47 votes

Is Silverstein the Key to Breaking 9/11 Wide Open?

Mob busts are always accomplished by turning the burros into states evidence – the runners, the carriers, the bag men. You immunize them or grant them plea bargains in exchange for giving up the higher ups who know more. The charges against them are easily proven. They get caught red-handed, with the load, the gun, trying to ditch the car whatever. There are two open-and-shut cases against bag men in 9/11: Rudy Giuliani for felony destruction of evidence, and Larry Silverstein.

The owner of the WTC put his foot in his mouth when he told PBS that they decided to “pull” Building 7.  "Pull it" is a term used by demolitions experts which means "pull" the building down, also used in the military for some military demo devices requiring a "twist and pull" motion.   WTC 7 is the weakest link in the chain of lies that is the official story.  Not hit by any planes, it nevertheless sank, dead-level at free-fall acceleration, into its own footprint on 9/11, the third building which disappeared from the skyline within seconds.  The building held an emergency command and control center for disasters built by Rudy Giuliani.

Silverstein said:

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.

Silverstein later tried to correct his slip by saying what he meant was "pull" out the firefighters, hoping no one would notice that the pronoun used was "it," not "them." One problem with this is firefighters had been pulled out by 11:30a.m., six hours before the building collapsed at 5:20. The New York Times reported:

" Falling debris also caused major structural damage to the building, which soon began burning on multiple floors, said Francis X. Gribbon, a spokesman for the Fire Department. By 11:30 a.m., the fire commander in charge of that area, Assistant Chief Frank Fellini, ordered firefighters away from it for safety reasons."

This is corroborated by the FEMA report on WTC7 which indicates that firefighting was not attempted in WTC7:

"due to lack of water, no manual firefighting actions were taken by FDNY."

I can hear it now.

Prosecutor: Mr. Silverstein, it is clear you knew WTC7 was wired for demolition. It is on-camera on national TV. You said they decided to "pull it." How did you know at that time that the building was wired? Who wired it?

Larry: I meant pull out the firefighters.

Prosecutor: But Mr. Silverstein, you know the firefighters had all been pulled out many hours before the building collapsed. You also said, after saying "so we pulled it," the words "and we watched the building collapse." So it is obvious you were referring to a demolition.

Larry: I wish to invoke my 5th Amendment.

Prosecutor: Very well you have that right. Your honor, I request you direct the bailiff to place Mr. Silverstein under arrest as a suspect in the crime of 9/11. Mr. Silverstein, you may want to reconsider. If you are more forthcoming we may be able to arrange a plea bargain.

Larry: If I do that I'm as good as dead.

Prosecutor: Think about it, Larry.

Any honest prosecutor must acknowledge that Silverstein:

- admitted to foreknowledge of the crime.

- as owner of the WTC was in a position to provide access to the entire complex

- actually profited immensely from the attacks, through a court decision doubling his insurance payment by counting the attack as two events, one for each tower hit. Silverstein took the insurance out just six weeks before 9/11.

We also know that Silverstein was not at breakfast on 9/11 at his usual table at the Windows on the World restaurant in WTC1. Silverstein told Charlie Rose that he had breakfast meetings there "every morning" since July 26th of that year. Remarkably, Silverstein's son and daughter, who worked for him on the 88th floor of the North Tower, were also not in their usual places. The New York Observer reports that they were "running late" that day. (Another who escaped death due to a last minute change is Bush cousin Jim Pearce.)

Therefore any honest prosecutor must view Silverstein with heightened interest if not outright suspicion. Silverstein blocked his own out by linking "pull it" to WTC7's "collapse." There is no satisfactory explanation for this admission to foreknowledge, caught on tape. If he does not answer how he got that foreknowledge he can be held in contempt. If he pleads the Fifth that's as good as a confession to some juries, especially with his monetary gain, and can be found guilty without testifying against himself.


Additionally there is the remarkable material witness testimony of Fox News reporter Jeffrey Shapiro, who in an article criticizing "conspiracy theories" nevertheless reveals:

"Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall."

