35 votes

Worse than Nazis: Official US Army Manual 3-39.33 ok SNIPING UnArmed American Protesters, for "Psychological" Effect Multiplier!

Read the PDF for yourselves; ready to have your minds blown: U.S. Army Techniques Publication 3-39.33: Civil Disturbances

Army Admits Plan To Execute Americans En Masse

Published on Aug 18, 2014

Special Report: Alex Jones reveals the US military's plans to subdue and kill Americans in civil disobedience protests.He reveals the documentation that proves how the protests in Ferguson MI, are just the start of martial law tactics in America.

** Gee... what a coinkydink, eh? Just in time for open PsyOp, Feds-PROVOCATEURed Ferguson protests.

This manual is now, officially the NWO-hijacked USG's 'Wansee Moment,' in the sense that they openly wrote down what is absurd and immoral, as a matter of official govt policy. Well, so okay, besides Patriot ActS and 2012 NDAA Section 1021/1022. lol. But still, doesn't make it any less unsettling.o/

Gloves are off. They're simply letting us 'peons' know that it's all entropying, and they don't give a frakk whether we know or care, or not. The document has been declassified for MAXIMUM distribution: it's open ended.

Here's accompanying article by AJ's resident Briton AnCap Paul Joseph Watson:

Document: Army Preparing to Use Lethal Force Against “Unarmed Civilians” During “Full Scale Riots” in U.S.
Training manual outlines "sniper response" during crowd control operations

by Paul Joseph Watson | August 18, 2014

A document released by the U.S. Army details preparations for “full scale riots” within the United States during which troops may be forced to engage in a “lethal response” to deal with unruly crowds of demonstrators.

The appearance of the document amidst growing unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, with the National Guard now being called in to deal with the disorder, is an ominous coincidence.

The 132-page document, titled U.S. Army Techniques Publication 3-39.33: Civil Disturbances (PDF), was written in April 2014 and recently obtained by Public Intelligence.

The document makes it clear that the techniques detailed therein are to be applied both outside and inside the “continental United States (CONUS)” in the event of “unruly and violent crowds” where it is “necessary to quell riots and restore public order.”

The training manual outlines scenarios under which, “Civil unrest may range from simple, nonviolent protests that address specific issues, to events that turn into full-scale riots.”

The most shocking aspect of the document is the fact that it describes the deployment of a “lethal response” directed against “unarmed civilians,” including “sniper response” and “small arms direct fire.”

Under the heading “sniper response,” the document states, “Ensure that target leaders or troublemakers are targeted,” in addition to a passage which states, “Exploit the psychological effect of an attack.”

Under the heading “small arms direct fire,” the manual states, “Escalate gradually, starting with a small caliber, single round and work up to a large caliber, automatic.”

Another graphic which depicts “escalation of trauma” directs soldiers how to use “riot batons” in order to cause the necessary level of injury or death to the subject. “Deadly force final target areas” include the back of the neck, the solar plexus, the neck, the spine and the head.

In light of events in Ferguson, where a predominantly black community has faced off with militarized police, it’s interesting to note that the manual makes reference to civil unrest that can arise out of “ethnic hatred” and, “Community unrest (that) results in urban conflicts that arise from highly emotional social and economic issues.” The document also mentions how rioters target “retail stores,” as happened during the looting in Ferguson.

Breaking: Army Plans To Execute Protestors

Published on Aug 18, 2014

Alex Jones talks with Paul Joseph Watson about his discovery that the army is training to execute protestors.

Breaking: Army Kill Plan Discovered

Published on Aug 18, 2014

Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson break down the unprecedented discovery of the armies plan to kill civilians.

** For me, the most interesting part oddly enough, isn't even the fact that they're now openly (anyone here doubt whether Feds wouldn't have sniped unarmed protesters, regardless, when they have a history of doing it, with or without 'official' doctrine okaying it??) greenlighting it, it's that it outlines a new ROE (Rules of Engagement) directing a sniper to target various body parts, for psychological force-multiplier effect!

As anyone who's ever done any long range shooting would know, aside from specific hostage situations or embassy situations (where an American in uniform killing a native is frowned upon, with much larger geopolitical diplomatic implications), you don't selectively target body parts, like in the movies, unless you're a sadistic fcuk. In a battlefield, a sniper's primary role is recon/scouting, provide cover & 'unknown X-factor' force multiplier. And, you only really target center mass, or whatever the hell's visible. The direct & indirect 'psychological' factor vs your enemies, is only in that they don't know where the sniper is, or where or when and from how far or close their lives will be taken.

NOT, so that you can play god vs unarmed AMERICAN protestors (as in their salary paying employer BOSSes). Well, all this is really a moot point, as we already are living in a policestate. But for the sake of conversation, in the context of 'what something is advertised to be/supposed to be,' y'all get the gist.

