37 votes

The Men Who Would Kill the World

Anyone who's not heard of Senate Bill 2277 "the Russian Aggression Provocation (sic) Act (RAPA)" ought to get to know it and quick. Sponsored by Sen. Bob Corker, it is co-sponsored by twenty-six other senators, all Republicans. These are the men who would kill the world:

Sen Alexander, Lamar [TN] - 5/1/2014
Sen Ayotte, Kelly [NH] - 5/1/2014
Sen Barrasso, John [WY] - 5/1/2014
Sen Blunt, Roy [MO] - 5/1/2014
Sen Burr, Richard [NC] - 5/1/2014
Sen Chambliss, Saxby [GA] - 5/6/2014
Sen Coats, Daniel [IN] - 5/1/2014
Sen Cornyn, John [TX] - 5/1/2014
Sen Enzi, Michael B. [WY] - 5/6/2014
Sen Flake, Jeff [AZ] - 5/1/2014
Sen Graham, Lindsey [SC] - 5/1/2014
Sen Hatch, Orrin G. [UT] - 5/1/2014
Sen Hoeven, John [ND] - 5/1/2014
Sen Inhofe, James M. [OK] - 5/1/2014
Sen Isakson, Johnny [GA] - 5/1/2014
Sen Johnson, Ron [WI] - 5/1/2014
Sen Kirk, Mark Steven [IL] - 5/1/2014
Sen McCain, John [AZ] - 5/1/2014
Sen McConnell, Mitch [KY] - 5/1/2014
Sen Portman, Rob [OH] - 5/1/2014
Sen Risch, James E. [ID] - 5/1/2014
Sen Roberts, Pat [KS] - 5/1/2014
Sen Rubio, Marco [FL] - 5/1/2014
Sen Thune, John [SD] - 5/1/2014
Sen Toomey, Pat [PA] - 5/6/2014
Sen Vitter, David [LA] - 5/6/2014

For, S.2277 is breath-taking in the audaciously aggressive actions it would take to provoke Russia into an immediate military countermeasure.

Steven Starr's article on S.2277 makes one shudder as to the consequences for world peace: http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-russian-aggression-preventi...

One of the most shocking parts is this: "The Russian Aggression Prevention Act, or RAPA, Provides major non-NATO ally status for Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova for purposes of the transfer or possible transfer of defense articles or defense services. Major non-NATO ally status would for practical purposes give NATO membership to these nations, as it would allow the US to move large amounts of military equipment and forces to them without the need for approval of other NATO member states. Thus RAPA would effectively bypass long-standing German opposition to the US request to make Ukraine and Georgia part of NATO."

This violates the NATO charter, which demands that only NATO members may receive this kind of treatment. And NATO members such as Germany and France have been wary of treading toward former Soviet Republics that were long-time parts of the historical Russia state, such as Ukraine and Moldova and Georgia, and all of which have or have had armed separatist conflicts within their borders -- another clear violation of the NATO charter.

But RAPA is not NATO. It is the diktat of the U.S. military industrial complex. Starr confirms this:

"RAPA would accelerate the implementation of phase three of the European Phased Adaptive Approach for Europe-based missile defense . . . by no later than the end of calendar year 2016. In 2012, Russia’s highest ranking military officer stated that Russia might consider a pre-emptive strike against such BMD deployments when the situation gets harder."

Furthermore, "RAPA would have the U.S. quickly supply Ukraine with$100 million worth of weapons and equipment, including anti-tank and anti-aircraft weapons, crew weapons, grenade launchers, machine guns, ammunition, and Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles."

Most terrifying of all, RAPA contains a definitive timed ultimatum for war -- the first since World War II:

"The Russian Aggression Prevention Act demands that Russia withdraw from the eastern border of Ukraine, which is by definition, the Russian border. In other words, RAPA provocatively demands that Russia remove its own military forces away from its own borders, while Ukrainian military forces are meanwhile massed on the other side, attacking predominantly Russian cities."

