Anonymous has indicated that they have information which leads them to believe that a false flag event similar to the twin tower attacks in New York is in the works for the Citi Bank building. The chief tenant of that building at this time is Freddie Mac.

They are specific in their information, with the attack expected on Friday, November 15th. They indicated that their information alerted them to SWAT drills being conducted in the downtown area in a manner different from other drills which have been recently carried out. They did not specify in what way they were different.

They also stated that the insurance coverage for the building has been dropped with the exception of those portions of coverage which provide for special conditions, physical damage, and coverages related to terrorism. Those coverages remain in effect, according to Anonymous’ sources. They identify the certificate holder for the insurance Hines Vaf.

*****************************************************************

Who knows if this is true, but here it is, judge for yourselves:

The Citi Bank building that is currently occupied by Freddie Mac just recently dropped all insurance policies except for the policy portion which contains special conditions, coverages related to terrorism, which is all risk of direct physical damage.

The certificate holder for this policy is located at 444 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, California 90015, under Hines Vaf, a private insurance company which offers Loss Adjusters, Allstate Claims Adjuster, Integrated Insurance Services, Property Insurance Adjuster and General Auto Insurance.

Similar to the destruction of the twin towers, changes were made to their insurance policies prior to the so called terrorist acts on nine eleven. Although we are not one hundred percent sure of these horrific activities being planned to transpire within the next few days, we did not want to take a chance and risk losing anymore innocent lives and have a repeat of nine eleven in New York.

Potential False Flag in L.A, CA Nov 15 2013
By: Slaughterotica645 on Nov 12th, 2013 | syntax: None | size: 2.51 KB | hits: 5,422 | expires: Never
download | raw | embed | report abuse | print

Potential False Flag----------------------------------Anonymous Shocking Current Events

Greetings citizens of the world, we are Anonymous. We have received intel related to the possible destruction of one of downtown Los Angeles's towers, being set up as a false flag event on Friday, November fifteenth two thousand and thirteen. Over the weekend, SWAT teams were conducting drills in downtown Los Angeles unlike any completed in the past. The Citi Bank building that is currently occupied by Freddie Mac just recently dropped all insurance policies except for the policy portion which contains special conditions, coverages related to terrorism, which is all risk of direct physical damage. The certificate holder for this policy is located at 444 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, California 90015, under Hines Vaf, a private insurance company which offers Loss Adjusters, Allstate Claims Adjuster, Integrated Insurance Services, Property Insurance Adjuster and General Auto Insurance. Similar to the destruction of the twin towers, changes were made to their insurance policies prior to the so called terrorist acts on nine eleven. Although we are not one hundred percent sure of these horrific activities being planned to transpire within the next few days, we did not want to take a chance and risk losing anymore innocent lives and have a repeat of nine eleven in New York. The buildings in question are the Citi bank building which is located adjacent to the US bank building on the corner of South Flower and West Fifth street. It is believed to be the target for a false flag event set for this Friday. We ask American citizens who work in this area of Los Angeles California to take extra precautions. It is advisable given the severity of this information, if you are employed and are working, or conducting personal matters in either the Citi bank or the US bank towers of los Angeles, that you stay away from these two structures on that day. This is a warning, and again, as a precautionary measure we alert you of this possible false flag event being set up in the city of Los Angeles. To the share holders of these policies, you have been warned. We do not forgive, we do not forget. Expect to be held accountable for your actions if you follow through with your sinister agenda. We will not tolerate your wicked greed in pursuit of more wealth and restructure. We are Anonymous. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us.

-------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------

*****************************************************************

In a town full of actors and actor-wannabes:

Dramatic scenes as SWAT teams close down part of L.A. in 'terror alert'... but don't worry it's just a drill

+ Spectators gathered to watch terrorism scenarios get played out including an actor pretending to detonate a suicide vest
+ The live demonstration on the streets of downtown L.A. was part of the 2013 National Homeland Security Conference

By David Mccormack
PUBLISHED: 22:50 EST, 6 June 2013 | UPDATED: 09:08 EST, 7 June 2013

These images could be mistaken for scenes from a Hollywood movie, but instead the action was part of a counter terrorism drill by Los Angeles law enforcement officials held on Thursday.

SWAT team members engaged actors and police officers pretending to be terrorists during a live demonstration on the streets of downtown L.A. for the 2013 National Homeland Security Conference.

The purpose of the drill, conducted by law enforcement officials from the L.A. Police Department and L.A. Sheriff department, was to highlight various counter terrorism tactics in response to a mock incident involving armed gunmen and weapons of mass destruction.

Spectators gathered to watch as an actor pretended to detonate a suicide vest and SWAT team members and pretend terrorists shot at each other.

