37 votes

FOX Tries To Smear Ron Paul As 9/11 Truther During IRS & Bundy Interview _April 18, 2014


http://youtu.be/dy2DSWG2BPw
Ron Paul appears on FOX news and talks about the Bundy ranch situation, the IRS attack on his Campaign for Liberty organization, and more.

One of the hosts asks Ron Paul to explain how he can allow Paul Craig Roberts to be a columnist on his website while Roberts believes the U.S. government was complicit in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Read more at http://libertycrier.com/fox-tries-smear-ron-paul-911-truther...

What's Crazy Truther About This Excerpt?

The self-inflicted hammer blows to Washington’s credibility have taken a toll. The most serious blow of all is the dawning realization everywhere that Washington’s crackpot conspiracy theory of 9/11 is false. Large numbers of independent experts as well as more than one hundred first responders have contradicted every aspect of Washington’s absurd conspiracy theory. No aware person believes that a few Saudi Arabians, who could not fly airplanes, operating without help from any intelligence agency, outwitted the entire National Security State, not only all 16 US intelligence agencies but also all intelligence agencies of NATO and Israel as well.

Nothing worked on 9/11. Airport security failed four times in one hour, more failures in one hour than have occurred during the other 116,232 hours of the 21st century combined. For the first time in history the US Air Force could not get interceptor fighters off the ground and into the sky. For the first time in history Air Traffic Control lost airliners for up to one hour and did not report it. For the first time in history low temperature, short-lived, fires on a few floors caused massive steel structures to weaken and collapse. For the first time in history 3 skyscrapers fell at essentially free fall acceleration without the benefit of controlled demolition removing resistance from below.

Two-thirds of Americans fell for this crackpot story. The left-wing fell for it, because they saw the story as the oppressed striking back at America’s evil empire. The right-wing fell for the story, because they saw it as the demonized Muslims striking out at American goodness. President George W. Bush expressed the right-wing view very well: “They hate us for our freedom and democracy.”

But no one else believed it, least of all the Italians. Italians had been informed some years previously about government false flag events when their President revealed the truth about secret Operation Gladio. Operation Gladio was an operation run by the CIA and Italian intelligence during the second half of the 20th century to set off bombs that would kill European women and children in order to blame communists and, thereby, erode support for European communist parties.

Italians were among the first to make video presentations challenging Washington’s crackpot story of 9/11. The ultimate of this challenge is the 1 hour and 45 minute film, “Zero.” You can watch it here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU961SGps8g&feature=youtu.be

Zero was produced as a film investigating 9/ll by the Italian company Telemaco. Many prominent people appear in the film along with independent experts. Together, they disprove every assertion made by the US government regarding its explanation of 9/11.

The film was shown to the European parliament.

It is impossible for anyone who watches this film to believe one word of the official explanation of 9/11.

The conclusion is increasingly difficult to avoid that elements of the US government blew up three New York skyscrapers in order to destroy Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Iran, and Hezbollah and to launch the US on the neoconservatives agenda of US world hegemony.

http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/...



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I loved 8:33

"To me, the people who overly criticize something like that are probably the ones who have the problem."

BURN!!!!! The guy hums, the woman shutters, and the dude on the far left nods.

My favorite was at the end

My favorite was at the end when he decried the Federal Commissions as never getting to the bottom of ANYTHING because their object was to protect the government..wow!

...

Someone voiced a view that was different and they're concerned about it? Shouldn't they be more concerned when everyone's views are the same?

I would love to see

the legal response Paul gave to our favorite agency. It sounds like he was on point.

SteveMT's picture

Ron Paul: I don't believe that gov't commissions ....

get to the bottom of anything.... They are setup to cover the government so that the government isn't guilty of anything."

The last reporter's attempt to corner Ron Paul failed. This unknown guy now knows the meaning of the phrase "being Ron Pauled."

DJP333's picture

the 1% of the article is nasty stuff?

Yes, because the official story is so darn believable.

"It’s not pessimistic, brother, because this is the blues. We are blues people. The blues aren’t pessimistic. We’re prisoners of hope but we tell the truth and the truth is dark. That’s different." ~CW

Government

Commissions are the marketing groups that shape your opinion back into the media haze. They are good at promoting a conspiracy tag to any questioning entity/entities.

But, as with the dollar, their business as usual models are crumbling

Here is the article to judge for yourself

http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/...

We all want progress, but if you're on the wrong road, progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; in that case, the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive.

-C. S. Lewis

matt_ Thanks

I put this up hastily.

