Iranian Oil Bourse IS A Reality
Submitted by politicallore on Tue, 02/05/2008 - 18:12
http://www.politicallore.com/uncategorized/iranian-oil-bours...
2 STORIES
http://www.politicallore.com/uncategorized/irans-oil-bourse-...
DIGG AND BUMP PLEASE!!!
Here is the newest one!
US - Determined- to have more U N sanctions for Iran
http://www.politicallore.com/shaun-booth/us-determined-to-se...
Please subscribe, and donate if you can!
Jan. was a slow ad month, I am having a hard time paying my writers :(
»




















Some interesting posts to be found in this thread
From early 2008...
IRAN......Israel would inform, not ask U.S. before hitting Iran
Israel would inform, not ask U.S. before hitting Iran
May 6 2009
www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE54523R20090506
So while no one questions Israel's willingness to attack should it deem U.S.-led talks on curbing Iranian uranium enrichment a dead end, such strikes would almost certainly entail at least last-minute coordination with Washington.
Israel would want to ensure that its jets would not be shot down by accident if overflying U.S.-occupied Iraq, and to give Americans in the Gulf forewarning of possible Iranian reprisals.
"Whether or not Israel got the green light from Washington to attack Iran is almost immaterial, as everybody in the region would believe that the U.S. was complicit," said Karim Sadjadpour of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
"Israel would seek forgiveness, not permission."
Israel Practices Iran Attack
www.comcast.net/data/fan/html/popup.html?v=774854814&pl=foxf...
Above is a FOX clip on the matter
http://voanews.com/english/2008-06-20-voa66.cfm
100+ Fighters Practice Attack
USAF Secretary and Chief Of Staff Asked To Resign
See related thread: http://www.dailypaul.com/node/51458
Wanted to add this news in the context of the "Iran/Oil Bourse" thread-
My immediate thought: Possibly due to opposition to attacking Iran this summer/August?
http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2008/06/airforce_canned_06...
Moseley, Wynne to be asked to resign
By Erik Holmes - Staff Writer
Posted : Thursday Jun 5, 2008 11:34:46 EDT
Air Force Secretary Michael W. Wynne and Chief of Staff Gen. T. Michael Moseley are expected to be asked to resign Thursday, Air Force Times has learned.
The stunning development follows a series of high-profile scandals and disagreements between Air Force leadership and Defense Secretary Robert Gates in the past year, during which both the Pentagon and congressional leadership have increasingly expressed frustration about the Air Force’s top bosses.
The last straw appears to be a report on nuclear weapons handling by Navy Adm. Kirkland Donald, director of naval nuclear propulsion. The critical report convinced Gates that changes must be made.
-snip-
Synthetic Fuel
A little research shows both Wynne and Moseley are stanch advocates of synthetic fuels.
The Wall Street Journal - U.S. Military Launches Alternative-Fuel Push
Michael Wynne: Flying out in front - The Air Force is taking the lead on synthetic fuel; will you follow us?
The plan, which would affect the service’s 5,700 aircraft, is intended to help the United States becomes less dependent on imported oil, Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne said at a recent conference. Wynne cited tensions with oil-producing countries such as Iran and Venezuela as a reason why the United States should reduce its consumption of fossil fuels. “The leaders of both countries have serious issues with the United States,” Wynne said.
It might be hard to control the world with oil-backed dollars if we can just mass produce the stuff.
I'm also wondering
I saw an article that mentioned the two guys on their way out were focusing on China and Russia as emerging threats instead of concentrating on Iraq and Afghanistan.
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/06/breaking-air-fo.html
See a related thread just posted
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/50738
UPI: Officials: Iran, al-Qaida communicating
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2008/05/29/officials_i...
Officials: Iran, al-Qaida communicating
Published: May 29, 2008 at 8:27 PM
WASHINGTON, May 29 (UPI) -- Top officials in the U.S. government say the Iranian government has secretly been in contact with al-Qaida leaders in recent months.
