15 votes

“Dear subscriber, you are registered as a participant in a mass disturbance.”

New Ukraine Law Goes Into Effect
That's a text message that thousands of Ukrainian protesters spontaneously received on their cell phones today, as a new law prohibiting public demonstrations went into effect. It was the regime's police force, sending protesters the perfectly dystopian text message to accompany the newly minted, perfectly dystopian legislation. Here
Kiev mass riots timeline Here
►This is the eruption of Nationalism
... and these are NOT 'ultra-right skinheads' -- the latest MSM 'spin' (including RT calling it 'Radical Nationalism').
►Nigel Farage predictions are manifesting. -- G.



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

revolution

are these folks in a revolution, against there government? hmmmmmm

why? nooooo media coverage? ... .

never mind the next posts

never mind the next posts question, i misunderstood what was said

404 on edit

can someone explain how it is

can someone explain how it is they were able to identify, and then send messages to these folks, what, through the nearest cell tower, do they have equipment to "point" at folks specifically, a largge group perhaps, or do they "accuse" everyone who happens to be in the same area, like inocent joe, in a blanket sense

Their building technology of control behind the peoples back to use ON the people, and they think nobody might have a problem with a minority of folks imposing their wills, their ideas on others without choice, not caring whether their own might turn bad, not caring the kind of power their collecting, for that person they dont care, whether they may come.........what the hell is a politicians job description exactly /s

i swear to uphold, my greed, my bribes, and my position, so help me god/s

Yes.

GeoAccess. Turn the phone OFF and remove battery.

If

If you are a muslim, a sleeper for the radicals.. be prepared for war because you're going to get one.. The elite set it up for the war to be Muslim Vs Muslim, but radicals want Christian blood..

To me, Muslims are why we have wars today JESUS IS THE PRICE OF PEACE and he was not a Muslim.

You can food people for so long but you don't have me fooled.

U.S. warships deploy for Sochi Olympics

I see now.

Got it.

Do you?

Where's the OUTRAGE by so called moderate Muslims? I don't see it.

What I'm seeing is double talk, LIES upon MORE LIES.

WARS GLOBAL WARS Blame America, Blame Israel.. the only places where there is some remnant of freedom especially for women and children

Racialised” Muslims and the criticism of Islam

Faked hateFREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE AGE OF JIHAD

Paul Austin Murphy has an excellent piece at The American Thinker on the thugs imposing Islamic speech restrictions in the West — in this particular case, the UK. Murphy exposes the lies, propaganda and defamation of the notorious Muslim supremacist, Fiyaz Mughal.

Mughal’s gastronomic appetite is matched only by his appetite for deception and destruction. He is a liar, and he lies to impose the blasphemy laws under the sharia. And because the British government is so weak and subdued, these thugs are steamrolling over basic human freedoms.

‘Racialising’ Islam The American Thinker, January 20, 2014

At the end of December 2013, a host for Liberty GB radio (Liberty GB is a British political party) was charged by West Midlands Police (England) with “racially aggravated harassment.” Tim Burton’s supposed crime was a Twitter post in which he described Fiyaz Mughal (who runs an “anti-Islamophobia” website/organisation called Tell MAMA) as “a mendacious grievance-mongering taqiyya-artist”

Fiyaz Mughal’s (or Tell MAMA’s) latest claim (as of the 14th of January) is that Tim Burton has also been guilty of “racialising Muslims.”

Now why did Tim Burton describe Fiyaz Mughal as a “a mendacious grievance-mongering taqiyya-artist”? He did so because it was revealed that Mughal had been deceiving the public about nonexistent “hate crimes” against Muslims (as first revealed by Telegraph journalist Andrew Gilligan). More specifically, Tell MAMA had published misleading statistics on “anti-Muslim incidents” in the wake of the Islamic murder of soldier Lee Rigby. In terms of detail, Mughal was publicly criticized by the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) and the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG).

As a consequence of these lies (or at least these acts of dissimulation), Tell MAMA had its public/state funding withdrawn.

So what happened next? What happened next was a bizarre case of self-reference.

Because Tim Burton highlighted Fiyaz Mughal’s bogus claims about nonexistent “Islamophobia” and “hate crimes” (against Muslims), Mughal decided to accuse Tim Burton himself of committing a hate crime for revealing such mendacity. Effectively Fiyaz Mughal is attempting to stop people pointing out his bogus hate-crime claims by saying that such criticisms are also, well, hate crimes.

