23 votes

The Daily Infowars

When you grab something from Infowars or Zerohedge or something, instead of just posting a link, why not put some personal spin on it? An angle. Something to discuss. Render an opinion.

What you post is your own business, and there is great utility in reposting cool stuff here, but I'm guessing most of us know about Infowars and if we're surfing Daily Paul, we've probably been there in the past few minutes.

The beautiful thing about Daily Paul is that we have a much, much, much better comments section than anyone else anywhere (i.e. you can actually learn something). So instead of a plain repost from Infowars, do a little review of your opinion with a quicklink.



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Nah

If it's a link to the interview, who needs the comment? The point of the post is generally to alert someone who may not know. Not ALL of us hit all the sites, all the time. Frequently comments only state the obvious.

Silly thread.

_____________________________
"Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it." -- Joseph Goebbels

Serving our DP community with personal intro-appeal

Appealing to our peers with a catchy subject line, and a brief intro, is the least we can do to show respect for those we hope will read it.

I hear you, George. Your point is well taken. Isn't it funny how many will make this thread about how they feel about AJ/Infowars, and hardly notice the purpose you posted it for?

Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them. - Frederick Douglass

My personal spin on Infowars

My personal spin on Infowars is that Alex Jones needs to learn to control himself. By his own admission on his radio show, he cannot control his emotions. He needs to learn to do this. His antagonism on his show detracts from his credibility. Similar antagonism shown on the Piers Morgan show did not help the cause of the 2nd Amendment, but I would never expect Mr Jones to recognize that. Those people looking to limit gun ownership point to people like Mr Jones and plead that people such as him, who cannot control their emotions, should not own guns.

Alex Jones continually says he has a lot of news, but his constant sarcasm prevents him from relaying it to his listeners. It's a much better show when someone else, such as Mike Adams, is hosting the show.

Jones' sarcasm & antagonism degrade his show into the entertainment category, when the only reason one would have to listen to his show is to hear news. But Alex feels he needs to educate the public and he thinks he can do that with his sarcasm and antagonism. I listen much less now than I used to. I just got tired of his sarcasm & his yelling & screaming.

Alex has thought long and hard about what you say.

He'd probably agree with you about his excitement level being over the top.

But this is what he says, and I paraphrase: "Instead of attacking me the messenger, pay attention to the message. I'm not perfect. But I am animated by the fight for Liberty. I know some of you all may be turned off by my sarcasm, my energy level, my antagonism, but I can't please everybody. Look at the fruits of what I have accomplished by being me. Millions of listeners. A powerful impact on the Liberty movement. Please move past the mote in my eye and work on the beam in your own, and let's work together in doing what we can to thwart tyranny and enlarge Freedom."

I completely disagree with this statement of yours, "Alex Jones continually says he has a lot of news, but his constant sarcasm prevents him from relaying it to his listeners." A quick listen to his show or glance at Infowars proves you are incorrect. He reports MOUNTAINS of news, contrary to your assertion.

Further you say, "Jones' sarcasm & antagonism degrade his show into the entertainment category, when the only reason one would have to listen to his show is to hear news."

His show is obviously not remotely an entertainment show, but I wish he'd do more entertaining. However, he doggedly sticks to reporting and commenting on the news and getting out his correct worldview in a very educational manner. You seem to want to just "hear news" and have the human element of commentary removed. Which totally negates the personal nature of the ALEX JONES show. It's Alex who has added value. People listen to hear HIS thoughts and opinions. HE is what makes him unique.

It's okay to not like him, but why waster your energy attacking an heroic champion of Liberty and enemy of tyranny? I think you would do well to ponder the idea that a house divided cannot stand. There's something to be said for unity. There's something to be said for looking for the good, or at the glass half full. Negativism doesn't solve problems. But through teamwork and unity, the Liberty movement can be unstoppable, as Ron Paul has said repeatedly.

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a rEVOLution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford

Agreed

I like the show much more when David Knight is on, he says the same things without all the blowhard nonsense.

Game on

http://www.infowars.com/nsa-calls-americans-zombies/

If I see John Darash from National Liberty Alliance being interviewed by Alex Jones, then I will focus attention on Alex Jones again.

Alex Jones is a competitive news reporter in a world where lies are heavily subsidized (the meaning of subsidize is "legalized crime in progress") and so any source of news where the report is referenced by original source references is a vast improvement over abject lies spewed from the pie holes of well paid liars.

News deals with the past and the present.

News does not command decisions made in order to control the future.

Which news items reported in which ways will offer the highest quality and lowest cost data required to affect the best future outcomes from this moment onward?

http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/breaking-news

On the bottom of that page is the latest news or Breaking News reporting on the battle between Liberty and Despotism.

Now, compare, and see the difference.

Headlines first:

1.
NSA Calls Americans Zombies

To me the message is couched in a language that aids and abets the Despots. There is no human being named NSA; therefore, NSA cannot call, speak, write, have an opinion, think, or act. The idea of there being a group mind, an entity onto itself, a responsible being that is not human, ends up being a cover, or false front, whereby the actual Despots, each with names, perpetrate crimes upon the innocent, and they get paid very well for each crime.