Starr concludes,

"RAPA therefore provides both military and political support for Ukrainian President Poroshenko’s stated goat that Ukraine will retake Crimea. This goal was recently echoed by the Ukrainian defense minister, who was applauded by the Ukrainian Parliament when he told them that the Ukrainian army will have a victory parade in Sevastopol. These statements are taken seriously in Moscow, where they are viewed as a promise to attack Russia."

I personally was in Sevastopol on vacation for a few days last week (August 12-15, 2014). While strolling on the main boulevard toward Nakhimov Square, I came to a war memorial to the Afghanistan dead with a tank in front of it. Some boys were playing atop it. My wife called out to them, "Boys! Will you fight for Sevastopol?" The nine and ten year old boys gleefully shouted, "YES! We will defend our city from the enemy, like our grandfathers did!" She asked, "Which enemy?" They shouted back, "ANY enemy who will try to attack!"

With that in mind, Starr informs us that

"RAPA also demands that Russian forces must have withdrawn from Crimea within SEVEN days of the enactment of the Act."

...Within SEVEN DAYS. Do you know what that is?

It is a timed note, whose expiry means war. Possibly nuclear war, for which the entire planet should pay with its combined lives.

The gigantic question is, for what purpose does this ferocious antagonism serve? None. There is no American interest AT ALL in this lethal game. There are big business concerns in extracting the wealth of Ukraine and removing it to the west, and, of course, all the money that must be spent to prepare for global war -- and prosecute it. But there is nothing that the American people would consider of vital and strategic interest.

In fact, in all of history, there is no example of a more disinterested people being flung headlong into a war -- not even Britain's sudden, unexpected guarantee to Poland in 1939, which was promptly sacrificed first to Nazi savagery for five years and then Soviet domination for forty years without apology or recompense.

And, when one considers it: Provoking the largest stockpile of nuclear weapons in the world to action is in no human beings' interest.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
SteveMT's picture

22 of 26 co-sponsors sign-on the same day bill was introduced?

Why? Do you believe some strategy sessions were needed prior to this bill being introduced? Ya think! The remaining four traitors signed-on just 5 days later.

The Wyoming Senators are the big shocker for me. Why both Senators from such a freedom loving state have cosponsored this bill from hell makes me sick. Perhaps Warren Air Force Base in Cheyenne is in need of some additional funding/renovations.

Other Links to Bill Here (Yup, it's real.):
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/s2277
https://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-bill/2277

bump for awareness

Bump

Truth is treason in an empire of lies

These cons

are all Rothschild Zio-puppet Corporatists, who are in office to protect the Dollar Hegemony controlling the World. The Ukraine is just another Zionist plot, because this is the true homeland where the ancestry of majority of so-called Jews dirive. I was happy to hear journalist Jim Marrs, on Coast to Coast last night, when questioned about what he is working on for his next book, state the
'culture of evil'. He said everywhere we look there is evil, Hollywood movies, American aggression, and the Israel genocide of the Palestinians. He then stated, I don't want to hear the anti-Semite claim, because I mention Israel, because the majority are not semites, but Europeans of Khazar lineage, and the Palestinians are the real Semites. That was huge, on a show with millions of listeners from around the world. I also, heard Gerald Celente, on the Jeff Rense show, state the same facts. They have now condemed Putin as the enemy, not just for his desire to end the dollar hegemony, but especially after he secured Crimea as a Russian province, as the Ashkanazi Jews had plans to reverse migrate and make Crimea their region of control. Don't believe me, read this blog on the Times of Israel. http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/leaked-report-israel-acknowle...

jaseed's picture

Thanks, fightapathy

I'm from Wisconsin and have never liked senator Ron Johnson. And he endorsed Romney even before the Wisconsin Rep. convention early 2012.

“The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them.”

– Thomas Jefferson

Bishop Willard Romney wanted WWIII all along, of course

Yeah, Johnson sure picked a winner, didn't he?! Bishop Willard Romney wanted WWIII all along, of course. He jumped the gun on demonizing Putin early, even before the campaign of 2012 officially kicked off.

