3 votes

Win the War on Terror Without a Single Dead Soldier

WE PETITION THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO:
Win The War on Terror Without a Single Dead Soldier
"...Iran is a vibrant, ethnically diverse melting-pot of Kurds, Turks, Azeris, and Arabs...owes its Islamic heritage to a wave of immigration from Arabia...
...urge the President to build upon this multicultural heritage and declare Iran a "Nation of Immigrants."
...Iran will be obliged to accept millions of immigrants from West Africa and Latin America.
Any Iranian who resisted would surely be called "racist" and fired from his job.
By 2060, Iranians would be reduced to a small minority and no longer a threat. By 2100 the Iranians would disappear completely.
Don't declare "War." Declare "Nation of Immigrants." The results are the same without a single shot fired."
CLICK TO SIGN PETITION!!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The War on Terror is a complete fabrication.

It has been created and fostered by the U.S./NATO/Israel axis in order to justify their invasions and interventions all around the world.

This being the case the correct course of action is for Americans to support the non-interventionist politicians and seek to educate their people about this issue, like Ron Paul.

The suggestion in the OP is from some kind of authoritarian Statist perspective that itches to interfere with force in other countries' affairs. It is this instinct that needs to be curbed and as far as possible deleted from public life.

"Jesus answered them: 'Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin. The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son remains forever. So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.'" (John 8:34-36)

...sovereign countries refused to accept fiat currency ...

Why did we "Shock and Awe" Iraq?

Well, we all know Baghdad didn't have any weapons of mass destruction. It was a False Flag.

We went in for the Bankers NWO to protect the Fiat Money System.
Saddam refused to accept Fiat Currency and insisted on gold or silver for his oil.

Iran is one of only three countries left in the world whose central bank is not under Rothschild control. Before 9-11 there were reportedly seven: Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran. By 2003, however, Afghanistan and Iraq were swallowed up by the Rothschild octopus, and by 2011 Sudan and Libya were also gone. In Libya, a Rothschild bank was established in Benghazi while the country was still at war.

When these sovereign countries refused to accept fiat currency they were invaded and introduced to democracy.

The purpose of the wars is to enforce the Bankers Fiat Money System.

End the Fiat System and return to a gold standard and the purpose of policing the world will end and the NWO will die on the vine.

Right now Iran is accepting only gold for their oil and four countries are complying. They are giving Iran Gold for their oil.

Brazil, India, Russia and China are those countries.

The Iranian nuclear bomb is a False Flag.

The threat of war is real. The New World Order is fighting for its existence. The Nuclear Bomb is a False Flag but the Fiat Money System means life or death to the UN and the New World Order.

“When we unplug the Fed, the dollar will stop its long depreciating trend, international currency value will stop fluctuating wildly, banking will no longer be a dice game, and financial power will cease to gravitate toward a small circle of government- connected to insiders.” Ron Paul

Live in Liberty
Tom Rankin

Yup.

.

"Jesus answered them: 'Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin. The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son remains forever. So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.'" (John 8:34-36)

In the last century, or two?

I wonder how many other nations have been destroyed for rejecting the internationalists' private central banking schemes.

My guess is all of them...

Including Great Britain and America. The UK and then the US have been used as empire builders and colonisers especially since the Bank of England was established in 1694. Even before then there were the Spanish, French and Dutch colonial enterprises. The Germans later joined the rush (as well as Belgium in an opportunistic fashion) and my understanding is that the resistance of the British and French ruling classes to the German upstarts was the real motivation for the Great War.

Empire building has been going on since ancient times and it was given impetus with the institution of private banking that took place in the Assyrian Empire around the 7th. century B.C. I believe. These banking enterprises discovered that it was most profitable to lend to powerful rulers and the rulers depended on ready money to advance their conquests. The looting and enslavement of the conquered nations has always been the result.

My own view is that until we can fully understand and change the way in which human enterprise and natural resources have been monetised and securitised, through many layers of risk transfer, we shall continue to suffer from the same condition. The theories that have been formulated to describe this process and to suggest alternatives are, in my opinion, quite inadequate. I believe they continue to ignore the inevitable growth of deliberate paper shuffling confusion resulting from the efforts of powerful, clever charlatans to transfer moral hazard to those least liable for it and least able to refuse to assume it...the people at large.

"Jesus answered them: 'Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin. The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son remains forever. So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.'" (John 8:34-36)

?

Isn't that a form of genocide?

hmmm...

We had good intentions...
...may have to rethink this

Very clever post!

Clever post and clever petition, but I'm not about to give my contact information to the White House on something that could be considered racialist.

You can register with only two initials

One for each, front and last, name.
No other info required.
But, we have enough signators already.
I don't think anyone really reads the messages anyway, but who knows?
LOL