18 votes

I live down the street from Ferguson, I smell psyops & distraction!

Before you begin, I do not claim to have facts, this is just an idea I had as a good friend gave me the rumors floating around the cops side of the story. The point of this article is to point out that if the cops side of the story is true and he is acquitted yet the public is not made aware of the information that proved his innocence then we will see another version of the L.A. riots in the mid-west.

Anybody remember the movie "Behind the Big Media"?

Go to 41:58 for a reminder of the game plan that feels like it's unfolding right in front of us once again. What i think we are experiencing is the good ole' time tested divide and conquer media blitz.

I have a very good / trust worthy friend who's family holds several key positions in St. Louis County Government and County Police Dept. I am getting this from a second hand source which means you are getting this information from a third hand source, still the info i received was SO plausible, I had to share with my friends at the DP. If the information is indeed correct the cop who shot Mike Brown is not going to serve a minute behind bars and if so, look out St. Louis, it's gonna get ugly.

Do not confuse the information here with siding with the police, I think what is happening to the protesters is sickening, I think the cop had plenty more options and this is all just another example of how tyranny is here and upon us.

What I think is all the facts that are available are not being given to the public, much like the Rodney King incident. We are only being given enough information so as to create our own opinions that lead to conjecture based on our own social opinions and bias.

What i have learned is that Mike Brown was walking home from that same QT that would eventually be destroyed. At that QT Mike Brown was confronted by a manager for shoplifting. After that a verbal confrontation ensued followed by short skirmish. Too bad because all of that video evidence was conveniently destroyed when the QT was ransacked and burned to the ground later that night.

Mike Brown and his friend took off. A police call was made, the officer caught up to two guys matching the description and asked them to move to the sidewalk so he could question them about what had just occurred at the QT. Upon ignoring several of the officers requests the officer pulled his cruiser over to block their path and swung his door open. At this Mike Brown rushed the officer and assaulted him as he was trying to exit his car and beat the holy crap out of him till he was lying half in and out of his car. After having the snot knocked out of him the cop got up drew his weapon and ordered Mike to stop as he was running away, at this Mike Brown turned back to the cop not knowing his gun was drawn and charged the officer, not with his hands up as we keep hearing, but reaching up and out in front of him. The cops response is now history. Supposedly the Cop needed stitches and looked like he spent a couple rounds in the ring with Tyson.

Also police have supposedly recovered pictures from Brown's Facebook page where he is flashing guns and gang signs, depicting a little more of a hoodlum than the image of a promising gentle giant headed off to college we are receiving from the mass media.

I'm not taking sides on this case, I'm waiting for all the fact to officially come out for that. What I am saying is St. Louis prepare! I have a bad feeling L.A. April 26th, 1992 is coming to a city near me.

Also, between riots and comedic suicides did anyone notice we are back at war in Iraq again? Damn, the owners' little minions running this sh!t show are getting really freaking good at this.



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"Bad experience"

They fucking beat down 5 people 2 that were/are women.(Which they stripped after one tried to run-out, which they close-linned and then broke her face as well. They other girl was just kicked a few times - no big deal right.) Are you insane? They robbed me a gun point, and then beat me mercilessly over an incident they completely made up.

I would like to put a gun in your face beat you to the floor and then say "Yeah, don't you ever say anything or I'LL KILL YOU, YOUR FAMILY THE END", and then see how you react.

Thanks for the compassion. Also if 18% of people are doing drugs while they work, they probably aren't happy, and that isn't good no matter how much spin you put on it. I take it you've never employed anyone. Would you be fine with your workers drinking, or smoking weed on the clock? Do you have no standards what-so-ever for people, or are they just children to you?

You're a biased ignoramus

I am sorry that you and/or your family had a gun put to your head and were threatened. I do have compassion but your words are making it easy for me to have a condescending and sarcastic tone without remorse.

"Also if 18% of people are doing drugs while they work, they probably aren't happy, and that isn't good no matter how much spin you put on it. I take it you've never employed anyone. Would you be fine with your workers drinking, or smoking weed on the clock? Do you have no standards what-so-ever for people, or are they just children to you?

How do YOU KNOW those people "aren't happy"? ASSUMPTION is a KILLER and I can't believe you haven't learned that after being here for 5 fucking years.

Would I be fine if my workers were "drinking, or smoking weed on the clock?" That depends: is my business a:

Bar/Restaurant?
Cannabis store?
Tattoo parlor?
Video Game outlet?
Massage parlor?
Spa?

