Content on the Daily Paul is the opinion of the original poster, not necessarily of the Daily Paul, its owner, moderators or Ron Paul.

Daily Paul readers and all other Ron Paul supporters, be aware!

Submitted by wgga on Mon, 10/08/2007 - 16:05

Daily Paul Liberty Forum

What does it mean for America under 3 Bush adminstrations? If Americans do not seize the opportunity this time to elect a freedom fighter like Dr. Ron Paul or Sen. Mike Gravel, then be ready to brace for a 3rd Clinton Administration, and you shouldn't complain because you'll get what you ask for.
It is believed that many Americans would not appreciate good people, would rather admire an a---kicker just to please the IRS and the police.

Let's not dismiss Mike

Submitted by DoubleOhNothing on Mon, 10/08/2007 - 18:21. Permalink

and his previous accomplishments, namely filibustering the draft in '71 and releasing the Pentagon papers.

His policies don't make a lot of sense, but that's OK because he really doesn't have a campaign. I think he knows he isn't winning anything, but enjoys yelling at people. I for one, don't think that the Dems get yelled at at nearly enough so I say: rock on Mike!

He reminds me of the anchor from Network, he doesn't know what to do, but he knows that the first thing people need to do is get angry.

"To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world."

—

******************
"To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world."

Fiscal responsibility

Submitted by DrOzzy on Mon, 10/08/2007 - 17:52. Permalink

Yes, I agree Gravel is not the candidate I am hearing a lot of Ron Paul supporters describe him as. In his most recent Democratic debate he was asked a question about his personal handling of finances and his response was some where to the effect of, "The credit card companies deserved the $90K I didn't pay due to bankruptcy."

He is no Dr. Paul... Let's keep our focus: Ron Paul 2008!

—

Get Adjusted: From the Womb to the Tomb!

Gretchen (below) thanks

Submitted by jwalsh on Mon, 10/08/2007 - 17:25. Permalink

for the link to that clip of Gravel. I didn't realize how delusional he is. Summing up: Gravel supports global government because he thinks it would be a way for the people of the world to control the multinational corporations.

Very funny. Here we are in America, a nation-state, where the corporations practically control our government, and the government passes all kinds of regulations to benefit powerful corporations and squelch competition, ...

yet Gravel thinks that this problem would somehow be fixed by an even bigger, less accountable-to-the-people global government?

LOL. The corporations are the ones that WANT world government! They would control it. Anyone who attended a Political Science 101 class would probably know that.

I give you the WTO as case in point #1.