But one has to really wonder what's going on in the minds of these people when they go around making WWIII a campaign promise? Do they think Americans really want civilization incinerated?

In 2008, when our stupid sock puppet Saakashvili cunningly used Putin's absence at the Beijing Summer Olympics opening ceremony to attack South Ossetia, who was the first to leap to the madman's defense? Candidate McCain, of course! "We're all Georgians now!" he growled, warning Russia of consequences for defending Russian peacekeepers being shelled by Georgian artillery. President Bush had the wherewithal to keep his trap shut about the whole mess. But not McCain.

And he lost the election to Barack Hussein, because with the economy collapsing all around their ears, the last thing Americans needed was WWIII on top of it all.

And then we had Bishop Willard, warning in 2012 about Russia when nobody else gave a rat's rear. And now he has the gall to go around television pretending to be some Old Testament "Told ya so" prophet!

"Cowards & idiots can come along for the ride but they gotta sit in the back seat!"

I don't like to swear too much but, may God damn every one of...

...these war-mongering RATS who are doing this only to enrich the profiteers of war who then promise to KEEP THEM IN OFFICE (AKA: their constiuents - weapons makers, bankers, military entities etc).

And of course they'll be safe in their posh senate offices all the while.

They know it won't be them - or their families - who have to go off like cannon fodder into the wars they advocate.

Thanks for posting this.

"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul

NATO should be disbanded.

The only possible use it could have in today's world is to start another World War.

NATO is the stooge of the Wolfowitz doctrinaires

NATO is the stooge of the Wolfowitz doctrinaires. The so-called "Wolfowitz doctrine" is the prime directive that, as the United States achieved world hegemony following the Soviet collapse, it must never allow any other power to rise to compete with the hegemon.

Historically, it is nothing new. All great powers strove to maintain their supremacy by buying off allies, intimidating would-be challengers -- or launching suicidal wars to eliminate them. All failed.

In reality, the doctrine effectively makes ALL sovereign states of the world the enemies of America, because any of them might challenge hegemony and provoke the inevitable decline. This is why the NSA spies on America's allies as well as enemies. It is the paranoia of the successful: when you've reached the top, there's nowhere else to go but down.

Sadly, declining hegemons usually took their friends down with them -- in this case, it will be the suckers in NATO, since they're the ones closest to a tactic nuclear exchange, and the so-called missile shield is nonexistent.

"Cowards & idiots can come along for the ride but they gotta sit in the back seat!"

I do not fear it is upon us...

stand taller than you've ever stood and be unafraid.

Father - Husband - Son - Spirit - Consciousness

We've got to...

... get rid of this Cornyn guy here in TX.

Plano TX

Warhawks

These people aren't going to get what they want. There isn't a single democrat on that list so it is unlikely to even be voted on. The list is helpful though for knowing who to vote against this 2014 election cycle.

During your quest for happiness don't forget to take a few breaks along the way and just be happy :)

Unfortunately, CT's dem senators are pro-nuclear war

Unfortunately, CT's democrap senators are pro-nuclear war; well at least, they play the Russophobe card like a couple of sharks. Back in the winter, Sen. Chris Murphy made it his business to go to every Ukrainian church in the state and promise the U.S. would bring "real democracy" by overthrowing the elected president and installing Nazi assassins in Kiev. And oily Dick Blumenthal's been beating the "threat, threat, threat!" drum like the opportunist he always is.

"Cowards & idiots can come along for the ride but they gotta sit in the back seat!"

They (It) want's all of it.

What historical empire ever stopped at just having a few slices? Greed won't ever stop. This is the essence of the thing.

But about myself I will not boast, except as it concerns my weaknesses (2 Cor 12:5). Let the unbelievers seek praise from each other; I wish that which is from God alone.

What is Rand Paul's position?

He wouldn't vote for this or would he?