Other scenarios being played out during the drill included a remote controlled bomb squad forklift lifting a truck and SWAT team members descending from a helicopter.


High drama: SWAT police appear to shoot dead a criminal in a daylight gunfight. But it was just a drill. Photo: ZUMA/Rex Features


An actor pretending to detonate a suicide vest is shot by law enforcement officials from the Los Angeles Police Department and Los Angeles Sheriff department, while a victim lies on the ground. PHOTO: Reuters


SWAT team members engage actors pretending to be terrorists in response to a mock incident involving armed gunmen and weapons of mass destruction. PHOTO: Reuters


A remote controlled bomb squad forklift lifts a truck during a drill conducted by law enforcement officials from the Los Angeles Police Department and Los Angeles Sheriff department. PHOTO: Reuters


A bomb squad robot works with law enforcement officials from L.A.'s police and sheriff departments during a live counter terrorism demonstration for the 2013 National Homeland Security Conference. PHOTO: Reuters


Carried away: Spectators gathered to watch as an actor pretended to detonate a suicide vest and SWAT team members and pretend terrorists shot at each other. Photo: ZUMA/Rex Features [Yay! Police State Porn!]

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Are we in rome, is this a

Are we in rome, is this a gladiator ring
"are you not entertained"

Nothing bad will ever happen

ever.

I saw the best minds of my generation, destroyed by pandas starving hysterical naked

-Allen Ginsberg

Nothing bad ever happens...

Nothing bad ever happens....Love my Oingo Boingo!
Interesting that these lyrics are more on-point today than they were when this first came out nearly 30 years ago!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQy5vKAaTuA

------------------
BC
Silence isn't always golden....sometimes it's yellow.

"The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." - Patrick Henry

OK...today is the day!

Keep watch...and hope Anon is wrong, or has thwarted the "event".

------------------
BC
Silence isn't always golden....sometimes it's yellow.

"The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." - Patrick Henry

Missing opportunities here?

Is everyone here forgetting something crucial? Think back to 9/10/01... What would you do if you could go back to that day, knowing the history from then to now?

I'd be investigating any recent 'construction'.
I'd be checking the market for related companies.
I'd be setting up video cameras from all angles.
I'd be putting in place every single thing I needed to prove all the things we suspect but can't seem to prove good enough for the majority to believe.

Even if this warning does scare them off and nothing happens, many things that show proof of intent would have to have been in place long before now. Go video the controlled demo setup that would be in place already. If there isn't any, we at least know it's not a planned building drop.

I'm viewing this a bit differently....

If Anon is correct in their assumption that SOMETHING is going to go-down, then by divulging this in a very public way they have possibly changed the course of action by the perpetrators. In the case of 9-11, only those who had some sort of tie with the Zionist regime got a warning the day before...and something like 1/2 of the people who should have been at work didn't show up that morning. There were entire offices that were nearly empty because of an email received the day before...also, warnings not to fly were zipping around the inboxes of those in "the club".
I propose that Anon should have only sent emails to those who work in that building and not put it out there publicly. Then, "the plan" would have gone forward...and lots of evidence to be had of fore-knowledge.

------------------
BC
Silence isn't always golden....sometimes it's yellow.

"The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." - Patrick Henry

FBI says cyber attacks are the threat.

This 'warning' could have other purposes. Like, for example, distracting the authorities or even providing an opportunity for a cyber attack (by anonymous) they could blame a financial crisis on. Thereby, maintaining the trust of wallstreet.

http://rt.com/usa/fbi-cyber-attack-threat-739/

"I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves, be wise as a serpent and harmless as a dove."

could be, could be my man; then again it could be anything...

if the capability exists for govt/corporatist fascists to do it, they'll do it, simply because they can.0/

plus, I believe tomorrow's 'warning' coincides with the ongoing DHS policestate acclimation drill: the Grid Ex II shutdown.

Anyone here who live in the region, directly affected??

Either way, seems like the potential is there for a 'perfect storm' of govt BS & tyranny for them to want to exploit: oh right, that's everyday! never mind! LOL...er.. .o/

Grid EX II And The Impact Of An EMP Attack On America

Dave Hodges
Activist Post

The following material is grim, very grim. Let me get the dramatics out of the way in the very beginning. If a nation-wide EMP attack ever takes place in America, given our present level of preparedness, it will prove to be the most cataclysmic event in human history.

This is an article that I did not want to write. However, it is an article which represents completely known information but is normally not available outside academic and government-sponsored conferences. I have synthesized and simplified much of the research in the hope of making the material understandable and useful to the general public.

Many authors who would write such an article would be immediately accused of fear-mongering. In this instance, I believe there is much to fear. Short of a 3-mile-wide asteroid landing in the ocean, I cannot think of a more devastating event than an EMP attack. If anything, the scenarios I present are on the very conservative side.

