20 votes

James Corbett BFP Eyeopener Report: Debunking the "War is Good for the Economy" Myth

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Of course, killing all the poor has been done -- in every war

Of course, killing all the poor has been done -- in every war. The poors' housing is destroyed, their slums burnt to the ground, and the poor themselves are the conscripts who are the ones who do the fighting and get killed.

In an infamously scientific manner, Wallachian Prince Vlad Tepes (dracula) invited all the beggars in Targoviste to a banquet, during which he barred the doors and burnt the building to the ground with all the poor trapped inside it. But, to his dismay, it wasn't long before beggars could be seen on the streets again.

The big argument against Cowen is this: Thomas Edison, Alexander Graham Bell, and Guglielmo Marconi were not defense contractors or employees of the war department. They devised wonderful inventions in the interest of humanity.

The final argument against Krugman and the broken window enthusiasts is, the American economy only improved AFTER the war, some years after, to be precise, when people were finally unchained from the war machine and had to work extra hard to catch up with their lives. The British economy took a decade to improve. It took two decades for the German economy to improve, and they were still repairing the damage forty years later.

And yet, this argument still holds water with the unthinking dupes out there...

"Cowards & idiots can come along for the ride but they gotta sit in the back seat!"

I wish...

he would show the quality of life, irrespective of those being shot and blown apart, of the citizens in war time. Meat, gas, rationing stamps - so much was unavailable. Nothing was manufactured to improve the quality of people's lives. Just because everyone could get a job killing and being killed helped the unemployment figures? How wonderful was that for the common schmuck?

Why we have wars. Explained in less than a minute

"Their objective isn't to control the conflict, it's to control the debt that the conflict produces."


http://youtu.be/qCY2l2F0JnA

"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom — go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, an

Michael Nystrom's picture

Bump

Thanks for the post. Corbett is awesome.

To be mean is never excusable, but there is some merit in knowing that one is; the most irreparable of vices is to do evil out of stupidity. - C.B.