22 votes

9/11 Documented Cover-up (video)

This gentleman explains the cover-up with fact after fact. 47 minutes of education:


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

This video should be everywhere

It connects many dots -- and yes we've heard some of it in other places - and yes it doesn't address falling towers.

But it certainly proves that there was a master plan form years earlier.

What he told us - Our leaders are lying scumbags. We knew that.

What he did not tell us- how an office furniture fire can distort and in some cases melt an ASTM A-36 boxed wide flange beam in a vertical load position.
I`d rather listen to James Corbett - he leaves show notes with backup after his Youtube presentations.

It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people that pay no price for being wrong.
Thomas Sowell

Do you have a link for a

Do you have a link for a Corbett 9/11 video or article besides the one that sums up the absurdities of the official report?

ACinMA's picture

heres a few


Fall River, Bristol County, Massachusetts

"When one gets in bed with government,
one must expect the diseases it spreads."
‎"It's not like I'm a powerful person. My ideas are."


Corbett is one of the best but he can get on my nerves with his delivery.


www.corbettreport.com , then subscribe to his newsletter. He`s great at researching facts and a very entertaining speaker.

It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people that pay no price for being wrong.
Thomas Sowell



"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!

Do you remember the days right after 9/11 politicians would

kind of snark about the "terrorists" saying, "The terrorists think America will just sue them in court for this attack, but they're gonna' find out differently."

Well guess what;
That's all we did do to the real players in Saudi Arabia.
We sued them in the legal action referred to in the last 15 minutes of the video.
And then Obama's operative Elena Kagan sabotaged the suit before she was rewarded with his nomination and eventual appointment to the Supreme Court.

Moth-er F.u.c.k-er!

What difference, at this point, does it make

What difference, at this point, does it make about how it happened?

With all due respect we have 3,000 Dead Americans!

Bush & Cheney go to jail.
Hillary too.
Round 'em up!
Once we get the water boards going we'll find out how it was done.

Because Facts Matter

3000 US citizens didn't die in the 9/11 attack; it was almost 3000 persons total.


Excluding the 19 hijackers

US citizens: 2624
Foreigners: 372
Combined: 2996

Of course, after 9/11, more than 4100+ US citizens in the US military died in Iraq, almost all would still be alive today if they were not sent to their deaths because of 100% purposely fabricated lies of "WMDs," Anthrax, Mobile Weapons Labs, Uranium from Niger, Secret Meetings with al-Qaida in Prague.

The same small groups in top level US government who lied about Iraq - and helped murder more than 4100+ of their own US citizens, in Iraq - are the same small groups who lied about 9/11 and helped murder more than 1500 less than the Iraq deaths, in the 9/11 attack. And they still lie about both.

Round 'em up! Once we get the

Round 'em up!
Once we get the water boards going we'll find out how it was done.

While I am definitely not pro-torture,

I have to agree with you. Some of the most worthy candidates for being drowned alive constantly, repeatedly, with waterboarding torture are many of the Bush administration members and Pentagon Department of Defense officials during Bush's first term.

fireant's picture

Two BIG reasons

1. Claims the government blew up the buildings on 911 make the liberty movement look stupid, which does nothing but keep our numbers down.
2. Claims of controlled demolition is a false lead which prevents there ever being a new investigation.
It matters

Undo what Wilson did

Wake up fireant

you're so busy fighting cd you don't hear me.

Hey Fireant, I'll ask you again

If not from thermite, where did the molten metal that was under the building come from??

fireant's picture

Have you yet provided any examples of molten metal being a

sign of controlled demolition? Has molten metal been found in controlled demolition projects? If you can't establish that molten metal is a characteristic of CD, it will never get before a grand jury.
And have you yet produced one piece of structural evidence in order to establish indeed, thermate was used to cut the building apart?
And what proof do you have that molten metal was found? (other than the South Tower drip) How will a grand jury be convinced to spend time investigating molten metal if you can't even establish those basics?

Undo what Wilson did

From the molten metal fairy?


fireant's picture

CD is killing any chance we have of a new investigation.

How does that honor the dead?

Undo what Wilson did

I'm willing to put the controlled demolition argument aside

even though I believe that's the only way those towers could fall at the speed of gravity -- with zero resistance.

But like I said, we have enough evidence as outlined in the video, to have those identified in the video brought in for charges.

I believe it would take a military group of some sort to manage the take down. Even the arrests will be violently fought by the CIA and elements in other agencies like the FBI, etc.

Where justice fails, tyrants run wild.

A year in a public pillory

Free includes debt-free!

Quick! Somebody! Quick!

Get over to Fireant's cave. Somene has grabbed his cudgel and bashed in his skull before gaining access to his laptop left powered up and sitting on the large flat rock near the back of the cave. The murderer has now accessed Fireant's DP account and is posting here.

What kills me Fireant is your obtuse inability to take this testimony, along with the familial "old-boy-network" anomalies unearthed and reported by Russ Baker in Family of Secrets, coupled by steel clamps to the absolute plethora of other evidence offered by architects, engineers, pilots and citizen investigators...and extricate yourself from your steadfast championing of the same government's explanation of 911 and the complete fallacy that it was.

