5 votes

AJC: It's High Time For a Palestinian "Yes."

I just heard a radio ad sponsored by the Jewish organization AJC. It stated that in 1947, the U.N. (translation: the U.S.) offered the Arabs and Jews a "2-State Solution."

What they failed to mention was that this proposed "2-State Solution" meant that 750,000 Palestinians were first forced to MOVE AWAY from their homelands and THEN get a piece of what was left and agree to the terms.

Who in their right minds would agree to those kind of terms?

Sadly, most Americans are so ignorant of the history of the region that they'll go right along with AJC and nod their heads in agreement. And many will be newly mis-educated about the subject.

This is pure propaganda in its highest form.
Below is a link to the radio spot and the full text of this week's commentary is as follows:
Is history repeating itself again and again?

In 1947, the UN proposed to create two states – one Jewish, one Arab.

The Jews said yes, the Arabs no.

A year later, Israel was created.

Meanwhile, the West Bank and Gaza were in the Arab world’s hands.

A Palestinian state could have been declared at any time, but never was.

In 1967, in a war of self-defense, Israel took these lands and offered to talk peace.

The Arab world refused.

In 2000 and 2001, Israel tried again to strike a deal for a Palestinian state.

The answer? No.

Same thing in 2008. That Israeli offer, too, was rebuffed.

And now, Israel is trying yet again, releasing convicted Palestinian terrorists as a goodwill gesture.

But as yet no sign of Palestinian flexibility.

So many opportunities lost because of so many Palestinian “no’s”!Isn’t it high time for a Palestinian "yes"?

Visit us at ajc.org.

This is David Harris of AJC.
Radio Spot from AJC:

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Actions speak louder than words.

Setting aside the question of whether Israel has a right to exist (I believe it does, at least for a time), looking at the actions of the Jewish State from the beginning we can see that they are following a plan of gradual annexation of the entire Land west of the Jordan River. Later documents also indicate that their ambitions extend even further to encompass the entire area promised to them by Yahweh, from the River Euphrates to the River Nile.

As to the pretexts used to justify this gradual annexation, once more these are questions to which one can receive opposing answers depending on which side of the debate one has set one's position. Again, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. e.g. Notwithstanding the Israeli claim that they acted pre-emptivley in 1967, the reports of meetings of the Israeli cabinet prior to the Six Day War prove differently. According to these reports the IDF knew that the Arab countries were actually unprepared for war and presented no threat to Israel. They decided that if they, the IDF, acted quickly they could easily win a decisive victory and so advance their goal of securing the entire land of Palestine for the Jewish State.

This deceptive behaviour has characterised the actions of the Jewish State from the beginning. They do have a fixed goal to annex the entire Land for themselves but do so opportunistically while pretending that they wish to negotiate. They see the act of negotiation as a means to delay any decision and to continue the actual implementation of their plan of annexation.

The most recent negotiations, that started last July and were due to end this month, have once again fallen victim to the foot dragging of the Israelis who now want to extend them to January 2015 while they complete the construction of an arterial road that will bisect the West Bank and make the creation of a Palestinian State practically impossible. They have also made the release of the fourth part of the Palestinian prisoners, that was supposed to be unconditional, a condition of the extension of the negotiations.

The Palestinians have at last acted decisively and have applied for membership in 15 bodies of the UN. (They have also cut off one hundred members of their security services who have been actually working undercover for the Shin Beth.) They will eventually apply to join the International Court of Justice and then pursue Israel in this court on indictments of war crimes against the Palestinians while seeking international recognition of their State on the 1967 borders rather than depending on bilateral agreements with Israel.

In other words, after twenty one years of waiting for the Oslo accords to bear fruit the Palestinians have decided they are going nowhere and have only resulted in even greater encroachment on their lands by the Jewish State who have acted in bad faith throughout.


"Jesus answered them: 'Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin. The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son remains forever. So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.'" (John 8:34-36)

Regardless of how it happened, I can only speak for the actions

...of THIS country, the United States.

Our founders told us NOT to do things like that. They would NOT have sanctioned this country using its power and influence to create the state of Israel - or any other foreign nation for that matter.

Especially if it meant displacing lots of residents with force.

When our founders said "...avoid entangling alliances" they KNEW that these types of alliances might bind us forever to some foreign government or entity.

We will never get away from the fact that we created Israel and used our mighty military to allow for it.

The U.N. couldn't have done it without us.

Through organizations like the U.N. we have lost most of our sovereignty because our elected officials support them out of populist ideals (and probably big campaign contributions).

"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul

no we didn't

Israel was created by, of and for the Jewish people who needed a country to enable them freedom and self determination. Israel fights for it's sovreignity.. Americans have been dumbed down and now preparing to abandon America. US and Israel are becomming opposites.

Obama administration doesn't get along with Netanyahu.. so the US and Israel are breaking apart. 2014 Israel has spent none of the US money alloted to it.

Within a decade, Americans will be the ones asking, "Where is Israel? We thought Israel was our friend" You watch.. Israel, if not nuked by the religion of peace, will continue to strive to thrive, while we plunge into a dark age.

I support Obama on this - even tho he still gives Israel...

...4 billion dollars a year. It's high time we get a president who puts THIS country first - not Israel.

