34 votes

Corbett Report: Meet Lee Harvey Oswald

Meet Lee Harvey Oswald, Sheep-Dipped Patsy

In this week’s special documentary episode of the podcast, we explore the life and legend of Lee Harvey Oswald. Was he a poor, disgruntled loner or an overachieving marine? A presidential assassin or a sheep-dipped patsy?

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

ignorant and stupid

Yes. The head goes backward is totally consistent with a shot from the front. Except only someone completely ignorant of forensic ballistics, but gullible to authority and inclined to repeat what agrees with their pre-conceived and scientifically ignorant minds would say that. Oh such minds are also ignorant of basic physics and conservation of momentum.

Go. Find a single forensic analysis of head shots that says that a high velocity bullet wound to the rear of the head will cause the head to move forward. Find a balistic film that will demonstrate that.

You will spend a lot of time searching for a thing that does not exist, and you will stop littering the idea space with your mental feces.

SteveMT's picture

I see a trend emerging.

A magical bullet, three buildings crumbling into their own footprint all on the same day, money being printed out of thin air X years, $8.5T of DoD money disappearing without a trace, the magical bin Laden assassination, the Sandy Hook no evidence event, the Boston Marathon no evidence event, etc.

I want to believe that 2 + 2 = 5, but I just can't get past the number 4.



a very thorough examination

a very thorough examination of Oswald and the political situation.


Corbett nails it again.

How Many Cowards are on here?

In my opinion, putting a thumbs down without commenting is a cowardly act.

I only propose watching the documentary which is on today; 6 PM Eastern, 5 PM Central, 4 PM Mountain and 3 PM Pacific on REELZ. It is on again 6 hours later.

Oliver Stone's JFK I still think is closest to the truth.

And that conversation with Donald Sutherland pretty well sums it up.

It was the CIA (probably in concert with the Federal Reserve).

Only they had the means, knowledge, money, influence, motives and heritage as secret agencies (who act outside of any real oversight), to pull it off.

And consider, JFK DID say he was going to break the CIA into a thousand pieces and create a new intelligence agency with his brother Bobby at the helm.

And he WAS printing new notes which said "U.S. Banknote" across the top, NOT "Federal Reserve Note" as before that and ever since.

He only succeeded in getting 1 and 5 dollar bills printed this way and was in the process of converting 10's and 20's.

But that policy ended immediately after 11/22/63 and subsequent bills all read "Federal Reserve Note" after that.

"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul

ecorob's picture

And the CIA...

got their war in Viet Nam like they wanted!

Qui bono?

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Who Killed JFK?

I watched a documentary that seems more plausible than any I have seen in the past, "JFK; The Smoking Gun" on the REELZ channel. It will air again tomorrow night, Friday Nov, 22 and again four showings on Sat. the 23rd. You can also learn about it at http://www.reelz.com/

Now in the documentary they believe it was an accidental firing from an AR-15 by a Secret Service Agent in the vehicle just behind JFK's vehicle. Maybe it was an accidental firing, maybe it was on purpose, but I do believe the evidence presented in this is the most plausible I have ever seen and I have studied this crime for many years since a report I did in 8th grade back in 1971. Please do not act like some on The Blaze and start insulting me before actually watching the documentary. To do that would be like joining a book club, not reading the book but giving your opinion about the book. Watch it, then come back and give your opinion.

Thumbs Down?

Why? Your not into other theories no matter how plausible? I find it more plausible than the driver of Kennedy's car turning and firing an exploding pellet with fish toxin from a plastic gun and Jackie trying to exit the vehicle because she saw where the shot came from or a shot from under the road through a water grate or even a shot from the front since there is no frontal entry wound ever found, unless you believe the entry caused the skull to explode and exited clean with a small hole. I find it more plausible that 100% of the Secret Service would stay quiet and cover up an accidental shooting by a rookie than 100% of them staying quiet and covering up an ordered assassination by LBJ or any other government agency or to participate in a cover up for the mob, Cuba or Russia. And they did participate in a cover up. Why is this theory, which in my eyes has more evidence than any of the above, seem to be worthy of a thumbs down? Watch the documentary, then come back and comment. It is on Friday and Saturday and again next week on REELZ.