Shapiro seems not to understand that office towers do not come pre-wired, nor that such work requires weeks if not months of planning and preparation.

2014 is the Year of Truth. You don't start at the top. You start at the bottom. Bottom-feeder Silverstein knows something. The billions he profited are small potatoes compared to the agenda of the big boys. 2014 is the year of getting beyond the "what" that is the shills' preferred battleground, because they simply repeat the silly index card points about the towers, for example, being like "hollow tubes."

Whoever allowed Silverstein on-camera to shoot-off his mouth made a grievous error. One problem with the criminally insane is you never know what they are going to say. There is no moral compass, so what is shocking to us, sounds fine to them.

We're moving the debate to the who and why. The trick to that is getting the bag men talking. On March 1, 1967, New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison arrested and charged New Orleans businessman Clay Shaw with conspiring to assassinate President Kennedy, reflecting the fact that law enforcement in America is not monolithic, but consists of thousands of elected fiefdoms. Because the effects of 9/11 were felt across the country, sending young men to war in almost every county, jurisdiction can be asserted by almost any DA. Garrison's case against Shaw was far flimsier and more circumstantial than the direct evidence against Silverstein.

The case is momentous. If Silverstein is the key to the higher ups, then WTC7 is the key to 9/11. Because if one building was wired, they were all wired.

Look up you local DA

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Start a petition

Lets start a petition to the Government Now
We the PEOPLE insist the U.S. government reopen the investigation of 911 and review all possible leads. This Nation will not resume it rightful place in the world until the nations and the persons involved are prosecuted and brought to Justice once and for all. If a petition exists please tell me where I can find it Thanks

Dan T Man

This corruption can NOT stand

There are many petitions, but the main one to get behind

is the AE911 international one, 16,000 sigs and counting.




The ReThink911 International Petition is open to all citizens worldwide.

When this petition reaches one million signatories, it will be delivered to the Head of State of every nation that had citizens who died in the attacks on September 11, 2001.
Sign the Petition:

To All Authorities Who Have the Sworn Duty and Legal Authority to Investigate the Events of September 11, 2001, Including Those in the United States, Those in Other Sovereign Nations, and International Bodies,

Please Take Notice That:

We the undersigned hereby petition for a truly independent investigation in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of September 11, 2001. There is an overwhelming amount of evidence that contradicts the official 9/11 Commission Report and the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s reports on the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 and the Twin Towers, and to which the U.S. government has been unresponsive. Therefore, a new and independent investigation must be opened. This investigation should include a full inquiry into the evident use of explosives in the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 and the Twin Towers.


Release the Sandy Hook video.

forget it

America won't wake up until its too late


Then you are content to hand your children

and grandchildren down into slavery. That's really f*ked up. It is always the three percent who do the fighting to secure the liberties the other 97% does not deserve. Let your progeny live in slavery. Not mine.

"Posterity! You will never know how much it cost the present generation to preserve your freedom! I hope you will make good use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in Heaven that I ever took half the pains to preserve it." – John Adams

Release the Sandy Hook video.



Release the Sandy Hook video.

The WTC insurers probably have some evidence

In their investigations, these would be private investigations.

If one were able to obtain a report of their findings it might shed some more light on the issue.

Munich Reinsurance, Lloyd's syndicate, and Swiss Reinsurance were three of the WTC insurers. I think Lloyd's syndicate is multiple companies in a conglomerate, I know there are 13 WTC insurers in total.

Each one of these 13 companies would have investigated 9/11 privately before the court cases began in 2003.

They must have found something, because Silverstein essentially lost his claim. He was asking for 'double occurrence' and did not get it.

Where are the security camera tape back-ups?

These systems usually consist of vhs tape running 24/7 then being run off-site for back-up. I know people who are security guards and that's how it works. It would be interesting to see what kind of work crews were coming in and out the building and let Larry identify them in court.

What are all those crates Larry how many times do you wash those windows?

Release the Sandy Hook video.

sharkhearted's picture

9/11 Justice BUMP


Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Criminals don't investigate themselves.

