57 votes

Congressman Confronted CSPAN "The Evidence That WTC Building-7 Was Brought Down With Explosives Is Real And Proven!"


http://youtu.be/JbnW_NoiUTM

lol, no i havent read the report but i think its real and true. nice one congressman. I hope time and truth shames this man..



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

He should have just said, "Look, I didn't get this far

by not believing what the tv says".

You don't get to be a rich establishment hack without first being an uninformed boob. Do people think there's a little "Reality 101" course that congressmen and government employees get to attend and learn the real story about all the nefarious things the government does? Well there's not. Dunkin Hunter is just like the rest of the country, a media-fed dolt who is merely awaiting instructions.

Vetted some cadidates for state senate.

In our friendly rapport with one NY state candidate, I brought out three official government documents. He saw the cover of the first one, which was the DHS one on right wing extremism. He waved his hand in a "not interested" gesture and immediately turned and walked away.

Just like 99% of everybody out there would do

Unless they talk about it on Oprah or the duck show or something it's meaningless. And even if they do, it's just part of the show and nobody actually cares anyway. By design.

Former juror here.

Evidence and credibility.

Over the years, and checking info out, 911 has a lot of coincidences.

It has government power positioned unacceptably via its own history of their actions and words for this event alone.

These raise red flags. Not one, but plural.

Somethings wrong.

fireant's picture

Have ya'll noticed all the diversion, yet not one spec of

structural evidence is offered to counter the mountain of structural evidence which says the buildings were not cut apart?
That should tell you something.

Undo what Wilson did

The mountain of structural evidence that it was not cut up

is not even the correct structure. Which is why no can make sense of what we know did happen.

http://algoxy.com/conc/fema_deception.html

Can we stop doing all the things we are doing that we do not want to do while still doing what we need to do?

fireant's picture

Concrete encasement went up only to about the 6th floor.

Everything above relied upon drywall to frame the stairwells, and spray on insulation.

Undo what Wilson did

Cut columns photographed PRIOR to clean up crews

Photo was taken by James Nachtwey on 9/11/01. It shows multiple cut columns.
http://www.jamesnachtwey.com/ (click "9-11-01" in left column and advance to the last photo)

Interview with him where he talks about his photographing on 9/11/01.
http://www.esquire.com/features/ESQ1005WIL_206

Also, photo of cut beam (at bottom center of slide# 21) taken while wtc 6 was still on fire.
http://www.slideshare.net/tvawler/amazing-9-11-wtc-ground-ze...

Cut beam atop roof of wtc 3...
http://busharchives.org/911/wtc3roof.jpg

fireant's picture

Not cut.

In each of those 3 you are looking at the square end of a column photographed at an angle, which will make it seem beveled. Plus there is no detail. You have to overcome hundreds, if not thousands, of photos with detail.
I'm not trying to be argumentative JC, and thanks for responding. But you have to admit this is the bottom line evidence. It all boils down to the structural evidence. I don't have a dog in this fight. I'm blandly objective. My premise is that if the buildings were cut apart, there will be plenty of cut beams in the debris. So far I have found none. I maintain that until credible evidence of cut structural members are found, there is no case for CD. The amount of structural evidence the buildings broke apart at their connections is overwhelming at this point.

Undo what Wilson did

Yes, you are trying to be argumentative...

...when you ignore the overwhelming evidence (photograpic, audio, eyewitness) of the EXPLOSIONS that more than likely helped the buildings ~break apart~ at their connections, and when you ignore the evidence of intense heat that bent and burnt the steel in ways that are not consistent with jet fuel and office fires.

C'mon fireant, to simply say the buildings "broke apart at their connections" while ignoring or dismissing all the other evidence is nothing short of misleading.

"Did you read the 9/11

"Did you read the 9/11 investigations by the committees?"
"No I did not."
"But you think it's adequate enough?"
"Yeah I think so."

So glad you quoted this comment...snort...

Amazing what passes as an actual answer and she just lets that "DOH" moment pass right on by with no follow up question. She is the problem as much as he...

If my need to be RIGHT is greater than my desire for TRUTH, then I will not recognize it when it arrives ~ Libertybelle

.

In this interview he also states all middle easterners (assuming he's not including israelis ;) ) are born liars and the US should use a strategic nuke against Iran.

Duncan Hunter: The face of the GOP and a mainstream ...

