47 votes

Rand Paul on Sunday Fox News With Chris Wallace March 9, 2014

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Chris Wallace = d-bag

That guy exemplifies everything wrong with the GOP, and why I can't be a part of it. He is a belligerent, intellectual sinkhole and everything that comes out of his mouth grates me like fingers on a chalkboard. Chris... you disgust me.

I'm not that big a fan of Rand in general, but next to Chris Wallace he sounds like Thomas Paine.

I had to cover

my screen w/paper to block his face. I hate his voice!!!!!


My sentiments exactly

I despise these interviews...

Where every question is designed to put our candidates on the defensive.

I understand that Rand is the front-runner now but these kinds of hostile, semi-antagonistic interviews where the interviewer sets a frame and uses tone to make implications designed to discredit and tear down a candidate and there is no response from the moderator to what is said anger me.

A small body of determined spirits fired by an unquenchable faith in their mission can alter the course of history.
~Mahatma Gandhi

Chris has established himself

As the frontrunner (PIVOT MAN ) in the MSM circle jerk competition.


he's like their "fluffer".

I'd rather have a bottle in front o' me than a frontal lobotomy

Jeb Bush...lol

Who were those 41% that claim to have voted for Jeb? No one I know is thinking of another bush...

they forgot to tell you

...the poll was conducted in west Palm beach Florida! Haha...now that I think off it, it probably was!Jeb plus Marco equalled 63% off the total vote! Where else would those numbers even remotely come from?

They Are Setting The Stage For More Vote Fraud

The establishment makes up phony or fake poll numbers like 41% and thus the sheeple believe these numbers and will go to the polls and make it a reality..Right?

The truth is at this stage of the new election cycle nobody really cares about 2016 until crunch time.

You've got to know these poll numbers are not scientific..More fresh lies for the mainstream sheep of voters..

Do you really believe anyone wants another Busher in the Whitehouse?

I don't!

41% - Really?

I say Bullsh*t!!

It's all

horse tookey, imo! Another recent poll totaled 143%! How is that possible? The poll shown here totals 167%! Again, how is that possible!
Yeah, I don't know a single soul who wants another Bush...

O.P.O.G.G. - Fighting the attempted devolution of the rEVOLution
Ron Paul 2012...and beyond

>100% is easy. Count votes for more than one.

>100% is easy.

You just do a poll that (unlike the federal elections) lets you vote for ALL the people you'd like to see run, rather than forcing you to pick only one of several that you'd like or accept and treats those you'd like only slightly less as if you'd vote for Stalin before voting for them.

Such polls are, IMHO, far more useful when it comes to measuring how much support a primary candidate could suck in. For starters, they don't artificially reduce the showing of members of larger factions, who are in competition with more like-minded people. (I'm betting that's why Fox chose this, in order to find SOME poll where Rand didn't blow away the neocon competition. B-) )

That said, the showing of Bush makes me wonder about othrt aspects of the methodology of this poll.

= = = =
"Obama’s Economists: ‘Stimulus’ Has Cost $278,000 per Job."

That means: For each job "created or saved" about five were destroyed.

I thought

the same thing. Jeb Bush? I still believe the republicans are going to nominate Jeb Bush and the democrats will nominate Hillary Clinton.

Another election where you either choose the lesser of two evils or, because of disgust, you don't vote at all.

Chris Wallace is such a

Chris Wallace is such a douche bag.

"The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that." — Alan Greenspan

The honestly worst newscaster in all of television...

The most insulting, resentful...

Remember when Ron Paul came in 2nd by-a-hair to Bachmann in IA straw poll and no one mentioned Ron Paul as doing well on Fox when they covered it live and Wallace says "and we haven't mentioned but we should....(drum roll)... Rick Santorum..."?

Not only does he try so hard to chop-down Rand with his resentful questions, but his actual body-language was so negative and condescending during the piece.
As he mentions the CPAC conference he shakes his head negatively and shrugs when he mentions it's influence on the party. Then he shrinks backwards when he has to mention another Paul as the winner... again.

Chris Wallace, as far as I can tell, truly cannot stand libertarianism or liberty, period. He thinks 'conservatism' means 'conserving the status quo'. This guy prefers socialism over liberty. He is an authoritarian, period. I've seen it all too often before. He requires someone telling him, and you, what to do, in order to feel secure. I'm pretty sure he needed his mommy to dress him for school every day, even in high school. Probably still does.

Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?