However, Silverstein was in on it all the way. The chairman of the Board of HCC, the insurance company that awarded him the 5 billion, was none other than Marvin Bush, George Bush Jr.s brother.

When did common sense become a super power? –Patrick F. Holman

Wow ...

... I didn't know Marvin Bush was on the board of the insurance company.

He was also a director of Securacom/Stratesec, which had the contract for security at the World Trade Center (their contract conveniently expired one day before 9/11).

This alone would be very interesting to bring out in a trial

...already big names are coming in and we've just started pulling the thread, like a little kitty. Oh let's see where this goes! All we need is one county DA who wants to save his country. I refuse to believe there is not one. But they need to know what a case they've got. So send this to your local sheriff, as they say...

It is true criminals don't investigate themselves. But Jim Garrison wasn't a criminal, and he investigated JFK, and could have won with evidence like this...hey look I found this really nifty tool for finding your local DA...


Release the Sandy Hook video.

I would like to know ...

... who wrote the script for the BBC reporter who announced that WTC7 had fallen when it was still standing.

Now THAT is foreknowledge by someone behind the scenes (not the reporter).

If you THINK a building might come down, you write a script that says a third building is in danger of collapse.

If you KNOW a building is coming down, you write a script that says it fell -- but you're supposed to release that script after it actually falls.

Here's a possible defense

a) He meant pull out the brigade of firefighters
b) The call he got was just before 1130am, ie. the time that NYT indicates the firefighters were ordered away
c) And then at 520pm, after they (Silverstein and some Fire Dept. officials assigned to watch WTC7) watched it on and off for most of the afternoon, saw it collapse

good defense

a) He didn't mean, he actually said, when referring to the BUILDING, to "pull it".
b) He did the interview weeks after September 11th. So he knew the firemen were out.
c) At 5:20 pm, the building was imploded by a controlled demolition as verified by 2,000 architects and engineers.

When did common sense become a super power? –Patrick F. Holman

Edit C) it is over 20,000

Edit C) it is over 20,000 not 2,000 :) just want to get info out if anyone reads your reply:)

Life is great with Isagenix

Apparently Lucky Larry has

Apparently Lucky Larry has been endowed with Moseses powers to summons 47 story buildings to collapse on demand. How dare you mortals question his integrity.

It's never going to happen.

Don't get your hopes up thinking that the red, white, and blue wall hiding the evidence will ever be penetrated. How long has it been now, fifty years since Kennedy was killed, and we still don't know what the government knows about the assassination, do we?

The 911 cover up, with all the evidence that WTC7 was a controlled demolition, will continue forever. We'll be dead and in our graves and the evidence will still be hidden. Even a grand jury wouldn't be able to perpetrate the red, white, and blue wall surrounding it.

That the towers site was never treated as a crime scene was the first clue that the cover up was begun immediately. They did the same thing with the Murrah Building after it was bombed. It was bull dozed and in the land fill so fast it amazed people tracking the progress of it. The only time the government works fast is when it's covering something up.

When's the last time an execution was carried out in less than four years. McVeigh was sentenced on 6-14-97 and executed on 6-11-2001. That may be some kind of record. The government wanted him in the ground along with the Murrah building.

It only takes one to KEEP AMERICANS FREE. Know your duties & rights as a juror. Stop the unconstitutional conviction of innocents in federal custody. The Fully Informed Jury CALL 1-800-TEL-JURY www.fija.org IMMEDIATELY if not sooner. It's that important.

Heard of Jim Garrison? The New Orleans DA took up the JFK

assassination by prosecuting Clay Shaw, another low-level bag man. The evidence was much flimsier than that against Silverstein, Giuliani, or Cheney. Your warped sense of history is what I call the "Eeyore" world view. If our Founding Fathers had taken it, British soldiers would still be camping in our yards and searching through our homes. Instead they defied all odds and beat the greatest empire ever seen. People like you were saying "we'll be in our graves and the Union Jack will still stand behind the crimes of the King."

