26 votes

DHS employee’s website: ‘We are going to have to kill a lot of whites’

DHS employee’s website: ‘We are going to have to kill a lot of whites’

By Phillip Swarts-The Washington Times Friday, August 23, 2013

Is this the type of people hired by DHS??

Is an employee at the Homeland Security Department also a racist preparing blacks for a campaign of violence against whites?

Ayo Kimathi, a small business specialist at the agency, is also a “gay-bashing, revenge-seeking black nationalist,” according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, a nonprofit group that tracks groups and individuals it says are bigoted and hateful.

Mr. Kimathi in his private time runs the website “War on the Horizon” under the user name “Irritated Genie,” SPLC said. The site advocates “properly educating Black people to prepare for Racial Warfare.”

“Warfare is [imminent], and in order for Black people to survive the 21st century, we are going to have to kill a lot of whites – more than our christian hearts can possibly count,” one statement on the site reads.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/23/dhs-employee...



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Wait wait wait... SPLC doing

Wait wait wait... SPLC doing something good? I need to pour some ice water on my face and make sure I didn't just imagine this.

Homeland security statement: patriotism is now considered terrorism.
I love www.isidewith.com shared it with everyone I know. If anything they realize its not just a red and blue idiot running for reelection.

Real Issue: Unconstitutionality of Federal Police Outside DC

***

The problem is that the federal government is Policing outside the "10 miles square" of Washington DC.

This is outside of the delegated powers of the Constitution. 



Read this in the Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788:

(In Full: http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/americanpatriotpartynewsl...)



Mr. George MASON: "...then observed that he would willingly give them exclusive power, as far as respected the POLICE and good government of "THE PLACE"; but he would give them "NO MORE", because he thought it unnecessary. He was very willing to give them, in this as well as in all other cases, those powers which he thought indispensably necessary.



James Madison: "…I cannot comprehend that the "POWER OF LEGISLATING" over a "SMALL DISTRICT" (Washington, DC), which "CANNOT EXCEED" "TEN MILES SQUARE" (Washington, DC), and "MAY NOT BE MORE" than "ONE MILE", will involve the dangers which he (PATRICK HENRY) apprehends.

If there be any knowledge in my mind of the nature of man, I should think it would be the "LAST THING" that would enter into the mind of ANY MAN to grant exclusive advantages, in a "VERY CIRCUMSCRIBED DISTRICT" (TEN MILES SQUARE OF WASHINGTON, DC), to the prejudice of the community at large."…"

"…The states may make what stipulation they please in "IT" (TEN MILES SQUARE OF WASHINGTON, DC), and, if they apprehend ANY danger, they may "REFUSE it ALTOGETHER". …" (Refuse any law made by the federal legislatures)

Mr. PATRICK HENRY "...replied (WARNED) that, if Congress were vested with "SUPREME POWER OF LEGISLATION", "PARAMOUNT TO THE CONSTITUTION" and laws of the states, the dangers he had described MIGHT HAPPEN;

for that Congress would not be CONFINED to the ENUMERATED (DELEGATED) POWERS. This construction was warranted, in his opinion, by the addition of the word "DEPARTMENT", at the end of the clause, and that they could make any laws which they might think necessary to execute the powers of ANY "DEPARTMENT" or officer of the government.

Mr. PENDLETON. (ANSWERED) "Mr. Chairman, this clause does "NOT" give Congress power to impede the operation of "ANY PART" of the Constitution, (N)or to make "ANY REGULATION" that (EVEN) "MAY" affect the interests of the citizens of the "UNION AT LARGE".

(****HERE IS THE DEFINITION AND CONSTITUTIONAL LIMIT OF FEDERAL POLICE POWERS:)

But it gives them power over the "LOCAL" POLICE OF "THE PLACE" (THE TEN MILES SQUARE OF WASHINGTON, DC), so as to be secured from any interruption in their proceedings.

Notwithstanding the violent attack upon it, I believe, sir, this is the "fair "CONSTRUCTION" of the clause".

It gives them power of exclusive legislation in any case within "THAT DISTRICT" (THE TEN MILES SQUARE OF WASHINGTON, DC).

What is the meaning of this? What is it opposed to?

