23 votes

9/11 Is Unravelled. Every Detail of Evidence Is Examined and Proven. All That's missing Is The Patience To Digest It.

It's Done. It's Over. This Series of videos demonstrates the utter fallacy of the official version of September 11, 2001.

http://youtu.be/e4TMqsQv740
Do you have the patience?

http://youtu.be/swQaDU1VogY
Do you have the will?

http://youtu.be/uSct1jqWUCI
Do you have the courage?

http://youtu.be/ScnVgAoV1e0
Will you accept the mission to expose people to the truth and break the back of the massive deception that has put America on it's heels?

The Journal of 9/11 Research
and
9/11 Issues
Yes, there are issues with 9/11!!!
"A time comes when silence is betrayal."
- Martin Luther King
http://www.drjudywood.com/

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Yeah, how dare I try and and

Yeah, how dare I try and and confuse a bunch of people who believe in Bigfoot and the chupacabra with the difference between probability and possibility. Can't confuse you geniuses with facts or reality.

"In reality, the Constitution itself is incapable of achieving what we would like in limiting government power, no matter how well written."

~ Ron Paul, End the Fed

ecorob's picture

No, its NOT BS.

It is a "directed energy" thermonuclear device.

Just look at the pictures, DA.

You explain what happened. You can't.

Our explanation is the truth and yours is, "I don't know".

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Find the major players of 911

and find out where they are today.

ecorob's picture

Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld...

Wolfowicz, Pearl, Kissinger.

We know where they are.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

No one must accept everything here to doubt known liars, eh?

Start with what you do know as parents of teens. If your 17 1/2yr. old had the same record of truthfulness that is accepted by the Prez., Congress, and SCOTUS; past AND present, and especially lately; would you be a good parent and neighbor by handing them the car keys, a couple of six-packs, and extra condoms?

Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them. - Frederick Douglass

Dr. Judy Wood brought up some very strance occurrences

It's too bad they did the videos so poorly on this, almost impossible to watch, they were so pixelated. It's clear something went on that day that the government and media don't want brought out.

SO??

Who's going to prison?

When they imprison us in learned-helplessness, they remain free

When we accept the boundaries of free thought to the narrow space between our ears, and surrender free speech to what is said under our breath, then the answer to your killah question is, US, with or without bars and barbed wire, eh, sistah?

Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them. - Frederick Douglass

I

saw today in Thailand, the protesters are being shot. This is what started the Syrian civil war.. protesters being shot.

What is being said "under the breath".. seems to me people say whatever they want.. just look at youtube.

Maybe I'm not following bruddah.. Aloha @>-->------

Some Truth -- Lots of Pure Speculation

Here's a reasoned critique of Dr. Wood's hypothesis. True, the official explanation makes no sense, but her Directed Energy Weapon explanation also lacks credibility.

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/505-ae...

Don't have time... tell me

Don't have time... tell me what happened in a nutshell.

If you disagree with me on anything you are not a real libertarian...

OK

A western high pressure weather zone merged with a eastern low pressure zone, (hurricane Erin) at the same time that the earths magnetic field reduced. Then 75% of the buildings turned to dust and blew away due to the Hutchinson field effect that can de-molecularize materials. This effect also turned over cars, melted engine blocks, toasted cars and bent large steel beams like a pretzel. She speculates that it is an example of "zero point" energy that has been weaponized and kept top secret from the public.

The butler did it...

The butler did it...

in the hallway? with a Knife?

or do you not have a Clue?
;)

Dr. Judy Wood

believes that there were no planes, only holographic images of planes, and that the twin towers were turned to dust from the top down by a directed energy beam from outer space.

excuse me, she says nothing

excuse me, she says nothing about there not being any planes. She never touches the airplanes. They are not relevant to the evidence of the destruction of the towers and therefor irrelevant to her investigation and not something she ever talks about

Are you sure?

Here, for example, is a paper by Wood and another author:
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/why/why_indeed.html
in which they criticize Jones for ignoring no-plane evidence, among other things. And another one:
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/a/KB/Barrett_Kevin.html
The evidence and arguments for no plane crashes is powerful.

I could be wrong, and the "dustification" argument is kooky enough to discredit her just by itself. Here's a good interview with her, in case anyone thinks she has any credibility:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qYm1AnUKi8

Someone needs to demonstrate

Someone needs to demonstrate a device that can direct energy to break down molecular bonds before making claims that such a device exits. It needs to be demonstrated for a second time before we can say it exists.

In the links there is

In the links there is scepticism presented about the planes, sure. I can remember alot of strange videos poping up on youtube at about this time, mid 2000, hinting towards a manipulation of videos of airplanes. Alot coming from Ace Baker, the same guy who killed himself several times on live radio. I do not really know anything about that since i never thought anything of it. Maybe people were fooled, including Judy and Morgan Reynolds, I do not know. In none of the presentations that I have watched of Judys compiled work does she ever talk about the airplanes. And in Q&A when asked about it she says it speculation and doesn't really comment.

What I can see in the links presented is that it is an email corespondance between Morgan Reynolds and a counterpart, not Judy Woods. Why she has it on her webpage I do not know. But I could imagine that she has worked with Morgan Reynolds during this time and instead of obfuscating her previous work or cooperation, wrong or not, she puts it out in the open. It will show up anyhow, as we all know. I guess one could ask her about it.

