14 votes

Ex-CIA Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers

TITLE SHOULD REALLY BE: "No Boeing 767 airliners" hit the Twin Towers, instead of "No Airplanes" as per what's in the affidavit.

"The affidavit, dated 28th January 2014 is part of a law suit being pursued by Morgan Reynolds in the United States District Court, Southern District, New York."

US Will Have To Rebut Or Accept Statement As Truth

"A former CIA and civilian pilot has sworn an affidavit, stating that no planes flew into the Twin Towers as it would have been physically impossible.

John Lear, the son of Learjet inventor, Bill Lear, has given his expert evidence that it would have been physically impossible for Boeing 767s, like Flights AA11 and UA175 to have hit the Twin Towers on 9/11, particularly when flown by inexperienced pilots:

‘No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors’, he stated in the affidavit."

Read More:


UPDATE: Some Good comments here & questions. Made me think for sure.

I looked for an actual PDF copy of the affidavit, but appears it has been deleted from all the sites that had posted it. There are copies of the text though.

1) Shared by Ceg. http://beforeitsnews.com/9-11-and-ground-zero/2012/03/911-ai...

2) http://www.activistpost.com/2012/03/911-affidavit-by-john-le...

UPDATE 2: PDF of affidavit. Thanks DocNo2. https://wikispooks.com/w/images/d/dc/Bill.Lear.affadavit.pdf

I'm thinking that if this exists (the Law Suit) we should follow it at least & see where it leads.

Nothing posted by me or any of us should be considered something that's definitive or implied as definitive. My belief is that we are all here to gather info & judge it for ourselves. Believe what we feel is true & not believe what we feel is false. Our job is not to try to convince others to believe that we our self believes, nor ridicule or belittle those who have a different slant on subjects that are posted. Just my two cents, for what it's worth.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Case was dismissed on 06-26-08 with prejudice

This case in Southern District of NY which was dismissed on 6/26/2008. I did not find the affidavit mentioned in this post...see below which was copied from the Docket for this case (1:07-cv-04612-GBD) using PACER/ECF. Anyone can do it providing you register at http://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/

07/16/2008 141 AFFIRMATION of Jerry V Leaphart re: 138 Bill of Costs. Document filed by Morgan Reynolds. (Leaphart, Jerry) (Entered: 07/16/2008)
07/11/2008 140 ORDER denying 139 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff's motion pursuant to F.R.C.P. 59(e) and Local Rule 6.3, that this Court reconsider and amend its 6/26/2008 decision granting defendants' motions to dismiss, is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 7/11/2008) (tve) (Entered: 07/11/2008)
07/11/2008 139 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 136 Order on Motion to Dismiss,. Document filed by Morgan Reynolds. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Leaphart, Jerry) (Entered: 07/11/2008)
07/07/2008 138 BILL OF COSTS Document filed by Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex A (part 1), # 2 Exhibit Ex A (part 2))(Semprevivo, Philip) (Entered: 07/07/2008)
06/30/2008 137 CLERK'S JUDGMENT That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Decision and Order dated June 26, 2008, defendants motions to dismiss, filed in each of these three cases, are granted, and all three complaints are dismissed with prejudice (07 CV 3314 (GBD), 07 CV 4612 (GBD), and 07 CV 3623 (GBD)); accordingly, these actions are closed. (Signed by J. Michael McMahon, clerk on 6/30/08) (Attachments: # 1 notice of right to appeal)(ml) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/1/2008: # 2 judgment) (ml). Modified on 7/1/2008 (ml). (Entered: 07/01/2008)
06/26/2008 Transmission to Judgments and Orders Clerk. Transmitted re: 136 Order on Motion to Dismiss, to the Judgments and Orders Clerk. (jfe) (Entered: 06/26/2008)
06/26/2008 136 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: The defendant's motion's to dismiss, filed in each of these three case, are granted. All three complaints are dismissed with prejudice. The Wood v. Applied Research Associates, Inc., et al., 07-Cv-3314 (GBD); Reynolds V. Science Application Int'l, et al, 07-CV-4612 (GBD), and Haas v. Gutierrez, et al., 07-CV-2623(GBD) actions are hereby closed. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 6/26/2008) (jfe) (Entered: 06/26/2008)

Repeal the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the 16th amendment - sound money for our communities and out of Washington, DC.

