-51 votes

Ron Paul: America's Most Dangerous Nazi - Book

New smear campaign.

Ron Paul is no libertarian; he is a crypto-Nazi. Crypto-Nazism is a term implying a secret support for, or admiration of, the genocidal political and economic system invented by Adolf Hitler. The term is used to imply that an individual or group keeps this support or admiration hidden in order to avoid political prosecution or, in Ron Paul's case, political suicide. Crypto-Nazis maintain covers such as "libertarian" and "populist" to disguise a hidden agenda. They use code words e.g. "Goldman-Sachs" means Jews. This book rips the cloak of deception off of Ron Paul and exposes his true pathological genocidal self,


Read the comments

Constitutional Clayton


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The majority

of people have been so psychologically indoctrinated into the over-hyped fabrications painted about the Nazi's to see, that the people promoting this agenda are and have been the epitome of premise presented. Instead, of just discounting my statement with their created terms, racist or anti-semite, one must look at the philosophy and actions the Ashkenazi class of Jews throughout their history. They are the class who enveloped the mantra created by the Babylonian Pharisees, that no matter what they do to the gentiles and/or no matter how they disgrace Gods laws of the Commandments, they are his 'chosen ones'. I could go through hundreds of examples, but since you pointed out 'Goldman Sachs', one must only need to look to the statement by their CEO, Lloyd Blankfein, 'were are doing God's work', to understand my premise. This statement was made after they were exposed as the major players in the 'mortgage backed security' scheme of fraud, that destroyed our economy and could lead to the fall of our Republic. I could write several pages giving examples of their actions that relate to the picture they have created for us in the theme of German Nazism, but I will end by presenting a speech by WWI and WWII cabinet insider, and former follower of Judaism, Benjamin Freedman, to present my point. http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

gods chosen ones?

Your reply sent me on a search (and I got the blue screen twice and had to restart, that's kinda spooky). My little search sent me to some critical thinking pages. Since all beliefs come from thousands of years ago, we weren't there, and there are many 'gods' and pretty much everything we are told is a lie ...

Well I googled 'is god good or evil'. Lots of interesting thought processes going on. Here is a sample.



they even discuss it openly in their philosophical discourse

those are public lectures where they admit that the only way goy gentiles will find God after "progressive reformers" pass over secularism is through Israel... a prelude to their idea of a Godless world but for Israel.

You can go purchase the Jewish Philosophy Reader and see all the lectures.. they are very good at encoding racism into their new age ideas of progress.

I'm not sure they are able to be stopped to be honest... less Jesus actually comes back which won't happen materially.

I think those magis knew what messianics would do to the christian faith if it were devoid of graceful gnosis; that they could then divide faith by the duality of time and prophecy.

A true flower can not blossom without sunlight and a true man can not live without love.

This guy needs to have a big fat law suit put on him.

Justice for evil liars who defame a good man.

But the justice system is corrupt and sold out as well so there is no justice except what an individual can personally accomplish.


Some of the headlines on this

Some of the headlines on this website make me laugh. I can't believe there are people out there that are this stupid.


go read the establishment clause.

A true flower can not blossom without sunlight and a true man can not live without love.

This is what I don't get

This is what I don't get about this meme. Ok, so if you are a crypto Nazi, then you must be ok with genocide against Jews right? But I thought Holocaust deniers were Nazis right? So, if one believes that there was no systematic intention to kill off the Jews, and if one believes that there is no evidence of 6 million being gas chambered, then why would one secretly admire the Nazis for killing off the Jews? You can't have it both ways.

Isn't it possible to doubt all that we have been told about the Holocaust, without loving Hitler or demonizing him beyond seeing him as just one more in a long line of tyrants?

It's about linking images and accusations.

The flag is enough of an accusation.

As things get desperate these smears will increase.

The book cover also includes the Presidential seal.

The President of a Nazi State.

Free includes debt-free!

Dr Paul is certainly libertarian

and certainly no crypto-nazi.

However I think your post is helpful in that some people new here may not have been exposed to this particular smear strategy, like the 'racist newsletter' thing. So those people should investigate and draw their own conclusions.

This particular smear is just another instance of egregious conflation meant to befuddle the less informed.

