Rep. Walter Jones, Convene Ad Hoc Committee to Investigate 9/11 Destruction of Evidence. Do We Want the Truth or Don't We?Submitted by Sue4theBillofrights on Mon, 12/16/2013 - 23:12
I applaud Walter B. Jones' attempts to get to the bottom of the Saudi connection on 9/11, though I can already tell you what the documents are going to say. That is because it is common knowledge that the Bush family and the Saudi royals are joined at the hip, and the head of Saudi intel, Prince Bandar, is so close to the Bush family they call him Bandar Bush.
This is the same Bandar whom Syrian opposition villagers said was behind bringing in chemical weapons, so its use could be blamed on Assad. Since the 19 9/11 hijackers were all Saudi, the story will reveal that Bandar was the point man for getting the 19 patsies on the plane. When it comes to Saudi dirty dealing, all roads lead to Bandar.
The question is, so what?
The intelligence connections between the CIA, MI-5, Mossad, Saudi intel, and Pakistani ISI are old and well-known. US military aid to Pakistan has come to around $20 billion since 2001, and it lately fluctuates between about $3 billion a year and one-and-a-half billion per year. It is best to think of these, as CIA whistleblower John Stockwell once said, as a "military-to-military brotherhood" which is transnational but tends to act in the interests of big business and big bankers.
Prince Bandar, head of Saudi intelligence
So if Saudi intel, i.e. Bandar, was in charge of getting 19 patsies aboard American planes, that's only about what you'd expect. That doesn't reveal who wired the three towers for demolition, or stood down the air defenses, or granted 24/7 access to the WTC complex so that the work could be done.
But now that the Saudi story has broken and caught the attention of Rep. Jones and Rep. Lynch (D-MA), why stop with demanding the redacted pages from the documents? Why not open an investigation which is limited, focused, and fruitful: Who ordered 99.5% of the steel evidence destroyed, making a positive reconstruction of the disappearance of the towers impossible?
Because that is really all we know. The physics of the official story are impossible, and alternative explanations, like demolition, cannot be proven, except by strong circumstantial evidence and inference. Yet thousands of American soldiers are dead and wide swaths of certain regions lay waste, as a result of the events of this one day. We know that, contractually, former Mayor Rudy Giuliani approved the orders to put the steel onto barges bound for New Jersey scrapyards, from where the steel was then in turn rapidly shipped to China and India for melting.
Find out who gave the order to Rudy, and you'll have the perps of 9/11. All law enforcement understands that destruction of evidence in a capital crime is a felony, and when you catch someone destroying evidence, you can pretty much stop looking for your first suspect.
Rudy was obviously only a bag man, but he knows who told him to get the steel evidence out of there, pronto, and to a place, and in a state, that would leave no clues. In return for this important task, Rudy was soon the frontrunner for the Republican nomination for president of the United States.
This was too much for NYC firefighers, who dogged him at his campaign appearances, letting people know that when the going got tough on 9/11, Rudy ran like a rabbit (funny Photoshop here anyone?) And didn't let anyone else know what he had been told: that the towers were going to come down. Thus costing untold numbers of people their lives because he ran to save his own hide instead.
We were traumaitized by 9/11, and all this took place before our eyes, with fire science professionals pleading with Rudy to stop the destruction of priceless evidence. Fire Engineering Magazine wrote in January of 2002:
“For more than three months, structural steel from the World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap. Crucial evidence that could answer many questions about high-rise building design practices and performance under fire conditions is on the slow boat to China”
But now that Rep. Jones and Rep. Lynch are showing it is okay to ask questions again, why stop with the Saudi connection?
A limited, focused investigation into the evidence destruction is manageable for an ad hoc committee, which any member of Congress can form, with subpoena powers.
Is the Saudi inquiry a ruse to throw off the truth dogs whose barks are getting worrisomely louder? The heat must be great for the Powers That Be to now consider throwing a key ally under the buskie. If it is not a ruse, then why stop there? Re-opening an investigation into the entire 9/11 event is daunting. This a manageable portion to bite and chew.
The findings of an investigation can be referred to a prosecutor. It was a felony. Now who told you to do it, Rudy? Talk. You're looking at 20 years.
Do we want the truth or don't we? That's the problem when you let the dogs out. You just don't know where they're going to go.
NYC Firefighters: Rudy "ran like a coward" on 9/11
Rep. Walter B. Jones contact page, faxes Fax: 252-931-1002 and 202-225-3286 (DC office)
Rep. Peter Lynch contact page, faxes Fax: (617) 428-2011 and (202) 225-3984 (DC office)
Please post further contact information