62 votes

Glenn Greenwald "The Goal Of The U.S. Government Is To Eliminate ALL Privacy Globally!"

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

No, not ALL global privacy ...

... they want governments to keep secrets.

Creepy

That whole news segment was creepy. A Piers'esque royal shill against the backdrop of a city morphed into a DNA radiograph. LOL, but as always GG articulates himself impeccably. Snowden chose his spokesman well.

I just wish Greenwald would ramp up the disclosures already! Gotta keep the public outrage stoked. The unwarranted dragnet of all communications is the work of evil, cowardly despots desperate to maintain control, and it's got to stop.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign: that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. ~J. Swift

Glenn is unflappable. These

Glenn is unflappable. These so called "professionals" are quickly shown to be basic shills. They really need to step up their game if they want to play with GG.

The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire. - Heinlein

Great as usual!

Great as usual!

SteveMT's picture

The darker the interviewer, the brighter GG shines.

The contrast is nothing less than striking. Thanks.

the

unflappable, courageous and brilliant GG knocks it outta da park every time.

Sorry Glenn, you are being

purposely untruthful. The US government doesn't want to eliminate all privacy globally, the UN does, and the communist Barry is helping them toward their goal.
As you worked for the Left Saloon.com, and the Left Guardian, and did a major interview on the Left CNN, spoke at a Socialist Conference and profit from gay pornography, you must lean Left
Your libertarian yap can't hid your Progressive agenda, and whilst you may speak a certain type of truth, I don't trust your motives one tiny little bit.
3 points,1) when you are telling untruths, stick as close to the truth as possible, just alter a couple of "facts".
2) Propaganda….the art of telling people what they want to hear in order to steer them to a pre conceived outcome. The BBC is a propaganda machine.
3)Samy Kamkar in 2010 and 2011, blew the whistle on Apple, Google and microsoft for data mining their customers, but he wasn't all over the news, at speaking engagements, and being interviewed, nor were Sibel Edmonds, David Webber, Michael Paul or John Kiriakou…so why are you?
To all the DPers who think Glenn Greenwald is the best thing since sliced bread…wake up and smell the Gulag.

Jill,

I respect that you don't want to see Glenn become a subject of hero worship, but can you point out ONE thing he has done that you can link to any of your statements here?

I can't find one. Unlike you, I think all of the Benghazi scandals were actually 'released' by the msm to get people to forget what Glenn was reporting.

We'll See.

YOU SUPPORT NEOCONS, YOU CLOWN.

In a different thread recently you posted these comments:

http://www.dailypaul.com/comment/3248388
http://www.dailypaul.com/comment/3248399

Offering this nonsense, from that second comment link:

http://www.independentsentinel.com/ask-george-soros-or-penny...

That is really from this story published by NeoCons, ahem, AIM:

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/the-u-s-support-apparatus-behi...

Read that. Have a good laugh. Those are the kind of NeoCons that Jillying supports and uses as argument support for attacking Edward & Glenn?! Perhaps I should refer to Jillying as That NeoCon That Hates the USA. You really posted a link to a NeoCon propaganda article that defends Mike Rogers?! Are you serious?! LOL.

JILL BOOTH IS A NEOCON.

PS. I downvoted you, you clown.

RonPaulWins

I don't support neocons at all. But answer me this question.
If a neocon, a liberal, a communist, a Nazi, a tyrant, a leftest, a rightest, a Zionist, a Jew, an Arab, a negro, a European, was asked what color is grass, what would the answer be?
Information is gathered from ALL sources, not just a narrow view from ONE perspective
Grow up ronpaulwins. If you really wanted liberty for US citizens, you would get your shit together and work hard for liberty, instead of trying to belittle DPer's and those who fight against the NWO.
Dickhead, and nasty little(?) troll.
I am not ashamed to say " I don't like you" and I am open to the very real possibility that deep in you heart, you don't belong on a liberty site.
Nasty little man.

I'll support this viewpoint.

