22 votes

Wolfgang Halbig Holds The Impeachment Key To Bringing Obama To Justice

The president can't be impeached unless the republicans win majority control of the Senate after the 2014 midterm elections, which is a big maybe.

Let's say the republicans do win the Senate and hold on to their House majority.

Impeach the president based on what? Benghazi? The IRS?

Benghazi has already essentially been blamed on Hillary Clinton, and the IRS scandal targeting conservative Americans led to what?

Amazingly nowhere.

What happened after Sandy Hook?

Only the biggest gun grabbing attempt in American history.

NYSAFE ACT anyone? Did you register your, "Assault Weapon," in Connecticut yet?

Bush waged war overseas after 911. Obama waged war on American gun owners after Sandy Hook. Has anyone ever noticed how the republicans are used for foreign affairs, and the democrats are used domestically to create, "change?" History is the expert witness.

School shooting expert, Wolfgang Halbig has been asking simple questions about what really happened at Sandy Hook only to be met with government spooks knocking on his front door and telling him to stfu or else they would charge him with harassment.

All for asking simple, basic questions any professional investigator would and should ask.


Here is Wolfgang Halbig's latest interview. Please watch, listen and please help keep Wolfgang Halbig in the news, and alive.

He needs our public support, he's an American hero for having the balls to stand up to America's Tyrant and Thief.

Interview starts at 17:40. Red meat begins at the 25 minute mark.

The police parked a quarter of a mile away from the school, and then walked to the school.


No trauma helicopters. Why not?

Porto Potties delivered on site?


Who made the decision to NOT let the paramedics inside the school?

"It just doesn't add up."

Gee, ya think?


Obama's government lied about Sandy Hook, and used it to further their Agenda.

All it takes is 1 single lie about Sandy Hook to be uncovered and the rest is history.

Why lie about a school shooting?

Don't be afraid to speak out now. Now isn't the time to remain quiet.

Don't let these bastards get away with it...again.

This could be our last chance at getting rid of the Bushclintonbushobamaitis disease that has ailed America since Hinckley shot Reagan.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Lake County pedophile Sheriff Gary Borders. Another Pat Sullivan

You might be interested in knowing who is harassing Wolfgang Halbig. The Columbine families had to deal with pedophile Sheriff Pat Sullivan. Hmm.
The Columbine families contacted the adjoining county Sheriff Grady Judd and told him about the January Incident thinking that he was a pedophile hunter. Hah. what a cover op.


This is a kid, who is all of

This is a kid, who is all of 25 years old calling Wolfgang Halbig a fraud because of his, "poor grammar."


Asking, "Who," and "Why," in the same sentence is not allowed?

Why not? Isn't that what good investigators do?

I have given this video almost 7 minutes of my time, and all I can say is this kid really needs to get off his high horse.

Looks like a naive twenty something know it all still living at home.

Never be afraid to ask simple questions.

Why was he asking such stupid softball questions?

This makes him seem very unreliable.

I take offense to calling ANY

I take offense to calling ANY question stupid.

The stupidest question is the one not asked.

Why is Wolfgang Halbig asking, 'such stupid softball,' AKA simple questions?

Because that's what investigators do!

They have to start off at point A, not skip all the way to XY and Z.

Never be afraid to ask simple questions.

Why Has No Parent Sued the Estate of Nancy Lanza?

I find it hard to believe the only civil law suit filed was on behalf of a 6 year old survivor (Jill Doe) and none by any of the parents whose children were allegedly murdered. The lawsuit named the State of Connecticut as the defendant but it was withdrawn by the attorney due to numerous negative comments received. Connecticut has written immunity provisions into its law which prohibits civil lawsuits unless approved by a claims commissioner (see: http://blogs.lawyers.com/2013/01/sandy-hook-lawsuit-withdrawn/ ).

So no trial means the public is denied seeing evidence of any crime. But why not sue the estate of Nancy Lanza for negligence and wrongful death? She was responsible for Adam Lanza's welfare and had the firearms in her home that Adam supposedly used in the killings. The State would not be a named defendant and therefore could not block the case going to the courts.