A great question to direct back to the script readers:

"Let me ask you a question. Do you think it is possible for there to be criminals in government or is everybody righteous and without blemish and incapable of committing atrocities?"

They HAVE TO answer "Yes."

"So then you are saying that it is possible that there could be criminal people inside our government who could have planned and perpetuated this great crime against the American people, correct?"

They have to agree with you here. If they do not agree, that is when you come back and say: "So if someone dares to question and dares to put forth evidence that there is criminal motive and criminal conspiracy, then you are saying we should look the other way?"

They have to answer NO here. In which case they lose the debate.

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a rEVOLution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford

.

I'd have more respect for Mr. Paul if he questioned 9/11 more. At least he doesn't believe everything about the official story.

Also Paul Craig Roberts is a bad ass. Fox News can stuff it.

Ron Paul's limit is here demonstrated.

All who know Dr. Paul know that he is a John Bircher in spirit and intellectually and in everything except being a card carrying member. In other words he knows criminal rogue elements in the government are behind 9/11. But what we learn here is that his line in the sand which he will not cross as a politician and as the father of a presidential candidate, is that he will not publicly challenge the beast. The beast being the true spiritual dark side of our government. It would mean certain political suicide for Rand and probably would lead to Ron's "suicide".

It is important to distinguish between what is true and what is right.

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a rEVOLution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford

Maybe, but I disagree

From what I can tell, Ron Paul doesn't like to press speculation as facts, which is why he always sticks to the talking point "reopen the investigation," instead of saying "Bush deserves to be in jail for staging the 9-11 attacks!!" He has stated many times that he does not believe the commission was adequate, but obviously has little evidence as to who was actually responsible. Sure, he could bring up Building 7 (or many of the other smoking gun factors), but all that does is raise further speculation and come back to his original point, the investigation was lacking and should be reopened.

Bump anything Ron Paul

Thanks for the post

For Freedom!
The World is my country, all mankind is my brethren, to do good is my religion.

hehehe Did you see little

hehehe Did you see little miss wankers face when she didn't get what she wanted ? lol

"If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin."
Samuel Adams

The BOSS put him in his place

Government Commissions are designed to protect the government."

The Grace Commission could have been the exemption to that

But the aftermath of it's findings served the status quo, eh?

"100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal Debt ... all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government."
-Grace Commission report submitted to President Ronald Reagan - January 15, 1984

Ronald Reagan was promptly shot after he dared to criticize the Fed, on the same day that the Pope was shot. After recovering, he changed his mind and praised the Fed."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/total_truth_sciences/q3GnC6e-pZ4/Il5MjapkNzoJ

Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them. - Frederick Douglass

You know....

I did a little digging into this quote last week, and here is the quote from the Grace Commission:

The commission found that: one-third of all income taxes is consumed by waste and inefficiency; one-third is not collected due to the underground economy; and 100 percent of all income taxes are absorbed by interest plus government contributions to transfer payments.

digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9044/m1/1/high_res_d/IP0281G.pdf#page=8

The part many, myself formerly included, leave out is, "plus government contributions to transfer payments."

Examples of certain transfer payments include welfare (financial aid), social security, and government making subsidies for certain businesses (firms).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfer_payment

There's also this. So, I'm not sure if transfer payments would count as services the public expects.

http://thetruthnews.info/GraceCommissionReport.pdf

Resistance to additional income taxes would be even more widespread if people were aware that:

One-third of all their taxes is consumed by waste and inefficiency in the Federal Government as we identified in our survey. Another one-third of all their taxes escapes collection from others as the underground economy blossoms in direct proportion to tax increases and places even more pressure on law abiding taxpayers, promoting still more underground economy - a vicious cycle that must be broken.

With two-thirds of everyone's personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt and by Federal Government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government.

I'm a serial entrepreneur and liberty activist from Texas!

www.RevolutionCarBadges.com
www.NonNetwork.com

Government commisions.

Are not going to snitch on their friends especially when both parties dislike libertarians. They will work to preserve their system for themselves.

This is like expecting police to follow the laws to the point of them arresting an officer acting out of order.

Dreams, pipe dreams.

How can any government ever have checks and balances is beyond me. How anyone can believe that people at the seat of power will ever be objective is just insane.

How many people are shot in cold blood EVERY SINGLE DAY by police and yet the reaction is well -- without them it would be anarchy. Except when they are not around people aren't beating each other with clubs and shooting each other. But the second they show up, all bets are off.