The United States has practically handed over its sovereignty to Israel as regards foreign policy.

Just about anything we do foreign policy-wise must first be approved by Israel.


When was the last time Israel ever paid one penny in U.S. taxes???

Or had one of their young men die in a war for America?

And yet the federal government gives them more money than if they were an actual state of our union.

I'm sick and tired of being a stooge for Israel and its demands.

"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul


Maybe you don't know that Israel told the US to take the FRNs and shove them up their collevtivsts NWO UN Agnedusts dumbed down asses.

Israel wants to US OUT of their affairs.

Israel supplies the US with high tech and engineering.. matter of fact, China, Rissia, Japan.. all depend on Israel's tech and engineering.

I think we should compete.. but seems Americans are no longer able to compete so instead they cry and whine about their FRNs that corrupt fiat money..

Who do they think they are? People who can never escape the blame and hate of the world.

You said: "Israel wants to US OUT of their affairs." Oh really?

UNLESS it's all the money we give them.

You forgot to say that.

So I'll remind you.

"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul

Research it

That is correct.. interesting site AJC.. led me to a even more interesting site http://www.unwatch.org/site/c.bdKKISNqEmG/b.1277549/k.D7FE/U...

Here's the ' real'

well researched facts about how the Israeli state was created, by two Israeli Political Scientists, after the Balfour Declaration to the Rothschilds of course! http://mepc.org/journal/middle-east-policy-archives/jewish-t...


The source, "The Middle East Policy Council" claims to be acting ONLY in the interests of the United States. It seems odd that you would have a problem with this. The Board of Directors you linked to only serves to amplify this statement.


"The Middle East Policy Council is a nonprofit educational organization founded in 1981 to expand public debate on the political and economic issues of the region and the policies devised to further American interests there. The Council is an independent, non-membership entity favoring neither right nor left and having no loyalties to any country but the United States. We have established two principal policy forums: the quarterly journal Middle East Policy (published by Wiley-Blackwell) and a series of conferences on Capitol Hill."

"Jesus answered them: 'Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin. The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son remains forever. So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.'" (John 8:34-36)

That's what they claim

Here's one of their projects, because TEACHING (programing) is one of their acts http://teachmideast.org/

Here's an example from their web pageL

Time: 1 class period
Level: Grade 6-12
Materials: "Who You Callin' Arab?" article, essays on Stereotypes from TeachMideast.org

The focus is on Arab, so an Israeli Arab would be a Middle Eastern Arab.

Imagine for a moment a class about Caucasian, or white. Think there might be some outrage? Isn't the real objective to improve the image of the Arab in the United States as the ADL works to improve the image of Jews, but not Israelis?

Surely any effort to improve understanding is welcome?

The general understanding of other cultures in the United States, as in my own country of the UK, is very poor. This then makes it very easy for political leaders to manipulate the people by reference to their common prejudices built on this cultural ignorance.

For example, it is possible to assert that the, allegedly superior, American system of government can be easily imposed upon other countries while characterising pejoratively the government system being replaced. If the American people understood the radical differences between the American culture and other more traditional cultures in foreign lands then perhaps they would be less likely to support intervention in these nations for the ostensible purpose of regime change.

If this outcome is indeed the result of the education programmes provided by the MEPC then it would be supportive of the non-interventionist policy of Ron Paul. I see no reason to be critical of this possibility.

"Jesus answered them: 'Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin. The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son remains forever. So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.'" (John 8:34-36)


I think I was 6 the first time I rode on Disney's "It's a small workld after all". There are tons of films and vid, and TV/docymentaruies, international students/workers, jokes... American has been called a cultural melting pot, but before 911 peoplew wanted to be American, and we have our own culture, which is a blend of many.

One of the worldly lessons of the Roman Catholic Church is governments come and government go. Empires rise, and empires fall. There are missions that are far older than the US.. and so these people were Mexican, and then became American, and maybe they will become Mexican again? Maybe Canadian? Maybe some new Union?

I thiunk many Americans understand that we live in an oil energy based economy, and that America energy corporations made agreements with kings and global leaders who are not good to their people, and so the people depend on Islam, which varies in it's own cults, and clashes.. Sharia courts, Halal, Clothing police, and Johad/martyr.. the suicide bombing, that target American investments, that call on military to help.

You think that if we know Arab cukture's (the video they made pointed out that Arabs have many cultures because they live globally) better, we won't bomb them for attacking American investments? Ron Paul voted to bomb Afghanistan. Plenty of Arabs there,, even the Arab, OBL.

I'm not doubting what he said. He just didn't tell the whole...


A lie of ommission you might say.

How do YOU justify forcing 3 quarters of a million Palestinian residents to pack up and leave?

The full power of the United States guns and the U.N. guns were behind it so they had no choice.

I think you'd be bitter to this day too.

"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul


The Palestinians who left were forewarned that there would be an attack as Jews were going to be wiped off the map, so thePalestinians left to avoid the fight, and once the Jews were eliminated, they could return to a JEW FREE Palestine!! What a deal eh?

Israel won the war. The Jes won. And the Arabs who stayed.. they're still there.

That's how I justify it.

US didn't have squat to do with it.