The closed circuit video surveillance that shows Adam breaking into the school and walking through the halls would be subpenaed as evidence. Then we would know the truth of the matter.


because her estate is worth almost nothing?


Besides, if it did go to court why would they subpoena the video? Do you think the lawyers for the estate would use "it didn't happen" as their defense strategy? Not that it would get to court, since the lawyers would burn through $64,000 before even getting to the point of being ready to file pre-trial motions.

The Full Asset Value of the Estate Has Not Been Determined Yet

Connecticut has a three year statute of limitations on civil lawsuits so if it is to go forward, it has to happen before the end of 2015.

The house on Yogananda Street was appraised at $540,000.00 in 2011 according to this article (see: http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Court-records-Nancy-Lanza... ). Her guns, car and other personal property had market value as well. Although there was no mention of life insurance policies, it is reasonable to assume she had one naming her successors as beneficiaries. We also don't know if an insurance policy exists that pays off the outstanding mortgage on the house upon her death.

Your article mentions the State of Connecticut gave Peter Lanza the house two weeks after the murders which I find strange since Nancy's will had Peter removed as a benefactor leaving her surviving son, Ryan, as the sole beneficiary (see: http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-nancy-lanza-will-... ).

You asked why would the video surveillance be subpenaed. The burden of proof rests with the plaintiff to show negligent supervision under the parental liability doctrine and wrongful death (see: http://jacksonandwilson.com/should-parents-be-held-liable-fo... ).

The only evidence the public knows about is that Adam Lanza's body was found in the school with Nancy Lanza's guns near by. That in itself does not show Nancy Lanza was negligent because there was no eye witnesses that saw Adam in physical possession of Nancy's guns, it is only assumed. However the video would confirm if in fact Adam acted alone under his own volition.

Mortgages paid off in Newton


The plot thickens...check it out yourself...


"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win!"

"The belief is worthless if the fear of social and physical punishment overrides the belief."

We have proof that Obama is

We have proof that Obama is covering up the Pedophilia that provoked the Columbine shooters. We also met personally with Bill Clinton and asked him for an independent investigation of the January Incident. We have yet to have that investigation. Lead cover up architect was Ken Salazar as Colorado attorney General.He was appointed as the Interior Secretary by Obama. Also Bill Ritter who was invited to speak at the Sandy hook advisory committee was deeply involved in the Cover up. Donna Taylor, mother of Columbine victim Mark Taylor was refused her request to speak. Google Release Mark Taylor.
Obama signed the stimulus bill after a meeting "Columbine ten years
after, Lessons learned". The meeting was blacked out.
Do you notice that Lieberman is signaling his buddies?


so many 'incidents' to learn the truth about.

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

We were researching a plane

We were researching a plane crash in Butte Montana and learned that they were trafficking children to a 1% club called the Yellowstone Club. The plane was owned by an abortion clinic owner who was providing young children to the elite. Low and behold, Clinton's Hillary village website pops up and we learn that these people are friends of the Clintons. It takes a village to traffic a child.



such monsters.

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

I do not think this story is

I do not think this story is going anywhere until someone with a pair in Congress comes out in favor of a full blown independent investigation.

Politics is a ruthless business, and the truth often gets discarded if it is not beneficial to winning an election.

No politician is going to say, "We need to know more about what really happened at Sandy Hook," until Wolfgang Halbig does all of the hard work and proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Sandy Hook was a government perpetrated hoax.

Republicans are going to let Halbig do all of the dirty work first before making any kind of public statements, but they would be smart to at least quietly assist him and make sure he stays safe for the time being.

If I was the leader of the GOP, I'd make sure Mr. Halbig was well protected, and given adequate assistance in a very quiet way.

Sandy Hook is the democrats version of 911, used to create political change domestically instead of overseas.

In order for a politician like, say Rand Paul to come out behind Wolfgang Halbig and support his investigation, some serious homework and preparation first needs to be done.