Globalist Capitalism/Corporatism = Globalist Communism in the same way that Liberal Progressive = NeoCon Progressive. They are two sides of the same coin, keeping The Masses divided and struggling against each other, while consistently excluding any outside challenge to power and always working toward their New World Order. They all work for the CFR/UN/IMF cabal and GG is part of the scheme or he would not be permitted to say anything at all. Nobody, i.e., RON PAUL, who could truly do harm to the globalist agenda is allowed to have a voice in the closed system of the old media.

SteveMT's picture

They would first ask is this AstroTurf or is it real?

Sometimes it's hard to know the difference whether real grass is imitation or not. Real grass grows. Fake grass may mimic very well cared for real grass that like the tree of Liberty must be refreshed with the blood of Patriots and tyrants. You can that as far removed or as personally as you want.

Well if it was astro turf

I'm sure that GG would be standing on red astro turf...bright RED, communist red, progressive red.

Jill

You are losing credibility with me here. What are you fighting for in NZ?

Holding US dollars? Attacking Glen is one thing, but attacking him for what he exposed is telling.

Just sayin. Don't become a Granger.

People in New Zealand are fighting for liberty too.

Our Government, like yours, is a UN signatory, when your government goes to war, our soldiers become your governments canon fodder.
Wither thou dost go, so go we. New Zealand is you bum boy, we have a Zionist Prime Minister, and are ready to sign the secretive TPP.
I have never "attacked" what Glenn Greenwald has exposed, but have stated that some of what he has exposed has been exposed by others before him, who have never gotten the Media coverage that Glenn has had.
Simply joining the dots about who GG has worked for, what speaking engagements he has appeared at...everything appears to be Left leaning.
I am not trying to make out that I am smarter than the average bear, but I do know a fair bit of my history, and learning how Communism works has always fascinated me.
I don't mind if I am wrong, I have done many U turns about many things, as I have learned and matured over the years, and am open to free discussion and other opinions.
Right now I have a "niggle" that the unfolding NSA scandal is a slick controlled media campaign. An old communist trick is..If people are going to learn bad news, control that news....and I question it.
But a certain few "yell" and name call without ever telling me why they think GG is liberty's friend.
Cheers.

Don't trust MSM

unless GG is on it?

Why do I find you posting about me to others?

LOL

I don't support neocons at all.

Either you're lying or you didn't bother to take the few minutes to read the source for the link that you posted. As I said above, it was from a NeoCon propaganda rag, look at their other stories too. And in the article that is source for what you posted, it defends Mike Rogers, a POS who hates the USA and liberty. A certified NeoCon traitor.

Either you're lying and are a NeoCon or you have no idea what you're talking about, or you're both. I would argue both.


But answer me this question. If a neocon, a liberal, a communist, a Nazi, a tyrant, a leftest, a rightest, a Zionist, a Jew, an Arab, a negro, a European, was asked what color is grass, what would the answer be?

Irrelevant to the discussion, but it could be any number of different colors depending on season and weather.

Information is gathered from ALL sources, not just a narrow view from ONE perspective

And using information from POS NeoCon rags as support for your attacks on Glenn & Edward only serves to make you look retarded and it's invalid information from a liberty-hating source.


Grow up ronpaulwins. If you really wanted liberty for US citizens, you would get your shit together and work hard for liberty, instead of trying to belittle DPer's and those who fight against the NWO.

I am grown up. I am relentless in my pursuit of returning liberty to its rightful status. You aren't fighting the "NWO" when you post "supporting" documentation or articles that DEFEND the "NWO." Clown.


I am open to the very real possibility that deep in you heart, you don't belong on a liberty site.

You support NeoCons. Ron Paul hates NeoCons. Why are you here again on a Ron Paul site?!

Ron Paul is a Christian

he doesn't hate anyone, he may hate the Neocon's war mongering, and the blatant theft and wasteful spending of tax payer money.
He doesn't hate Obama and the Democrats, but he probably hates their policy of social engineering and the blatant theft and wasteful spending of tax payer money.