It goes something like this.

Hitler hated Stalin so Nazism and Socialism are at extreme odds with each other. End of argument.

This despite the fact Hitler and Stalin were best allies.. before they weren't.

This despite the fact that they always use the word Nazi rather than the actual phrase National Socialism.

The first fallacy is that there was something fundamentally opposed between National Socialism/Hitler and Socialism/Stalin other than they came to distrust each other and ended up wanting the same geography.

The second fallacy is that because someone somewhere way back expressed support for Hitler their descendant is a secret Nazi/Anti Semite.

This is implausible on it's face, but especially so since statists at the time of every stripe and most especially progressives loved Hitler's massive economic interventions, and Mussolini's as well.

If you have an ancestor famous ancestor famous at the time of Hitler's pre-war ascendance, they expressed admiration for Hitlerism.

It should be noted that it is apparently not only no crime but very hip these days to express current admiration for other mass murderers like Mao, Che', and the aforementioned Stalin. (not to mention Wilson, Lincoln, Truman, and FDR himself)

There is certainly one difference between Hitler and Stalin we should note. Body count.

There's no particular reason we were involved in the war at all except to expand the coffers of the military industrial complex. The reason we picked the greater evil to fight with is an interesting question.

FDR's predecessor, Herbert Hoover, in "Freedom Betrayed" cites massive USSR infiltration of the U.S. government, and he's certainly not the only one to do so. But the reader should draw her own conclusions.

Where is the evidence that

Where is the evidence that Hitler killed more than Stalin did? The 6 million myth predates WW1 among the Jewish community. This isn't to say no Jews were killed or died, as a result of Nazi policies, but again, where is the proof for 6 million? Even the post WW2 Germans at Aushwitz had to lower the number on a sign at its gates, from 4 to 1.5 million deaths.

One is one too many.

Demonize who is to be destroyed.

History is written.

Daily the media demonizes new targets. What do we do to protect our families, friends an neighbors, today?

Free includes debt-free!

You are correct, and I was implying that very thing.

I was saying Hitler killed fewer, which I assumed most everyone knew by now.

so where is the link for the book then?

its just a link for amazon.com

Michael Nystrom's picture

Geez Clayton, now why did you have to go and post this?

What is the point? I'm really interested in your thought process. Why exactly do you think this old book is relevant on this fine day in February, 2014?

Now there is a picture of the cover of this book over on the bookshelf. This picture, of Ron Paul in front of a swastika, will be displayed about 100,000 times today, every time someone comes by to any page of the Daily Paul.

Why do you want to do this? Seriously, I'm interested in knowing.

Just a piece of friendly advice:

With great power comes great responsibility. And just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.

Do me a favor Clayton and read this seven year old thread:

He's the man.

You know, this book was posted

in 2012 without any repercussions. Back when it would have mattered more.


It only got 5 down votes then. My, how the times have changed.

It's your private property you can do as you wish.

I think this thread adds nothing to the discussion of liberty.

Why not just wipe it off clean by the end of the day and delete it! It's your website. The damage will only be 1 day of views. Otherwise it's gonna keep getting bumped and discussed daily!
: \

Michael Nystrom's picture

Why should I clean up Clayton's mess

Please see my comment below.

The ark door is closed. Now it is time for those on board to learn to take care of the ship.

Clayton made the mess, Clayton can clean it up (or not). In the process we can all learn something, including Clayton. If about nothing else, then about what kind of a person Clayton is.

It takes a big man to fess up to his error.

He's the man.

Pic of RP with a swastika on the front page of DP...

... under book talk. Great job Clayton (not).

Oh, and Michael, maybe you can explain one more time.

WTF are we supposed to learn from this???

hmmm, what do you mean by the

hmmm, what do you mean by the ark door is closed? Does that mean no new comers can join the DP? Sounds like I missed something...

TwelveOhOne's picture

See this thread


I love you. I'm sorry. Please forgive me. Thank you.
http://fija.org - Fully Informed Jury Association
http://jsjinc.net - Jin Shin Jyutsu (energy healing)

Why should you clean up?

