4 votes

Remember the Campaign to Call Out Snowden as a Traitor?

Imagine the clip:

He's a Traitor. He is a threat to national security. Snowden is a traitor. He needs to be brought to justice. He's an enemy to America. ...

I could go on and on, but I am not a video editor, so I'll spare you. But you can imagine all the soundbite news that parrotted this campaign.

I admit, I don't believe a whole lot that hits the media. It's all a disinformation campaign. But did we really need a Snowden to tell us the things we already knew....that is if you had been paying attention to the "Soundbite" or "Headline News" dating back to the Bush Admin?

I remember snippets of news about backdoors into cell phones with GPS tracking and when you try to explain it to people or bring it up, they would look at you like you were crazy. It's kind of like when you talk about the lies of 911, you get those comments about tin foil and paranoia. But I remember news of what Google was doing in China. Then you started putting 1 and 1 together. Then you started analyzing the Patriot Act. I mean this storyline didn't come overnight, but if you can put together a puzzle, it started to appear, long before this Snowden deal, which is why I was skeptical, and let's put blunt, probably still am. Our criminal government has done some fascinating things in terms of controlled opposition, so I wouldn't hold it past ANY of them.

But now that that story came and went away (if it is real at all)...and you look back at the sudden hit job on the name Snowden, yah, it's apparent the government had a PR Stunt to pull off. But what else is new?

I don't expect mainstream media to ever come around to telling the truth, and perhaps this is where they need to be shut down by market forces, but one just has to wonder if they will ever come true. More interestingly, I look forward to seeing how the mainstream media and their talking heads adapt to what Greenwald releases in time.

One thing is for certain. The credibility of the mainstream filtered and controlled news media (Globalists) needs to be continually challenged, because they are just going along with the criminals...and then have the audacity to report it as news.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

You asked:

"But did we really need a Snowden to tell us the things we already knew..." Though there was no question mark.

If by we you mean the members of the Daily Paul. The answer is of course no, we did not.

If however by we you mean the general population of America, then the answer is a resounding YES.

The general population doesn't know much of anything about the events that transpire around them.

Also, until Snowden's whistleblowing, the talking points of the NSA spying was just an easily dismissible theory that could not be proved. No proof? Oh, you must be a tin-foil-hat-wearing-dope-smoking-bad-mouthing-your-country-ron-paul-supporting-moon-bat-kook.

Just as MK Ultra was "just a theory" so was the spying. Until now that is.

Thanks. I did pretty good in

Thanks. I did pretty good in English class and yes I caught that error on the ???? but was too lazy to fix it, until you caught it.

Be Your Own Media!!!

The nature of abridged free speech is that

Most things that are easy to learn about what is going on is wrong.

Meaning that if a any media has a "buzz" on an issue, the NWO wants to impart useless info to you.

Can we stop doing all the things we are doing that we do not want to do while still doing what we need to do?

enter in Justin Beiber or a

enter in Justin Beiber or a story about a Boy Kahuna from Notre Dame that falls in love with Mika on the internet or more Jody Arias....

I got a kick out the fill they used with the British Royalty.

Be Your Own Media!!!

Yep

quilty