13 votes

Sandy Hook: Free Homes and “Big Bucks” Incentives for Leaders and Players

These incentives include real estate transactions, wherebyvaluable homes were deeded to Newtown’s three Selectmen and to other participants for the sale price of $0 dollars on 25 December 2009, which may be the only real estate transactions on Christmas in the nation day, where they constituted very special and high-value-at-no-cost “Christmas presents”. The “survivors” have already raked in $27 million in donations to split. And now we have a new report that 200 Connecticut State Police are going to be rewarded for essentially “doing nothing”.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Avoid Fetzer

Last month Veterans Today published a nonsense-littered 'Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax' article that was primarily authored by none other than Jim Fetzer with some contributions from Prof. James Tracy and Sofia Shafquat. This was part of my dialogue in YouTube PM with another YouTube user regarding my distrust for Jim Fetzer and Sofia Shafquat, Sofia Smallstorm's real name. The highlighted images are screen captures of the article.

1. The Glass Window


story photo

Jim Fetzer's using pathetic photo trickery, purposely not showing a front or near angle. Instead he showed the angle most obstructed, from farthest away, a night shot no less.

front photo

near photo

The bookcase in the near photo has been pushed out of the way *arrow indication* and came to rest against the seat blocking it from either falling over or being pushed further out of the way. That is, unless it's "normal" for seating arrangements to have a bookcase like that - with the books inaccessible to anybody lol. There also appears to be a bullet hole in the top-left area of the bookcase.

Jim Fetzer also intentionally fails to mention that Adam Lanza was allegedly 6'0, very thin weighing ~110 pounds, his alleged weapons & ammo taped to his clothing and also in handgun holsters. If Adam Lanza in fact was the shooter, or only shooter, if he used the Bushmaster, then the only weapon he had to maneuver when climbing in through the window was the rifle.

6'0, thin & lanky, holding only a rifle, would have difficultly to climb through that window after pushing the bookcase out of the way and tipping over the potted plant stand, without disturbing the other not-in-the-way furniture such as the seat & couch?

Jim Fetzer is a liar.

2. FEMA "Drill"


It wasn't a drill, it was a classroom course 20 miles away in Bridgeport, CT. It was not near Sandy Hook elementary.


There is no indication it was an I.C.E., neither that it had any tie in with the Sandy Hook shooting.

Fetzer tries to take the classroom course information that is nothing like what happened at Sandy Hook, then conflate it with his claims of an alleged "I.C.E. drill" at Sandy Hook to conclude they were in fact both the same thing.

Jim Fetzer is a liar.

3. Wayne Carver Acting "Crazy"


This was discredited over a year ago. The "Crazy Carver" misinformation was an edited piece designed to give the appearance he was crazy and acting like a weirdo. Watch the actual full press conference instead for proper context.


Jim Fetzer is a liar.

4. Anderson Cooper's "Green Screen"


This was discredited a long time ago. The "green screen" problem with Anderson Cooper's nose disappearing was from compression of the file. Watch the 720 HD instead.


Then read this regarding Motion Compensation.


Jim Fetzer is a liar.

5. School Nurse Sally Cox to USA Today Reporter


There is no audio recording of that interview presented, therefore we can't be certain what Sally Cox told that reporter, if Sally Cox directly talked to that reporter at all. But we have other interviews of Sally Cox, where she explains using her own words.


Notice that 'scifake' says Sally Cox is "lying" because her story allegedly "changed"? Read the above paragraph again. The USA Today reporter likely added information to sensationalize the account, simply listen to the sensationalizing way the unknown/not famous reporter describes the interview with Sally Cox. It seems the reporter added information to give more drama to the story.


Jim Fetzer is a liar.


There is other information from Jim Fetzer that's problematic or outright lies but I didn't feel like typing any more at that moment.

Again: Avoid Fetzer.

It's a Jim Fetzer piece for Veterans Today.

Attempted discrediting/co-opting of Wolfgang Halbig, nothing more. Advice: Avoid Fetzer.



Easy to check

It doesn't make much sense that they would do something like this. There are far less traceable ways to accomplish the same thing. So I went looking.