The fact is this country consists of not one law enforcement agency, but thousands. Every elected county DA is a fiefdom unto himself, as Garrison showed, and can alone bust a national crime wide open. Had Garrison obtained a guilty verdict, there would have been revolution in the streets. Men like Garrison are rare, but they are out there. Look at Ron Paul.

JFK and 9/11 are a bad comparison. With JFK they killed our president, unfortunately not enough to bring people to action. On 9/11, they started slaughtering US.

Trial of Clay Shaw in JFK assassination:

Release the Sandy Hook video.

Careful, your truth is showing

The only time the government works fast is when it's covering something up.

False equivalency

Too many Americans awake, only way these rats can cover up a thing is with billions of dollars. With the Federal Reserve crashing, well that just died. Bad position to be in for this.


Even the areas they try to prevent exposure can all be prosecuted through the media. The media will do a huge firestorm when the public gets wind of it. Documents of cover up are outrageous.

Bircher demands it reopen immediately.
Amash has been on record forcibly demanding it be reopened.
It will have no alternative, other than to hit every air wave.


The problem with 911 is not that there are no smoking guns. There are many.

So Silverstein is on record admitting he ok'd bringing down bldng 7. Who is going to bring charges? You? Me? nope. Nobody is going to question or charge Silverstein.

How about the dancing Israeli's? Setting up a camera, filming, then celebrating. They were arrested and were found with lots cash and bomb residue in their vehicle.

Another group of mossad were apprehended with a van full of explosives. They were all set free and none of it was in the 911 commission report. Cleary, these mossad has foreknowledge....a smoking gun.

And isn't the obvious demolition of bldg. 7 enough?

No one will ever be questioned or charged for 911... not in my lifetime.

Congress will

Unleash the national security blackout and convene a Grand Jury. Then all of them can be charged and every worm will turn on the next, since national security "excuse" doesn't stop subpoena bound Grand Juries working under duress of Congress own oversight chamber.



Too big a crime and national television already accusing Israel..

sharkhearted's picture

BRAVO!! This quote especially:

"2014 is the Year of Truth. You don't start at the top. You start at the bottom. Bottom-feeder Silverstein knows something."

Indeed. WELL SAID! And I agree...2014 is the year it all comes down. Sue4TheBillofRights you are relentless in your assault here...and I love it.

In addition to Silverstein's on-air flub, also we have ON CAMERA evidence of a cover-up at NIST...ala "I know of no reports of molten metal" Dr. John Gross.

John Gross and NIST (he's still ensconced there) is another bottom-feeder coverup artist to start with.

Watch here:


Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Another point about Silverstein knowing something:

From wiki:

"Silverstein has said on interviews that he usually spent his mornings in breakfast meetings at Windows on the World on top of the World Trade Center North Tower, and with new tenants in the building. However, the morning of September 11, 2001, his wife insisted that he attend a medical appointment with his dermatologist."

I wonder if the NSA has his phone records for that day and two days prior.

Could it be that all data from that date is still sitting on servers somewhere?

I love you Sue

and will follow where you lead

bring on the G-D- hordes of riotous pitchfork wielding Patriotic MFers pissed off and on a mission to save their great constitution.

It's coming, and I only hope I live long enough to see it

And Lucky Larry is DEFN the right place for this all to start!

'''oooh my itchy red boil. Lucky day, thanks god for that angry itchy rash. saved my life I swear'''

O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!

The lobby was extremely busy at the Carlyle Hotel

during the Christmas season and with the commotion and animation centered around some street chess players who come into the hotel in the daytime to warm up and stay into the busy evening, the traffic in the lobby was painfully hectic to the manager, whose patience was exhausted with these off-street players, and so with one quick gesture summoning an alert assistant, says to his underling in his thickest British accent, "Andrews," he says, wiggling a finger from his outstretched arm in the direction of the players, "they're quite done, please pull those chessnuts from the foyer."

I heard that joke or something close to that about 45 years ago, and thought it fit in with the "pull it" joke of this thread. No?