Competitive headline:

2,
BREAKING NEWS - Mandamus from the bench to Judge

That type of Headline does not speak to idiots, minions, drones, zombies, or the willfully ignorant. That type of information contains information describing how the defenders of Liberty are effectively reaching for the intended goal in time and place.

How did I do?

Joe

Completely agree. Let's save

Completely agree. Let's save each other time with limiting the "sport posting" without insight, commentary or at least a summary...

“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.” ― Henry Ford.

the best comment section on the web!

This is why I spend time here. Even forums don't provide such visually well laid out threads.

"All our words are but crumbs that fall down from the feast of the mind." - Khalil Gibran
"The Perfect Man has no self; the Holy Man has no merit; the Sage has no fame." - Chuang Tzu

Yup. I come to DP for the

Yup. I come to DP for the comment section.

FiresofFreedom's picture

This can be said about more then infowars

If you feel the need the share something, its always good to double check the sources.

A personal spin is good where appropriate

I do this on occasion, however I think some pieces of news and information are best left without additional comments; especially when the content seems to speak for itself.

To comment on Alex Jones' Infowars, on much of the low-level stuff, Infowars and Alex Jones are often correct, however the true control-structure is never discussed, largely because Alex Jones' income tangentially depends on this conspiracy and its continuation.

Defenders of Jones often say "look how much he has done to wake people up."

To that I say he may have on the contrary served as a hindrance to many because it could potentially take even longer for these "awoken" people to realize the true conspiracy of Rome. So there is no use in getting diverted along the way; in fact as I have said, that is part of Jones' modus operandi: to divert attention from the Jesuit-Vatican-Roman conspiracy.

Alex Jones most certainly is a hindrance to the truth movement as a whole, as well, and his Roman-gatekeeping is half of it. The other half is how he behaves. His flailing arms, shouting and bursts of sensationalism act to give the appearance that anyone looking at the world in a different way is mentally sick.

Here is an exchange I had yesterday regarding Alex Jones in this thread: http://www.dailypaul.com/309280/my-interview-with-world-bank...

--------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]

Karen Hudes: You are right. Alex Jones is a disinformation specialist. This is how he is described on Wikispooks:

Low-level, right-wing liaisons to the conspiracy community

---------------------------------------------------------------------

More accuratly, he is truly a Temporal coadjutor
Submitted by Veritas Aequitas on Fri, 01/03/2014 - 18:05. Permalink

who serves to make those investigating suppressed history and information appear to be crazed and drug-addicted while misdirecting about the true power behind this NWO, which undoubtedly is emanating from the Jesuit Order. He has ties to the Roman Catholic hierarchy including the Knights of Malta; following any mention of the Jesuits on his show, one is cut off and disconnected. Even commenting on his videos about this subject results in a ban from his channel.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Interesting
Submitted by kevink on Fri, 01/03/2014 - 18:09. Permalink

I don't agree w/ the premise of the question though [omitted]. I haven't heard AJ say things are hopeless. He repeatedly says "we can beat these people".

---------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree that the question asked [omitted] is based on a slanted premise.
Submitted by Veritas Aequitas on Sat, 01/04/2014 - 12:23. Permalink

One must question the sincerity of Alex Jones however, when individuals such as David de Rothschild of the Sabbatean Frankist Hofjuden Rothschild banking dynasty, Pat Buchannan, a Knight of Malta, and Charlie Sheen whose father was the renowned Knight of Malta, Martin Sheen have appeared as guests on his show.

I am confident that the Bohemian Grove Club footage he claimed to have obtained by sneaking into their ceremony was taken after he was admitted into the grove purposefully. There are police guards outside the grove, at least now, and probably were before, like there have been at Bilderberg meetings for some time.

infowars is controlled opposition

I agree with the poster that DP users should put their own spin on whatever articles they post... but please take anything Mr Dual-Israeli-US-citizen Jones says with a grain of salt. There are some big and important stories shared on infowars, but AJ never follows them far enough.

Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations... great work on exposing these groups, but what's the next level? where did these groups come from? who funds them? whose agenda are they pushing?

AJ chooses not to (or perhaps his media masters prevent him from attempting to) follow the money to its source... and in order to find out Who-What-When-Where-Why-How, one must follow the money.

At their inceptions, the #Liberty, #OccupyWallStreet and #TeaParty movements all had the same basic goal... What happened?

You are corrrect

It took me a long time to figure it out, and I used to argue against people who would say it, but Jones is indeed what one may refer to as 'controlled opposition'. Whether or not that is by design or by circumstance - it is. Jones refuses to hold Israel, dual US/Israeli citizens, and Zionism accountable for everything from 9/11 to the FED. He lays everything at the feet of the nameless, faceless 'New World Order' and 'Offshore Megabanks'. While I don't disagree with this assessment, he never delves into the Zionist aspect of these entities. While his wife, children, and almost all the sponsors of his radio program are Zionists and/or Jewish, and he has close ties to Stratfor - a Mossad front - his fundamentalist Christian beliefs likely mean that he is sympathetic to the Zionist cause.

