7 votes

Washington Post: How Rand Paul’s bid could fundamentally transform the Republican party on foreign policy

By Chris Cillizza | July 14, 2014
The Washington Post

In the last 48 hours, two likely Republican presidential candidates have exchanged foreign policy body blows via op-ed.

First came Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who blasted Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul in a piece over the weekend in the Post. Perry writes that Paul believes "our nation should ignore what’s happening in Iraq", adding that Paul is "curiously blind" to the threat to American interests posed by ISIS. Paul, not one to avoid verbal fisticuffs, answered back in Politico Monday morning. "Governor Perry writes a fictionalized account of my foreign policy so mischaracterizing my views that I wonder if he’s even really read any of my policy papers," writes Paul. (Our favorite part of Paul's op-ed? His attack on Perry's hipster glasses; "Apparently his new glasses haven’t altered his perception of the world, or allowed him to see it any more clearly." writes Paul of Perry.)

Putting aside the verbal slap fight, there is something very important going on here. The most important paragraphs in either op-ed -- as it relates to the future (and the past) of the Republican party -- are these two written by Paul:

On foreign policy, Perry couldn’t be more stuck in the past, doubling down on formulas that haven’t worked, parroting rhetoric that doesn’t make sense and reinforcing petulant attitudes that have cost our nation a great deal.

If repeating the same mistakes over and over again is what Perry advocates in U.S. foreign policy, or any other policy, he really should run for president. In Washington, he’d fit right in, because leading Republicans and Democrats not only supported the Iraq war in the first place, but leaders of both parties campaigned on it in 2008.

What Paul is proposing is that he is the Republican candidate willing (and able) to handle the party's long-delayed reckoning with the war in Iraq.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Nothing wrong with supporting Israel

Just send all the "American" Jews to do the fighting, it's their war anyways. Hell, just let Israel draft and tax their "dual citizens"

If Rand continues his "stand

If Rand continues his "stand with Israel," things won't change much. There will be new false flags, that will inevitably lead him to intervene.


The guy we're pushing for is actually being called the front runner? "Most likely to win?"

This is surreal.

Eric Hoffer

An idea who's time has come

An idea who's time has come can not be stopped by any army or any government.