27 votes

NY Times' David Sanger on C-SPAN Challenged by Caller, Doesn't Know That No Plane Hit WTC7

After a caller challenges NY Times coverage of 9/11, Sanger says there is no evidence that the buildings came down as a result of anything but planes hitting them. Problem: No plane hit WTC 7. A little Truth for Christmas Merry Christmas!

Ed Asner on WTC 7



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
fireant's picture

Not from the top.

From about the 60th floor. Along with all the other evidence I've posted, this overhead of WTC6 confirms a slab of side wall fell exactly in line with column 20 of WTC7 (location of gash), directly across the street:
7 Evidence Slab Trail
I don't know that the breached south face would have caused collapse, but the building would have to be torn down. It is however, the loss of horizontal stability which allowed the fires to cause column buckling.

Undo what Wilson did

fireant's picture

Look closely center and down; follow the trail of perimeter wall

as it emerges from under the pile and down to the bottom of the photo.
This isn't the pic I had in mind, and it is not one I saved, so this is the best I can do for now. This one is clear though, that the wall splayed outward and laid down on the ground.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/docs/oem/9_2...

Undo what Wilson did

fireant's picture

And this is where the trail ends; Bankers Trust, south of the.

South Tower. Note the wall segments are lying north south end to end:

Undo what Wilson did

irrelavant

.

Sure appears that the bankers took down that tower

Only issues is it has to go to court to prove it. Everyone needs to deluge their representatives to release the 28 redacted pages.

sharkhearted's picture

-

_

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Blew it up 300%

full screen. There is nothing that fits your description.

sharkhearted's picture

Avoid wasting your time with SHILL Fireant

He is an EMBARRASSMENT. EVEN TO THE SHILLS!!! A complete NIMROD...retarded even.

Kindly ignore his mental handicap and move on...that's my advice.

Fireant...you are RETARDED.

Seriously, dude...you are nothing more than a sorry-ass paid government shill who can't even defend the piss-poor puddle of piss he is standing in.

FOR SHAME.

And...by the way....F___ck you!

You are my mortal enemy. And the mortal enemy of 3000 9/11 victims, plus 6000 USA troops who have died because that day....plus HUNDREDS of thousands of dead Iraqis and Afghanis.

Let me say again Fireant: F__CK YOU!!

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

fireant's picture

Tell it to the grand jury shark...

I'm sure they will be swayed with your juvenile and cowardly rantings.

Undo what Wilson did

Has a grand jury

been convened?

fireant's picture

Your arguments have be grand jury worthy if they are to have

any worth. The grand jury will be shown tons of structural evidence showing the buildings broke at their connectors. You should busy yourself with finding structural evidence they were cut, or you will never overcome that simple fact.

Undo what Wilson did

Meanwhile

I should just ignore logic? Nice deflection. A grand jury hears two sides.

p.s.

You are not the jury.

His ignorance

or subterfuge is on full display. I call it fun, like a cat and mouse game. Every response exposes him further.

Of course, it might be all about that half gallon I got for Christmas.

Happy New Year, shark

sharkhearted's picture

And a prosperous and happy new year to you, VR.

~

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

fireant's picture

You actually think you fooled me?

I knew exactly what you were doing. Thanks for the opportunity to post facts, none of which have been refuted.

Undo what Wilson did

Right

It was me trying to fool you. lmao

Facts? You don't need no stinkin' facts.

fireant's picture

Your not looking. The lighter strip bottom center and up to the

core of the south tower is layered with perimeter wall end to end. Look for the distinctive linear texture of those perimeter walls.

Undo what Wilson did

Yepper

It must be me.

You might want to make a video so that you can use some graphics to point out what you are seeing. It's like looking at a stereogram.

Show them

!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

Not sure which one but that's the standard answer.

Not sure which one but that's the standard answer.

Also nothing I said should imply that I believe the official story or that I don't have questions about WTC7.

Check out http://ronpaulforums.com for activism and news.

His words are:"There has not been any evidence...

His words are:

"There has not been any evidence to suggest that the BUILDING COLLAPSES were caused by anything but the two planes hitting them."

That means all the buildings. He never says a word about WTC7 or why it collapsed, because he dodged the question. Give me the time stamp exactly where he does. I guarantee you can't produce it.

Hey troll troll trolly! Wanna play? How's the weather in that Mossad basement?

"Bush Neocons Urged Netanyahu to Use U.S. Forces to Remove Saddam, Five Years Before 9/11"

Release the Sandy Hook video.

You give him too much credit

He said many things before responding. I don't think he dodged the question as much as just was unclear.

Besides, is it really a theory that WTC7 was a controlled demolition but WTC1 and WTC2 collapsed only due to the planes? It's fair to assume if you think WTC7 was demolished than you think all three were.

And I am not in a basement. :)

Check out http://ronpaulforums.com for activism and news.

So he got a cool question mark to go with his snappy photo, hey,

trolls gotta conversate, lol.......

kind people rock

This guy, why did he automatically go back to the president?

The caller never even mentioned anything about the President, he asked a reasonable question about building 7.

kind people rock

Probably some human drive to

Probably some human drive to say, "I was with the President on 9/11". If you are implying that this man knows the truth about 9/11 but is keeping it a secret, I think that's unreasonable.

If you are implying that he has doubts to the official story but has no real evidence to prove a conspiracy, that's more likely.

Check out http://ronpaulforums.com for activism and news.

We know Ari Fleischer, chief of staff, was with Bush that day..

holding up a sign from the back of the classroom saying "DON'T SAY ANYTHING YET."

Then Bush was left to sit there for a full 20 minutes like a sitting duck, this photo op was publicly announced and every terr'ist in the world knew exactly where he was. Webster Tarpley says it was a message: "You want to play ball or not?"

Release the Sandy Hook video.

bump

.

Bump for this Webster Tarpley vid

I had never heard those theories before

Called tap dancing...

...change the subject quick!

Release the Sandy Hook video.

Bump

.