6 votes

Help Us TODAY to Stop Seattle CC: Limit Speech And Mesh Spying: Help Us!

Fellow DPers,

We need your advocacy and agency to make a few phone calls, tweets or email!

It is urgent that we continue to fight to protect our Rights against infringement upon our free speech AND to fight to stop the Seattle MESH surveillance system. Today the fight against limiting public comment continues and tomorrow the funding for MESH SPYING is on the docket in council chambers.

The pertinent information about the speech limitation and the MESH is below, but what you can do (and please do) Tuesday/Wednesday is this:

1. Communicate with City Council:

Sally J. Clark the Committee Chair for Economic Resiliency and Regional Relations: meets today about Resolution 31489
206-684-8802 sally.clark@seattle.gov

Bruce Harrell the Committee Chair for Public Safety, Civil Rights, and Technology Committee: meets Wednesday about Reolution Council Bill 117996
206-684-8804 bruce.harrell@seattle.gov

See http://www.seattle.gov/council/ page with all the tweety things, Facebook and other types of communication.

See http://www.seattle.gov/council/councilcontact.htm for individual email and phone ccontact info or call: Dana Robinson Slote Communications Director dana.robinsonslote@seattle.gov 206-615-0061or email: council@seattle.gov

2. Attend City Council at 2 p Tuesday (Speech) and/or 2 pm Wednesday (MESH) Dec. 4 at Seattle City Hall
600 Fourth Avenue, 2nd Floor Seattle, WA 98104

We need to pack the room. They only allow 10 minutes for public comment but your presence there with a home made sign would be a POWERFUL meassage!

Again I thank you! Please share with other advocates of free speech, privacy, liberty and First and Fourth Amendment fans!

A project of Seattle C4L and Project for an Open Government

Re: Limiting Public Comment and punitive measures

Regarding the revisions of certain City Council rules and procedures and adopting a new set of General Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council to supersede those previously adopted in Resolution 31343 and as amended by Resolution 31391:

The news Rules proposed do not serve the public well but rather serve the members of the City Council by limiting speech, engagement with the citizens who they are to serve, and are a dereliction of the duties and responsibilities of the City Council as set forth in Attachment 3: general Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council the Duties and Responsibilities of the Members of City Council include : upholding the public trust, and ...fairness; and being responsive to citizens... http://clerk.seattle.gov/~ordpics/31391at3.pdf and abrogates your responsibilities as per the Charter of the City of Seattle ARTICLE XIX, Section 4 in which you subscribed an oath or affirmation that you will support the Constitution of the United States, and of the State of Washington. To wit and at a minimum: the U.S. Constitution First Amendment in part: Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble. The Washington State Constitution ARTICLE I DECLARATION OF RIGHTS, SECTION 2 acknowledges that: The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land. And SECTION 5 that verifies: Every person may freely speak, write and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right.

Especially eggregious are the changes and additions in Section III Public Participation Sections B and C wherein the rights guaranteed under the Consitituion of the United States and Washington, and the Charter of the City of Seattle, and the spirit current Rules and Procedures of the Seattle City Council are violated particularly in Section C.4. in toto:

4. If an individual fails to comply with the requirements of III.C.1 over the course of multiple Council or Committee meetings, the presiding officer may exclude the individual from participation in future public comment periods before the Council or Committee meetings, or exclude the individual from attendance at future Council or Committee meetings, unless the decision of the presiding officer is overruled by a majority vote of the Councilmembers in attendance.
a) The presiding officer shall inform the individual of the specific reason for his or her exclusion, and the specific terms of the exclusion.
b) Exclusions from future participation in public comment periods or future attendance at Council or Committee meetings may be issued for up to 14 calendar days.
c) The length of the period of the exclusion may depend upon the seriousness of the disruption, the number of disruptions, and the individual’s prior record with conduct at Council or Committee meetings.
d) When issuing an exclusion from future public comment periods, or from future attendance at Council or Committee meetings, the Council President shall include specific notification that the individual may submit written comments to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council at future public comment periods.

The legality of the entire process by which an indivivual is denied their guaranteed free speech rights and their future participation in the exercise therof is limited by a governmental agency must be questioned and the liability of any future lawsuits by such individuals agains indivivdual City Council members individually, en masse or against the Seattle itself must be considered.

Re: MESH Surveillance:

The Seattle City Council's Public Safety, Civil Rights, and Technology Committee's Agenda for 12/04/13 includes approval of $1.6MM of US DHS funding.

Part of that funding is earmarked for support of the regional fusion center,
including "the completion of information sharing networks" and "UASI [Urban
Area Security Initiative] portions of the Fusion Center's related equipment
and training needs."

Another part is earmarked for what sounds like facial recognition software ("booking photo comparison software system"), described on pp11-12 of

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Sue the bureaucrats individually in the personal capacity!

Petitioning, protesting, testifying does NOTHING. SUE them!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeplTS49eKg Dean Clifford - Courtroom Procedure & Jurisdiction – Full
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XnVqSNV3Aw&feature=youtu.be "Good jurors nullify bad laws" - Campaign to promote jury nullification
http://fija.org/ Fully Informed Jury Association
"Reaffirmation of Oath of Office, by (original author unknown) revised by Gregory Allan (4K)
Hold Public Servants to their oath, or make them pay the price. It basically asks them to sign a contract to make you one of the people to whom they have sworn an oath. No one will ever sign this, but showing it to them and asking them to sign it becomes evidence they have been put on notice."
"Grand Juries are the highest and most supreme power...So, if all political power resides within the People, and the People, sitting as Grand Jurors, have the ultimate control over all criminal matters and are free to indict whomsoever they will, including public officials, why propose Recalls of public officials?..e one and only way we will ever recover our country, and that is through our inherent power to establish Special Grand Juries." has the power to enforce law and remove people from office.


Thanks for sharing this here!

I'll ask the Blue Republican founder Robin Koerner to help out on this - he lives in Seattle!

Support Liberty Media! http://benswann.com/

I believe we won't turn things around in this country until we first change the media and the culture - please donate to a liberty media creator today! http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/truth-in-media-project