I have a great deal of respect for the work that Jones has done. He has brought much truth to the forefront and is a tireless advocate for liberty. His listeners, however, MUST be cognizant of this glaring hole that he leaves in truth. It is a huge piece of the puzzle that cannot be ignored.

good post & very well stated.

good post & very well stated.

Opinions are like...

Opinions are like assholes. Everybody's got one, and they all stink but mine. ;-)

There are two kinds of people in this world: Those who agree with me, and idiots. ;-)

Freedom is my Worship Word!

To delve further,

here is a relevant comment that I think accurately sums up the unfortunate proclivity of the truth movement to Alex Jones:

"The ruling bloodlines are the ones in the background that are not seen nor heard. Ptolemaic bloodline families (Orsini,Aldobrandini, Breakspear, Somaglia and Farnese) oversee the more public bloodlines of Saxe Coburg Gotha and Bauer (Rothschild)and run the show through the higher religious orders attached to the Vatican (the Jesuit order, the Sovereign military order of Malta--controlling the world banking system, drugs and NATO) through subordinate societies (Pilgrims, Committe of 300, Le Cerque, Jasons, council of 13, Royal Order of the Garter, e.g.), think tanks (Club of Rome, RIIA, CFRe.g.), provincials and assistancies (9/11 and Vietnam were run through Fordham University and the new York Archdioses), and then down to intel (CIA, Mossad, MI6), media, corporations, academia and politics through worker bee mentors (Soros, Strong, Brzezinski, Kissinger) and policy making structures such as the Hudson Institute, IPS, etc...Zionism is simply a Luciferian cult and political ideology that is simply part of this masonic structure. Zionism was INVENTED BY the Jesuit order on or about 500 years ago at the Council of Trent in Italy by the second Superior Jesuit Order General (psychopath) Diego Laynez, Roman Catholic from a Jewish bloodline--for the Vatican power structure. So yes, Alex Jones is a Vatican agent and yes, he is involved with the structure that includes papal Zionist court Jews. Israel itself is run by a structure that starts at the Knesset, goes to the Prime Minister, then to Knight of Malta black magician Zionist and Vatican banking head Lord Jacob Rothschild..and above Rothschild is the General of the Middle East--Roman Catholic Juan Carlos Farnese, the Prince of Jerusalem (among other hundreds of titles); above him is Roman Catholic Fra Mathew Festing the 79th Prince and Grand Master of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta and above him is Spanish Roman Catholic Adolfo Nicholas Pachon, the 30th Superior Jesuit Order General in concert with the Ptolemaic bloodline families mentioned. Also remember that the Vatican's CIA and the Vatican's FBI were first headed by Knights of Malta. So Israel is merely a Vatican instrument for the Roman power structure...and yes, Romans and old wealthy Jews from a millenia ago were brothers in creating mystery Babylon. The blaming of Jews for everything is actually one component for the existence of Zionists--they aid the world's hatred for Jews by dictum...and if you look up Orthodox Jews against Zionism and True Torah Jews (NETUREI KARTA) on the internet, you will see religious Jews burning the Israeli flag, protesting the state of Israel and calling for an end to Zionsism. So Jones is clearly working for this Vatican power structure...is highly involved with the Jesuit trained politicians and entertainers who pepper his show and while Alex Jones DOES mention Zionism, he never EVER mentions the Vatican, the Knights of Malta and or the very top of the power structure that owns his soul and spirit. Now you know why...as for the patriot community, I hope some day that the zeal to learn the truth translates in the ability to understand brainwashing, programming and mind control to the point in which good patriotic people stop reinforcing their programmed beliefs and start scrutinizing them and learning all they can about what serious people say on these issues."

-Anonymous

Reading above is Revelation 17, reading below is what's to come!

Revelation 18:1-8 NKJV
[1] After these things I saw another angel coming down from heaven, having great authority, and the earth was illuminated with his glory. [2] And he cried mightily with a loud voice, saying, "Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and has become a dwelling place of demons, a prison for every foul spirit, and a cage for every unclean and hated bird! [3] For all the nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth have become rich through the abundance of her luxury." [4] And I heard another voice from heaven saying, "Come out of her, my people, lest you share in her sins, and lest you receive of her plagues. [5] For her sins have reached to heaven, and God has remembered her iniquities. [6] Render to her just as she rendered to you, and repay her double according to her works; in the cup which she has mixed, mix double for her. [7] In the measure that she glorified herself and lived luxuriously, in the same measure give her torment and sorrow; for she says in her heart, 'I sit as queen, and am no widow, and will not see sorrow.' [8] Therefore her plagues will come in one day-death and mourning and famine. And she will be utterly burned with fire, for strong is the Lord God who judges her.

I never go to infowars...

Just sayin

Séamusín

Me neither but this is a pretty good suggestion

in general, imo.