Why am I here? Because I fell in love with the message of Dr Paul, and know that what ever direction your country goes in, ours follows...you guys are heading down a dark road, and we are right behind you.
I came to this site to learn from like minded people about liberty.
Finding my way through your political system, and who is who, is a nightmare. It is so vast.

My apologies if my sourcing was from the wrong type of article, but I'm trying desperately hard to get people to at least explore the idea that GG may very well be a Judas Sheep, (you know, the trained sheep, that leads other sheep up the ramp to be slaughtered?)
Something about GG simply doesn't "sit" right.
As for Ed Snowden? I simply don't know, but there is a constant niggle that he has been badly used. That he did the right thing, but for the wrong people.
Thank you for entering into a discussion about this...I am trying to put the Big Picture together, and when both the Republicans and the Dems are working towards a common NWO goal, it's hard to sort the shit from the fertilizer. Cheers.

Does it seem like its too good to be true?

I sort of understand where you are coming from, but I think your "niggle" feeling is from thinking "gosh, this is almost too good to be true." Sometimes we have to be trusting, but guarded. Wait and see what happens.

By the way, it's not a "Judas Sheep" but a "Judas Goat" Goats were used to lead the sheep to slaughter.

Thank you.

I appreciate your comments. But being from New Zealand, where sheep outnumber people 3 to 1 we call it a Judas sheep. We don't have many farmed goats.
But each to their own.
Cheers.

Yeah.

Glenn may have some of his own separate motives that are co-mingled with his honest and truthful reporting of what's been reported thus far - including things that are progressive / socialist, that he supports - but that does not mean he is some "NWO UN Agenda" conman.

If anything, Glenn's actions are totally opposite what you would expect from some "NWO UN Agenda":

Since the start, Glenn has SUPPORTED, PROMOTED and DEFENDED the US CONSTITUTION, including that it holds the traitors in the USG accountable for what they have participated in with these illegal spying programs.

Glenn hasn't supported, promoted or defended ANY "NWO UN Agenda" BS regarding any of this. NOTHING. But if you want to claim that he has, then PLEASE post something, anything to support that claim because you haven't in all the comments you've posted attacking Glenn & Ed.

When you said "I'm trying desperately hard," ain't that the truth.

This Might Help You...

...from the preface of GG's own book......and written by him...
"This is not to say that I was not angry about the attacks. I believed that Islamic extremism posed a serious threat to the country, and I wanted an aggressive response from our government. I was ready to stand behind President Bush and I wanted him to exact vengeance on the perpetrators and find ways to decrease the likelihood of future attacks. During the following two weeks, my confidence in the Bush administration grew as the president gave a series of serious, substantive, coherent, and eloquent speeches that struck the right balance between aggression and restraint. And I was fully supportive of both the president’s ultimatum to the Taliban and the subsequent invasion of Afghanistan when our demands were not met. Well into 2002, the president’s approval ratings remained in the high 60 percent range, or even above 70 percent, and I was among those who strongly approved of his performance. [...]

During the lead-up to the invasion, I was concerned that the hell-bent focus on invading Iraq was being driven by agendas and strategic objectives that had nothing to do with terrorism or the 9/11 attacks. The overt rationale for the invasion was exceedingly weak, particularly given that it would lead to an open-ended, incalculably costly, and intensely risky preemptive war. Around the same time, it was revealed that an invasion of Iraq and the removal of Saddam Hussein had been high on the agenda of various senior administration officials long before September 11. Despite these doubts, concerns, and grounds for ambivalence, I had not abandoned my trust in the Bush administration. Between the president’s performance in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, the swift removal of the Taliban in Afghanistan, and the fact that I wanted the president to succeed, because my loyalty is to my country and he was the leader of my country, I still gave the administration the benefit of the doubt. I believed then that the president was entitled to have his national security judgment deferred to, and to the extent that I was able to develop a definitive view, I accepted his judgment that American security really would be enhanced by the invasion of this sovereign country."

...demonstrates his support for the NWO globalist agenda in general and, specifically, Neocons.