You're talking about being unable to perform on the clock I.E. drunk or stoned out of your mind. Of course you used the most exaggerated example and didn't think that, "hey, maybe some people take a couple of hits or have one or two beers at lunch and make no mistakes.

But that's "impossible to do" in your own little world of employement isn't it?

If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.

How do I know they are not happy.

Where to start... Um people do drugs incidentally in the long-haul to kill themselves. It's slow and perpetual suicide, I'm not talking about marijuana, but usually alcohol, cocaine, opium/heroin.

People that work at those places are a dime a dozen and soon will be replaced with machines, there is nothing special about them, and if you know someone hurting themselves you should help not make excuses for why they are "fine".

You keep generalizing

"People that work at those places are a dime a dozen and soon will be replaced with machines."

"Um people do drugs incidentally in the long-haul to kill themselves."

All of your opinions substantiated by nothing but your way of thinking and your sole-experience as a former drug dealer.

Good luck to you, Entrenched.

If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.

Well since you want to be a dick about it.

I have lost quite a few people around me to drugs, and am still dealing with drunks. How many people must you love die before you wake up and smell the coffee.

Lynard Skynard - "The smell", best song ever to describe it.

You're just an asshole I get it. You think people slowly killing themselves is PERFECTLY FINE. What does that say about what you're doing ? Care to be honest.

Anyone who knows me

knows I go out of my way to be nice to strangers. I always give them the benefit of the doubt.

You're grouping "all people who do drugs" and are equating it to "a bad life choice."

All opinions, especially when talking about people who consume Cannabis.

You say, "people are slowly killing themselves" as if it were fact. You're factually wrong when talking about people who consume Cannabis.

I'm only an asshole in your opinion because I'm questioning your logic of generalizing Americans who chose to harm no one and damage no property, yet, again, you equate it to "bad life choices."

It is YOU who couldn't handle drugs, Sir. Why should I not be able to enjoy something that I CAN HANDLE, just because you can't?

Sir.

If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.

How many people die a year from just alcohol

Humor me.

I have no stance against people taking drugs. I could careless if they want to, I don't believe in prohibition. HOWEVER I do not deny their effects on personalities and the end result.

What killed Robin Williams BTW? Depression.... Right. I'm sure it had nothing to do with all the cocaine and alcohol, and more than likely what he did while under the influence. When I used to drink I would sleep with every women I could - big, fat, small, whatever - big mistake.

The reason I say people do drugs to kill themselves slowly is because I have never genuinely met someone smoking crack, heroin or drinking that WAS HAPPY. I mean I'm sure they exist, they are just an anomaly. People don't look to escape for no reason, they do it to ESCAPE from reality.

Your story is now being reported by police

Your information regarding the supposed events are now what is being released by the police. They claim to have security cameras showing the confrontation, but will they be released to the public?

http://www.infowars.com/ferguson-cops-say-michael-brown-robb...

Not without video

I will never believe a cop's version of events unless there is undeniable video corroboration. No exception.

"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."--Mark Twain

That's right, all cops are

That's right, all cops are not humans. They are all cyborgs who take an oath to Bilderberg when they are sworn in. Everyday before work they secretly get together and plan how they can initiate the NWO and Armageddon, with Rockefeller and the Federal Reserve System at the helm.

What if that cop

Was your father, or brother ? Would you just turn your coat? It's ok to hate people and wait for the evidence, life isn't as black and white as you might think.

Apples to Oranges

If I knew them personally, and trust that they are honest and wouldn't lie to me to cover for their crime, then I suppose that would be an exception. But, no family members are cops, so it is a non-issue.

I don't care if they are someone else's brother and father.

"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."--Mark Twain

I'll keep this for later

"I don't care if they are someone else's brother and father."

So facts don't matter at all I can see. Tell me have you booked a vacation to the lovely Ferguson yet? Are you aware of their crime rates?
Since you would rather be surrounded be people like them with such honor bound personalities it should be a perfect place to go to.

When would you trust a cop than? Let's suppose your daughter is gang-raped - who do you call? Or should it just be brushed under the rug, and her feelings of injustice be suppressed?

Makes no sense

There are more fallacies of logic in that post than there are sentences.

I choose not to deal with irrational people.

Take care.

"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."--Mark Twain

Unless they're

Looting?

Public knowledge?

Wouldn't some of those things you mentioned already be public knowledge? Particularly the QT owner's report of theft.

Is it possible

the QT was set on fire by the police themselves disguised as protestors to make sure when the story comes out that all video was destroyed. if the police were to release the story with corroborated evidence from the owner of the QT would this not help quell the riots? I just don't see any reason to keep this quiet if true.

