14 votes

Ex-CIA Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers

TITLE SHOULD REALLY BE: "No Boeing 767 airliners" hit the Twin Towers, instead of "No Airplanes" as per what's in the affidavit.

"The affidavit, dated 28th January 2014 is part of a law suit being pursued by Morgan Reynolds in the United States District Court, Southern District, New York."

US Will Have To Rebut Or Accept Statement As Truth

"A former CIA and civilian pilot has sworn an affidavit, stating that no planes flew into the Twin Towers as it would have been physically impossible.

John Lear, the son of Learjet inventor, Bill Lear, has given his expert evidence that it would have been physically impossible for Boeing 767s, like Flights AA11 and UA175 to have hit the Twin Towers on 9/11, particularly when flown by inexperienced pilots:

‘No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors’, he stated in the affidavit."

Read More:

http://the-tap.blogspot.ca/2014/03/ex-cia-pilot-gives-sworn-...

UPDATE: Some Good comments here & questions. Made me think for sure.

I looked for an actual PDF copy of the affidavit, but appears it has been deleted from all the sites that had posted it. There are copies of the text though.

1) Shared by Ceg. http://beforeitsnews.com/9-11-and-ground-zero/2012/03/911-ai...

2) http://www.activistpost.com/2012/03/911-affidavit-by-john-le...

UPDATE 2: PDF of affidavit. Thanks DocNo2. https://wikispooks.com/w/images/d/dc/Bill.Lear.affadavit.pdf

I'm thinking that if this exists (the Law Suit) we should follow it at least & see where it leads.

Nothing posted by me or any of us should be considered something that's definitive or implied as definitive. My belief is that we are all here to gather info & judge it for ourselves. Believe what we feel is true & not believe what we feel is false. Our job is not to try to convince others to believe that we our self believes, nor ridicule or belittle those who have a different slant on subjects that are posted. Just my two cents, for what it's worth.



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
fireant's picture

I merely quote what Marshall told me.

And you have the audacity to lecture me when you have not the first bit of structural evidence Building 7 is "the smoking gun", when in fact every bit of structural evidence shows it broke apart at it's connections? Who is making the leaps here?
As for Marshall's death, his divorce was bitter. Little is known about his ex. For all we know, she may have done it, or hired it. I doubt we will ever know what happened, and speculation will get us nowhere. Stick to facts.
Ps edit: You should read his book. I'll send you a copy for free if you wish. PM me.

Undo what Wilson did

unless you are a government troll

hmmm who would have an issue with a government troll? Snowden is still a government troll, now works for Russia (if USA and Russia working together needed any evidense).

I see no reason why you can't make your point without threatening someone of their reality (except your own reality is weak).

This "controlling" others with these threats is just another form of censurship.

Keep Assuming

You Say "it would be impossible to conceal from the pilot during pre-flight checks." Are you assuming they were commercial planes and the "pilots" weren't in on it? Seems like a lot to assume, or you just spreading disinfo

fireant's picture

Can you read?

It's what Marshall told me. Take it for what it is. Marshall flew the radar tracks and FDR. According to him, there was absolutely no intercept or remote control. I'm merely relating what he told me.

Undo what Wilson did

Garbage.

Garbage.

Worst Title for a post, ever...

The title of "no plane hit towers", is misleading and inaccurate. Thousands of people saw what appeared to be planes hit the towers, at first glance. What hit the towers, were military drones. Unfortunately, like Sandy Hook, Aurora Shooting, TSA-LAX shooting, and Boston Bombing -- 9/11 was a False Flag designed and carried-out to scare us into giving away ALL our liberties.
The Elite Oligarchy (Bilderberg/CFR/Federal Reserve) are in trouble, with their collapsing fiat currency ponzi scheme. If the Elite can come in, and seize all resources, replace all leadership, and seize all savings/IRAs, they can keep their empire a few years longer. Perhaps there is only 24 months at most before this comes to a head. We will be forced to have a Global Currency, and have our guns confiscated. The American people will NOT go for it.
BE PREPARED
Get libertarian Republicans elected
God Bless YOU and YOUR FAMILY

Michael K-obzina
Republican District Captain 25h
3o3-933-2898
Give me Liberty, or Give me Death...
STOP Federal AND State Governments servitude to THE FED and Corp.s!

This is

the kind of stuff that does more harm to the 911 truth movement than anything! I watched it live on tv, obviously planes hit the towers. Some how it seems like people that claim no planes hit the towers are used to discredit the movement, because it twist the truth and the uninformed population will hear that, go on YouTube and watch the footage of actual planes hitting the tower and think the movement are crazy. Probably the same people who believe this are the ones who believe in lizard people. Insert lies into some truth, and it discredits it.

"I watched it live on tv" !!

lmao

Well

unless there is a new way to do special effects while broadcasting live, I believe actual planes hit the towers. If it was pre-recorded then I can see, but even then you have witnesses on the ground who claimed to see the planes fly right into the towers. Not sure how people can say no planes were there.