Good work.....

noBIGgov. Big question I had was, date of the affidavit 28th January 2014 as quoted in the Original post. Because in the affidavit I Posted:
( https://wikispooks.com/w/images/d/dc/Bill.Lear.affadavit.pdf ) the date was January 28, 2008.

I'm still searching for answers. I actually sent a message to http://pilotsfor911truth.org/ to see if they had any comments on the subject. No response thus far, but will update in the event they do.

ecorob's picture

Project Camelot is NOT insane...

Are you afraid of the truth?

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Was that comment directed at

Was that comment directed at me? If so, no I am not afraid. I am a truth seeker, someone who know that there is a lot of misinformation, distractions and money whores out there. Project Camelot may not be insane, dont watch the series much. But from what I have seen many of their guests very much seem to be either one or more of the three above mentioned categories.

Don't assume too much when engaging in discussion.

sworn affidavit or not John

sworn affidavit or not John Leer is completely insane. He was a guest on the C2C show a week ago and... man... insane isn't even the right word. Bat shit crazy? maybe?

Also since when is it a good idea to trust a CIA man? A CIA man with deep connections to the Bin Laden family, and therefor the Bush crime family... None of the first reactions here on this forum makes any sense at all.. get a grip plz

Also, forgot to add that in

Also, forgot to add that in the C2C interview he was quite explicit about there being NO PLANES, meaning holographic planes.

The interview is available either in the C2C archives or on youtube, just go listen to him. He is..... crazy as fuck

Ghost planes on 911?

Yeesh where does it end! Next you're gonna say there was some conspiracy to keep Jerry Sandusky's child abuse concealed.
What's that?
Oh a special investigative counsel led by former FBI director Louis Freeh reported that "in order to avoid the consequences of bad publicity, the most powerful leaders at the University — Spanier, Schultz, Paterno and Curley — repeatedly concealed critical facts relating to Sandusky's child abuse from authorities"
And this conspiracy lasted how long? 14 years

Ok, tell me more about the ghost planes on 911.

The 911 lunacy never ends

The 911 lunacy never ends here. Now no planes hit the building despite thousands of first hand witnesses. Take this s**t somewhere else. I have to believe at this point people who post this garbage are either crazy, or they are the disinformation trolls Snowden talked about sent in to rile up the crazies and discredit the liberty movement.

Take a page from Ron Paul strategy and talk about the thousands of other things you can talk about which don't make people look at you like are a whole lotta fries short of a Happy Meal.

"In reality, the Constitution itself is incapable of achieving what we would like in limiting government power, no matter how well written."

~ Ron Paul, End the Fed

voted you up.. I dont believe

voted you up.. I dont believe the official story one bit but holographic planes??????????? and YOU get almost 10 down votes????

Seriously.. DP, ffs..

ecorob's picture


I voted him down for using the words "9/11 lunacy never ends" in his title and will do it again as whatever his message is, its flawed with a title like that!

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

no planes is lunacy...

no planes is lunacy...

You're correct

It is Lunacy, it is also Retardation, and Disinformation.



I must though admit that I am also crazy since in my honest opinion the one theory that makes the most sense is the theory of exotic technology used on that day. We have had this discussion earlier RPW and it didn't go over well in your ears, calling me all kinds of things. No hard feeling here but I dont think we agree on alot except that there in fact were planes flown into the buildings. :)

have a good day RPW

Voted down by two trolls so

Voted down by two trolls so far! LOL

"In reality, the Constitution itself is incapable of achieving what we would like in limiting government power, no matter how well written."

~ Ron Paul, End the Fed

fireant's picture

I voted you up, so at least 3

Funny; I don't use the vote button much though. It seems like child's play to me.