Hmmm, because you can? I understand you want people to "learn something" about this post... but, cmon man, just delete the post. We don't need this type of trash here. Just sayin

metalhed19's picture

Fully agreed Sir. Clayton,

Fully agreed Sir. Clayton, why give help the statist, mainstream pukes that want to drag the good Dr.'S name in the dirt??? Remember Bambi and the Thumper rule. If you don't have anything nice to say, (about RP) don't say anything at all. :)

*Wisconsin Constitution* Article I, Section 25 "The people have the right to keep and bear arms for security,defense,hunting,recreation or any other law-abiding purpose"

Great advice to EVERYONE on the Arc...

With great power comes great responsibility. And just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.-- Michael 'the' Nystrom

Lay hands suddenly on no man (article), neither be partaker of other men's sins: keep thyself pure. 1 Timothy 5:22

Think before you give your 'blessing' on any post.. the 'privilege' to post here is an awesome responsibility... having said that, I understand your 'thinking' Clayton.. no problems mate.. carry on and


I said in the post it was a smear piece. I am not trying to start anything or imply anything.

I would never read or buy such garbage. I thought it was awesome that people got on the comments and slammed it.

I also downvoted the post myself, because I don't like the book.

When I brought this up for awareness, that was not an endorsement.

Ron brought the Liberty movement together, Rand is expanding the crap out of it! :)

Try deleting your own post....


Wha? .....hey....who stole my country?

Michael Nystrom's picture

I get it that you're not trying to start or imply anything

I get it that you would never read or buy such garbage. I get it that you're not endorsing this book. I don't doubt your sincerity. And it is awesome that people got on the comments and slammed it.

I get it. But still - what is the purpose?

When there are so many positive things that can be done to better yourself, to better others, to push the movement forward, why post this?

You have introduced an image into people's minds that cannot be erased - the image of Ron Paul standing in front of a swastika. You have called attention to it to the 100,000 people who will visit this site today, and the 100,000 more that will visit it every day as long as that cover stays on the bookshelf ---->

Not everyone who comes by is a Ron Paul supporter. You might even encourage non-supporters to buy it, and to spread whatever is in it. The law of unintended consequences is a law.

Did you read the thread?

Just think about what you post here, that is all I'm saying.

Do you think Ron Paul would like to call attention to this book?

He's the man.

I did read it

I get it. When I posted this I had no idea it was going to link the "books" section to it. I see that it has created an eye sore on the front page. I really thought it would be a post that would get buried and never seen again, but people would be aware of what is out there.

I never thought showing the enemies hand was a bad thing though.
I am a huge Rand Paul fan, but people slam him all the time on this site, which is more puzzling than me making this post.

That being said, I wish I had not made this post now (obviously) and even after deleting the pic and link that book still shows on the side.

I do a lot of positive blogging on this site and I hope that this can be a lesson learned from the dailypaul and move on.

Ron brought the Liberty movement together, Rand is expanding the crap out of it! :)

is it possible

to delete the post? I understand freedom of speech and expression but it is antithetical to our purpose. don't look at is as stifiling expression, rather correcting a mistake.

by the way, your photo from the 90s was brilliant. could you post more photos on your journey to libertarianism and the DP?


Michael Nystrom's picture

Thank you Mrs G.

It just so happens that I stopped by my storage unit to pick out some more pictures from the good old days! I'm now sitting in the McDonalds next door, enjoying a $1 coffee, and their free wifi.

I'll have another post up soon. I'm glad you are enjoying the posts.

But to your question: Could I delete this post?

Yes, I could. But I don't like to exercise too heavy a hand around here. Yes, I could correct Clayton's mistake, but that would deprive him, and others here, of an opportunity to learn.

Part of what I'm trying to do - and this ties into posting pictures and stories of myself when I was younger - is to help people understand that there is a person behind this whole operation (me). Not only that, but behind every screen name is a person.

People are free to post here. My pressure on Clayton is an attempt to increase the cost of posting: To make people think twice before they do something like this again. That actions do have consequences, and ultimately everyone has to answer for their actions.

Thank you for giving me the opportunity to explain this as well.

He's the man.

Weberman gives trolls a bad name

Getting his a$$ kicked by Bob Dylan might be the highlight of his career.