The OP article links to what is apparently the original source of the story:
Looking at some of the actual data, what stands out immediately is that the sale at $0 was *to the same owners* as before that date. I.e.:

Sold to Brian Engel & Shannon Merlino on 12/25/2009 for $0
Sold to Brian Engel & Shannon Merlino on 6/25/2004 for $272,00

It's not much of a "christmas present" if it's the same people's home before and after the "sale."

Fishy thing number two was that the guy says he made a list of the addresses of the people involved (parents of victims, etc.) and checked those. But why check just the homes for the people involved? What about the other homes in the area?

Put any fragment of a name in that search box here: http://data.visionappraisal.com/NewtownCT/search.asp
and you'll get a page of addresses. Click on "View this property" for any of them you want. I entered "Dog" in the search box, got some houses on Dogwood Terrace. Clicked three at random: all three had sales at $0 on 12/25/2009. I took twenty addresses from twenty different streets that started with "S" and fourteen out of twenty had a sale at $0 on 12/25/2009. I did several other random searches, dozens of other addresses, and all with similar results.

In fact the web page from the original source has the most plausible answer already:

An administrative assistant at the Assessor’s Office, Andrea Santillo, promptly returned my phone call. She said that the Newtown city government recently had switched to a new computer system and had not been able to enter the property data for all Newtown homes. So the computer used the 12/25/2009 and $0 as, respectively, a “filler” default sale date and price.

When it's a very large percentage of the whole town, database filler is a very plausible explanation.

Thank You

I'm glad someone did some basic detective work. There is plenty of other evidence pointing to a staged event; sloppiness just gives opponents of truth more ammo to use against truth seekers.

Thank you.

You are completely correct.

Purported "parents" of the real or not real Olivia Engel

would NOT be paid off if this incident was real. I worked for over 11 years in a Coroner's Office and around Detectives, and I can tell you THIS WOULD NEVER HAPPEN!

Hell, the Counties don't even pay for a funeral. Are you kidding me? These people were paid off by the Federal Reserve Money Printers. The homes had to have been bought previously at taxpayers expense, then transferred for $ZERO.

If we could get JUST ONE FRIGGIN' CONGRESSMAN TO INVESTIGATE THIS----but good luck on that.

Did you read what I wrote?

Something like 70% or more of all the houses in that city show, in that database, a transfer for $0 on Christmas of the same year. Not just a few homes of people connected with the incident. A large percentage of *all* the houses in that database.

The guy who initially published the claim picked a handful of names related to the incident and found the recurring $0/Christmas sale for those people, but then didn't think to check to see if that pattern extended to everyone else in the city. It does, and using the link I provided it's trivial to verify that it does.

Denise B's picture

This is absolutely

unbelievable and, if true, it is about as close to a "smoking gun" as you can get. Thanks for finding and posting. This needs to go viral and these people need to be forced to provide an explanation for this and if it is found that they are complicit in perpetuating a hoax of this magnitude upon the American public in an effort to strip them of their right to keep and bear arms, they need to be prosecuted and thrown in jail for a very, very long time (along with everyone else who was involved in any way).

Oh, I guarantee you, if our government regime is

voted out or overturned someday, these people who committed & perpetrated MASSIVE FRAUD against the United States & would be tried as TRAITORS to our US Constitution would be jailed & imprisoned & the fines would be steep.

Essentially ALL of their belongings and property would go back to the US Treasury (once we have gotten things back in order in D.C.). I don't think the country would be in much of a mood to be too light on their sentences.


I think Wolfgang Halbig holds

I think Wolfgang Halbig holds the key to unlocking Obama's lawless door.

Please listen and share. He is doing nothing but asking SIMPLE questions that IF answered could be the beginning of the end of Obama's rule.


But what about Benghazi, the IRS targeting conservative Americans, the NSA's surveillance over all of us, and the president's unconstitutional healthcare mandate, along with his pen and phone diplomacy?

Why not try to impeach him over those offenses?

Because that would be like trying to charge Al Capone with murder.

Never be afraid to ask simple questions.