51 votes

Connecticut Gun Owners Publish "List of Tyrants" Responsible For Unconstitutional Gun Law.

Tuesday, February 25, 2014
A Sipsey Street Public Service Announcement: The Connecticut Tyrants List, voluntarily subscribed by the participants on 3 April 2013.


The state of Connecticut is making lists of firearm owners to raid. It seems obvious to me that it is thus only fair to list those anti-constitutional tyrants who will have blood on their hands the moment the first Connecticut citizen is shot by the CT state police while carrying out their orders. I will be sending these folks my own email later today.

CT State Senators voting Yes on "An Act Concerning Gun Violence Prevention and Children's Safety, also known as Public Law 13-3 or Connecticut Senate Bill No. 1160," 3 April 2013. List includes home addresses. Photos and home phone numbers of these tyrants are available here:http://www.cbia.com/ga/CT_State_Senators_List/-AZSENATE

John W. Fonfara, 99 Montowese St., Hartford 06114-2841

Eric D. Coleman, 77 Wintonbury Ave., Bloomfield 06002-2529

Andrea Stillman, 5 Coolidge Ct., Waterford 06385-3309

Gary LeBeau, 501 Canyon Ridge Dr., Broad Brook 06016-5602

Kevin Kelly, 240 York St., Stratford 06615-7952

Steve Cassano, 1109 Middle Tpke, E Manchester 06040-3703

Anthony J. Musto, 15 Maymont Ln., Trumbull 06611-2111

Beth Bye, 99 Outlook Ave., West Hartford 06119-1432

Andres Ayala, PO Box 55106, Bridgeport 06610-5106

Terry B. Gerratana, 674 Lincoln St., New Britain 06052-1833

Michael A. McLachlan, 47 W Wooster St., Danbury 06810-7731

Bob Duff, 50 Toilsome Ave., Norwalk 06851-2425
Toni Boucher, 5 Wicks End Ln, Wilton 06897-2633

Paul Doyle, 38 Thornbush Rd., Wethersfield 06109-3554

Carlo Leone, 88 Houston Ter., Stamford 06902-4449

Toni N. Harp (no longer in the Legislature, she is now the Mayor of New Haven, CT).

John McKinney, 986 S Pine Creek Rd., Fairfield 06824-6348

Martin M. Looney, 132 Fort Hale Rd., New Haven 06512-3630

Donald E. Williams, Jr., 41 Malbone Ln., Brooklyn 06234-1563

Edward Meyer, 407 Mulberry Point Rd., Guilford 06437-3204

Dante Bartolomeo, 167 Reynolds Dr., Meriden 06450-2568

Gayle Slossburg, 14 Honeysuckle Ln., Milford 06461-1671

Joan V. Hartley, 206 Columbia Blvd., Waterbury 06710-1401

Leonard Fasano, 7 Sycamore Ln., North Haven 06473-1283

Joseph J. Crisco, Jr., 1205 Racebrook Rd., Woodbridge 06525-1822

L. Scott Frantz, 123 Meadow Rd., Riverside 06878-2521

CT House members voting Yes on "An Act Concerning Gun Violence Prevention and Children's Safety, also known as Public Law 13-3 or Connecticut Senate Bill No. 1160," 3 April 2013. Photos and home phone numbers of these tyrants are available here:http://www.cbia.com/ga/CT_State_Representatives_List/-AZHOUSE

Catherine Abercrombie, 64 Parker Ave., Meriden 06450-5945

Ernest Hewett, 29 Colman St., New London 06320-3558

Peter Tercyak, 150 Belridge Rd., New Britain 06053-1008

Brenda Kupchick, 85 Liberty St., Madison 06443-3258

William Tong, 99 Chestnut Hill Rd., Stamford 06903-4030

Gary Holder-Winfield, 480 Winchester Ave., New Haven 06511-1920

James Albis, 369 Coe Ave., Apt 14, East Haven

David Alexander, 277 Pearl St., Enfield 06082-4368

Bryan Hurlburt (Stepped down to take a position with the USDA's Farm Service Agency.)

Diana Urban, 146 Babcock Rd., North Stonington 06359-1334

Gail Lavielle, 109 Hickory Hill Rd., Wilton 06897-1135

Claire Janowski, 263 Hany Ln., Vernon 06066-2740

Edwin Vargas, 141 Douglas St., Hartford 06114-2422

Angel Arce, 248 Franklin Ave., Hartford 06114-1841

Susan Johnson, 120 Bolivia St., Willimantic 06226-2818

Joe Verrengia, 160 Colonial St., West Hartford 06110-1814

David Arconti, Jr., 141 Great Plain Rd., Danbury 06811-3844

Tom Vicino, 92 Carter Hill Rd., Clinton 06413-1230

Joe Aresimowicz, 248 Lower Ln., Berlin 06037-2231

David Kiner, 5 Cranberry Hollow, Enfield 06082-2200
Toni Walker, 1643 Ella T Grasso Blvd., New Haven 06511-2801

Patricia Widlitz, 12 Island Bay Cir., Guilford 06437-3058

Timothy Larson, 33 Gorman Pl., East Hartford 06108-1450

Christina Ayala, 506 Brooks St., Bridgeport 06608-1303

Terry Backer, 125 Jefferson St., Stratford 06615-7810

Roland Lemar, 6 Eld St., New Haven 06511-3816

Roberta Willis, PO Box 1733, 30 Upland Meadow Rd., Lakeville 06039-1733

Tom O'Dea, 37 Holly Rd., New Canaan 06840-6406

David Baram, 5 Warbler Cir., Bloomfield 06002-2233

Matthew Lesser, 1160 S Main S.,t Apt 110, Middletown 06457-5034

Christopher Wright, 35 Ruth St., Apt 49, Bristol 06010-3218

Arthur O'Neill, 617 Bucks Hill Rd., Southbury 06488-1952

Brian Becker, 14 Candlewood Dr., West Hartford 06117-1009

Rick Lopes, 208 S Mountain Dr., New Britain 06052-1514

Elissa Wright, 51 Pearl St., Groton 06340-5732

Elizabeth "Betty" Boukus, Legislative Office Bldg., Rm 4017, Hartford 06106

Geoff Luxenburg, 45 Chatham Dr., Manchester 06042-8522

James Maroney, 22 Saranac Rd Milford 06461-9401

Larry Butler, 70 Blackman Rd., Waterbury 06704-1203

Juan Candelaria, 28 Arch St., New Haven 06519-1511

Brandon McGee, 43 Warren St., Hartford 06120-2117

Robert Megna, 40 Foxon Hill Rd., Unit 54, New Haven 06513-1166

Charles "Don" Clemons, 130 Read St., Bridgeport 06607-2021

Michelle Cook, 499 Charles St., Torrington 06790-3420

Patricia Miller, 95 Liberty St., Apt A4, Stamford 06902-4732

John Shaban, 29 Ledgewood Rd., Redding 06896-2916

Bill Aman, 878 Strong Rd., South Windsor 06074-2006

Philip Miller, 24 Bushy Hill Rd., Ivoryton 06442-1108

Victor Cuevas, 17 Keefe St., Waterbur,y 06706-1616

Mike D'Agostino, 575 Ridge Rd., Hamden 06517-2519

Russ Morin, 495 Brimfield Rd., Wethersfield 06109-3209

Richard Smith, 25 Jeremy Dr., New Fairfield 06812-2109

Prasad Srinivasan, 268 Grandview Dr., Glastonbury 06033-3946

Bruce Morris, 315 Ely Ave., Norwalk 06854-4619

Stephen Dargan, 215 Beach St., West Haven 06516-6133

Paul Davis, 335 Smith Farm Rd., Orange 06477-3127

Ted Moukawsher, 48 W Elderkin Ave., Groton 06340-4933

Mitch Bolinsky, 3 Wiley Ln., Newtown 06470-1812

Stephen Walko, 7 Charter Oak Ln., Greenwich 06830-6911

Mike Demicco, 6 Deborah Ln., Farmington 06032-3031

Mary Mushinsky, 188 S Cherry St., Wallingford 06492-4016

Patricia Dillon, 68 W Rock Ave., New Haven 06515-2221

Sandy Nafis, 49 Whitewood Rd., Newington 06111-2133

Larry Cafero, Jr., 6 Weed Ave., Norwalk 06850-2224

Terrie Wood, 50 Saint Nicholas Rd., Darien 06820-2823

Joe Diminico, 26 Finley St., Manchester 06040-5616

David Yaccarino, 1804 Hartford Tpke., North Haven 06473-1248

Elaine O'Brien, 1321 Hill St., Suffield 06078-1024

Kim Fawcett, 234 Collingwood Ave., Fairfield 06825-1877

Chris Perone, 8 E. Rocks Rd., Norwalk 06851-2919

Christie Carpino, 29 Sovereign Rd., Cromwell 06416-1136

Lonnie Reed, 60 Maple St., Apt. 44, Branford 06405-3562

Andy Fleischmann, 25 Sherwood Rd., West Hartford 06117-2739

Mae Flexer, 452 Main St., Danielson 06239-2104

Emmett Riley, 150 Yantic St., Unit 160, Norwich 06360-4248

Daniel Fox, 14 Carter Dr., Stamford 06902-7013

Matt Ritter, 169 N Beacon St., Hartford 06105-2246

J. Brendan Sharkey, 600 Mount Carmel Ave., Hamden 06518-1606

Jason Rojas, 128 Langford Ln., East Hartford 06118-2369

Gerald Fox, III, 66 Fairview Ave., Stamford 06902-8129

Mary Fritz, 43 Grove St., Yalesville 06492-1606

Livvy Floren, 210 Round Hill Rd., Greenwich 06831-3357

Henry Genga, 5 Elaine Dr., East Hartford 06118-3515

John Frey, 2 Copps Hill Rd., Ridgefield 06877-4013

Linda Gentile, 158 Hodge Ave., Ansonia 06401-3236

Robert Sanchez, 269 Washington St., New Britain 06051-1024

Minnie Gonzalez, 97 Amity St., Hartford 06106-1001

Ezequiel Santiago, 991 State St., Bridgeport 06605-1504

Jeffrey Berger, 134 Gaylord Dr., Waterbury 06708-2181

Auden Grogins, 155 Brewster St., Apt 5L, Bridgeport 06605-3111

Hilda Santiago, 86 South Ave., Fl 3, Meriden 06451-7624

DebraLee Hovey, 296 Fan Hill Rd., Monroe 06468-1329

Bob Godfrey, 13 Stillman Ave., Danbury 06810-8007

Antonio Guerrera, 194 Catherine Dr., Rocky Hill 06067-1096

Brian Sear, 11 N Canterbury Rd., Canterbury 06331-1209

Elizabeth Ritter, 24 Old Mill Rd., Quaker Hill 06375-1319

Tony Hwang, PO Box 762, Fairfield 06824-0762

Joseph Serra, PO Box 233, Middletown 06457-0233

Gregg Haddad, 28 Storrs Heights Rd., Storrs Mansfield 06268-2322

John Hampton, 33 West Mountain, Simsbury 06092

Charlie Stallworth, 35 Wickliffe Cir., Bridgeport 06606-1929

Themis Klarides, 23 East Ct., Derby 06418-2640

Noreen Kokoruda, 85 Liberty St., Madison 06443-3258

Jonathan Steinberg, 1 Bushy Ridge Rd., Westport 06880-2104

Jack Hennessy, 556 Savoy St., Bridgeport 06606-4125

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Gun? check
mags? check
ammo? check
food? check
Shirt? Dang
Not ready then... BreakingThreads.com

Connecticut Gun Confiscations

Tyranny vs Liberty - Connecticut


they should make WANTED posters

for everyone on that list and plaster them around the state.

I'd rather have a bottle in front o' me than a frontal lobotomy

List of Shame

I used to live in that Communist state. I think it is a good idea to publish this information. After all, they always like to threaten to publish the names of firearms owners, and portray them as sex offenders. This is a kind of terrorism. It is a threat - what you are doing may be legal, but bad things could happen to you if you do it. We see this coming out of Washington DC all the time: if you own too many firearms, you might be a "terrorist", if you are pro-life, you might be a "terrorist", if you are an Iraqi veteran, you might be a "terrorist", if you support Ron Paul, you might be a "terrorist".

And these thugs think they have the right to assassinate anyone they believe is a "terrorist", without a trial despite what the Bill of Rights says. And now, they are alarmed to have their names and addresses available to the people they are supposed to be representing!

Maybe they should flee to North Korea, or some other "socialist paradise".


What would Walter White do?


Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?

How is this news to anyone?

How is this news to anyone? Don't you have the phone number and address of your legislative officials? I mean, come on folks.

Live Free or Die!

I may be wrong...

but this list contains the legislators that voted to pass the bill to confiscate arms. Maybe some didn't. Shouldn't they be excluded from the list if they upheld the Constitution?

Every State Should Make up a List of Home Addresses

I have said for years, they know where we are, we should know where they are.

If any employee violates your Bill of Rights, enters your home, causes you and your family any harm, you have the right to return the favor.
This is state sanctioned murder against law abiding citizens.

Who gave the employees of the government the right not to follow the Constitution?

Perhaps they will think about it further.

Remember - Print out the list. If the infrastructure goes down, the list will also disappear.

Don't they? This is all well

Don't they? This is all well known information in New Hampshire. How else do you contact your state reps? You call them on their cell phones. You call them on their home phones. You visit them at their door. This is politics as usual where I live.

Live Free or Die!

I saw a this recorded phone conversation of a lady

Who called the state patrol CT because the state has sent a threatening letter to their home. It made me take pause and consider how critical these events could be to what comes in the near future. I pray for the well being of those people who resist these tyrant thugs.

Here is the audio link I listened to, I feel obligated to say that I found the article on whatreallyhappened.com web site initially.



I am not a resident of Connecticut, but. . .

in case no one has thought of it, somebody up there with ready access to the information should also start posting the names, home addresses, phone numbers and pictures of all the state police in Connecticut as well, just to give them something to think about too. And, even the local police if it looks like that may become necessary. The biggest mistake the residents of Connecticut ever made was getting rid of their system of County Sheriffs. If Connecticut still had a County Sheriff system I'm sure that at least some of them would have been Oathkeepers and stood against this faux, UNCONSTITUTIONAL ON IT'S FACE "law" side by side and shoulder to shoulder with the people.

The things that will destroy us are: politics without principle;
pleasure without conscience; wealth without work; knowledge without character; business without morality; science without humanity; and
worship without sacrifice: Mahatma Mohandas K. Gan

We can sell a lot of Wolfgang

We can sell a lot of Wolfgang candy when we start going door to door.

"I know you boys like em sloppy". The Lunch Lady

Read them Federalist #46

Federalist #46: James Madison - Complete Quote Text ( http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa46.htm ):

James Madison: "...The only refuge left for those who prophesy the downfall of the State governments is the visionary supposition that the federal government may previously accumulate a military force for the projects of ambition. The reasonings contained in these papers must have been employed to little purpose indeed, if it could be necessary now to disprove the reality of this danger. That the people and the States should, for a sufficient period of time, elect an uninterrupted succession of men ready to betray both;

that THE "TRAITORS" should, throughout this period, uniformly and systematically pursue some fixed plan for the extension of the military establishment;

that the governments and the people of the States should silently and patiently behold the gathering storm, and " continue to supply the materials", "until it should be prepared to burst on their own heads", must appear to every one more like the incoherent dreams of a delirious jealousy, or the misjudged exaggerations of a counterfeit zeal, than like the sober apprehensions of genuine patriotism. Extravagant as the supposition is, let it however be made. Let a regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger.

The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This proportion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men.

"TO THESE" (The United States Military) WOULD BE "OPPOSED" A (CITIZEN) "MILITIA" amounting to near half a million of "CITIZENS" with "ARMS IN THEIR HANDS", OFFICERED BY MEN CHOSEN FROM "AMONG THEMSELVES" (CHOSEN BY THE LOCAL CITIZEN'S - NOT MILITARY OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT), fighting for their (THE CITIZEN'S) common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their (THE CITIZEN MILITIA'S) affections and confidence.

It may well be doubted, whether a (CITIZEN) MILITIA "thus circumstanced" (25 to 1 ARMED POWER RATIO) could ever be conquered by such a (SMALL) proportion of "regular troops" (i.e. federal US ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, MARINES).

Those who are best acquainted with the last successful resistance of this country against the British arms, will be most inclined to deny the possibility of it.

Besides the advantage of (THE CITIZENS) being armed, which the Americans (CITIZENS) possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of "subordinate governments", to which the people are attached, and by which the (CITIZEN) MILITIA officers are appointed (officered by men chosen among themselves), forms a barrier against the "enterprises of ambition", more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.

Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes.

But were the people to "possess" the additional advantages of "LOCAL" governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national will and direct the national force, and of officers appointed out of the (CIVILIAN) militia, by these (LOCAL) governments, and attached both to them and to the (CITIZEN) MILITIA, it may be "affirmed with the greatest assurance", that the throne of "every tyranny in Europe" would be "speedily overturned" in spite of the legions which surround it.

Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion, that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in "ACTUAL POSSESSION", than the "debased subjects of arbitrary power" would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors.

Let us rather no longer insult them with the supposition that they can ever reduce themselves to the necessity of making the experiment, by a blind and tame submission to the "long train of insidious measures which must precede and produce it"."


APP: This should alarm any US Citizen, as our present condition of Citizens NOT armed with a 25 to 1 superiority over our own standing army; and the fact that our "Citizen Militias" officered by men "chosen among THEMSELVES" do NOT exist in any number near this in military capability or armament, is CLEAR EVIDENCE that the "long train of insidious measures which must precede and produce it" have "ALREADY OCCURRED".




Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788

Mr. GEORGE MASON. "Mr. Chairman, a worthy member has asked who are the militia, if they be not "THE PEOPLE" of this country, and if we are not to be protected from the fate of the Germans, Prussians, by "OUR" representation?

I ask, "Who are the MILITIA"? They consist NOW of the "WHOLE PEOPLE" (of each LOCAL COMMUNITY OR STATE), except a few public officers. But I cannot say who will be the militia of the future day. If "that paper" (THE LIMITED CONSTITUTIONAL COMPACT BEING CONSIDERED) on the table gets "no alteration", the militia of the future day may not consist of all classes, high and low, and {426} rich and poor; but they may be "confined to the lower and middle classes of the people", granting "exclusion to the higher classes" of the people.

If we should ever see that day, the most ignominious punishments and heavy fines (APP: i.e. jail and imprisonment for simply being armed - or being armed with equal ARMS with the standing federal US MILITARY) may be expected. Under the present government, all ranks of people are subject to militia duty. Under such a full and equal representation as ours, there can be no ignominious punishment inflicted.

But under this national, or rather consolidated government, the case will be different. The representation being "so small and inadequate", they will have no "FELLOW-FEELING" for the people. They may discriminate people in their own predicament, and exempt from duty all the officers and LOWEST CREATURES OF THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT. ..."


Mr. JOHN MARSHALL " asked if gentlemen were serious when they asserted that, if the state governments had power to interfere with the militia, it was by implication.

If they were, he asked the committee whether the "least attention" would not show that they were "MISTAKEN".

The state governments "DID NOT" derive their powers from the general (federal) government;

but EACH (STATE & LOCAL COUNTY) government derived its powers from the PEOPLE, and each was to act according to the powers given it. Would any gentleman deny this? He demanded if powers not given were retained by implication. Could any man say so? Could any man say that this power was not RETAINED by the states, as they had NOT given it away? For, says he, does not a power remain till it is given away? The state legislatures had power to command and govern their militia before, and have it still, undeniably, unless there be something in this Constitution that takes it away.

For "Continental" purposes Congress may call forth the militia, as to suppress insurrections and repel invasions. But the power given to the states by the people is "NOT taken away"; for the Constitution does NOT say so.

In the Confederation Congress had this power; but the state legislatures had it "also". The power of legislating given them within the "ten miles square" is exclusive of the states, because it is "expressed to be exclusive".

The truth is, that when power is given to the general legislature, if it was in the state legislature before, both shall exercise it; unless there be an incompatibility in the exercise by one to that by the other, or negative words precluding the state governments from it.

But there are NO negative words here. It rests, therefore, with the "STATES".

To me it appears, then, unquestionable that the state governments can call forth the (CITIZEN) militia, in case the Constitution should be adopted, in the "SAME MANNER" as they could have done before its adoption.

Gentlemen have said that the states cannot defend themselves without an "application to Congress", because "Congress" can "interpose!

>>>>Does not every man feel a "REFUTATION" of the "argument" in his own breast? (i.e. CONGRESS CANNOT INTERPOSE)

I WILL SHOW {420} that there could NOT be a combination, between those who formed the Constitution, to take away this power.

All the restraints intended to be laid on the state governments (besides where an exclusive power is expressly given to Congress) are contained in the 10th section of the 1st article. This power is NOT included in the restrictions in that section.

But what excludes every possibility of doubt, is the last part of it that "no state shall engage in war, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay."

When invaded, they (the States and People) "CAN" engage in war, as also when in "imminent danger". This clearly proves that the states can use the militia when they find it NECESSARY."

"...But the worthy member (Patrick Henry) fears, that in one part of the Union they will be regulated and disciplined, and in another neglected. This danger is enhanced by leaving this power to each state; for some states may attend to their militia, and others may neglect them.

If Congress neglect our (CITIZEN) militia (i.e. "CITIZENS"), "WE" (the States and People) "CAN ARM THEM" "OURSELVES".

>>> CANNOT Virginia "import arms? >>>Cannot she put them into the hands of "HER" militia-men?

(APP: i.e. THE CITIZENS OF THE INDEPENDENT STATE "CAN" import arms; and as clearly established above, "without ANY application to Congress / federal government")

(APP: So much for the "MYTH" that the Federal government can "interpose or prevent" military arms from being imported across state lines, by (mis)using the Commerce Clause)

He then concluded by observing, that the power of governing the militia was NOT vested in the states by implication, because, being "possessed of it" > "antecedent to the adoption of the government, and "not being divested of it" by any grant or restriction in the Constitution, they must necessarily be as "FULLY possessed of it as ever they had been. >And it could NOT be said that the states derived ANY powers from that (the federal government or Constitution) system, "but RETAINED them,

" >>>>>>>>"though not acknowledged in ANY PART OF IT"."


Educate yourself. Educate Others.

American Patriot Party.CC

FB: https://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Patriot-Party-CC-Nat...

Daily Paul: http://www.dailypaul.com/user/14674

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.

It's quite clear...

...that in our Constitution, in our ideals that once made us the greatest nation on earth, in our spirit, our Rule of Law, and our intellectual reason of natural law and the fundamental natural rights which have been deemed inalienable and "self evident", (that which all contributed to the greatness, the prosperity and success, of our great nation and people)...that it is prohibited to infringe upon, or to take away these basic human liberties/freedoms from another individual.