If people are already pulling the race card on Wolfgang Halbig, I think that means we are over the target.

Questioning Sandy Hook will be combated with the old, "Questioning 911," book of smear tactics.

"How dare you."

"You're disgraceful to even say such a thing."

Blah, blah, blah. Same media crap, just another day.

But Sandy Hook wasn't as big of a lie as 911 was, and that's their big problem. The bigger the lie, the easier it is to fabricate and make people believe.

The day after 911, few people questioned what happened.

The day after Sandy Hook, many people were questioning what happened.

That's a huge difference.

The American people are more skeptical than ever before.

The, 'Old Media,' has a serious opportunity to gain back what they have lost.

All they have to do is tell the truth, because the truth sells.

Never be afraid to ask simple questions.

This is excellent news! It

This is excellent news! It proves that Wolfgang Halbig does not have a political motive behind his work. He's not asking simple questions about Sandy Hook because he hates democrats.

Halbig is not some hardcore republican that only votes for people with an R next to their name.

Wolfgang Halbig's credibility just got even better.

If Halbig voted for every single republican presidential candidate from the time he became eligible to vote, people would question his motive.

Now we don't have to worry about that.

Never be afraid to ask simple questions.


He also donated to McCain.

Has nothing to do with his expertise and credibility.

It isn't meaningless: Wolfgang donated to Hillary Clinton

That was Hillary vs. Obama; after Obama was nominated, Wolfgang donated to McCain.

Why Hillary, and then why switch parties? Racism.

Here is a Wolfgang Facebook post from 2013, where he says white folks should be able to call black folks "nigger," or simply use the word freely because black folks say "nigger."


Of course, black folks don't say "nigger." Instead black folks sometimes say "nigga," to refer to themselves or others, either in an abusive way or as a term of endearment. When used in the latter, [they] took the word "nigger," in its abusive connotation, and morphed it into a term of endearment when used "positively."

I didn't say Wolfgang's support of Hillary was anything to use against his credibility or expertise, but it is interesting and was worth informing others of. Wolfgang donated to Hillary Clinton.

Also regarding Wolfgang's credibility and expertise, a few things he's said regarding Sandy Hook are patently false. I am in the process of creating some Sandy Hook truth vids that disprove some of those conspiratard fictions. What points? You'll see when they're finished and on YouTube.

Why did Wolfgang support Hillary, then after Obama was nominated, support McCain? Racism.

Go here:


I do believe this black rapper has it spelled with an "er" in large letters across his t-shirt.

It is OK for black people and not OK for white people - it is just another doublespeak to promote racism.

The law cannot make a wicked person virtuous…God’s grace alone can accomplish such a thing.
Ron Paul - The Revolution

Setting a good example is a far better way to spread ideals than through force of arms. Ron Paul

I don't even have to look at the link

I know who it is, from the artist name in the link. That is Nas, a great artist. That was as a political statement, and part of his album promotion. The album in question was supposed to be titled Nigger, but had to be changed to Untitled.

The album cover, notice the scars:

Nas telling his Nigger album name explanation to MTV:


A quote:

"I wanna make the word easy on mutha----as' ears," he explained. "You see how white boys ain't mad at 'cracker' 'cause it don't have the same [sting] as 'nigger'? I want 'nigger' to have less meaning [than] 'cracker.' With all the bullsh-- that's going on in the world, racism is at its peak.

Wikipedia about the album:


Anything else?

What a transparent crock of excrement

Are you telling me its OK for any one to use the N word as long as they leave the R out of it? Or is it only allowed for African Americans to utter that word? As far as Martin, interesting how the third component of the skittles and ice tea concoction so in fad with minority kids was left out of all reports. Before you shoot your mouth off, have you seen the toxicology reports?
The main problem with constantly grinding your axe is that you eventually run out of substance to grind.

There are no politicians or bankers in foxholes.

No, that isn't what I said at all.