...NEO-CON, Arab-hating HACK who DIDN'T EVEN QUESTION that report before making such a statement!!!

Didn't this idiot run for president too?

"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul

dunkin'...

nutter.

Defeat the panda-industrial complex

I am dusk icon. anagram me.

We need to get this fool out

We need to get this fool out of office.. he didn't read something, but approves of it?

If you disagree with me on anything you are not a real libertarian...

sharkhearted's picture

Ignore the paid disinfo idiot troll Fireant.

All you have to do is stomach yourself to endure these sorry-ass pathetic "structural" arguments...then you will realize this individual is incapable...of being rational or reasonable.

And yeah...fireant...this is a directed and concerted toward you: you are INCAPABLE of making a rational argument here.

Further question: Who funds you? And, if you are funded...what is your scientific support for your arguments?

Ah....I thought so.

There is none.

PS AT SOME POINT YOU WILL BE NAMED AS HELPING COVER UP A MASS MURDER EVENT??

WHEN THE "NEW NUREMBERG" OCCURS...ON WHICH SIDE OF THE "ARGUMENT" DO YOU WANT TO BE ON?

THE CHOICE IS YOURS....

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

You're Back Sharkhearted?

Unless I somehow missed it, you stopped posting for a while. Was wondering what had happened. Hopefully all is okay. What was your 911 website again? Have you been updating it?

sharkhearted's picture

I am fine dude....thanks for reaching out.

The only thing that tires me...is incompetent RETARDED (and I mean really, really retarded) disinformation trolls like fire ant. (Ad hominem fallacy intended).

What a total f-cking waste of energy and time.

Other than that I am doing well.

And yeah...I haven't updated my site lately...but I am trying to figure out how to do my part in organizing the New Nuremberg.

Thanks for staying in touch. Email me at sharkhearted at gmail and we can keep in touch as to the next steps.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

fireant's picture

Which means you have NO CASE.

Classic attack and smear. You know you cannot overcome the massive amount of structural evidence which shows the buildings broke apart at their connections, so you divert with slander.
Take all your speculations to court and you will be decimated with the structural evidence alone. It trumps all you bring to the table. All you have to do is produce structural evidence that the buildings were cut apart. There are tons which say they were not. You know this, so rather than face the truth, you cower behind lies.

Undo what Wilson did

"Broke Apart" Is Different Than "Pulverized Steel"

Plus why did building 7 free fall even at the beginning if there was uneven damage?

fireant's picture

Why? I can tell you what the structural remains show.

They show the grid of the perimeter walls broke apart in stair step fashion around the 8th to 12th floor. If they buckled, meaning the upper and lower portions were no longer plumb, then broke, you would have free fall for 80 to 120 feet for everything above that point.

Undo what Wilson did

fireant's picture

What is "pulverized steel"?

I can find plenty that is bent, crushed, stretched, and lacerated. Pulverized suggests being shattered into little pieces. No structural members show that.
Again kevink, your facts are mistaken. The visible outer shell initiation of collapse was a sideways move prior to any alleged free fall. I still say the free fall is unproven, because neither of the measurements account for the measuring point falling away from the camera.

Undo what Wilson did

Jefferson's picture

Actually

you're the one who has "no case." All of YOUR speculations were brought to "court" and dismissed. So...uh...CHECK MATE.

WTC Developers Cleared of Fault by 2nd Circuit
Wednesday, December 04, 2013
Nevertheless, Con Edison failed to "establish, beyond the point of speculation and conjecture, a factual, causal connection" between the design of Tower 7 and its collapse, she added.
http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/12/04/63436.htm

The truth of the matter is that WTC 7 was a "superstructure" made to take all sorts of punishment, from hurricanes to earthquakes (and fires). It was apparently "safe" enough for them to house not only the NYC-EOC, but also a handful of the largest CIA and regulatory agency HQ's in the US.

The truth of the matter is that "America's Mayor" and his fellow henchmen Bernie, Cherty, Larry are rotten to the core corrupt. They are the fed's mafia Capos, and only subservient to the larger fish like Cheney, Rummy, Perle, Wolfowitz and the other scumbags that hatched this plan.

You cover for these scumbags with your little song and dance routines trying to get people to focus on minutia and distract, rather than seeing the bigger picture. Your efforts here have not only been an epic failure that has not converted ONE DP member that I can tell, they have fallen into the realm of laughable.

