10 votes

Did anybody notice the bodies in the wreckage from the Malaysian airline shoot down ?

How come we didn't see any bodies in the wreckage of 9/11 crashes.
Pennsylvania , D.C , just wondering if anybody had any thoughts on this.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

An interesting point to make,

An interesting point to make, if you watch cnn they place in their scroller "CNN IS THE ONLY NEWS NETWORK AT THE WRECKAGE." lol

Well helllloooooooooooooooooooooooo?????

The one thing I'm curious about...

who out there had big short positions on Malaysian Air just prior to the incident??...you know....just like 9/11.

Silence isn't always golden....sometimes it's yellow.

"The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." - Patrick Henry


Go to liveleak.com and you will see bodies.

Live in Liberty
Tom Rankin

The planes that went into the

The planes that went into the WTC hit the buildings at around 500 mph. Anyone who was inside the plane, their bodies would have ended up inside the building, and severely burnt, probably turned into jelly, same with the Pentagon. Did you see the massive hole in the towers? That's where the bodies were. They're not going to fall out onto the ground, nor would they be recognizable in the rubble. I don't know why this isn't obvious.

As far as the Pennsylvania plane, I don't know. I think that it was probably shot down with a high powered missile that completely obliterated the plane in the air, along with everyone inside. This one is more of a mystery.

The crash in Ukraine is not at all similar to anything that happened on 9/11, I don't understand the attempt to relate the two, especially as far as bodies are concerned.

I'm not an expert, so just

I'm not an expert, so just guessing, but, no two crashes would ever be the same; but, they would, I think, share some common elements.
The pattern of wreckage (organic and non-organic) would vary greatly depending on a wide range of variables.
I don't have enough information to know the answer, but from what little there is, it does seem suspicious.

"The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that." — Alan Greenspan

DJP333's picture

The plot thickens with the Russian side of the story


On July 8, Ukraine’s State Aviation Service banned all flights over the Donetsk and Luhansk regions aiming to provide “adequate safety and security for all flights of civil aircraft in favor of state aviation.

Meanwhile, Ukraine's National Security and Defense Council took a decision to close the airspace over the area of the so-called anti-terror operation to commercial flights three days ago, Rosaviatsia reported.

Qantas hasn’t used the route for a few months, said Andrew McGinnes, a spokesman for the Australian carrier, while Hong Kong-based Cathay Pacific said it has been detouring for “quite some time.” Korean Air Lines Co. and Asiana Airlines Inc. said in statements they have been avoiding the area since March 3.

And finally, as RT reported, the national governor of the Donetsk region, Pavel Gubarev, admitted that while the separatists indeed are in possession of one BUK missile unit, it is not operational, and even if it was, it would be unable to reach a height of over 30,000 feet without central radar guidance which the Donetsk region does not have, once again suggesting that a Surface to Air Missile, if indeed one was used, came from the Ukraine side.

"It’s not pessimistic, brother, because this is the blues. We are blues people. The blues aren’t pessimistic. We’re prisoners of hope but we tell the truth and the truth is dark. That’s different." ~CW

The million dollar question - Who sent that plane into the

war zone? So bizarre that it was Malaysia Airline. My imagination is going wild.

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know Peace." - Jimi Hendrix

DJP333's picture

We may not find out so easily....

"Ukraine's SBU security service has confiscated recordings of conversations between Ukrainian air traffic control officers and the crew of the doomed airliner, a source in Kiev has told Interfax news agency."


Son of a B!tch

"It’s not pessimistic, brother, because this is the blues. We are blues people. The blues aren’t pessimistic. We’re prisoners of hope but we tell the truth and the truth is dark. That’s different." ~CW

Correct me if I'm wrong, but

Correct me if I'm wrong, but on 9/11 there were 4 planes "hijacked". Of those 4 planes not one body or black box was recovered....

I think the only hard evidence is the "plane engine" at ground zero along with the "passport" of one of the "hijackers". Of course I lean toward the dustification theory of the towers so the black boxes and bodids being completely "gone" makes sense.

Also, the shuttle which blew up reentering Earth going thousands of miles an hour? Yeah body parts were recovered...

Some things are censored for a reason

It was hard to hold back some tears when seeing the bodies. Especially one that looks like a small child.

link to pics

Click on the "show" button.

I hate posting stuff like this, but keep in mind major news outlets do not like to show dead bodies. I have seen enough proof that false flags are real, and most human disasters are the result of governments. However I want to prevent posts like this from growing out of control before we have all of the evidence.

The OP didn't state that THIS incident had no such pictures,

just the opposite.

Try reading it again.

The poster is juxtaposing this incident with the 9/11 incidents where NO images show bodies. If there are no images from NYC, the Pentagon, or Shanksville with bodies or body parts, blurred out or not, and yet every other wreckage scene has this (as one would naturally expect) then some serious questions need to be asked and answered about the events that day.

My fault for reading more of the comments then the OP

Thanks for correcting me to the context of the question.

"?" Throws the conversation off. "Did you see my wallet on the counter?", "Just wondering because it wasn't there yesterday".

The question mark seems to imply that the wallet is not there now. I could make this statement (Did you see my..) and imply that my wallet is actually there, but was not yesterday.


Who would benefit from such a diversion? Think of the carnage being inflicted at this very moment on the Palestinians. Any guesses? Who controls the media?

Did EVERYONE miss the boat on this topic?

It seems like people here are just as clueless when they read as the MSM is when they report.

There seems to be an epidemic of NOT PAYING ATTENTION to what you are reading or watching.

April Gallop

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know Peace." - Jimi Hendrix

Is this woman legit?

what's up with her ID? Was she a contractor for the accounting department there? Today is the first time I have seen this video.

I was thinking the same

I was thinking the same thing. Not a single body or body part. I don't think I saw any luggage debris either. We see all kinds of gruesome pictures from other incidents, crashes, or whatever, but nothing here. You can't tell me someone didn't get to this scene and get raw pictures or video and post it to the net. This stinks of a set-up for sure.

Turn off the TV Propaganda.
Find out what's really going on!
"Your portal to reality!"

FAIL for not reading the post.

Try again.

So You're Thinking A Jet Was Shot Down With No Bodies?

Are you saying this was a false flag issue?

No, the implication is that since there are bodies in

this wreckage (as there are in other "accidents") yet there were NO bodies or body parts at the Pentagon, then that means whatever hit the Pentagon was NOT a civilian airliner, or certainly, not one with anyone on board.

This begs serious questions.

(I'm not saying this is what happened, but that is the implication I was reading from this post)

A Remotely Controlled Boeing 777,,,

Might have "no" pilot or passengers ???
And new paint could hide older I.D. markings.


They usually avoid those kinds of photos because:

1. It's disturbing content. "Bodies" in a high-speed, high-kinetic energy impact tend not be in one piece.
2. The bodies are buried deep into the impact crater.
3. They do not want to identify any persons out of respect.

Of course, while it may preserve human dignity, it may also work doubly to mask the nature of the crash--be it a genuine accident or incident or false flag.

I believe in the freedom to be what we choose to be.

Reasonable, but THIS crash, as many others, have those parts of

the images blurred out for that reason.

There are no such blurs on footage from Pentagon wreckage. Eyewitnesses ON THE SCENE report no bodies as well. That is disturbing to say the least.