-8 votes

Obamas in trouble

LMAO
https://scontent-a-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/1489278_636...

“It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so fucking what."

[I saw hate in a graveyard -- Stephen Fry, The Guardian, 5 June 2005]”

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I saw something

I thought was funny. I posted it here, and all hell breaks loose. Sorry if I broke rules, some people need a sense of humor.

Ron brought the Liberty movement together, Rand is expanding the crap out of it! :)

Please.

Obama has been publicly challenged on this subject.
A suspicious death occurred around this issue with Obama.
This is a fair subject.
And why is Michelle looking angry?

Larry Sinclair Exposes Connections Between Obama & Murdered Donald Young

http://youtu.be/B4ffcKjm-kY
Choir Director Murdered To Conceal Obama's Homosexuality/Drug Use?

http://youtu.be/rTDZyMzNuyw

Any of You Selective Scripture Readers

Do any of you selective Scripture quoters have the courage to come on the air, as I do enjoy exposing the hackneyed idiocy of those who think Liberty only applies to members of a similar Spiritual Dogma.

Simply use the contact form over at http://DailyPaulRadio.com/contact

WGRR DB - rEVOLutionary talk for revolutionary times. Listen LIVE!

Let me get this straight.

Let me get this straight. Some cracks a joke about Obama being gay and you get all bent out of shape. Lighten up hun.

See what I mean.

This has absolutely nothing to do with denying anyone's "liberty". You are the one who can't stand a persons liberty to choose who they want to associate with or believe how they choose to believe and you will do everything in your power to make sure that YOUR idea of liberty is followed by all. Good work little miss socialist.

Please don't talk about Scripture when you obviously know nothing about it.

No its about manners

There are Gay people on the Daily Paul, and out of respect, friendship, civility, and cordiality, you should be nice and not go out of your way to be a derp to those who also come here for the same reason, i.e. the philosophy of individual liberty and peace promoted by Dr. Paul.

So please stop with the red herring, and just learn some manners. Hate gays all you want privately or on your blog. Just stop acting hostile and purposefully offensive on a website you do not own, and to wit we are all here searching to understand the beauty of true Rightful Liberty.

Dear god, you act like being nice to one another is akin to getting a root canal.

WGRR DB - rEVOLutionary talk for revolutionary times. Listen LIVE!

There are jokes about

heterosexuals, thousands of them, jokes about whites, blacks, Asians, Africans, English, Irish, Scots. Even jokes about Americans.
In fact there are jokes about everything.
Now that Gayness is mainstream, why can't we have jokes about them? Is gayness far too precious to be joked about? Hell, all the gay people I know have a healthy sense of humor.
Please don't get sucked into the PC climate, it was developed by the UN to cause devision and hate speech…don't let them win.

It's a fair subject to

It's a fair subject to discuss. Obama's entire past has been locked away. It's just another piece of the fraud.

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

Yep

Yep everything is fair game for a public official, whether the sexuality of President is at all material, as contrasted against his wanton murder, expansion of war, spying, etc is an entirely different subject. Priorities as they say.

My disagreement with the post came in the early morning, when the title was pure hyperbole "Gay Obama" in conjunction with the litany of Fred Phelps-like comments seemed in my opinion to be purposefully worded to try and tarnish the DP's reputation and of course give members of the WAR party, just another SEE people who like Ron Paul are all bigots, which is so not the case.

But yep, if you want to spend your days contemplating the sexuality of presidents then more power to you. But after a while it really starts to sound a lot like Rick Santorum and his sweater-vested self-loathing.

WGRR DB - rEVOLutionary talk for revolutionary times. Listen LIVE!

Anyone in office who holds a

Anyone in office who holds a secretive lifestyle leaves themselves open to all sorts of blackmail....so yeah, it's kind of a big deal.

Also, if you're willing to lie to the people and present yourself as someone you aren't...what won't you do or lie about?...and what won't you do to protect your secret?

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

Ok Whatever

You are so right who he sleeps with is WAaaayyy more important than bombing people across the globe and bleeding the country dry.

WGRR DB - rEVOLutionary talk for revolutionary times. Listen LIVE!

That thar is an awfully tall horse ya got thar miss...

How important would you find the president's past sexual exploits were you to find out...say some day down the road...that this seemingly "pacifist" leaning man who has talked against war many times prior to, and during his run into the Whitehouse...the same guy who received a Nobel Peace Prize for such seemly faux talkery, was brought into a room and had all of his embarrassments laid out on a conference table before him and told that all would be exposed if he didn't toe a specific line from this point forward. Would this then rise to a level of being pertinent in your eyes?