So firstly, Fiyaz Mughal is attempting to stop all criticism of Muslims (as Muslims) and Islam itself. And now he’s also trying to stop all criticisms of his publicly-known deceit.

As a result of all this, Tim Burton will be standing trial on the 18th February 2014 at Birmingham Magistrates’ Court (England).

The very strange thing about all this is rather than it being the case that Tim Burton is “racialising Muslims”, as Fiyaz Mughal claims, it’s actually the case that Tell MAMA (or Fiyaz Mughal) and the Left are doing so. What Tell MAMA/Fiyaz Mughal and the Left are trying to do is convince everyone else that all criticisms of Islam and Muslims (as Muslims) are racist in nature. Why? Because if they can pull that off, then they can silence all such criticisms.

The extreme Left had already thoroughly and intentionally “racialised” Muslims and even the criticism of Islam itself. For example, the Guardian‘s resident Marxist and associate editor, Seumas Milne, has unequivocally stated the following:

“Islam has become a proxy for race, and Islamophobia [is] a form of racism.”

In addition to that he also believes that those critics of Islam and Muslims (as Muslims) who don’t see themselves as racists have simply “absolved themselves of racism.” Apparently, all of us are “entirely oblivious to more than two decades of debates around race.”

The UK’s Islamophobia Watch and Loonwatch in the U.S. have also racialized Muslims and even Islam itself; as well as claimed that critics are “Islamophobes” or “fascists”. Indeed, even those critics of Muslims and Islam they don’t explicitly classify as “fascists” or “Islamophobes” are deemed to be “contributing to the rise of Islamophobia [fascism].”

In other words, Tell MAMA and the Left actually want — or they politically require — all critics of Islam and Muslims to be racist: all the easier and better to silence them. Fiyaz Mughal, just like the Left, is using race or racism as a tool to bring about his own little piece of sharia blasphemy law. More specifically, Fiyaz Mughal is trying to use the Religious and Racial Hatred Act of 2006 as a means to stop all criticism of Islam and Muslims.

The 2006 Law & the Racialisation of Muslims & Islam.

The consequences of the initial Bill of 2005, and the reality of its wide scope, were captured very well by Lord Lester at the time of a main amendment:

“The new speech crimes are sweepingly broad. They apply to threatening abusive or insulting words, behavior, written material, recordings or programs intended or likely to stir up religious hatred. Unlike most other serious offenses they require no criminal intent. They apply not only to words spoken in public but in private. They cover the electronic media, plays, films, works of fiction, political argument, preaching by priests and clerics, comedians and politicians.”

We are talking here about the possibility of people being sent to prison for up to seven years for saying such things as “the Koran is full of violence and aggression”. We are talking about a law which seems intent on freeing Islam from all criticism, as has been the case in parts of the Muslim world for up to 1,400 years.

The 2006 law can be seen as an attempt by Muslims and their friends to racialize their religion — Islam. What I mean by this is that Sikhs and Jews, in the UK, already had full protection from incitement because the courts regarded them as distinct races. They didn’t see Muslims and Christians in the same light.

Here we come across a problem of Muslim hypocrisy. On the one hand all Muslims stress the fact that Muslims do not constitute a single race (as an argument against racists). They stress “Muslim universalism” and the fact that “Islam embraces all races”. On the other hand, many Muslims want to be seen and treated as a race simply because, in legal terms, that would benefit Muslims as a whole.

Thus because the laws against racial incitement don’t fully protect Islam and Muslims from criticism, it was seen to be necessary to racialize Muslims in legal terms. In that way they would gain the full protection which ethnic minorities receive from the state and the courts. Thus it was then hoped that it would come to pass that all criticism of Islam, the Koran and Muslims (as Muslims — not as a race) would be seen as racist (or as “the last acceptable racism”, as Baroness Sayeeda Warsi once described it). Only in that way would all criticism of Islam, the Koran, and Mohammed be stopped. And this is precisely what many Muslims, and their Leftist friends, are trying to do. This is what the initial law essentially attempted to bring about.

The thing is that adequate religious discrimination laws were already in existence before 2006. There were specific laws which banned religious discrimination in the workplace. This in itself shows us that many of those who originally brought about the 2006 law wanted to go beyond the mere protection of people from religious discrimination. In other words, people of various religions were already protected from bigots by older laws. In that sense, the 2006 law was simply not needed.