When I see your comical BS droppings on these threads, I am reminded of one of those creepy jack in the box clowns that springs out. Or better yet, more like one of those inflatable "boppo clowns" with a sandbag in the bottom of it. No matter how hard you punch it in the head, it still rises back up with that creepy smile on its face. Well, I just deflated your little clown act. After you soak in that court report, you can go spoon with "rhino" in the corner. I understand he needs a little lovin'.

You cover for scumbags, therefore you are a scumbag (imo).
http://whodidit.org/cocon.html

fireant's picture

Just produce the structural evidence the buildings were cut

apart.
You must overcome the vast amount of structural evidence which clearly shows the buildings broke apart at their connections in order to have a case. Until you do, you will be shamed out of any court or investigative panel with the structural evidence alone.

Undo what Wilson did

Jefferson's picture

Oh

that's right, because "the bones don't lie" as you stated previously.

Nevermind that there were 1/4 to 1/2 inch HUMAN BONE fragments shot out onto the rooftops of other buildings, and that encased reinforced concrete turned to powder in mid air. We all know THAT happens in a gravitational collapse./sarc

You have been shown evidence of explosive force ad nauseum, and you still shuck and jive like a greased pig.

You are either partially retarded, or a serious glutton for punishment. (possibly both)

BTW, I'm embarrassed to admit we were watching a movie the other night called "Olympus has Fallen." There was a scene in there where a hostile AC-130 gunship headed for the WH, clips the Washington Monument.
Even though it's computer animation, a pile of Masonic stones, and a stupid brain dead action movie, I thought it'd be the perfect example of GRAVITATIONAL COLLAPSE and RESISTANCE even for a simpleton like you.
You seem to like and believe computer animations like what NIST produced, (after changing their story 4-5 times) so this should be right up your alley. Take note of how the lower portion RESISTS the upper portion. (spoiler alert: 2/3rds of the "monument" remains intact and doesn't turn to powder, even in make believe land)

http://youtu.be/LGuNEkJXxlk

You might want to consider your response, because I am not interested in locking horns with a "time vampire" such as yourself. I already spanked you with the recent court report, blowing your little WTC 7 was built on shaky ground and substandard design arguments out of the water, and others here have relentlessly pummeled you with enough solid evidence of explosive force to begin court proceedings.

Like I stated, you've been beaten back into your jack in the box hole so many times, your attempts at rebuttal are laughable and frankly just reflect your agenda, which I now believe is protecting scumbags.
(considering previous appeals to common sense have been futile)
Now, I'm going to go watch "Curious George Christmas" with my nieces. It's slightly more believable and entertaining than beating on the boppo clowns.
RIP Danny Jowenko

http://youtu.be/877gr6xtQIc

HILARIOUSLY SPOT ON -

I saw that movie and I did NOT think to analyze the PHYSICS -- GREAT FIND.
That clip "destroys" the story for Buildings 1 & 2.

And building 7 wasn't damaged on all sides - EVERY CORE COLUMN could not have failed at precisely the same MILLISECOND. It doesn't work like that - everyone knows that right ? Uniform Collapse was an IMPOSSIBILITY. And Larry Silverstein FIRST ADMITTED to PBS that he had the building "pulled". (ignore the lies he spews afterward to try to cover it up)

Cool post.

fireant's picture

Then show us the structural evidence the buildings were cut

apart. There is plenty of that which shows they broke apart, so you should have no problem finding it. Without it, you have no case.

Undo what Wilson did

Inherited his seat...

Duncan Hunter is the Congressman for my district...(notice I did not say MY congressman?!) I campaigned door to door for Mike Benoit, the Libertarian candidate. Hunter is a DB, kiss the butts of TPTB idget, in the pocket of the MIC, whom, IMO, is only a congressman because his father (also Duncan Hunter) was before him and many voters do not even realize that this is a different guy...

of coarse he really isn't a different guy -he's just a chip off the old block as his Dad was a complete RINO too...

Between him and our sheriff (Ruby Ridge Gore) I can't wait to get outta San Diego.

If my need to be RIGHT is greater than my desire for TRUTH, then I will not recognize it when it arrives ~ Libertybelle

Hi LibertyBelle

Was thinking of you at 4:00 AM when I turned on my irrigation to save my orange tree from frost. Hope your garden fares well

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown