20 votes

Call them "Rothschild Republicians" The best way to brand and identify the traitors!

Politicians aligned with the Rothschilds need to be identified and branded as "Rothschild Republicans". If they are called this in public, the brand could soon stick and be perpetuated by the media. This would prompt those who are unaware of the empire to question and soon find out who is now running this country.

I would love to hear politicians like John McCain and Lindsay Graham asked in public if their allegience lies with Americans or the Rothschilds!

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I like it

I think it could work.

Bad idea

You won't brand them as traitors, you'll only brand yourself as an anti-Semite.

I guarantee it.

The moment you start complaining about Rothschild in any mainstream venue, people will instantly envision you with a Hitler mustache and won't listen to another word you say. The fact that you aren't an anti-Semite is totally irrelevant, that is how they will perceive you.

So, if you want to actually persuade people, bad idea.

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."

Yes: I Like the Idea of "Branding"

Tagging them as "Rothschild Republicans" is a good start.

It is important to call out the Rothschilds publicly for the crooked institutions that they and the Rockefellers created, and all politicians who align with them.

Unfortunately "Rockfeller Republicans" will not be perceived as an insult to many. The News Media will refer to "Rockfeller Republicans" as simply moderate republicans (more acceptable).

But what is moderate about perpetual War, a broken Monetary system, and police-statism?

So maybe "Rothschild Republicans" will work better.

Most people underestimate the power and importance of key words.

The RRs have expert linguist that study the most efficient word and branding for their propaganda. Most people have never heard of the Rothschild so the idea is to at least get the to ask "Who is that".

Used to be called.

"Rockefeller Republicans" as opposed to "Goldwater Republicans." After Nelson died, they were called by various names. RINO probably was the most common. The Goldwater branch allied itself to Nixon and Reagan. The conservative wing of the Democrat party, formerly allied with George Wallace, shifted to support Reagan. The Rockefeller branch became the Bush/CIA branch. They remained big government, foreign policy hawks, but gave lip service to the low-tax, smaller government base. Once it felt secure, it stopped doing that. After all, where were the Christian, Southern, conservatives going to go? So Bob Dole and John McCain and Mitt Romney all either insulted or ignored a big chunk of the party and lost.
I call them CIA Republicans. They all graduated from the same schools and know all of the secret handshakes. Obama is a CIA Democrat. John Kerry is another.

[F]orce can only settle questions of power, not of right. - Clyde N. Wilson

ecorob's picture

We have Rothschild's republicans here in Tennessee!

Lame ass senators Alexander and Corker are BOTH Rothschild's republicans.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

I agree. Everyone knows the

I agree. Everyone knows the Rothschild's secretly control the world, therefore this strategy makes sense.

Daresay you. the problem is

Daresay you.
the problem is NOT the Illuminati. dear BILL3
it is the ignorati.

Sounds like a synonym for the

Sounds like a synonym for the humanti, daresay I

I disagree

No matter how much you think you are right, or how much you may even be right about the Rothschild's, it will only ever come off as a fringe conspiracy nut spouting more nonsense. I just don't think it will catch on out side of this movement. To be honest, just like 9/11 truth, even if you all are right about it, which I don't believe you are, but even if you were, I just don't think there is ever going to be enough steam behind your movement to get out of the fringe and into the mainstream.
Rand Paul however, has a very real chance to catch on with the mainstream. He has steered clear of some of the things which are near and dear to many here on the DP, but he has brought many other very important ideas his dad worked decades for, into the national debate and potentially into the executive branch. The second he jumps onto something like 911 truth, or Rothschild conspiracies, he is done.

Free market capitalism isn't right for America because it works better. It's right because it's free (and it works better).

ecorob's picture

snakepit 22 is a troll!

A fool, an idiot, however you want to describe him negatively, he is that.

NOT a partner in our efforts; just look at his history.

Hell, just look at this post.

snakepit 22 should rename himself ostrich4ever as he hasn't a clue!

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

deacon's picture

Disagree with what?

Rands name wasn't even mentioned,so why interject it into this topic?

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

Watch this a true event!

When is this movement going to cease with the paranoia.

How can this movement hold to completely contradictory stances at once and ever expect to gain a foothold in anything other than a diagnoses of schizophrenia?

Secondly, if this is true and most of our eggs are in the Rand Paul basket -- how can he get passed an oligarchy? By your own rules they will do whatever and say whatever to win.

How many times is this movement going to build 2000ft walls and ask us to pay for ladders for more power hungry among us?

Live for yourself, and your family. No government or politician will ever save you. If anything they will beat your ass and than kill you.

I literally stopped going to ronpaulforums becuase it turned into paid-programming for rand paul. I'm not an anti-government guy that is going to bring in Rand Paul (suppose you could) just so republicans can get more respect in the coming years.

Rand sold his ass to mcconnel and the party heads so he could share "their" power and he could do funraising for them and be front and center in their new goal of PR.

Anyone that was involved in the last two elections (especially delegates) just remember how we were treated by OUR OWN.

Yeah, were going to cancel the campaign (benson) but we are still going to need money ........ OK................... What about the delegates........ LOL (benson) You guys thought we were going to win. LOL I did it just for the money and power, look at me and mcconnel - my father and law must love me to pieces.

ecorob's picture


Join us or get the hell OUT of the way.

We will steam roll you.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Michael Nystrom's picture

Your post reminded me of this article

In the Sunday NY Times:

The Republican donors who have financed the party’s vast outside-spending machine are turning against the consultants and political strategists they once lavished with hundreds of millions of dollars.

In recent months, they have begun holding back checks from Republican “super PACs” like American Crossroads, unsatisfied with the groups’ explanations for their failure to unseat President Obama or win back the Senate. Others, less willing than in the past to defer to the party elders and former congressional staff members who control the biggest groups, are demanding a bigger voice in creating strategy in exchange for their continued support.

Donors like Paul Singer, the billionaire Republican investor, have expanded their in-house political shops, building teams of loyal advisers and researchers to guide and coordinate their giving. And some of the biggest contributors to Republican outside groups in 2012 are now gravitating toward the more donor-centric political and philanthropic network overseen by Charles and David Koch, who have wooed them in part by promising more accountability over how money is spent.

“People are really drawn to the Koch model,” said Anthony Scaramucci, a New York hedge fund investor and Republican fund-raiser, who attended the Kochs’ annual donor conference near Palm Springs, Calif., in January. “It’s adaptive, data-driven, and they are the most propitious capital allocators in political activism.”

The quiet revolt signals a broader shift in the world of big money. Clubs of elite donors in both parties are taking a more central role in shaping policy and campaigns, displacing party leaders and the outside-spending organizations they helped create after the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision in 2010. And the sheer scale of their spending is almost certain to rewrite the playbook for political campaigns this year, as candidates reckon with the strongly held views of some of the world’s wealthiest people.


He's the man.
TwelveOhOne's picture

I love the universe, and its communications :)

This morning, I read this comment. I gave thought to, and then decided not to, respond to your comment with the following:

"Scaramucci? Can he do the fandango?"

But I thought "no, a bit too vague, nobody would get it."

Well, the universe did, and on my way in to work, sent that song through my radio: Queen, "Bohemian Rhapsody" (105.7 WROR, between around 9:30 and 9:45).

I am so happy to be here.

I love you. I'm sorry. Please forgive me. Thank you.
http://fija.org - Fully Informed Jury Association
http://jsjinc.net - Jin Shin Jyutsu (energy healing)

Michael Nystrom's picture

That is excellent

I'm not only glad you're here, I'm happy that you're happy to be here!

He's the man.

I like it!

That's a good one. More than anything, we need to call things what they are. That one is accurate. There are Rothschild Democrats too. That distinction is more important than Democrats vs Republicans.

Imagine someone asking McCain or Lindsey Grapham if they

are true Republicans or Rothchild Republicans. Let the stammering begin.

They would call you crazy, and rightfully so.

Even if there is actually Rothschilds republicans good luck getting the other 90% of people to care.

Also they are politicians, are you actually saying some government control is good? Ron Paul didn't need to appeal to conspiracy to get us on board, so why are we going to devolve into that?

All government is bad, all politicians are bad. The end. It's like searching for answers in the bottom of a bottle and then wondering where it all went wrong. It all went wrong when you thought you could find answers in delusion.

Call them covetous, killing, lying thieves. Why confuse matters?


Free includes debt-free!

The Rothschilds are the hidden family of bankers that

call the shots. Unfortunately most people do not know who they are. Therefore by identifying the culprits by name, you are not confusing the situation but clarifying the problem so people will better understand.

If you would like more information read GE Griffin's "The Creature from Jekyll Island". He lays out the history of this European banking family who took control of the European monetary system approx. three hundred years ago. They were behind the deceptive creation of the Federal Reserve and have been the primary hidden controllers of American policy ever since.

The job of creditors is

The job of creditors is to to get borrowers to overextend themselves so they can collect the collateral.

Our problem is Congress.

How many in Congress for the past 220 years have refused to borrow and stick us with the bill.

The Rothschild bogeyman is a distraction, IMO.

Congress borrows money it can only repay by looting others. So they loot and plunder the world over.

No principal on the national debt has been paid since 1893.

Free includes debt-free!

How are they even involved in

How are they even involved in US politics or politics in general? The Koch Brothers and George Soros are exponentially more involved.

Check out http://ronpaulforums.com for activism and news.

Dig into to it and you will find the Rothschilds have been

maniulating governments for 300 years. They are ring leaders who call the shots and only let the Rockfellas, Kochs and Soros in as minor players.

I have and I can't find any

I have and I can't find any historical evidence that supports the claims. One was political in Israel but most aren't. Can you show me a Rothschild who has attended a Bilderberg event? Maybe Jacob?


Check out http://ronpaulforums.com for activism and news.

The Rothschilds are not the puppets,

the are the puppeteers. Maybe you could dig a little deeper.

I have. And if you dug a bit

I have. And if you dug a bit deeper, you'd realize you're mistaken. They're not even involved in commercial banking nor fractional reserve banking. You're believing hysteria and misinformation.

Check out http://ronpaulforums.com for activism and news.

They're involved in CENTRAL BANKING

IMF, BIS, World Bank, Federal Reserve, First Bank of the US, 2nd Bank of the US, Bank of England, bank of France...

At their inceptions, the #Liberty, #OccupyWallStreet and #TeaParty movements all had the same basic goal... What happened?