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

BUMP for Awareness!

I hope and pray this ISN'T true.

If it is, and it actually happens with our prior knowledge, then it will 100% confirm what many already know to be true of those desperate to hold on to their minuscule illusionary power: They're all f***ing crazy psychopaths and it's time to throw them in cages.

"We are not human beings having a spiritual experience; we are spiritual beings having a human experience"—Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

I too hope and pray that

their warning, isn't the case.

but with false flags, no harm being vigilant of it, whether it comes to pass or not.

hopefully, Los Angelinos would be safe...

regardless, prayers for SoCal souls....

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Anonymous~

If they are accurate, would putting out this information preclude a false flag attack? I mean, wouldn't it be sorta =suspicious= if they went ahead and did something tomorrow? So who knows..

Garnet
Daughter of 1776 American Revolutionists

Probably a group of

Probably a group of xboxihadists attacking the PlayStation 4 launch. Probably...

Homeland security statement: patriotism is now considered terrorism.
I love www.isidewith.com shared it with everyone I know. If anything they realize its not just a red and blue idiot running for reelection.

It seems

Anonymous is drawing their own conclusion, not like they have convincing evidence.

They cite two things: dropping of portions of insurance policy, and known SWAT drills.

If that's all they have I'm personally not convinced. To give a warning of something IMMINENT you need to have more than that, something specific. If they had that they would reveal it.

I'm glad they're vigilant. We all need to be, but we also need to use good judgment and facts on information.

Let's progress the conversation, AnCap:

If Anon is right and something happens like they say, what then? I mean, does that mean Anon is complicit?

Also, if Anon is correct, who in the he11 did they hack or who is their source? I understand concealing one's source to maintain safety, but won't TPTB just vet whoever they believe to be leaking the information?

And if Anon is wrong, do we start taking their *warnings* with a grain of salt?

I like where Anon's "collective" heart is, but when will they have some kind of "smoking gun" evidence against the very people they exploit?

Thanks for posting, AnCap.

If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.

you're welcome; personally? I don't think they're "complicit"

as that would be akin to 'shooting the messenger.'

but as I've stated before, there is no harm done, no matter how many 'crying wolf' they pass along, as if they're wrong: no one's harmed. they're simply hacking data, wherever that maybe from (other hackers can verify the veracity of their claims as well as 'source' if it can be ascertained). Plus, I'm of the mind, personally speaking, when it comes to warning about possible false flags, it's always better safe, than to be sorry. so I don't consider prior warnings as 'hysteria.' Besides, it's not as if the citizenry are mobilizing shutting the window shutters, bolting down doors/windows, shutting off the digital signature, and bugging out, as would be in a govt-terrorist mandated "evacuation orders."

so if they turn out to be wrong, would ANONymous 'lose credibility?'

well, first I'd ask WHO are 'they'?

precisely. WHO are they?

Submitted by AnCapMercenary on Thu, 11/14/2013 - 12:04. Permalink

it literally could be anyone.

it's not like it's a 'brand' with known board members.

it could be legit grassroots "White Hat" hackers, or could be some CIA/NSA-cutout be they astroturf or infiltrated.

it all depends on how good or evil they've been.

so far, none of what they publicly 'claimed' has been pro-govt tyranny, so far...

so, guess we shall all see what comes of it, as history flows along...

be that as it may, no one knows for certain if in past, the public realization about news/revelations of Ft. Dyess nuke transfer to SC, may have actually staved off an actual planned/scheduled false flag, along with a few years ago, a lot of indie media warning about false flag vs. Iran, may have forced the 'powers that be' off their schedule.

but, ANONymous provided their own caveat in the above warning as well:

Although we are not one hundred percent sure of these horrific activities being planned to transpire within the next few days, we did not want to take a chance and risk losing anymore innocent lives and have a repeat of nine eleven in New York.

IMHO, no one can know for certain, other than what can only be visibly and publicly gauged.

so suppose, unless one lives in the vicinity of those possible false flag targets, as for the rest of the world, looking from the outside in, truthfully, the only thing anyone of us as individuals can do, is to prep/plan for the worst, and hope for the best (cliched, but oh so true, no?), and just surf the waves of history as it unfolds the best one can... .o/

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

How can there be a smoking

How can there be a smoking gun if the crime has not yet been committed?

Also, the publishing of false flag warnings isn't really for us to prepare, it's to alert the perpetrators that we know what they are planning. They don't know what we know, we might have the goods on them personally, so they don't move forward. If nothing happens, this publishing was a success.

But like you say, the boy who cried wolf comes in to play eventually. It doesn't really matter though so long as they prevent the act.

"How can there be a smoking gun.."

You kinda took that out of context, Sir.