Yeah

Becuase we haven't seen this same shit play out 100 times before. You have no proof of that, and I know that if a cop tried to act like these thugs he would be pointed out immediately. Think about it most of these people (looters) have been to jail - I think they can spot a cop a mile away.

Do you just view blacks as being so dumb or ignorant that they will just follow someone committing crimes ? Because you didn't say the cops looted, just through the firebomb - and with no proof I might add.

yep you would think.

Has anyone in the media spoken to anyone working at the QT that day? The details in the rumor i heard are not the point of this post. The point is explained at the beginning of the post.

'Police-State vs. The American people'

The 'clash' has been coming for a long time now.

Most of us here at DP know it as well as anyone. We see the videos and read the stories everyday. We constantly see & hear about police brutalizing, traumatizing, and killing Americans, whether they be black, white, brown, young, old, fat, skinny, man or woman, senior citizen, or little baby in a crib. Not to mention dogs and pets of all kinds.

The MSM never seems to pick up the most outrageous and appalling of these incidents. Such as happened recently in Texas where the cops threw a percussion grenade into the crib of little baby boy, blowing his chest open. All in search of a little drugs, which were never found. And not a peep from the MSM!

But, this story is yet another RACE-BASED issue, that they can use to DIVIDE & CONQUER, as the OP stated.

Now let's face it, this situation in MO is a no-win for the police. TPTB may see a silver-lining, but the police themselves have got to be realizing they are pushing the American people into a corner, and soon there will be pushing back. In order to keep this from getting out of hand, the MSM has to step in and make sure to spin this as a RACE issue!

They need to divide the American people on this. They cannot allow the American people to stand up in unison against the NWO police-state. They need white/conservative-America to condemn the actions of "Blacks" in St. Louis, and they need the black-majority protestors to be seen and heard making it all about racism.

The facts are that the unconstitutional, ever-encroaching militarized police-state is a threat to ALL Americans' freedom, livelihood, and safety. The militarized police have demonstrated their efficiency at killing little old white ladies, as well as young black males, and children of all races and age range. It is the system that we are facing.

America is a melting pot. Despite the government/MSM's constant
divide & conquer, race-baiting tactics, most Americans get along great with each other, and are not racist. The NWO socialist system is the threat to all of us, and we need to come together and defeat the totalitarian-collectivist state, and fight for Liberty for all individuals!

United we Stand. Divided we Fall.

PEOPLE OPPOSING TYRANNY - Real Grass Roots!
Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?

Race is involved because

Race is involved because that's how the story has been spun. Whatever the truth is, the marchers are multi-racial. The looters all appeared to be from the neighborhood, but what do I know. I'm not from Missouri.

Yeah, that's what I'm saying...

The MSM is making a race thing out of it, so they can distract from the real issue which is the militarized police-state threatening all Americans' lives and liberty.

PEOPLE OPPOSING TYRANNY - Real Grass Roots!
Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?

You cant handle the truth

Dont expect to ever know the truth. These details, true or not, will fuel the arguments of the statists and talking heads, talk shows and Sunday mornings, and maybe even a court room(followed by more media drama). The groundwork for a Red vs Blue arguments are being laid. Each side prepared to fortify their position followed by some poorly worded meaningless questions at a presidential debate. I do not expect any truth in any of it.

I do find it interesting that on CNNs home page didn't show any of this until this morning. How big did it have to get before they covered it? Why the delay?

Any way like the poster says....I smell a rat.

Hallelujah

I couldn't agree more, I just hope it doesn't lead to violence.

State motions toward deescalation

This will be interesting. Deescalation or one step closer to martial law?

"Missouri governor: Highway patrol will direct security in Ferguson"

http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/14/us/missouri-teen-shooting/inde...

"The Missouri Highway Patrol "will be directing the team that provides security" in Ferguson, Missouri, Gov. Jay Nixon said Thursday.
Nixon said he decided to put state troopers in charge of security because "at this particular point, the attitudes weren't improving, and the blocks towards expression appeared to be a flashpoint, and that if we put some people first, that we'd be in a better situation."
Lately the community of Ferguson, which has been the scene of clashes in the wake of a weekend police shooting that left an African-American teenager dead, has looked "more like a war zone, and it's not acceptable," Nixon said."

Martial LAW ?

As I state above, "Deescalation or one step closer to martial law?"

Missouri National Guard headed to Ferguson

Here is a follow up on that statement. . .

http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/18/us/missouri-teen-shooting/inde...