I'd suggest that you read John Perkins to understand that this is EXACTLY how the world works before tripping over your falderal in full view of the public...just sayin'. Who cares who's sucking what? Nobody. Who cares who's lying about it? You should...

Wha? .....hey....who stole my country?

WHo the Heck said he was a Pacifist

HOW does this uniquely apply to gay people? Gay sex is scandalous and a threat ot the HOMELAND, but cheating on your hetero spouse is not a risk to NATIONAL SECURITY? - lmao

If you are bad on WAR your an awful person, period end of story.

If you are bad in bed, I could not care less.

And please stop with the Jack Bauer logical fallacies, dear god you people have active imaginations.

Either offer a counterpoint not relying upon logical fallacy or just stop trying to justify your obsession with a person's sexuality.

WGRR DB - rEVOLutionary talk for revolutionary times. Listen LIVE!

Big words...apparently small mind...

I have no sexual obsession (although I have always considered my self a "legs and butt" man) as, not being gay myself, I still live in a world that provides me with loved ones who are or were.... That they do/did not lie about it while running for a public office is what sets them apart from this very pertinent and possible scenario in the case of a President who may be holding himself out to be what he is not...the very thing you seem to be up in arms about one one hand...and defending him on in another.

If he was born in Kenya and lied about it...would THAT matter to you? What if his education record was falsified? Would that matter to you? Is it OK for a President to lie...about some things and not others when the information is what is being relied upon by voters in weighing their decision to vote for the man? What if his being gay means that we don't now, nor ever would have had a President Obama? And then, given that blackmail is a long understood, and regularly employed political tool, it can't be that far over your head...but I dunno, maybe it is...that this MAY be a possible means for his "about-face" from the Senator that ran for office.

You do understand what a security clearance is right? You do understand the types of questions that are asked and WHY they are asked...don't you? You do understand why investigators and grantors of such clearances might be concerned about perceived deviance or criminal activity that could be used to coerce...don't you. Security Clearances (read:trust)are not given to those with known coerce-able histories that one wants to be, and hopefully remain hidden. Nothing Jack Bauer about it..whoever he is???

You have certainly made me question your thought processes and now..to discount any worthiness to a show based upon your opinion. You seem to have only a narrow focus and may have difficulties in grasping larger concepts.

Wha? .....hey....who stole my country?

Corrupt people with secrets

Corrupt people with secrets are usually the ones who reach high office. Once in office, they can easily be manipulated,coerced, and blackmailed into bombing people, starting wars, etc. Cause and effect.

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

Manners?

Who said anything about manners? And respect? I don't RESPECT deviance and I'm not going to start just to appease you or your desires.

Hey looky here, another city counsel has just voted to FORCE business owners and individuals to accept wickedness and deviance.

http://www.ktbs.com/story/24198191/shreveport-city-council-s...

That should make you happy. So much for your one way street version of liberty. You people are hypocrites from the word go.

Yeah and I totally Don't support That Either

Absolutely government has no right to tell a baker to make a cake for gay folk, and why gay folks would want to buy a cake from a baker who will be forced to begrudgingly provide the confection is beyond my understanding.

But your strawmen and red herrings aside, being nice, does not mean you have to agree, it simply means being nice.

WGRR DB - rEVOLutionary talk for revolutionary times. Listen LIVE!

“Gay” Soldiers in George Washington’s Army?

“Gay” Soldiers in George Washington’s Army?

by Peter Sprigg
July 24, 2008

One of the most bizarre aspects of the July 23 Congressional hearing on homosexuals in the military was the effort to read 21st-century political correctness back into American history.

Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-Calif.) insisted, “We’ve had gays in the American military from the first unit that was ever formed.” Rep. Christopher Shays (R-Conn.) echoed this astonishing claim, saying that “gays have served in every conflict, every war” this country has fought.

In fact, Shays was even more specific, noting a patriotic event in his district at which they read the names of “everyone who lost his life in the French and Indian War—some of whom were gay.”

Rep. Joe Sestak (D-Pa.) declared that allowing homosexuals to serve would be an expression of the high value Americans place on the principle of equal opportunity. He even claimed the father of our country, George Washington, as an ally who believed that “the way to the top should be open to everyone.” In context, that referred to the respect Washington had for enlisted men in relation to officers—but Sestak apparently would have us believe that Washington felt the same way about equal opportunity for homosexuals.

Actually, though, we have some very precise evidence in the historical record of what Gen. Washington thought about homosexual conduct. It can be found in his General Orders issued on Saturday, March 14, 1778, toward the end of his army’s long, bitter winter at Valley Forge. Like today, his army was at war. Like today, his army had serious problems of recruitment and retention. Perhaps, like today, there might have been some people who would have argued that his army could not afford to lose a soldier over something like his sexual conduct.