That said, even in US embassies abroad in dangerous arenas, where 'anti-American' protests by the local population is the relative norm, the protocol has always been clear: only when a visible threat (as in smallarms) is directed toward the facility, individuals, or the embassy/consulate's security detail, are they okay-ed to engage. One notable instance, before the AfPak & Iraq invasion/occupation, was of a USMC sniper at US embassy in Port Au Prince, Haiti, in the 1990's, who took out a machinegunner, who was taunting him outside the walls of the embassy, and was about to swing the muzzle around toward his direction. You can probably find the interview online somewhere; believe he was featured in one of those History or Discovery channel mini-docs.

Plus, embassies have far more international diplomatic/geopolitical implications which any hostED nation would not want any lone individual 'representing' their nation's colors, on their host sovereign nation's soil, to be antagonizing the local population.

Here's their official recruitment propaganda:

Marine Corps Embassy Security Guard - How far will you go

Uploaded on Oct 19, 2010

Congress has authorized a growth of up to 1,000 more Marines for the Marine Corps Security Guard program. To find out more about the program, visit: http://www.mcesg.marines.mil/unithome.aspx
or their Facebook page at: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Marine-Security-Guard-MSG-Dut...

The Marine Security Guard program was established in December 1948. Marines on MSG duty provide internal security preventing the compromise of classified material vital to the national security of the United States. They also protect U.S. citizens and U.S. government property located within designated U.S. diplomatic and consular premises.

But observe, unless it was a local Bosnian police sniper and not a USMC security detail, even with a full auto AK47 wielding nut, they shot him only to incapacitate enough for the local PD to be able to arrest him, NOT kill him, or dicker around for psychological warfare vs rest of the populace:

Video: Man fires at US embassy in Sarajevo, Bosnia, shot by sniper

Uploaded on Oct 30, 2011

The attack on the US embassy in Sarajevo by a gunman believed to be a follower of an ultraconservative Islamic sect exposed Bosnia's inability to deal with religious extremists who penetrated the country during its 1992-5 war. The gunman is accused of shooting at the embassy building for at least 30 minutes on Friday, wounding a policeman guarding the facility, before a police sniper immobilised him with a shot in his leg. The attacker, identified by police as 23-year-old Mevlid Jasarevic, was known to Bosnian police as someone who had frequented one of the country's most isolated communities practicing extremely conservative branch of Islam alternatively referred to as Wahhabism and Salafism.

But, when you're an American who pays for their sorry tax-leeching asses? Well, it's open season on you! You've just been greenlit as a target of State-directed assassination, if like oBUSHma's "Terror Tuesdays"-play-God-sessions, the State and its actors arbitrarily deem you to be a 'threat,' which at this point in history, ANYONE NOT working in/for/with/contracted out on behalf of govt, you're deemed a terrorist threat to the state, until it says you're not.

Then again, this isn't 'new' either, as Occupy Wall Street protesters found out, just what exactly FBI/DHS were planning:

FBI Ordered to Justify Shielding of Records Sought About Alleged ‘Occupy’ Sniper Plot

By Jacob Gershman
7:41 pm ET, Mar 18, 2014

A federal judge has ordered the Federal Bureau of Investigation to give her a better explanation for its refusal to turn over information to a student researching an alleged plot to assassinate “Occupy” protest leaders in Houston.

The ruling stems from a lawsuit brought by a Massachusetts Institute of Technology graduate student who is seeking records from the FBI related to a Houston spin-off of the 2011 Occupy Wall Street protests and an alleged sniper plot. The student claims that the heavily redacted responses he got back from the government violated the Freedom of Information Act.

Information about the alleged plot first surfaced in FBI documents — released through a prior FOIA request by a civil-rights legal organization in Washington – that referenced a “plan to kill the leadership via suppressed sniper rifles,” according to court documents. It’s not known who was behind the alleged plot or whether the FBI investigated it.

Dire times we're living in...

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The term You're looking for

The term You're looking for is "useful idiots". I doubt they get paid.

"The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that." — Alan Greenspan


can't wait for my "agent" checks to start rolling in. Dumbass

OK, I'm a dumbass...but u didn't post a link

with the article that discredits him. Did you forget? How about saying something about the article? Lol, that's what I thought. TROLL U

Zero credibility

Doesn't Alex Jones have his own forums?

Maybe you should post there. Maybe there are many of us who are embarrassed that you spread that stuff here, making us all look like conspiracy theorists.

As long as we're free to post

As long as we're free to post whatever we feel is relevant , you are free to ignore it or post your silly objections. Mk? Thanks!

And if questioning known liars, i.e. Government, gets me labeled as a 'conspiracy theorist', well I'm in pretty good company.
What does that make you, pal?