Is it opposed to the general powers of the federal legislature, or to those of the state legislatures?

I understand it as opposed to the legislative power of that state where it shall be.

What, then, is the power?

It is, that Congress shall exclusively legislate "THERE" (TEN MILES SQUARE OF WASHINGTON, DC), in order to preserve {440} serve the "POLICE" of the "PLACE" (TEN MILES SQUARE OF WASHINGTON, DC) and their "OWN" personal independence, that they may not be overawed or insulted, and of course to preserve them in opposition to any attempt by the state where it shall be this is the "fair CONSTRUCTION".

Can we suppose that, in order to effect these salutary ends, Congress will make it an asylum for villains and the vilest characters from all parts of the world?

Will it not degrade their own dignity to make it a sanctuary for villains? I hope that no man that will ever "compose" that Congress will associate with the most profligate characters.(APP: If this was not such a sad statement, it would be funny)

Why oppose this power? Suppose it was contrary to the sense of their constituents to grant EXCLUSIVE PRIVILEGES" to citizens residing within that place (TEN MILES SQUARE OF WASHINGTON, DC); the effect would be directly in opposition to what he says.

It could have "NO OPERATION" without (OUTSIDE) the LIMITS of "THAT DISTRICT" (TEN MILES SQUARE OF WASHINGTON, DC). Were Congress to make a law granting them an exclusive privilege of trading to the East Indies, it could have NO effect the moment it would go without "THAT PLACE" (TEN MILES SQUARE OF WASHINGTON, DC); for their exclusive power is CONFINED TO "THAT" DISTRICT (TEN MILES SQUARE OF WASHINGTON, DC).

Were they to pass "such a law",it would be NUGATORY (!!!!!); and every member of the community at large could trade to the East Indies as well as the citizens of that district.

This exclusive (SUPREME) power is LIMITED (!!!) TO "THAT PLACE SOLELY" (!!!), for their own preservation, which all gentlemen allow to be necessary. ..."

----

American Patriot Party.CC
http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc

Educate Yourself. Educate Others.

American Patriot Party now on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Patriot-Party-CC-Nati...

Follow APP On Daily Paul: http://www.dailypaul.com/user/14674

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.

the SPLC is the hate group

the SPLC is the hate group and they are the Spin Doctors.
They need to be called out for what they really are. They are ideologues that cast stones. Nothing more.

Be Your Own Media!!!

Bad Argument

Blaming DHS for one employee's exercise of free speech is like blaming Ron Paul for one donor's racism.

It makes no sense to blame the employer unless the employee broke the law or acted irresponsibly while performing their duties, and the employer should have stopped it.

DHS has other problems, most of which are really the fault of Congress and the voters who elected Congress.

What do you think? http://consequeries.com/

No... Not the same at all.

It goes to the statement that DHS is not doing any kind of background checks or personality typing before employing someone with deadly weaponry.

Confusion

So, when does this hunting season open? Need to verify to keep plenty of ammo on hand just in case, never know when whitey is going to pop-up and surprise ya!

Just like Joe Biden popped-up recently in our neck of the woods.

gotcha, opposition = racist,

gotcha, opposition = racist, loud and clear.....no other possible explanation

Those who cry racism when there is no racism, should think about the little boy who cried wolf.....and ask yourself who will listen next time when there IS real racism

Not EVERYONE opposing is opposing because of racism, if those who oppose dont oppose for the reasons their opposing, then get ready for a whole new world where you WISHED racism was one of the ONLY big problems,.......history shows that empires by their nature are the biggest arbitrators of change, good AND bad.......if you dont consider the bad possibility, how can you avoid it, if and when it comes calling, and time is but its countdown.........

actions that dont consider posibility, deserve neither, and if they do consider possibilities, they deserve public debate aswell as public consent, the individual right comprising of said public

fireant's picture

Token black "hate group" from SPLC,

is what I see. Easy target for SPLC because it's "anti-gay" as well. They can now say they don't exclusively go after white ringers.

Undo what Wilson did

The SPLC

were no doubt having fits when they had to report that the a large
percentage of people involved in the Sovereign Citizen movement
were black in one of their reports from a year or two back...