Those who swore to uphold these basic Constitutional/Natural liberties and/or freedoms, have an obligation to protect those liberties/freedoms/rights.

Let it be that reason/love/liberty/peace prevails!


Keep your eye on the prize! - Ending legal tender laws in order for the Federal Reserve System to self-destruct is of the upmost importance.
What in the World are They Spraying https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf0khstYDLA

This make my day!

Those who are targeting gun owners without cause in order to take away their God-given right of self-defense by sending government pawns with guns too their homes should understand that they too will face the scrutiny of those they seek to subjugate.

Let them be ostracized and enjoy a bit of their own medicine.

If they come violently for the guns... let the chips fall where they may.


"The greatest mystery of all is truth." - Me, 2009

Posts like this remind me

Posts like this remind me of the wish I had that we could vote with added weight somehow, like a one foot vote, a two feet vote (both feet planted firmly), a foot stomping vote (for really emotional fervor) a kick in the rear vote (booted this one out of the building!)

This one warrants a two feet vote. I stand firmly behind this kind of public exposure of governmental miscreants, and would love to see it followed up with lawsuits, charges, trials and prison time (I am generally against the concept of prisons, but in the case of treasonous acts as this, I'm willing to make an exception as long as it is followed up with death by hanging, and that publicly).

Freedom is the ability to do what you want to do.
Liberty is the ability to do what you ought to do.
"Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty." 2 Corinthians 3:17

Three-cornered hat-tip to you, Barracuda!

That's the kind of activism I like to see! BRAVO!!!

Let's make them a public spectacle; make them nervous. Maybe this will bait them into forsaking their oaths to protect the rights of the People to scrambling to protect themselves. This bears constant watching.

We honor those who fired on the British for attempting to confiscate their cache of weapons at Lexington and Concord; will be bestow similar honor on those who fire upon the first tyrants who come to confiscate our guns?

Could this old adage apply, "shoot at the brass buttons"; or in this case, the corporate button pushers (government "legislators")?

The right of self defense is to one's self, not to one's government. When governments change from protecting the rights of the people who delegate power to them to protecting the power of the government, such government deserves to be purged.

Let them fall into their own pit.

Freedom is the ability to do what you want to do.
Liberty is the ability to do what you ought to do.
"Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty." 2 Corinthians 3:17

anonymous commenters...

"There would be far fewer unconstitutional votes in this country if representatives believed, even remotely, that they might be personally held accountable for their actions. Like Barry said, they need to feel like they have skin in the game."

You Need to Add......................

Home address
Office address
Home Phone
Cell Phone
Licence Plate Numbers
Route to and from work,
and Schools!

Especially Names of Spouses and Children

Photos! So that They Are EASILY Identified.


They NEED TO FEEL....Very UNCOMFORTABLE. 24-7.............


Attempting to Rob YOU!!!

I see your point, but...

I thought we were better than that.

That's a LOSER'S attitude

Winners take steps to improve their odds of Winning.

Loser's are unwilling to do what is Necessary to Win.

There is NO PRIZE for 2nd Place.

Irresistible Pressure Must be brought to bear on those Responsible.

I'd rather do the right thing.

Any other sort of "winning" is an illusion.

The Legislator's Home phone and address

can be found if you actually go to the page links posted and click on the individual names, it takes you through to pages like this: http://www.cbia.com/ga/CT_Sen_John_Fonfara/-N252452

The things that will destroy us are: politics without principle;
pleasure without conscience; wealth without work; knowledge without character; business without morality; science without humanity; and
worship without sacrifice: Mahatma Mohandas K. Gan

meekandmild's picture

Keep us updated

I doubt MSN will tell the story.

makes a nice recall list too :)

as well, a class action suit should be filed and signatures gathered.
This is citizen push-back and NEEDS to happen and GROW.
They will 'go' for the 'head' of any grassroots movement UNLESS it grows too FAST for them to decapitate.
250,000 instant 'felons' is outrageous.