I hope this is not found offensive, truth be told, I would love to see Larry Silverstein roasting on an open or closed fire. I don't think we'll get any satisfaction on anything 9/11 until we get some Libertarian minded individual in the WH.
I've always felt, aside from the obvious WTC Demolition of the three bldgs to rally America to war, that it was something of a money laundering operation to boot. I mean the Insurer was Allianze, a German company, and I would think good investigators would have found there existed a preponderance of evidence suggesting "inside job", thereby making any claims null & void, or at the very least, suspect and put on hold for years. But nazis will be nazis - Cheney Bush did it for sure; but hey whuddo I know, I'm just an angry constantly complaining can't take it any more out of my mind patriot.

Allianze is just another red herring

Fact is, the elites would love all of you to go after Allianze since they would allow the whole new investigation. Then it would turn into another Warren Commission because truthfully, Allianze had no part of the whole scam.

Truth be told in its entirety, it was only Mr. Krongard who had proven financial links and direct benefit to the World Trade Center's complete demise. And tracking all of Krongard's stock trades, would wind up directly on David Rockefeller's desk and his minion Tazzoli.

The elites would try to threaten everybody, once it was obvious David Rockefeller would be brought to the witness stand. However the evidence is literally unimpeachable, that David Rockefeller gained millions of dollars off put-options and his minions provided cover. He can't even deny these facts they are so stark.

At minimum, David Rockefeller was utterly a central architect. And that would lead straight to Rudy Giuliani for felony obstruction of evidence. What they would love, is you chase after Egan or Rumsfeld all who were mere associates of Rockefeller. Then they could just walk away by that time.

You can't prove anything about the people who, seemingly befriended Rockefeller. Yet you can prove right away that, at minimum Rockefeller was a central architect of 9-11. And his powerful friends in the U.N. including Tazzoli or Giuliani, provided him cover since that allowed the Mossad and Saudi teams to get inside WTC. At minimum he is caught red-handed, no second chances.

Since there isn't much time, toss Rockefeller on the stand.

You need operations people on the stand first before getting to

the "behind" guys. All Rockefeller has to say is he got lucky. The case is far too circumstantial, a jury can not meet the standard of "beyond a reasonable doubt" based on your evidence. But it can for:

_ Giuliani, destruction of evidence
- Cheney, Pentagon stand-down
- Marvin Bush, Silverstein, able to secure 24/7 access to complex with no one asking any questions, (material support.)

You need to think like a prosecutor, not a CTer. Beyond a reasonable doubt is a high standard.

Would someone like Rockefeller come up at some point? Maybe. But a few million is nothing to Rockefeller, why would he risk high treason and a lethal injection for a lousy $5 mil? Don't forget the ultimate, obvious goal, to get to the big guys. Only an unholy alliance between Zionist Neocons, bankers, and the same renegade CIA which killed JFK could pull this off. That means all roads lead through Poppy Bush

Release the Sandy Hook video.

He didn't "just" get lucky

It is quite a different story, when you consider that Rockefeller built the twin towers and owns all the original document leases to those same towers. So there is no way he just got lucky. He watched both towers go down with a big smile from a front-room window.

At first he could merely say, well I got lucky and just happened to plan Freedom Tower before those attacks. But after cross-examination on Giuliani who destroyed the evidence, cross-examination on Tazzoli and other minions...certainly Cheney forced to testify against Giuliani due to the AIPAC connection.

Then U.N. bigwigs like Rockefeller could be criminally found guilty. After all why does his own son have all these WTC stock options? Rockefeller appears, looks and sounds like a chief architect. And if you demanded a plea bargain, you got to "hit" him with it, so he then turns on Juan Carlos. (a clear cut beneficiary of the NYC Port authority exploding..and an Italian zionist)

If you believe

If you believe the Government official 911/story you are a total IDIOT !!!! Wow I have 30 + years in construction and have worked with many engineers . They All way over build . ........ Structural supports just don't crumble because the building that they where designed to support fall on them ........ Lets start arresting these f---ers and bring the real Criminals to trial .