Being opposed to both, even back then, why would I trust, or listen to, him today?

That's interesting, thank you.

But Iraq wasn't a "NWO UN Agenda," it was a NeoCon Agenda.

I think that it is retarded Glenn first supported Bush at all, also what he says about Islamic terrorism threats without saying anything about "Islamic" terrorism mostly being manufactured by small groups in top level USG?

But you should have quoted the entire passage with the above you posted highlighted. The things you ommitted above are kind of important. That book also was published 2006.

Do you not think the NWO agenda

and the neocon Agenda are one and the same? Different paths, same destination?
The invasion of Iraq was a bankers wet dream, the US citizens were robbed of trillions of dollars, and thousands of lives all for the privilege of stealing Iraq's wealth from her people, and redistributing it to the Global banking cartels.
To "herd" 10s of millions of people, you need more than one dog.

...again I have never stated that GG is a conspitator,

or that he openly works for works the UN or the NWO. But he is left leaning.
Communism doesn't over run a country by bombs and bullets...it sneaks through the back door. At first.
It creates social unrest, exposes the wrong doings of the government, trashes the wealthy for being wealthy, whilst at the same time its leaders are themselves corrupt,and garner enormous amounts of wealth from the very people they are pretending to "protect".
Communism, like Political Zionism has no compunctions about using people to bring about it's own ends.
I have questioned whether Edward Snowden has been used (not complicit)
to futher an Agenda.And I think he has. I do not think he sold out.
I question whether GG is being USED to further and Agenda. I think he maybe, he has the perfect personality for it, egotistical, and highly intellectual.
I question because there are 2 sides to EVERY coin.
What can be used for good can also be used for evil.

SteveMT's picture

Jill, the 'right' has also done what you describe.

Right and left are false paradigms. They are the same people with the same agenda. It is true that "What can be used for good can also be used for evil." What the U.S. government was doing was pure evil. Snowden through GG brought that evil to the attention of the world. That alone tells me that what Snowden did was good. You are getting into things that cannot be proven, only hinted at. Snowden performed a patriotic service to America and to the world, and the world owes him a debt of gratitude, IMO.

I agree SteveMT

but what are the consequences? Civil unrest? Strained diplomatic relationships? War?
Every action has an opposite and equal reaction. That is the law of nature.
What if the people who want Global control have learned how to use this against us?

I'm beginning to think you are a Judas

You Jill are trying to discredit the truth, by attacking the messenger.

"Something about GG simply doesn't "sit" right.
As for Ed Snowden? I simply don't know, but there is a constant niggle that he has been badly used."

Go fondle your niggle, I plan on standing up for the truth where I see it.

Listen to all and follow NONE, but the ONE.

God Bless you Jill,
Base

I'm not attacking the messenger base1

I am questioning the reason that GG has major…and I mean MAJOR media coverage (by a controlled media,
both sides), when others who have tried to speak out have been largely ignored, even gagged.
Is this because the first "whistle blowers" were too radical? too left or too right of "mainstream"? Was the message of cart blanch spying becoming so loud that someone, somewhere had to sit up and take notice? "Or was it so loud that "someone" had to take control of it?
Was GG in the right place at the right time?
If you want real liberty for yourself and the Citizens of the USA, you have to question these things, because throughout History, the People have been duped time and time again.
You only have to look to Barry to see that this is true. And before him, G W Bush and his particular brand of untruths to "herd" We the People. Were we so focused on Radical Islam that we forgot about the morphed and rebranded communist movement?
We also know that there is a real effort to bring about a One World Government….and how will these people manipulate the currant climate to further their own ends?
i have no interest in "fondling my niggle" as you so basely put it, but am open reasoned debate.
You seem to be a God fearing man without realising that the devils most damaging play ground is The Bible…..imagine the trouble he can cause in a corrupt government.

Go Glenn!

He shames these mouthpieces every time.

___________________________________________________________________________
"Bipartisan: both parties acting in concert to put both of their hands in your pocket."-Rothbard