Undo what Wilson did

This is what I don't get

Conspiracies involving hundreds of people are almost impossible to contain 10+ years after the event. Everyone wants their 15 minutes. There is always a Snowden. Same with Sandy Hook. Smells terrible, nobody is talking. Do you know how hard it is to control the speech of hundreds? Really, really hard. That it has been done several times since 9/11 is mind boggling. I admit the evidence is very damning, but I am bothered that there are not whistle-blowers by now. Someone knows, why are they remaining silent?

Dead men tell no tales

And yes, there have been some untimely deaths which serve as a warning for others. Also, keep in mind that each victims family was awarded at least 2 million dollars tax free. That's alot of hush money.

good for rand paul

its clear that the minds of those invested in this topic are sharp but it is also clear that the flag bearing the name of paul flying beneath this topic suffers ... rand is lucky ,still, for 80,000 views a day will not win or loose an election.

How to make a ghost plane

Still looking for the wing vortices on 911 videos

Here's what they look like.


I posted john Lear here for years under old accounts and nobody took it seriously.

His project Camelot stuff is the best but it will be scoffed by the uninformed here because it's not "liberty" material.

Check out this interview


they will discredit and ingore him like ron paul

they will discredit and ingore him like ron paul
because John Lear is on video talking about things on the moon and ufos.

I have seen the interview of John stating no planes hit it and there are numerous other pilots with the same claim , those planes could'nt reach that speed noted in the 9/11 comission because of parasite drag, "ironman77" obviously hasn't done his homework as most trolls on here don't , they just like to immediately discredit with no further anything.

Wish it would be true but I'm afraid the snowden docs that our being dribbled out there may be the only key to proving what happened that day.

nuff said

"He's this eccentric Ghandi-Like figure that you cant touch with the normal bribes that people respond to."
the man Doug Wead on DR. RON PAUL

I don't think

we will ever find out what happened since sufficient evidence has been destroyed and we have people floating all kinds of ideas like holograms and energy weapons, mini nukes, etc, etc, etc to maintain division and chaos. I personally am sure that something terribly evil happened that day and I suspect that it served the purposes of some very rich and powerful globalists (such as Silverstein). I believe that planes hit the buildings but I can't explain how they were able to hit their targets or how the building could have fallen from fires. Holograms, nukes, are all complete nonsense if you ask me.

"Endless money forms the sinews of war." - Cicero, www.freedomshift.blogspot.com

Interesting documentary from NOVA/PBS

In the documentary they mention a warehouse full of debris kept from the world trade tower site that they would be using in the new museum. (Starting at the 20:50 minute mark)

fireant's picture

The myth which keeps the ignorant in a fog.

"...sufficient evidence has been destroyed..."
I used to believe it too. I started looking specifically for structural evidence of controlled demolition about a year and a half ago, even though I had been told it was all destroyed. What I found was not only is there an abundance of evidence available, there is no sign of controlled demolition in it, and just like an auto crash investigation, it shows precisely what happened.
That one myth is enough to keep all the wild theories afloat.

Undo what Wilson did

Even If it is true, which I

Even If it is true, which I wouldn't be surprised...

We have so much other evidence that is more powerful and rock solid and thoroughly studied- that we are still fighting to bring attention to.

And all of a sudden someone gives a sworn testimony in an area where we don't feel comfortable conversationally, and are more easily dismissed. Seems a little strange.... But Yeah I'll watch to see where it leads.

there is proof of

no planes - video proof from NBC. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPKq2K2dh6k

I am gross and perverted, I'm obsessed and deranged, I have existed for years but very little has changed, I'm the tool of the government and industry too. Have you guessed me yet??
I'm the slime oozing out from your TV set.

That is proof of nothing,

Other than pathetic-quality resolution used to deceive.

The pathetic

quality was in the many versions where they installed a plane

I am gross and perverted, I'm obsessed and deranged, I have existed for years but very little has changed, I'm the tool of the government and industry too. Have you guessed me yet??
I'm the slime oozing out from your TV set.

"Where they installed a plane"

You're a "No-Planer" lunatic. Buh-bye, clown.