4 votes

Felony Friday: MI Proposes Banning Employers From Asking About Felony Convictions

Liberals never seem to learn from their prior mistakes. It is hard to find a better example of a liberal disaster in the United States than Michigan. The “Great Lakes State” symbolizes the destruction that results from massive intervention by the State. The state of Michigan is a graveyard littered with formerly productive companies that had their capacity to produce castrated by crippling Statist policies.

Unfortunately, for the good people of Michigan, politicians that are like-minded to those that played a role in the destruction remain in power. Evidence of this can be found in a MLive article that reports on legislation knows as “Ban-the-Box,” which was introduced in March by Rep. Fred Durhal Jr., D-Detroit. This liberal dream is gaining momentum in the Michigan Legislature.

The bill would ban employers from asking prospective employees about previous felony convictions. There has not yet been a vote, but the House Commerce Committee heard testimony on the bill this past week.

Michigan would not be the first place to enact such a law. Fifty-three localities throughout the US have approved “Ban-the-Box” legislation in the past nine years. Cities such as Boston, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, Kansas City, Atlanta, Austin, Memphis, and Tampa have all adopted laws which make it illegal, in some capacity, for employers to ask prospective hires to disclose previous felony convictions. By in large, most of the laws are only applicable to vendors or contractors doing business with the city. Additionally, many of the laws still require a background check for certain positions or after the offer has been extended.

Continue Reading

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

If they servered thier time

there records should be ex-sponged. The problem is when you have a murderer who clearly did it, I mean you have 5 witnesses video tape weapon, they get a plea deal and get out in a few years, but when you have a guy who defends himself and all they got is circimstantial evidence, I mean motive, he gets the death penalty or life because he defended himself.

The problem is a serial rapest gets out in 2 years, and someone who messed up on their taxes gets out in 5.

The problem is a thief goes to prison gets in a gang and has to make stealing his career. And a drug addict pretty much spends his whole life in prison.

The problem with this bill is that pretty much the entire justice system is screwed up.


For the state to even try to intervene in this way. The impact of hiring someone with an unknown criminal past not only effects the employees but also the potential customer interaction. What if someone has a horribly violent past, gets hired, then murders a customer in a store? Now the private company gets sued, goes out of business all because of state interference.


Good point brian