This is utter nonsense

1. William Greer was no "rookie", and he did not even have a gun (or shoot one), and could not possibly have struck Kennedy in the right temple in a left-to-right trajectory from where he was seated. (Greer was responsible for bringing the limousine to a halt and therefore was complicit).

2. Jackie Kennedy was climbing out on the back of the trunk to retreive a bone fragment that was blasted out the back of the President's head. After she climbed back (with assistence from Roy Kellerman), she then held her hands over Kennedy's head all the way to the hospital .. as if to try to fix his shattered head.

3. Oswald's background was with the CIA and FBI. The CIA and the Military Generals (where the phony autopsy was performed) were the designers of this enterprise.


Who was talking about Greer, the driver of Kennedy's vehicle? I was talking about George Hickey, the shooter in the vehicle behind Kennedy. Although there are a lot of people who believe Greer fired an exploding pellet with fish toxin with a type of plastic hand gun. They use the Zapruder film to say you can see a gun when he turns to look back, but when you look very close, you see it is an optical illusion and is in reality, the sun shining off the head of the Secret Service Agent in the passenger seat. Watch the documentary at 6 PM ET today on REELZ.

Kennedy was shot from the Front!

Kennedy was shot in the front of the throat (and the bullet did not exit his body).

And then he was shot in the right temple -- also from the front (the fatal head shot).

Only one shot that hit Kennedy came from behind (hit him in the back, and was also not a fatal shot).

ecorob's picture

I've never heard that one before.

And a lot of Secret Service Agents interviewed (that I've heard) have never mentioned it.

Again, the kill shot would have to be from the back which, I don't believe.

I am thinking this is just another media distortion. They can make it sound pretty convincing, you know?

I still remember where I was the day he was murdered. I remember the funeral on TV and a lot of things. I don't believe the AR-15 story simply because it means the kill shot was from the back. I don't think it happened that way.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Watch the documentary

After you watch it, get back to me. The documentary shows that the single bullet theory is correct and that it is most likely that Oswald only shot twice. The Secret Service Agent had only been with the agency for four months and his job was a driver and maintained the vehicles and should have never been in a shooter position. It has true ballistics evidence along with eyewitness testimony that was never brought before the Warren Commission. Oswald was shooting full metal jacket ammo that would not explode upon impact where the AR-15 (experimental at the time) did. The AR-15 was never used by the Secret Service from that day forward, testified by the director during the Warren Commission Hearings. The entry wound that caused JFK's head to explode was the size of the round from an AR-15 and too small for the full metal jacket round to fit through. The ballistics presented shows that the direction of this round would have come from the back and to the left of Kennedy which is exactly where Agent Hickey was with the AR-15 which a picture taken from a bystander shows Hickey with an AR-15 in his hands. The evidence shows that it is probable that Hickey grabbed the AR-15 and stood up because he saw where the shots were coming from in the Depository and he was going to return fire, but the car sped up causing him to fall backward in the vehicle where he accidentally fired and the weapon was pointed directly at Kennedy. A sad, sad horrible accident which the Secret Service had no choice but to try and cover it up to avoid the scandal and embarrassment of the situation. I mean, they had a shooter they could blame it all on. Watch the documentary tomorrow or Saturday and let me know what you think after that.

Posthumous healing!

Good one!

"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul

SteveMT's picture

I thought that you'd appreciate that comment, pawnstorm.

Once in a while, I get these isolated moments of singularity in a sea of mediocrity.


They establish the identity of the exhumed body as being Oswald by the teeth, yet the autopsy cut on the head that should've been there was not.

ecorob's picture

Strange, but true.

The doctor who performed the autopsy and removed Oswald's crain to examine the brain immediately after death was ALSO the doctor who identified Oswald after exhumation and declared there was no crainial cut from the original autopsy that SHOULD HAVE been there!

How much weirder can all of this get?

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

SteveMT's picture

Posthumous healing.

I suppose that could be possible, with the right soil conditions and nutrients.