Received Reply From Editor of The Plain Dealer

Both papers left Dr Paul out of their presidential candidate coverage. One editor is called Mike Silverman and the other is Susan Goldberg. Is there a connection here to a zionist agenda?

Either your eyesight is slipping, or you're suffering from Rectal Cranial Inversion. Either way I think you need a doctor. I just so happen to know a doctor who is quite capable of helping you. First let's analyze your symptoms:

Your eyesight or the math centers in your brain seem to be malfunctioning. Dr Paul received 10% of the primary vote in Iowa, 14% in Nevada and 19% in Maine thus far. If you're eyes/math abilities were not weakened you would notice that these numbers are increasing over time.
Also other areas of your brain seem to be afflicted as well. This is obvious from the fact that you are a journalist, but seem to have forgotten how to research the election process. Were this not the case you would know that the numbers that determine a candidates chance to win is their delegate count, in which Dr Paul is doing quite well.

Dr Paul has a great track record of curing blindness in those who can't (won't) see what is right before them. Perhaps you should schedule a visit with him when he comes back through your area to thank his supporters for helping him gain the Oval Office. If you can't afford the medical bills (Either due to the recession, or for having lost your job due to your lack of journalistic integrity) Dr Paul is kind man who has treated a number of patients for free over the years...I'm sure he can take the time to treat you.

My reply from "Fortune" was totally-canned. But it was fun getting 'round the filters anyway! ;)
JMR

Subject: Re: Please...
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:24:05 -0500
...

Thank you for your letter to FORTUNE. We appreciate you taking the time to
share your thoughts with us. I will pass your comments along to the editors
and Mr. Serwer.

Regards,

Cullen Wheeler
Letters
FORTUNE

On 2/2/08 2:31 PM, I wrote: (subject-line was "Please...")

> Try to maintain a thin veneer of fairness & balance by including He
> Who Must Not Be Mentioned By Name in your economic challenge.
>
> Since you know who I mean anyway, I'll avoid any email filters by
> following the mediabiased "rule" and not mentioning him...
> JMR
>
>
> "The budget should be balanced, the treasury should be refilled,
> public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom
> should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign
> lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt." Cicero,
> circa 63 B.C.
>
> Regards,

Stephen Dupont
119 Doreen Street
New Bedford, Massachusetts 02745
February 4, 2008
Susan Goldberg
Dear Madam:
For someone who has risen to the position of editor it would seem as though you have not been paying attention to the current political landscape nor do you grasp a conceptual understanding of your duties as an unbiased News Agency. First the facts, as we are all entitled to our opinion we do not have the same luxury with regards to FACT based reporting which you seem to be seriously deficient, so please allow me to assist you in this area.
Fact # 1
Primary results: http://abcnews.go.com/politics/elections/candidate?candidate...
As you may be surprised to learn Dr. Paul has received at least 14% in the three most recent primaries not to mention a 10% haul in Iowa.
Fact # 2
Another indication of a candidate’s viability is, Straw Poll results and Ron Paul has had success in this area.
Straw Poll Results: http://www.ronpaul2008.com/straw-poll-results/
Fact # 4
Campaign fund raising is often used to determine how a candidate manages their finances during the campaign itself and may offer a window into how a particular candidate may perform if elected. Ron Paul’s Campaign is by far the most fiscally responsible of any candidate Democrat or Republican. Ron Paul raised more in the 4th quarter of 2007 with 19.9 million dollars and currently has more cash on hand than any republican including the ultra wealthy Mitt Romney.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/02/news-shoc...
Ron Paul has also set and broke his own record for single day fundraising with 4.3 million dollars on November 5th, 2007 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21646939/
And then on December 16th, 2007 He broke the record for single day donations in history with a 6 million dollar haul. http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/12/18/america/camp.php
Fact # 5
Grassroots organization is a vital component to any serious run for the Presidency and Ron Paul has cornered the market in this category. Meet up groups are boots on the ground supporters and Ron Paul dwarfs everyone shown here. http://ronpaul.meetup.com/about/
106,491 Members 10,033 Interested 1,611Meetups 1,189Cities 32Countries 32,801 Meetings so far!
Meetup groups continued:
Mitt Romney:
106 Members 86 Interested 11 Meetups 11 Cities 1 Countries 9 Meetings so far!
John McCain:
149 Members 94 Interested 7 Meetups 7 Cities 1 Countries 13 Meetings so far!
Mike Huckabee:
16,942 Members 1,390 Interested 497 Meetups 442Cities 2 Countries 2605 Meetings so far!
With all this evidence of Dr. Paul’s viability in the 5 different aforementioned categories it would seem that you have joined the ranks of the many mainstream outlets that are attempting to force upon the American people your wishes of who we should choose from. This would be fine if you did not present yourself as an unbiased source of news but this is not the case. You know that people depend on your written word for information they use to formulate their opinion as to who we would elect to the highest position of public office. It is therefore my opinion that you are doing a grave disservice to the general public by unfairly giving other candidates free face time in your newspaper while simultaneously excluding a very viable candidate with a much needed opposing viewpoint than the candidates that you endorse simply by their inclusion in your coverage. Many people are waking up to this media bias everyday and it is painfully obvious to us all how news outlets are scrambling to silence Dr. Paul’s message of non-interventionism, peace, and prosperity. I realize Ron Paul is not the preferred candidate for the elites of society because quite frankly Dr. Paul’s platform threatens future profits and is geared towards getting big government off the backs of ordinary citizens like myself that your paper professes to serve. I respectfully request that you include Dr. Paul with your coverage or come up with more concrete facts in order to explain your decision to exclude what I and many other Americans believe to be the only true conservative voice in the Republican Party currently running for President.

Sincerely,
Stephen Dupont
New Bedford, Massachusetts