Some jobs just aren't worth the check...but...thanks for the post...good video and another nail in the coffin

Wha? .....hey....who stole my country?

fireant's picture

Show me some corroboration of controlled demo in the structural

remains, debris patterns, and video of collapse from ALL angles.
What? You mean the architects and engineers haven't provided any? Are they taking "what couldn't have happened" to court for their new investigation? That's it? Against tons of structural evidence which shows no sign of CD? Your architects and engineers will be thrown out of court. They'll be lucky if they aren't jailed for fraud.

Undo what Wilson did

There's plenty of evidence of Controlled Demolition

in the debris: 1) thermite and thermate in the powdered remains;
2)hardened thermite & thermate on remaining center I-beams;
3) Pictures of I-beams sticking up from basement are cut on a 45% angle before firemen & demolition crew arrived;
4) Videos of center of Bldg 7 at roof area showing center imploding even before the rest of the building moved downward;
5) As Bldg 7 is collapsing, squibs are seen exploding from the side of building going up the building;
6) Videos show helicopter at rear of one or two of the three bldgs at the upper floors stopping, hovering and then a small white light is shown on the interior floor; this is done two times. This was an anomaly in the face of a natural collapse.
7) The idea that ten floors can collapse each second is still the most telling piece of information. Only a free falling bldg without center columns could drop so fast which proves beyond any doubt Demolition.
8) Thousands of tons of concrete and furniture were vaporized. Not one piece of office equipment remained, and no large concrete slabs remained. All was turned to powder is evidence of Demolition.
9) Videos showing people ducking as loud explosions can be heard.
10) Beams ejected with such force they became lodged in other buildings hundreds of feet from ground zero.
11) Beams shot halfway to Hoboken.
12) Beams & debris shown shooting Up and Away from the Towers as they fell, which is unnatural in a collapsing building but not in explosion or Demolition.
13) Just about every vehicle surrounding the Towers was vaporized; some cars with aluminum engines remained intact while cast iron blocks were vaporized; certain kinds of metal door handles vaporized and others did not. A recent book by Judy ____ suggested electromagnetic impulse weapon was used or something to that effect.

This is from memory, but due diligence can uncover a hundred reasons beyond a shadow of doubt why this was Demolition; any thoughts to the contrary is denial, coverup, stupidity.

In an honest and impartial court of law, the idea of a Demolition as reason for collapsing Towers & Bldg 7 would be a foregone conclusion. Our Government under Bush/Cheney at the time was/is criminal and must be held accountable.

Don't feed the Trolls:

When a man or woman who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, they will either quit being mistaken, or cease to be honest. –Unknown

Live in Liberty
Tom Rankin

fireant's picture

Post photos of your structural evidence.

I'm open to any I may have overlooked. If it's those same old proven to be clean-up cuts, you still have no corroboration.

Undo what Wilson did


you haven't been murdered and have somehow regained control of your computer...but your soul is lost along with any sense of reason.

Peer reviewed scientific evidence isn't worth shit...neither is eyewitness evidence...not when a paycheck is needed, so spare me the priestly postulations.

Besides...what remains...the whole thing was carted off out of reach and then melted down. But then there was some dust...

Hopefully someday it will be you that is jailed as an accessory after the fact...like I said, some jobs ain't worth the check...

Wha? .....hey....who stole my country?

fireant's picture

What is unreasonable about wanting some corroboration?

It's what any grand jury will demand.
And you can hide behind "it was all carted off" all you want, but we can still see you. How come I can find tons of structural and debris evidence today, none of which shows any sign of CD?

Undo what Wilson did

Obviously because...

you wouldn't recognize it if you see it. Corroborating video...actual video of the demotions has existed since the day it happened. View any video showing the demolitions themselves....WTC1....WTC2...WTC7...there....all the evidence corroborated and available for your viewing pleasure. To edify further, the controlled demotions that took place, video's of the demolitions can be matched against controlled demolitions and the results of steel structured building fires the world over.

You have been watching corroboration for years yet you don't recognize it for what it is. What you will not find...is corroboration and video evidence of the story that you'd like us to believe...nowhere...nohow. That you KNOW there was a cover-up (cuz bashing Bush is fun) and can't see it for what it holds up is beyond reality and exposes you for the paid shill you are.

Wha? .....hey....who stole my country?

fireant's picture

Video does not corroborate controlled demolition.

Careful analysis of several angles show the shell of Building 7 fell over in two directions, in perfect conformity with the south face gash. Claims it came straight down are false. Video of both Towers show gradual deformation of the wall on the side to which it fell, prior to collapse. The gash called "little damage" by the architects and engineers. Why haven't they done an objective study of the damage, instead of hiding behind "little damage"?
WTC7 Gash Graphic2 Image
More: http://www.dailypaul.com/311054/wtc7-the-gash

Undo what Wilson did

Careful analysis of every angle available...

proves controlled demolition. Claims that the WTC1...WTC2...WTC7 fell from pancaking energy resulting from two jets filled with kerosene are false. Video of both Towers and WTC7 show massive buildings being demolished in two separate demolition methodologies. These methodologies caused massive damage...in fact destroying three building in a symphony of explosions, dustification of concrete and ejections of massive steel beams over great distances. That the "gash"...so seemingly important to paid shills on the internet were deemed of little significance in the explosions of three buildings given testimony of earlier prep charges going off by individuals within Bldg. 7 gives shills little to hide behind as the rubble of WTC7 was decidedly like all other bottom up pulls...

Wha? .....hey....who stole my country?