On that sentence, I was implying that Anon hasn't really given the public a "smoking gun" piece of evidence like Snowden/Greenwald has. Maybe you could prove me wrong with some material on that.

And I may be ignorant of the facts on this, but what, exactly, has Anon done that has changed any kind of legislaion *OR* have prompted legislators to introduce new legislation?

Snowden discussed the NSA's blatant disregard for the 4th amendment with evidence (KeyStroke software) and *POOF* instant National Discussion. Now, you could argue that Snowden's release of that info was "intentional," but to this day, I do not see how that is logical nor beneficial to any elements of TPTB.

If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.

I agree with you.

I agree with you.

Daily Mail UK's coverage of a previous 'terrorism' drill

in a town full of actors and actor-wannabes:

Dramatic scenes as SWAT teams close down part of L.A. in 'terror alert'... but don't worry it's just a drill

+ Spectators gathered to watch terrorism scenarios get played out including an actor pretending to detonate a suicide vest
+ The live demonstration on the streets of downtown L.A. was part of the 2013 National Homeland Security Conference

By David Mccormack
PUBLISHED: 22:50 EST, 6 June 2013 | UPDATED: 09:08 EST, 7 June 2013

These images could be mistaken for scenes from a Hollywood movie, but instead the action was part of a counter terrorism drill by Los Angeles law enforcement officials held on Thursday.

SWAT team members engaged actors and police officers pretending to be terrorists during a live demonstration on the streets of downtown L.A. for the 2013 National Homeland Security Conference.

The purpose of the drill, conducted by law enforcement officials from the L.A. Police Department and L.A. Sheriff department, was to highlight various counter terrorism tactics in response to a mock incident involving armed gunmen and weapons of mass destruction.

Spectators gathered to watch as an actor pretended to detonate a suicide vest and SWAT team members and pretend terrorists shot at each other.

Other scenarios being played out during the drill included a remote controlled bomb squad forklift lifting a truck and SWAT team members descending from a helicopter.


High drama: SWAT police appear to shoot dead a criminal in a daylight gunfight. But it was just a drill. Photo: ZUMA/Rex Features


An actor pretending to detonate a suicide vest is shot by law enforcement officials from the Los Angeles Police Department and Los Angeles Sheriff department, while a victim lies on the ground. PHOTO: Reuters


SWAT team members engage actors pretending to be terrorists in response to a mock incident involving armed gunmen and weapons of mass destruction. PHOTO: Reuters


A remote controlled bomb squad forklift lifts a truck during a drill conducted by law enforcement officials from the Los Angeles Police Department and Los Angeles Sheriff department. PHOTO: Reuters


A bomb squad robot works with law enforcement officials from L.A.'s police and sheriff departments during a live counter terrorism demonstration for the 2013 National Homeland Security Conference. PHOTO: Reuters


Carried away: Spectators gathered to watch as an actor pretended to detonate a suicide vest and SWAT team members and pretend terrorists shot at each other. Photo: ZUMA/Rex Features [Yay! Police State Porn!]

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Who IS Anonymous???

They could be anyone including agent provocateurs. How and where are they getting this info from?

We'll see if it comes true.

________________________________________

Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it. ~Thomas Paine

precisely. WHO are they?

it literally could be anyone.

it's not like it's a 'brand' with known board members.

it could be legit grassroots "White Hat" hackers, or could be some CIA/NSA-cutout be they astroturf or infiltrated.

it all depends on how good or evil they've been.

so far, none of what they publicly 'claimed' has been pro-govt tyranny, so far...

so, guess we shall all see what comes of it, as history flows along...

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

hey, I'd say even IF it may just be sketchy at this point, if in

someway this places enough public pressure and realization enough that the govt/corporatist/contractor terrorists who maybe involved, back off?

no harm done: better safe than sorry, when it comes to false-flag vigilance, IMHO.

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

IF true, the most pertinent part as to WHY they 'revealed' this:

Potential False Flag in L.A, CA Nov 15 2013
By: Slaughterotica645 on Nov 12th, 2013

The Citi Bank building that is currently occupied by Freddie Mac just recently dropped all insurance policies except for the policy portion which contains special conditions, coverages related to terrorism, which is all risk of direct physical damage.

The certificate holder for this policy is located at 444 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, California 90015, under Hines Vaf, a private insurance company which offers Loss Adjusters, Allstate Claims Adjuster, Integrated Insurance Services, Property Insurance Adjuster and General Auto Insurance.

Similar to the destruction of the twin towers, changes were made to their insurance policies prior to the so called terrorist acts on nine eleven. Although we are not one hundred percent sure of these horrific activities being planned to transpire within the next few days, we did not want to take a chance and risk losing anymore innocent lives and have a repeat of nine eleven in New York.

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul