57 votes

Congressman Confronted CSPAN "The Evidence That WTC Building-7 Was Brought Down With Explosives Is Real And Proven!"


lol, no i havent read the report but i think its real and true. nice one congressman. I hope time and truth shames this man..

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Hey You!So good to hear from

Hey You!

So good to hear from ya man! I'm almost outta here - in the process of moving and transitioning my business to a remote, sustainable ranch in the Sierras. I will breath a deep breath of relief when I make the last trip and are there to stay. All is well my friend, and I hope, with you and your endeavors.

For Liberty!


If my need to be RIGHT is greater than my desire for TRUTH, then I will not recognize it when it arrives ~ Libertybelle

Lemme drink some of this coffee...


And some of the Kool-Aid!

The towers were brought down, eh? As opposed to...fell down?

fireant's picture

What's in the FBI files???

If callers to these shows want to do some good, that is the question to ask. It is precisely where we have documented evidence of a cover up. What was hidden in those files? Page after page redacted. Calling in claiming CD is proven, when it clearly hasn't been, simply keeps everyone on a cold trail, and away from the obvious obfuscations.

Undo what Wilson did

Architects and Engineers For 911 Truth

Hi guys,

I tried to post a reply to a comment below about where to find proof of a demolition, but for some reason it's not showing up.

Anyways if you have not checked out this sight before I'd recommend it - http://www.ae911truth.org/. It's an organization of Engineers (over 2000 and counting) that question the official story of building 7 from an engineering standpoint.

They also put together a pretty good documentary summarizing the problems with the official story around building 7 here - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddz2mw2vaEg

Hope this helps!

fireant's picture

"from an engineering standpoint", LOL!

They can't even accurately describe that the building visible shifted to the east and essentially cork screwed down, with the east portion falling into Fiterman Hall to the north, and the west section falling south across the street. Rather, they claim it fell straight down into it's own footprint.
The fact it shifted as a first move means lower support was not suddenly removed; rather, it buckled or folded as a first move.
So why haven't these truth seeking engineers pointed this out?

Undo what Wilson did

Here's the full documentary FREE on youtube

See if you can watch this and still believe the official story....

2000 Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth "Experts Speak Out"

Release the Sandy Hook video.

Gotta get him one of these

Gotta get him one of these mugs instead.



I know what WOULDN'T HAPPEN :


I don't care if it was hit with 7 100 ton slabs -- you would NEVER GET UNIFORM COLLAPSE.

Absolutely every single one of the internal columns would need to fail at the exact same precise moment.

(oops - this is for fireant 3 comments down below)

fireant's picture

I care nothing about any "government case", whatever that means.

I only look at available evidence and let it speak. I started my quest a little over a year ago actually in order to prove CD, having believed Gage and Jones for a time. I found the evidence does not support their beliefs, and they both ignore and lie about the facts, which disturbs me greatly.

Undo what Wilson did

I can agree that you are. greatly disturbed..

what you don't understand is that proving CD is not important.

the only thing that is important, is making public the Truth.
and THAT, remains unknown.


fireant's picture

Making public the truth would mean releasing the FBI files...

At least to a grand jury. But you will not find the truth by speculating over that which cannot be proven.

Undo what Wilson did

and thus pontificates....

the "Fireant"

fireant's picture

Then it should be easy for you to find structural evidence

to support your belief.

Undo what Wilson did

But it wasn't even mentioned in the 9/11CR

Even if we accept the claims that WTC 1 & 2 'pancaked' after being hit by airliners, WTC 7 itself would be the only skyscraper in history to have caught fire and collapsed without being hit by an airliner.

No skyscraper in history has ever collapsed due to fire - ever. Many skyscrapers have in fact been engulfed in flames and have had both their entire interiors and exteriors facades completely burned away by fire yet in each of those instances, the internal steel framing has remained standing - every time. Therefore, it would be an understatement to say WTC 7 represents an anomaly.

This congressman is either a frightfully ignorant moron serving as a representative of his constituency or a shill because there in fact has been no adequate investigation into WTC 7 itself falling down due major damage caused by severe impact from a 100 ton airliner striking WTC 7 and the burning of fuel released from the tanks of such an airliner inside WTC 7.

Okay, maybe it is a building falls down after a fire after it first has been hit by a 100 ton airliner but WTC 7 wasn't hit by a 100 ton airliner.......Exactly what does he think any such investigation found?

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. - Margaret Mead

fireant's picture

For the record, 7 was hit with a hundred ton slab of steel.

I don't know the actual weight, whether it was 100 tons or 50 tons, but it was massive enough to slice the south wall top to bottom. What do you think that might have done to a trapezoid shaped large span 47 story tall building, where the perimeter wall is a vital element of multi-dimensional stability?

Undo what Wilson did

Don't give up the ghost


"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

rolls eyes and face palm

rolls eyes and face palm

Even If So....

Would that cause it to fall down in an even fashion at freefall speed and cause steel to be pulverized?

fireant's picture

Torque, due to dimensional instability.

Ignoring for a moment that I do not accept your "facts" as accurate, the building was doomed even without the fires. It may not have fallen without the fires, but would have to be brought down. When you twist, or torque a tall rigid structure, joints pop. The building is documented to have been leaning, bulging, and making creaking noises.

Undo what Wilson did

fireant's picture

Where is the structural evidence of controlled demolition?

Structural remains show the building broke apart at it's connections, and that there was considerable torquing of the inner core, but no signs of artificial dismemberment. Without such evidence, there is no case for CD.
The better question for call-ins is "what's in those blacked out FBI files?"

Undo what Wilson did

Over 2000 Architects and Engineers question the Govt Story

I don't have time to read through all the comments to see if folks have already put this out there, but check out this site of the Architects and Engineers for 911 truth here - http://www.ae911truth.org/.

Pretty much all your questions would be answered here from this organization of engineers that question the official story of building 7 from just an engineering standpoint.

They put together an interesting documentary (an hour long so you may want to just check out the resources on the site if you don't have the time) that can be found here.


Hope this helps!

Intellectual Dishonesty -

You're as MORALLY BANKRUPT as the congressman in the video.

BTW - I provided you with a link to a scientific paper containing evidence of thermite.

Want to change your tune now?

Are you satisfied that a plane struck the pentagon without having been shown EVEN A SINGLE FRAME of a plane hitting the pentagon that day ?

fireant's picture

And how much study was done into the fact rust has a much

lower boiling point than iron, and the fact it reverts to iron at it's boiling point? Where can I find that in your paper?

Undo what Wilson did

Dr. Niels Harrit responds....

The BBC did a "hit piece" interview where they tried to discredit Dr. Harrit - and his response to them fits perfectly here:

If you can find a scientist who can refute the SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN findings of Dr. Harrit -- then we suggest you PUBLISH your Scientific Findings.

Make it a matter of public record - because he has.

You said you have evidence all over the place.


Until then: STFU.

fireant's picture

LOL! You're going to take THAT to a grand jury?

"Here is a scientific paper. Prove we are wrong!"
You got me rolling on the floor friend, I'll give you credit for that.
Sorry, but the burden of proof is yours. All you have to do is produce structural evidence of CD. If thermate were used to dismantle the buildings, there will be cut structural elements all over the place. I can find tons of structural evidence that the buildings broke apart at their connections, but no evidence of being cut. You have no prayer unless you produce the structural evidence. Bones don't lie.

Undo what Wilson did

fireant's picture

Your silence means they did not consider all potential sources

of iron micro spheres. Why am I not surprised?

Undo what Wilson did

SteveMT's picture

Free-fall for 120 feet shows that all resistance was removed.

Partially collapsing building falling asymmetrically would have resistance all the way down if they didn't stop collapsing altogether during the trip down.

fireant's picture

Structural evidence shows the perimeter walls broke at the 10th

to 12th floor, which would eliminate resistance for about 120 feet. Structural remains also confirm the core collapsed ahead of the perimeter walls. It didn't come down as one unit.

Undo what Wilson did

fireant's picture

Then there should be no problem finding the structural evidence

to support your theory. Find it and you have a case.

Undo what Wilson did

LOL the evidence was illegally sent to China to be melted

at record speed. First you say "produce the evidence" then when that is pointed out to you, you say, "but it was inspected at the landfill." Try telling the public in a courtroom that you cannot produce bullet casings, blood samples, hair, because someone had a look at it and saw nothing amiss, so you destroyed it. You'd be in jail.

As for steel debris falling onto WTC 7, I guess we can do away with the demolition industry. Light a few fires, drop a couple of wrecking balls on top of your structure and viola! It comes straight down, perfectly symetrically at free-fall! How silly of us to have been writing all those million dollar checks to people with lifetimes of experience and training to make them collapse that way.

Release the Sandy Hook video.