"The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that." — Alan Greenspan

Nice deflection

"Questioning known liars" doesn't get you labeled as a "conspiracy theorist." Eagerly spreading Alex Jones' "content" (I'll stick with a value-neutral term for the sake of civility) gets you labeled one.

I'm "free" to take a number of steps in response to your hijacking attempts. And politely asking the Jonesians to respect the difference between the liberty movement and Jones' conspiracy fans is one such step. Usually that doesn't work, because inconsiderate little punks who listen to that stuff don't really care about other peoples' wishes/reputations.

You, sir or madam, are entitled to your idiotic opinion. You're entitled to myopically think that people are just critiquing the messenger (while remaining blind to the fact that they formed an opinion of said messenger after looking at his toxic messages over quite a long time span). You're entitled to view the mainstream liberty movement's "objections" as "silly." Those are called opinions.

You're not entitled to attack fellow Paulites (or anyone, for that matter) with LIES. I know having "evidence" to back up paranoid bull**** isn't really how Alex Jones fans roll. But you don't get to just call people "agents" and make up sinister facts about them. That's called defamation.

I hope your little cadre of Jonesian propagandists enjoys this little fiefdom. Maybe you'll hang out here and avoid real activism, oblivious to the fact that we're drummed you out of C4L, local LP and Paulian Republican groups, and other gatherings that matter. Oh, I know lots of people who listen to Alex Jones. Some listen for its comedic benefits. Others are "useful idiots," to borrow the term you've misappropriated: they have foolish beliefs but don't spew them all over the place. And then there are the ones who are drummed out: the ones who don't want to win the actual, meaningful battle being fought at that moment for tangible change as much as they want to blabber on about chemtrails or the Bilderberg Group and turn people off.

I know which group you're in. And I know your only remaining refuge is here. There, there. Keep your head up and your tinfoil hat on tight. You're free to think I'm an idiot all you want. You're even free to express that view. But don't think I'm intimidated by your attempts and intimidation and defamation.

lol! You're serious aren't

lol! You're serious aren't you? I would give you a serious fisking if I thought it was worth my time and effort. It isn't.
You can continue hurling your insults down range at the stawman. You're way off target with me, pal.
You don't own this site, nor do you own the 'movement'.

Your objections are ineffectual.


"The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that." — Alan Greenspan

ecorob's picture

Newsflash. This just in!

Dateline. All across America.

They don't have enough guns to subdue us and their threats are hollow sounds from a paper tiger. They (the threats) don't even come from this country.

These are scare tactics.

Why are we even here, now, talking about this? Because common sense no longer reigns supreme and tyranny abounds. Rule of law applies only to the elites and their thugs/Nazi law enforcement.

Sovereignty in America is being attacked.

Stand and deliver, American Patriots.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Must be lost.

"He reveals the documentation that proves how the protests in Ferguson MI, are just the start of martial law tactics in America."

Maybe AJ should at least reference the correct state.

No. Because focusing on that

No. Because focusing on that little mistake would be missing the entire point. But then you know that, don't you?

"The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that." — Alan Greenspan

They keep sharing poorly written Alex Jones scribbles here

Clearly, there are a handful of people here who want to promote Alex Jones and his websites. It makes us all look bad.

In the last few days, I've seen an Alex Jones article shared here that referenced Ferguson being in Michigan, and another article that spelled it "Furgeson."

First class reportage, there, folks!

Yes, focus on the messenger

Yes, focus on the messenger and not the message. That is great tactic. Oh and derailing the topic with anal spellchecking - fantastic work, agent.

"The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that." — Alan Greenspan

lol, time for AJ to waggle fingers

at his geography-confused employee who wrote that caption. it happens. xD

though, if I were a media employer, think I'd have a ginormous note at the office, especially at the cubicles of whomever are writing primary articles and video description boxes, to recheck most commonly mistaken typos & definitional misuses, in the post-Internet era, with something like:

MarTIAL Law (not MarSHALL Law, Tommy!)

It's (it+is contraction, itS = possessive, Frankie!)

You're (you+are contraction, your = possessive, Sandie!)

Aggrevate, means to make worse, NOT 'to emotionally frustrate'!! (John!)

And, check your State acronyms, and double double recheck them, prior to 'print'!!


Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

And then we should RECHECK the RECHECKS...

i.e. Aggrevate == Aggravate. :)

hey, not fair; not before I could edit, gosh dang it! ,cD

Ya locked me out, -Ƒlux-, with cool custom "F" font!

Yes. I drop my head in aspiring wordsmith guild-card unworthy shame: "Doh!" would be in fitting order; stoooopid spellchecker .o/

same note posted at my non-existent cubicle xD

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul


Sorry, the opportunity was just too good to pass up! :)