I clearly said: "black folks sometimes say "nigga," to refer to themselves or others"

How did you misinterpret that as me saying "anybody should be able to say nigga"?

It doesn't matter if Trayvon bought those items to use for making "lean" or "syrup."

You should also have noticed I didn't give any personal opinion on Trayvon's death.

Instead I only included screen captures of Wolfgang telling a black woman she's "stupid,"

And telling another commenter, who is also black, that he's just like "all the other blacks."

race baiter is English for Backpfeifengesicht

Your attempt to discredit this man is an epic fail.
No word should be bared from use by any race.
Saying nigger has no significant difference to saying a sshole.
They are both insults designed to cause pain/anger.
Any one who can not see this is either to lazy or to stupid to see that divide and conquer is being used on this country as well as a few others.

Until you focus on the real enemy YOU are a willfully ignorant slave!

"You only live free if your willing to die free."

I'm not a race-baiter

I disagree with your opinion that 'anybody should be able to say nigger,' because it is not the same as saying a-hole. So your comment is BS.

Also it wasn't an attempt to discredit the man. I have said previously, weeks ago when the first story about Wolfgang broke, that I think he's a great guy and has asked many of the proper questions regarding the Sandy Hook shooting event. Since then, I have continued to pay attention, and I have some doubts about the man. I provided a few pieces of character information that anybody honest with themselves would pause to say, "Perhaps I should research more about who this guy is?"

My advice: Question more; Trust less.

My free speech trumps your thin skin

"I disagree with your opinion that 'anybody should be able to say nigger,' because it is not the same as saying a-hole. So your comment is BS."

I see not every one at the DP was able to totally repel their politically correct training by the state.

An insult is an insult the details of who it targets or how effective it may be does not change it's nature.

Why should any race deserve special treatment or consideration over any other?

There is no freedom in America from being offended, but there is freedom of speech.

"You only live free if your willing to die free."

You're dumb.

Saying "nigger" or "nigga" in a dialogue about the words, if you are not being racist or advocating racism in said dialogue, is acceptable. Saying "nigger" or "nigga" otherwise, such as in regular conversation, definitely not acceptable - unless you're black. It also isn't a political correctness issue, it's a morality issue. But say what you want to say, and don't talk to me again.


I can't wait to see your debunking videos.
You can start with the conspiracy theory you just hatched on Wolfgang.

After all it's impossible that Wolfgang could have seen something besides skin color in Obama that he didn't like in a presidential candidate...
Like ... uh .. experience?... a voting record to examine?

Just pure racism from a guy who's been working around children of all colors for decades... and never uses the word nigger personally.

Wolfgang isn't full-on bigot, but he is somewhat racist

In the comments to a 2012 NBC.com story about school protests planned in support/honor of Trayvon Martin:

Wolfgang calling a black woman "stupid."

Wolfgang telling another commenter, who's also black, that he's "judgemental just like all the other blacks."

PS. The Sandy Hook Truth vids I am in the process of creating won't be a "debunking," per se, because that word is retarded and I hate it. But, of the few Sandy Hook Hoax Fiction Lies that I have thus far decided to create solid refutations of, I am sure you'll enjoy them. If you enjoy the truth, that is.

Now I'm really going to bump you

In the last five years, I've become "somewhat racist" because of the behavior of multitudes of blacks who are in fact racist.
So I stand with Wolfgang on that score, if you say so.

He didn't say anything in those posts that I would find offensive because he spoke the truth in an unvarnished way.
He could have been more eloquent or sophisticated in his choice of words.
But he was speaking to the frenzy that we were submerged in surrounding the Martin Zimmerman affair.
And in his final comment where he calls them out for their hypocrisy, I concur.
Those protestors never say a word when multitudes of blacks commit heinous attacks on whites, many who are elderly, disabled or female -- in spite of video footage that gives evidence to the surprise and unprovoked attacks! Not a word.

So you go ahead and make your "Truth" videos, because I do, in fact, enjoy the truth.
So there.
Get to work.