4 votes

Video: Pilot forgets to turn off chemtrail sprayer while landing

Don't know if this is true but it sure looks fishy


http://youtu.be/F-xD0QxGlGM

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Chemtrail Sprayer?

Is the common theory on chemtrails really that commercial planes have seperate tanks and nozzles that are operated by pilots that create the chemtrails?

That seems like an awful lot to keep under wraps. I had always assumed that the theory was something added to the fuel at refining or closer to production that could be dispersed without having to modify airplanes and could avoid bringing a whole platoon of people from pilots to ground crew to manufacturers to maintenance to upper management into the cover-up.

This is clearly...

a CONTRAIL because you can see the vapor coming over the wing. The foggy conditions most likely brought this on. I've actually see a CONTRAIL while looking out of a plane window before as the atmospheric conditions were just right to cause that water vapor to form. Which is basically what a CONTRAIL is. However, CHEMTRAILS are very real and there IS a difference. When watching a plane make a CONTRAIL you can see it dissipating as it moves across the sky. However, when watching a plane that is spraying a CHEMTRAIL that substance stays aloft and DOES NOT dissipate for quite a long time. I've seen CHEMTRAILS that have lasted over an hour or more. Contrails don't do that.

Surely

this is a chemtrail spraying plane flown by a reptillian nwo pilot.

"Endless money forms the sinews of war." - Cicero, www.freedomshift.blogspot.com

.

http://youtu.be/z1ncB-cyBa4

"Endless money forms the sinews of war." - Cicero, www.freedomshift.blogspot.com

Ira,

It's called a wingtip vortice.

"I'm Ron Paul." - Ron Paul

Are there any commercial airline pilots...

who wish to comment??

US Patent US5003186

US Patent US5003186

https://www.google.com/patents/US5003186

"Abstract
A method is described for reducing atmospheric or global warming resulting from the presence of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere, i.e., from the greenhouse effect. Such gases are relatively transparent to sunshine, but absorb strongly the long-wavelength infrared radiation released by the earth. The method incudes the step of seeding the layer of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere with particles of materials characterized by wavelength-dependent emissivity. Such materials include Welsbach materials and the oxides of metals which have high emissivity (and thus low reflectivities) in the visible and 8-12 micron infrared wavelength regions."

...

One proposed solution to the problem of global warming involves the seeding of the atmosphere with metallic particles. One technique proposed to seed the metallic particles was to add the tiny particles to the fuel of jet airliners, so that the particles would be emitted from the jet engine exhaust while the airliner was at its cruising altitude. While this method would increase the reflection of visible light incident from space, the metallic particles would trap the long wavelength blackbody radiation released from the earth. This could result in net increase in global warming.

(edit: I did not intend to respond to this comment. I am not a pilot.)

Are you a commercial airline pilot?

Chemtrails have been debunked.

Wintip vortices and contrails are a normal environmental response to abnormal environmental conditions.

I created a thread to help clear up misconceptions about this issue.

http://www.dailypaul.com/317329/rosalind-peterson-and-the-tr...

"I'm Ron Paul." - Ron Paul

Chemtrails have been debunked?

Where? When? By whom?

"VR" My own personal troll

You guys could have one too. These types of trolls are attracted to science, logic, and reason. They don't really understand it but the more you use in your posts and comments, the more likely you will have your own special friend follow you.

Now VR, I will feed you as soon you answer the questions I posed to you on the other forum.

"I'm Ron Paul." - Ron Paul

And all of this time

I thought you were the troll.

And, then, the master deflector insists that I answer his questions.

wow

Do I have to be a pilot to

Do I have to be a pilot to know information about airplanes? Under that assumption all engineers or designers involved in building airplanes or understanding how airplanes work are pilots, which of course is ridiculous. I am not a pilot, although I almost did become one. I instead chose to become a civil engineer specializing in structures, but have been working in highway and traffic design. I have seen your thread for days now and my conclusion is that you are just a troll, or just really, really naive. The fact that the post has a -47 vote shows that no one believes your nonsense. Additionally, I will state on record that the above video is not a chemtrail. Clearly it is very humid, as one can barely see the airplane through all the fog. Chemtrails exist and the US Patent 5003186 proves it.

The OP made the claim

Pilot forgets to turn off Chemtrail sprayer while flying.

Zoeandgrace asked if there were any commercial airline pilots who could address this.

You responded.

That's why I asked if you were an airline pilot.

Being that you're a learned scholar, familiar with patents involving Solar Radiation Management, you shouldn't have any troubles defining Chemtrails for me.

No need to be elaborate. A simple definition will suffice.

"I'm Ron Paul." - Ron Paul

chemtrail:

A visible trail left in the sky by an aircraft and believed by some to consist of chemical or biological agents released as part of a covert operation.

Oxford Dictionary

Dissipated too quickly

to be anything other than water.

Not chemtrails

It was a wing tip vortex: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wingtip_vortices

"The cores of the vortices are sometimes visible because water present in them condenses from gas (vapor) to liquid, and sometimes even freezes, forming ice particles.

Condensation of water vapor in wing tip vortices is most common on aircraft flying at high angles of attack, such as fighter aircraft in high g maneuvers, or airliners taking off and landing on humid days."

If ignorance is bliss, Washington DC must be heaven.

OK, thanks

We don't have that kind of humidity in the SW desert so I never see this

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

I always thought that was

I always thought that was just vapor when I've seen airliners approaching landing.

ChristianAnarchist's picture

Can't say for sure. I didn't

Can't say for sure. I didn't see any sort of nozzle system on the wing. In many days with high humidity (looks that way in the video) you will see streams of condensing water vapor curling off of the wing surfaces. I think that's what's happening here. A large jet like this one would need any spray system to be apart from the wing since most of the trailing edges are moving flaps or ailerons. Not many places where a nozzle could go...

Beware the cult of "government"...