But I must admit I am not 100% sure about her position on the planes anymore, people can be wrong and change their position, though, cant they? She says though that she doesn't think it is relevant which she makes perfectly clear in her recent (post 2010) presentations.

About the "dustification" term is perfectly valid in my opinion. She is talking about an, for the public, unknown physical reaction to a material, speculated that it is connected to the hutchison effect (a not understood electro magnetic/electro static effect on material(s)). And using a known term like vaporization to describe an currently unknown effect is scientifically and linguistically wrong.

Judy Wood Is Purposeful Disinformation

Judy Wood is not 9/11 Truth.

ecorob's picture

We are tired of arguing...

with idiots and trolls.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

please explain the presence

please explain the presence on tritium in 911 dust samples or come with a valid argument explaining the massive amounts of unexplained physical evidence that cannot be explained by conventional explosives or thermite, thank you.

Please explain the chain of custody of that "tritium evidence."

Also if you weren't clearly retarded, you would realize I didn't say anything about explosives or thermite in my above comment. Try to think before you post reactionary replies.

I have better uses of my time than argue online about why and how Judy Wood is purposeful disinformation.

Especially because, anybody who is stupid or gullible enough to her bullish!t isn't somebody worth arguing with anyway. She's a lying b!tch. But if you want to believe a disinformation asset, have at it. #retard

ecorob's picture

Then start using your time more wisely and quit...

talking about it.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

you make a valid point about

you make a valid point about the chain of custody of samples taken on 911 and it is something that has to be extensivly analysed and critiqued during a criminal investigation of the events of that day, an investigation that yet has taken place, and an investigation that Judy Wood herself calls for. Did you question the chain of custody for Dr. Steven Jones evidence of thermitic effects of that day? No? didn't think so either...

None the less that was only one of many discrepancies in the theories spouted by known charletans like Dr. Steven Jones. (I have never heard of a stupider concept than science by vote like the dear Dr. gatekeeper seems to want to have it handled) And none other than Judy Wood tries to explain it or even try to look holistic at New York on 911, everyone else has their premade opinions about what happened and isn't led by the evidence, and ignores evidence that contradicts their premade assumptions about that day. I am not sure what happened on 911. Judy Wood's theories about cold fusion effects of that day can be wrong, absolutley. But the evidence suggesting that "something more" happened on that day is overwhelming. To try to discredit her just by calling her names, and also calling me names, is just YOU loosing face and looking like an idiot.

You call yourself RonPaulWins but discredit his name and his message when acting like a complete fool. I hope you understand that.

I admit that I may be an idiot and I don't know exacly what happened that day, but you are an even bigger idiot by trying to resolve conflicts by namecalling and ignoring evidence. Get of your high horse and open up your fucking eyes, follow the evidence and let the evidence tell the story.

ecorob's picture

Bravo!

I love you.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

I love you too my friend

I love you too my friend

You're assuming, and that leads to problems for you.

Did you question the chain of custody for Dr. Steven Jones evidence of thermitic effects of that day? No? didn't think so either - bastu

I just told you: "I didn't say anything about explosives or thermite," and again you mention thermite. What the fukc is wrong with you?!

This is a problem I have noticed with Judy Wood supporters, especially regarding book reviews at websites such as Amazon for 9/11 literature: Judy Wood supporters say nonsense and attack with retarded arguments regularly. But since they support and defend Judy Wood, it isn't surprising they say - and repeat - nonsense.

I have understood the chain of custody for evidence is important since pre 2005. I also question Steven Jones' "nano-thermite samples from WTC dust."

I call Judy Wood names because she's a clown, a liar, probably works for intelligence agency as an operative but at the minimum she is an asset, her theories are mostly nonsense, and she is wrong.

PS. It is spelled "losing" not "loosing."

PPS. I use the screen name RonPaulWins, formerly RonPaulWins2012, and Ron Paul would laugh at Judy Wood if he knew she existed and what she promotes to the stupid and gullible. Her information, for the most part, is nonsense. You could research how vehicles were towed from the WTC site area and put in empty lots and places like by that bridge. Or you could believe Judy Wood, that those vehicles were already there, far from the WTC site, and they "mysteriously" caught fire. I don't believe Judy Wood because I have fought disinformation assets and operatives for years, including "prof" Jim Fetzer. But of course, you don't really have any idea of my history in 9/11 Truth so LOL.

Ok good, I was wrong, you

Ok good, I was wrong, you also question Steven Jones, good. Then we agree that a criminal investigation needs to take place. A criminal investigation that must follow the evidence and from the evidence make conclusions, right?

All other "investigations" have a premade conclusion and cherry pick the evidence that suits that premade conclusion and should therefor be disregarded, right?

You make some huge assumptions about Judy Wood in your responses and never direcly point to any errors in her conclusions or analasys. You are just spewing hot air to try to discredit her and try to make me look stupid. Not a good method for argumentation, sry... just trying to let you know of your intellectual dishonesty, To quote Skeleton Jack "Try again, dont give up."

Also english is my second language and I make errors in spelling, thank you for noticing, I do try my best. Perhaps you can use your second language and do no mistakes... learn some humility my dear friend.

I ask you once again to discredit her work or compilation of evidence and make some sense and stop the ad-hominem attacks towards me or Judy Wood, it just makes you look stupid and dishonest, to be honest.

I'm off to bed, I wish you the best...