Some still believe their own eyes

Not sure how an aluminum airplane flies through a steel girder wall.

fireant's picture

You mean the same John Lear who believes cities on the moon

are camouflaged by holographics?
"We know that most of the near side of the moon is hidden by holographic or other kinds of camouflage measures. Somehow at 5:30 am on October 7 the camouflage became inoperable or was turned off for a short time giving us a view of what is really up there."
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/47john_lear/menu.html
Please.

Undo what Wilson did

What a load

You are telling me the 2 tallest buildings in New York City couldn't be hit by a large plane? A blind person could hit one of those buildings in a couple of tries. I don't think this story is true

I listened to this

Sounds pretty shaky. The Narrator says the plane is going far beyond it's limits and that anything other that an experienced pilot would cause the aircraft to tear apart. He actually says that the aircraft is "traveling at 150 knots over maximum operating speed". Here's the truth. The second plane was traveling at 586 mph which a little over the average cruising speed of a 767. There was a convincing "pilot" talking about flight simulators, but unless I knew more about the person talking, and considering the blatant misinformation given by the narrator, I'm calling Bologna!!

fireant's picture

Philip Marshall, airline captain rated on 737,747,757, and 767,

and other pilots, flew all 911 patterns several times in flight simulators with ease. The patterns were loaded into the simulators from flight data recorders and radar tracks. The only problem encountered was keeping the nose down on AA77 as it powered up coming out of the loop, but with a few tries, it too was flown with no problem.

Undo what Wilson did

deacon's picture

fireant

From your own comment
" but with a few tries, it too was flown with no problem."
How many "tries" did them alleged hi jackers get to accomplish
their mission?
Did they get multiple attempts?
D

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

fireant's picture

Read his book

This is a very important part of why he believes live yoke training was provided for the pilots in the Arizona desert.

Undo what Wilson did

deacon's picture

fireant

You said you read that book,this is why I asked what was said
D

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

At what speed?

Please provide a link for the above.

fireant's picture

According to Marshall,

they flew the exact patterns as provided by radar tracks and flight recorder data, which includes the speeds of the airplanes indicated on the data. He said it all matched up with no discrepancies. His book is available at Amazon, or you can message me for a free copy. I purchased a few extras to give out.

Undo what Wilson did

SteveMT's picture

I guess these 9/11 truth pilots are all incompetent idiots.

Are all of these members in the Pilots for 9/11 Truth also incompetent? Do they also not know how to fly?
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core

I don't know, but they seem real to me. I guess any truth movement must always attract a bunch of trolls. I'm sorry for posting that propaganda video.

FYI

bump

.

Misleading title

The article suggests no commercial aircraft hit the towers.

Please consider the veracity of your publication accordingly

My husband and I

(both of us Mechanical Engineers, he also has a minor in Aerospace Engineering) have been saying this since day 1.

First discussed with fellow engineers - mocked.
Then discussed with non-technical people - mocked.

Now we just talk to each other and our kids. Much more pleasant.

The Laws of Physics are the Laws of Physics.

The law cannot make a wicked person virtuous…God’s grace alone can accomplish such a thing.
Ron Paul - The Revolution

Setting a good example is a far better way to spread ideals than through force of arms. Ron Paul

"No Boeing 767 could attain a

"No Boeing 767 could attain a speed of 540 mph at 1000 feet above sea level ‘parasite drag doubles with velocity’ and ‘parasite power’ cubes with velocity."

I don't remember reading that the planes were traveling at 540 mph.

"John Lear, the son of Learjet inventor, Bill Lear, has given his expert evidence that it would have been physically impossible for Boeing 767s, like Flights AA11 and UA175 to have hit the Twin Towers on 9/11, particularly when flown by inexperienced pilots:"

I watched a show about airplane crashes that said that ever since planes went to fly by wire they were able to be controlled from the ground.

You can make a drinking straw go right through a potato if you hit it fast enough


http://youtu.be/tUwfj8-bcsc

Good catch on the straw/potato but the devil is in the details

Skip to about the 2:00 mark for the explanation.

saying it was impossible to happen by untrained pilots

is one thing.

saying it didn't happen is another.

Agreed. By chance a French

Agreed. By chance a French film crew had their camera pointing in the right direction so we actually have a video of the first plane hitting the Twin Towers. There are numerous videos of the second plane hitting. The far fringe of the conspiracy movement would have you believe that these were all satellite controlled holograms or some such nonsense.

A flight instructor decided to have his students try to hit one of the Twin Towers in their flight simulators. None of them could do it. They kept missing. Then the flight instructor tried himself, and it took several tries before he did it. So the act, while not impossible, is a lot more difficult than it seems.

If you want to argue that the planes were computer controlled when they hit well maybe you can make a case --- that will join the long list of speculations we can't prove or disprove about 911. But if you want to claim that planes didn't hit the buildings at all you have joined the ranks of those with zero credibility.

Fat chance.

Can you prove that the filmmaker didn't point at the building explosion the photoshop the plane in post-production.

Is there evidence in that film that was made at the correct time or even the same day?

What was the chain of custody for these bitmaps.

Are their any markings that prove it was the alleged plane?

Is the sound signature correct for an that airliner?

The time until the impact could reached the camera?

What was the explosion before the plane hit?

Why was the building on smoking before the plane hit?

It's evidence of something, but what?

Lack of physical evidence is damning in itself.

Free includes debt-free!