3 votes

Supreme Court To Take Another Look At Obamacare

Supreme Court To Take Another Look At Obamacare

WASHINGTON November 25, 2013 (AP)
By MARK SHERMAN Associated Press

President Barack Obama's health care law is headed for a new Supreme Court showdown over companies' religious objections to the law's birth-control mandate.

Amid the troubled rollout of the health law, and 17 months after the justices upheld it, the Obama administration is defending a provision that requires most employers that offer to their workers to provide a range of preventive health benefits, including contraception.health insurance

Roughly 40 for-profit companies have sued, arguing they should not be forced to cover some or all forms of birth control because doing so would violate their religious beliefs.

Both sides want the justices to settle an issue that has divided lower courts. The high court could announce its decision whether to take up the topic as early as Tuesday, following its closed-door meeting.

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/supreme-court-weigh...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Mussolini

publicly commemorated Roosevelt for modeling the economy after his corporatism in fascist Italy. We've been a fascist state for longer than you may have thought.

Regardless, Roberts will

Regardless, Roberts will still sell himself to the highest bidder like a cheap (but expensive) wh0re.

"Villains wear many masks, but none as dangerous as the mask of virtue." - Washington Irvin

As I understand it they are only reviewing the on clause

regarding birth-control and not the other 2,000+ pages of illegal and unconstitutional mandates.

What a joke!!!!!

"A vote for the lesser of two evils is a vote to keep things the same", Buckminster Fuller..
A choice for liberty is always a choice for liberty.

Correction. I meant to type reviewing the "one" clause

.

"A vote for the lesser of two evils is a vote to keep things the same", Buckminster Fuller..
A choice for liberty is always a choice for liberty.

No severability

Wasn't this law unusual in that it was missing a severability clause? (i.e., it's all-or-nothing)

Wait A Minute

Do we know that they aren't considering whether provisions of the law can be severed without ruining the entire bill?

___________________________________________________________________________
"Bipartisan: both parties acting in concert to put both of their hands in your pocket."-Rothbard

If this gets turned down

If this gets turned down. It will be more then enough proof to me that we live in a facist totalitarian government that does not care about human being's any more!

This country is turning in Nazi Germany more and more each day!