But that argument carried no water with Washington. On the 10th of March, a General Court Martial was held to try Lieut. Frederick Gotthold Enslin “for attempting to commit sodomy, with John Monhort a soldier.” Having been convicted, he was sentenced “to be dismiss’d the service with Infamy.”

That may have been the verdict of the court martial, but is there any evidence of what Washington himself thought? In fact, there is: “His Excellency the Commander in Chief approves the sentence and with Abhorrence and Detestation of such Infamous Crimes orders Lieutt. Enslin to be drummed out of Camp tomorrow morning by all the Drummers and Fifers in the Army never to return . . .”

http://www.frcblog.com/2008/07/gay-soldiers-in-george-washin...

In a sinful nation that pushes homosexual

deviance and forces association with such tripe why would Obama's homo past put him in trouble. Unless you are talking about in trouble with God in which case we didn't need you to tell us that because he has a long list of trouble in that regard.

And is it also

Is it also a Sinful nation that eats shellfish or opts not to sell their daughters into sex slavery or do you just quote selectively from the bible so as try to cover up your own obviously closeted queer feelings?

You should totally ask for a refund from the Phelps Academy of Internetz Comment Trolling

LIBERTY is for everyone not just those who ascribe to your Dogma.

WGRR DB - rEVOLutionary talk for revolutionary times. Listen LIVE!

Just what I would expect.

Do you approve of murder? NO? Then you must be covering you own desire to murder. See how stupid your statement is? Probably not. Especially if you think Scripture promotes selling girls into sex slavery.

What a demented person you are.

Perhaps you should look up the meaning of liberty because you obviously are under the impression that liberty means doing what others want you to do.

Apparently

Apparently the difference between VOLUNTARY interactions amongst free people and violent assault escape your intellectual capacity.

Do you have an actual counter-point NOT rooted in Logical Fallacy as you have thus far resorted to:

Ad hominem, Apppeal to Authority, Apples & Oranges, false dichotomy, strawman.

Anything, any reasonable arguement as to why you REFUSE to be civil on a forum dedicated to Peace, Gold, liberty?

Anything at all?

SMH

WGRR DB - rEVOLutionary talk for revolutionary times. Listen LIVE!

Murder violates someone's

Murder violates someone's life and liberty, while consensual gay sex does not. Try using your non-religious brain.

egapele's picture

This is tasteless

and immature.

Why is this on the front page?

Who put this on the front page?

What's the point of putting this on the front page?

Is the DP trying to show just how immature its readers are?

WTF is going on around here lately?

Its on the front page

My guess is that the algorithm that pulls the "most" active posts is skewed due to light traffic this early cold morning.

Oh and yesterday was free account Wednesday so perhaps some noobies are unaware of the rules?

WGRR DB - rEVOLutionary talk for revolutionary times. Listen LIVE!

I'm an oldie member

and I just now found out we had a rule against immaturity, or the equivalent.

I thought a mod had to be the one to designate something for the front page. Is the site more on auto-pilot now?

---

Oh, free accounts all over yesterday. That would explain it. But I would think, in anticipation of the consequences of that, there would be more moderators around on Troll Thursday.

Defend Liberty!

The Active Posts

The active posts are pulled via an algorithm. Thus, when trolls post tripe such as this, it gets people to click and respond (guilty) and thus merely by looking at the gross display of the collectivist mindset, the post ends up under the "active" category and lands on the front page.

Best thing to do by my estimation is vote this garbage down, ask for a moderator to intervene as it violates the DP guidelines, and request those in the chat rooms to assist in publicly denouncing this garbage with negative votes.

WGRR DB - rEVOLutionary talk for revolutionary times. Listen LIVE!

This is absurd - Request for Moderator Deletion

This is absurd and counter to the posting guidelines you voluntarily agree to abide when using the Daily Paul.

Further, this is not humorous in the least. Please show some decorum and self-censor by removing this tripe.

House Rules Excerpt

  1. No profane, disrespectful or divisive language
  2. Spell check and grammar check your work before posting, and refrain from excessive use of CAPITAL LETTERS
  3. Do not post the ENTIRE text of articles from other sites. This is copyright infringement, and could get you, me, and this site in trouble. (In fact, it already has!) Feel free to post a short intro, and then a link to the original article. Understanding fair use would be wise, also.
  4. Do not post racist, sexist, pornographic or otherwise obscene materials

Daily Paul House Rules and Posting Guidelines

WGRR DB - rEVOLutionary talk for revolutionary times. Listen LIVE!