22 votes

Instant Road Rage Karma...Guy Wrecks $50,000 Truck While Intimidating Female Driver


http://youtu.be/3XqZoaWKv2k

For anyone who has ever been a victim of this type of intimidation, here is a highly satisfying outcome to an incident in Tampa, Florida. Her laugh at the end is priceless!

Enjoy :)



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

.

.

I think this thread is done

The psycho's are showing up now with truly whacky stuff.

There are a whole lot of...

There are a whole lot of dumb conversations/arguments on here. I always expect higher thinking from this community, but some of these posts are like reading the 'Yahoo.com' comments.

The tailgater was in the wrong for not keeping appropriate space between himself and the car in front of him. He's also in the wrong for taking complete attention off of the road while sticking his face and finger out the window. (When a person has to even out and 'make sure' the other person sees them flipping them off - they're just an insecure, childish idiot.)

The woman was potentially in the wrong if she was going under the speed limit (I'm not sure what the speed limit is on that road.) She was definitely just immature to yell at a guy like a three year old. So many insecure and immature people; when things like that happen to me, I just keep it all in my head. Because no good comes from saying anything out loud or overreacting.

Now, as for some of the comments here. Most people who are those 'idiots' are clearly going to argue that people need to move out of their way if they're going faster. That is a ridiculous argument. 'Passing' is to occur when an individual in one lane either isn't or can't go the full speed limit for some reason. If in the 'passing lane' and you are not going the speed limit, then get over at the earliest/safest time possible, or accelerate to match the speed limit. If you're doing the speed limit/5 over, and someone wants to pass you - You have EVERY right to stay at that exact speed in that lane (unless the lane specifies for passing only). Other people breaking the law does not mean you have to break the law as well, or make room for their law breaking. If it's not a 'passing only lane' and you are doing the speed limit, then the other driver should inconvenience themselves by switching lanes to attempt to get around you. Some idiots do not seem to realize this. Speed limit is just that. Like it or not. Passing lanes are not an excuse for people to exceed the speed limit - they are for maneuvering around individuals who are UNDER the speed limit.

Isn't common sense wonderful. Usually, there is no 'debate.' Just lack of reasoning on different sides attempting to prove they're less 'dumb-sounding.'

You give too much authority to speed limits

I could care less about the speed limit. When I drive, I drive as safely as I can. If I have to speed up passed the speed limit to allow an impatient driver to pass, well that's the safest thing to do in my situation. This girl was driving specifically to annoy or cause rage in another driver. It was her actions that caused the crash. If you are purposely driving to be an annoyance, you deserve a ticket and you're liable for the predictable results of your actions.

"Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito."

"But, but I want to justify

"But, but I want to justify my own road rage by vilifying this girl's horrible driving!" says half of the comments on this video that I've seen posted ...

What if drivers controlled their patience until there was a …..

passing opportunity? Why do you have to accelerate more gasoline (increases RPMS/lowers miles per gallon) in order to make it safer for the speeder? Why do people drive their car like a race car in order to find themselves one car in front of you at the next exit or red light? Perhaps they have more money than I do for gas, brakes, and fender benders. To each his own, peace.

kind people rock

This guys driving has no defense.

He's being a jackass.

I just figure the safest thing for me is to let them get out of my area. It's NOT safe to egg them on, or even upset them. Your all working together to get to your destination safely. As soon as you act against that goal, you are in the wrong, and your creating unsafe conditions on the road. This guy may be a jackass, but he did not need to have his truck ruined, and he wouldn't have had that happen if she had just let him speed off. She chased him down. Causing an accident.

"Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito."

"She chased him down. Causing an accident."

ok interesting…...

kind people rock

He's a psycho

He's a psycho

true that…...

haha

kind people rock

I live near an intersection where I have to be in the left lane

in order to move into a left turn lane to get to my house.

I LOVE frosting the balls of idiots who think they are entitled to ride my a-s-s and go 60 mpg in a 40 mpg zone.

I deliberately drive 40 mph just to frustrate stupid fools.

I really love it when they pull up to my passenger side and realize they we so busy being stupid they didn't see that they were speeding just to be stopped by a red light anyway.

My dog knows how to hit the window button and put down the front passenger window.

She just climbs up and stares at the psycho with one of those big dog grins. Sometimes she barks.

Ha…..

funny.

kind people rock

Anyone care to bet that the phone she was using is a

Obamaphone???

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.
Friedrich Nietzsche

hahahhahahahaha

You nailed it! That describes the whole situation.

She must have come straight from WallMart with a fresh reminder.

"If you see something, say something"

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.
Friedrich Nietzsche

Both parties are in the wrong

The man in the truck is wrong for trying to intimidate a driver in front of him. If he wants to drive faster than posted speed limits that's on him. He should be able to do so at his own risk. If he loses control or gets pulled over by revenue collector, that's on him.

The woman in the car is wrong for impeding the truck driver from driving like a moron. It's not her place to regulate his driving. She's also wrong for causing a distraction for herself and the moron in the truck by filming. The only thing filming has done for this woman was give her a video with close to 8 million views.

The truck driver should have practiced more patience and less douchebaggery. He also shouldn't have instigated further negativity by slamming on his breaks and throwing up his middle finger to the woman in the car.

IMO, both parties are in the wrong and are both at fault.

-----

I drive above posted limits. When approaching a slower vehicle in my lane I do not ride their ass or try to intimidate. That being said it DOES piss me off when people won't move over. If a non-passing lane is clear and they won't move over then I WILL pass them on the right. It's not their place to regulate my speed.

