| |
  
|
||||||||||
IGNORE NEGATIVE POSTS - READ THEM BUT DO NOT RESPOND
Submitted by Canadianfriend on Wed, 01/30/2008 - 22:26
Critism is part of the process, but lets not bicker like the clowns did tonight. » |
|
|||||||||
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul or his Presidential Committee. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original poster, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site IMMEDIATELY. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2011 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul. | General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here
Faith that the message cant be distorted any more once heard!
Champions of constitutional canvasing, join us!
http://bikeronpaul.com/
joez
Pay no attention
To the man behind the curtain
Bumpity bump
Bumpity bump
"Might does not make right"
Yep!
I completely agree.
I don't post much during the debates, but I DO read, and I DO flag.
I suppose Freedom of Speech allows for diarrhea of the mouth.
Many posts that are made during events, like money bombs, debate nights, are made with the intent to demoralize. I flag them.
Nothing personal.
"I don't endorse anything they say"
~Ron Paul On the 911 Truth movement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGyhlNY0y1k
This movement is in Danger of becoming a CULT
CULT....
1) Can't handle critical comments of any kind
2) Paraniod --spies are everywhere-- mentality
3) Emotionally vulnerable and fragile so that any "negativity" is suspect
4) Name calling such as Traitors, Trolls, and so forth is the only response to critizisms
5) Personality Worship.... As in Ron Paul is Gawdlike perfect. He is not.
6) Ron Paul says that Policy is what SHOULD be debated on CNN debate, yet don't try discussing Policy an inch to the Left or Right of Ron Paul's position, you will could be called a troll or worse, have your post deleted.
7) I can't think of number seven... eight or nine or even ten. Someone else help me out here.
Treg / Tempe AZ Meet up
I think the poster has a
I think the poster has a point. The law of attraction states that whatever you focus on the most will become your reality. With that in mind, there has been a deliberate effort by other candidates supporters to post negative or discouraging words about Dr. Paul on this site. This would never be allowed on any other candidate site, though I would love to post discouraging thoughts on them -- i have tried. At least we are more civilized by saying don't flag, but don't respond. The best way to get Dr. Paul elected is to focus on that goal rather than to wallow in negativity.
i agree
if anyone 'outside' the movement visited these forums, they'd see a bunch of whackos. You should confront criticism directly, instead of calling people trolls, traitors, or flip-floppers. Promote discussion of how RP is leading the campaign and handling the debates. Don't stifle free thought. Eschew cult-mentality.
Simple question(s)
Are you interested in Getting Ron Paul elected?
would you be willing to "bite your tongue" on occasion? Because you know what you are about to say, might alienate potential new voters?
In other words, are you willing to exercise self restraint? Without having others do it for you?
"I don't endorse anything they say"
~Ron Paul On the 911 Truth movement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGyhlNY0y1k
Problem is not obvious 'troll' ....it is the sczhoid trolls....
trolling for 'suckers'
Working Definition- Troll: noun
Definition:
2 types of trolls.
Intentional vs. Schizophrenic Troll
1) Intentional: One who posts with intent to : distract, divide, disparage. the intention of baiting other users into an emotional response.
2) Schizophrenic troll- schizoids who claim to support RP, but obsessively post the same divisive, negative thoughts, over, over, and over--even though, they and other schizoid-trolls, have already posted the same negative thoughts over, and over too.
The contemporary use of the term first appeared on Usenet groups in the late 1980s. It is thought to be a truncation of the phrase trolling for suckers, itself derived from the fishing technique known as trolling.
The hallmark of the schzoid troll is the irrational consistency of the compulsive repetitiveness.
Absolutely agree...
Traitors in Washington's time were not given a forum...they were shot on the spot.
NO! I honestly disagree...
If you pursue this line,.... you will make the Revolution movement turn into the Revolution CULT.
Think about it.
Treg / Tempe, AZ
yess!!!
I thought this was a revolution!!! We don't want our candidate to sound or act like all the others...this is time for a real change.....Ron Paul the statesman!!!!!
agree.
yes, agree too.
thank you!
good post
If you honestly believe he
If you honestly believe he is done,,just dont visit this website or any other site that promotes Ron Paul. Show your support to who ever you now support by leaving here. Dont complain if whoever your new preferance is win's and you have to wallow in what ever happens to this country. I'm sure we have all said "I hate flip-floppers" so with that being said, ask yourself (if this applies to you) if you just became one of them.
amen...
amen bro...
If you honestly believe he
duplicate post .. sorry
Yes, indeed!
Yes, indeed!
"Might does not make right"
Yes, indeed!
Yes, indeed!
"Might does not make right"
Agreed
People who give up so easily truly do not understand what is at stake.
Pushing such messages to the top with responses only does more damage.
The Abuse of Greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power. - Shakespeare
bump
bump
"Freedom suppressed and again regained bites with keener fangs than freedom never endangered." -- Cicero
words of wisdom...
seldom heeded though...some on here are hot-heads, just like McCain.