TwelveOhOne's picture

Huh, another Nixon. Any relation, I wonder?

...

I love you. I'm sorry. Please forgive me. Thank you.
http://fija.org - Fully Informed Jury Association
http://jsjinc.net - Jin Shin Jyutsu (energy healing)

Jay Nixon is scum....

This is the same Jay Nixon that told Missouri last year that "there is no magical database" when the Department of Revenue scandal broke out, only for it later to be proven that MO had a facial recognition database in violation of state law. Jackie Bemboom, Alana Berrigan-Scott, and others involved in this scandal, were forced to testify during the Bipartisan Investigative Committee on Personal Privacy to reveal this information. There is a letter sent by former DHS secretary Janet Napolitano thanking Jay Nixon for complying with the REAL ID Act, that he denies ever knowing about.

On paper, Missouri is not complying with REAL ID or gathering biometric data. In reality, it still is. The new images are up to the standards of states such as Texas, California, and all other U.S. states; very high resolution, ICAO compliant, with the ability to generate an accurate 3D model and texture map of your entire face in minute detail, and grab irises.

An underling flunky for William Kraus(MO state Senator) told me that there is no violation of privacy unless the facial template and iris are extracted! LOL! Do they really think we are this stupid? The data is in the fucking photo, right there to be grabbed. That photo is EASY to share and even dump onto the internet. This flunky told me that MO residents needed to have their photos on file in order to make things safer for police officers, but a biometric photo is wholly unnecessary for this end; an exemption was added to the law that classifys the photo as "not a biometric" even though it is a biometric. The photo is the problem. An ordinary photo posted on social media or snapped at random by a smartphone will not allow accurate extraction of this kind of data to the extent that the DHS/ICAO-compliant cameras in DMVs across the U.S. do, and to the extent that it allows you to be identified in a wide range of conditions in a very large dataset.

The old fee office cameras used from 2007 to 2012 weren't of a high enough resolution to enable this, but they have been siezed by Morphotrust, and supposedly destroyed, even though the taxpayers of Missouri paid for their purchase, not Morphotrust, even though the cameras still worked just fine.

Jay Nixon is NOT to be trusted. He certainly lives up to Richard Nixon's legacy as a sociopathic liar, but I am not aware of any familial relation between the two.

I regret having voted for Jay Nixon; I voted for him in 2012 because he signed into law the 2009 bill prohibiting compliance with REAL ID and the gathering of biometric data in MO, and his opponent, a Republican, seemed comparatively less friendly towards liberty than even Jay Nixon(Jay Nixon seemed, based on his known political career, "moderate democrat" by American standards, which qualifies as "right-wing authoritarian" by the standards of the rest of the developed world, just a tiny bit to the left as the neocons, but similarly authoritarian).

I wanted MO to keep fighting REAL ID, and figured he would be more conducive towards that end than anyone else that had a realistic probability of being governor next term(he was the incumbent, after all). Now I know for a fact that it was all a show, even if I only had contemplated the possibility of this being the case in the past before this revelation, but disregarded the scenario due to Occam's Razor. The nightmare scenario turned out to be the unfortunate reality.

You see, in Missouri, a tracking infrastructure is being set up using this biometric data. Police will be able to reference this data with handheld devices, or do matches from CCTV footage for identification and/or live tracking. Read about it here:

http://www.dailypaul.com/324327/missouri-is-illegally-comply...

The vast majority of states are doing similar. So are other countries around the world.

I can trust a snake, but I will never trust a politician again. I am anxious/cautious about Rand Paul. He is certainly not his father. Is it just another show, or is he really a neocon? I'm now intolerant of shows, and even moreso, of neocons.

I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws our country. ~Thomas Jefferson

TwelveOhOne's picture

Wow thanks!

"You don't ask, you don't get" / "Ask and you shall receive". Good info, thanks again!

I love you. I'm sorry. Please forgive me. Thank you.
http://fija.org - Fully Informed Jury Association
http://jsjinc.net - Jin Shin Jyutsu (energy healing)

We don't know what happened

between the officer and Michael Brown. Until we hear the dispatch tapes, read the autopsy report (which will show the number of bullets that entered his body and the distance when fired) and take into account the final resting place of the body, we don't have any evidence that either statements from the police (above) or the eyewitnesses are accurate or truthful.

The statement above is nothing like the reports of the eyewitnesses. In my opinion, when reports are this divergent, one statement is the truth and the other is a lie. We will have to wait and see.