Even though I drive above posted limits, there are still others out there who drive faster than me. If I'm in a lane and see a faster vehicle approaching, I get over, unless it's a one-lane road (in this case it's up to them to pass me whenever they feel they need to or can pass me). It's not my place to regulate the faster vehicle's speed behind me.

My Political Awakening: I Wanted to Change the World...
I am NOT Anti-America. America is Anti-Me - Lowkey
How to Handle POLICE STATE Encounters

I agree to some extent, but a couple of questions?

You said, "The woman in the car is wrong for impeding the truck driver from driving like a moron." Define how she was driving like a moron???

Also I totally try to get over when I see a faster vehicle approaching from behind if I'm on the Interstate, but does it make sense for the vehicle on the left lane to get over in a lane with slower traffic just because their not going fast enough for the person behind them's liking???

kind people rock

Re: I agree to some extent, but a couple of questions?

You said, "The woman in the car is wrong for impeding the truck driver from driving like a moron." Define how she was driving like a moron???

Sorry for the misunderstanding. I wasn't describing the woman's driving as moronic. I was talking about the man in the truck. His impatience/intimidation/road rage are what I am describing when I say "driving like a moron".

Also I totally try to get over when I see a faster vehicle approaching from behind if I'm on the Interstate, but does it make sense for the vehicle on the left lane to get over in a lane with slower traffic just because their not going fast enough for the person behind them's liking???

No it doesn't make sense. This is another reason why the man in the truck was in the wrong, and his impatience shows.

I wouldn't slow myself down by merging into slower lane to accommodate someone going faster than me, but I would get over if and when the lane was available and I can still go the speed I feel comfortable with (this is based on the premise that I'm already driving over posted limits and "speeding"). On a one-lane highway, would I pull over onto the shoulder to let a faster vehicle pass? If the case were that I was hauling something and needed to go slower than posted limits, I would say I probably would. If I'm just driving somewhere, and I'm already going above posted limits, I would say no.

My Political Awakening: I Wanted to Change the World...
I am NOT Anti-America. America is Anti-Me - Lowkey
How to Handle POLICE STATE Encounters

I hear ya, peace…...

…….

kind people rock

She is clearly passing people

She is clearly passing people who are in the right light and she is getting ready to make a left turn. This is not a limited access interstate she is on, so the left lane is not the "passing lane" as people are trying to describe it but regardless she is passing people.

It was him hitting the breaks slowing up to get beside here to yell and flip her off that was the next part where people claim she sped up on him.

The filming was wrong but this whole slow driver should get over argument is just wrong, since that was not the case in this situation since she was going faster than the right lane and she was getting ready to turn left on a non highway.

She was clearly blocking the

She was clearly blocking the passing lane. If people behind her want to go 100 MPH then its their right to do so. Its not up to her to regulate how fast others can go by sticking her ass out in the passing lane. She should of gotten over to the right but instead she just insist on filming the guy, while BLOCKING THE PASSING LANE. Get over to the right, bitch and learn how to drive.

I should start a indiegogo fund to help the guy out with his nice truck.

So your argument is that his

So your argument is that his right to go 100 miles an hour trumps her right to pass others at a slower speed and to be able to make a left turn? She can not go to the right lane when their are vehicles on her right side that she is passing nor should she have to as she needs to be in the left lane to get ready to make a left turn. Again this is not the freeway they were on. I drive down streets around here where the right lane is even the passing lane in some areas they allow parking in the right lane so no one drives there unless passing people turning left.

Jawa86, You should expose more of your stupidity so people

understand better why we live in a police state.

It's thinking like yours -- lawlessness -- that feeds and justifies the police state.

Animal vs human thinking.

How is the filming wrong?

She never lost her focus on the road.

Her assailant left her no choice.
In fact if you just look at the way things played out, her instinct and impulse to record were prescient.

The video, when examined without bias or prejudice is almost flawless in capturing every important detail of this incident.

This woman could have died that day. And given this criminal's record of behavior -- fleeing the scene -- her possible death could have gone unaccounted for.

The reason is because in

The reason is because in order for her to film it makes her a distracted driver as well, removes a hand from the steering wheel, and was likely the impetus that got him to slam on his breaks when passing(my theory) as he was passing he probably saw her recording it and decided he was going to show her a thing or two for it. Which doesn't justify his actions in any way but is likely the catalyst for the accident.

Using a phone in the car as the driver rather its for talking, texting or filming is an increased chance for personal accident, now if it was a passengers of hers I would of not said as much.

weak

Your comments all come out of your imagination.
Not from the evidence in the actual video.

She didn't put anything at risk nor did she cause any behavior.

The road rager was on automatic. He was out for a good road rant.

Anybody in front of him would have gotten he same treatment.

That is your assumption just

That is your assumption just as what i stated is my assumption. The video does not clearly show this as the video can not show intent in a persons mind.

I make no claim of that part as being a fact I am only assuming it as much as you are assuming he was so outrageously hostile looking for anyone to give that treatment to. Again the video can not show intent in his mind. And any comments from any poster as well as me and you can only assume these intentions on our best guess of past behaviors of others in these type of situations.

There IS one thing we can both know

That he had no idea he was being filmed until he passed her passenger side window.

So that would prove my point about him being indiscriminate about whom he would have charged at from behind.

Don't take it personally when someone like me, who is far more astute at perceiving reality (as it is), calls you out on your imagination based perceptions.

That's why you and 75% of the world operate from flawed logic.

You don't 'see' reality. You make it up.

Wow hahahahahahaha you are

Wow hahahahahahaha you are incredulous with self serving adolation. Heck I agreed with you on 99 percent of what you wrote and you go off on a tirade about one little tiny part of my first post and than try to claim how superior you are to us lowly peons. All I can say is hahahahahahahahahahaah. :p Your superiority complex is laughable.