That was why the original 2005 Bill was subject to various amendments. More specifically, it was stressed, at the time, that “the freedom of speech must be insured just as much as the freedom from bigotry.” Thus we are entering the world of semantics. A distinction was made between “threatening words and behaviour” and words which were merely “critical, abusive and insulting.” Nonetheless, many Muslims tried, and are still trying, their hardest to close or even eliminate the gap between threatening words and behavior and mere criticism. They are attempting to criminalize the criticism of Islam, the Koran, and Mohammed.

One primary reason why this law didn’t go completely down that route was because the law itself was turned against Islam, Muslims and even against the Koran itself (as, in the latter case, Christian groups did). If the 2005 Bill hadn’t thrown up this self-referential problem for Muslims, God know how far down the banning, prosecuting and imprisoning route we would have gone by now.

The Labour Government of the day (in 2005/6) did try to defend itself and its new law. It argued that it was necessary because Jews and Sikhs were already protected by existing law, but Muslims weren’t. This is argument is false. Jews and Sikhs are protected as ethnic or racial groups; not because of their religion. Muslims do not constitute a single race. Indeed there are Anglo-Saxon, Chinese, black, etc. Muslims (as Muslims themselves often stress in other contexts).

Racially speaking, there already existed laws which protected Asians or, more specifically in the case of the UK, Pakistanis, as racial or ethnic groups: even the Asians or Pakistanis who happen to be Christian or non-Muslim. Thus, again, the Government of the time, and many Muslims, wanted more than mere laws against racial discrimination or racist violence. They were and still are attempting to make it illegal to criticize Islam, the Koran, and Muslims (as Muslims) in any way.

I see

lots to consider.

This IS skinhead nazism from the Lviv soccer hooligan clique

This IS skinhead nazism from the Lviv soccer hooligan clique, and they've embraced neo-nazi Boxer Klitschko with "Sieg Heil!" salutes, just because he's a tough guy. Never mind he's been punched in the head too many times to form a coherent sentence. Its a bit like SA thugs trying to make Rocky president.

This is the western Lviv clique surrounding the arch-criminal billionairess Yulia Tymoshenko, jailed for robbing Ukraine blinded. They are trying to wage an Orange war on their Blue nemesis from the East, Viktor Yanukovych, whose son has been robbing the country blind since his father took office.

Most of the impoverished people of the country prefer to ride out west/east struggle for domination.

"Cowards & idiots can come along for the ride but they gotta sit in the back seat!"

Live Stream

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/euromajdan?rmalang=en_US

My Political Awakening: I Wanted to Change the World...
I am NOT Anti-America. America is Anti-Me - Lowkey
How to Handle POLICE STATE Encounters

Use to be

one could log on to Al-Jazeera English and watch what was going on overseas...not anymore.

When logging on to the Al-Jazeera.com/video there is this statement:

"The video you are trying to watch cannot be viewed from your location. Visit Al-Jazeera.com/America to view content in the U.S."

The gatekeepers are working overtime...

The question is

How long before Russia invades.

sovereign

I thought they were

I thought they were protesting to GET IN the EU?

Southern Agrarian

It's mixed... factions are ALL anti-government....

The government took a bailout from Putin.. and the protesters want nothing to do with Russia (again).
Some are crying out for EU/US sanctions against Ukraine tyranny so that spins the 'pro' EU flavor you are mentioning..
... but all are Nationalists wanting Independence for Ukraine.
Some get it.. some don't.. I made the graphic to SHOUT a warning.
an MSM analysis is Here
cheers,
G.

Nationalism Ukraine :Ukrainian riot police breakup EU protest

Looks like Nigel Farage is right on the money -- the rise of Nationalism Anti-EU has begun

http://youtu.be/r7ZVPlbyYxY

LIVE

RT Video

RT is circulating a video that shows the pissed off (and well organized) mob taking down a couple revenue enforcement officers (aka fascist pigs) and giving them a little taste of "knight stick justice". It's pretty great.

Also, it's 4 am and I'm too tired to go digging. Google "Kiev Riot Cops injured RT". That should bring you to the promised land.

TQ

not RT here... but resistance is massive

http://youtu.be/-0hk3h9sgME