The officials told ABC News that highly sensitive intelligence indicates the Iranian government has communicated with al-Qaida leaders on the status of high-level operatives in the terrorist organization who have been under house arrest in Iran since 2003.
ABC said the operatives include two sons of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden.
"The Iranians know there would be hell to pay if these guys were set free," one official said.
"Iran likely sees these individuals, as major bargaining chips," another official told ABC News. "How and when they're going to use those chips or whether they are going to keep them in the bank is part of an ongoing strategic discussion they are having internally."
ABC News said all of the sources spoke on condition of anonymity.
Iran = Poland circa 1939
Poland posed no threat to Germany prior to the German attack on Poland. But the Germans actually portrayed the attack as defending their territory from a Polish attack. Sound similar?
Mike
"Fire Team for Freedom" on revolutionbroadcasting.com
Mondays thru Thursdays Midnight EST
or visit www.mikeandjake.com
Mike
"Fire Team for Freedom"
visit www.mikeandjake.com
Bump
Did any of you see this article?
http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSL25658177200...
Hmmm
The obvious question: Petrodollar recycling (dollar hegemony) has been in place by force when necessary since the 70's Why does the US suddenly seem to NOT care if oil continues to be valued and sold in USD? It is our means of speading inflation around the world.
Hugo and Mahmoud-B.F.F. ?
Venezuela has declared that it is establishing a common bank with Iran to finance economic development projects in the two countries.
The bank, to be based in Tehran, will have an initial capital base of 1.2 billion dollars, with each nation providing half of the funds, AFP reported on Tuesday.
It follows up on a March 2007 agreement the two countries signed.
The relations between the two countries has elevated to an unprecedented level during President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's term.
Last month Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said unity and cooperation between Tehran and Caracas has gotten the 'US imperialism' riled up.
"The two countries' cooperation has turned into a great unity between the Iranian and Venezuelan nations and this annoys the US imperialism," he said.
www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=56645§ionid=351020102
US, allies say UN report bolsters fears Iran wants nuclear bomb
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5...myOPK8iCnzBzlQ
US, allies say UN report bolsters fears Iran wants nuclear bomb
4 hours ago (around 3:30 CDT on 5/27/08)
WASHINGTON (AFP) The United States said Tuesday that Iran's refusal to respond to queries from the UN atomic watchdog is "very troubling," warning its behavior bolstered suspicions it aimed to build a nuclear bomb.
The US government, which has spearheaded toughening rounds of sanctions against Tehran, added it was studying what "diplomatic next step" to take after Monday's report from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
France and Germany -- which along with Britain, Russia and China are locked in carrot-and-stick negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program -- voiced immediate concerns about the report.
The IAEA on Monday expressed "serious concern" that Iran is still hiding information about alleged studies into making nuclear warheads and defying UN demands to suspend uranium enrichment.
The alleged studies comprise a uranium conversion project, high explosives testing and designs for a missile re-entry vehicle, and suggest there may have been a possible military angle to past nuclear work.
The report "refers to the fact that the Iranians are willfully -- trying to willfully withhold information about their activities related to potential weaponization," McCormack told reporters in Washington.
"There are a number of different questions out there about the military's involvement in this nuclear program, about Iran's efforts to fabricate hemispheres of uranium," he said.
"And I'm not sure other than for a weapon why you would do that," McCormack added.
Washington has in the past pointed to IAEA inquiries into Iran's possession of blueprints for making the uranium metal hemispheres that are the core of bombs as signs of military intentions.
McCormack called the new report "very troubling" and "disturbing," adding: "And we'll see what diplomatic next step will flow from this."
The State Department spokesman said the report will have no impact on a so-called "refreshed" package of incentives for Iran to halt its uranium enrichment and reprocessing work.
"The package is set," McCormack said.
European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana said he hopes to travel to Iran soon to present the package from the six negotiating powers after meeting Tehran's Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki over the weekend.
The permanent Security Council members Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States plus Germany have re-worked an offer of political and trade incentives originally made in 2006.
Solana has been struggling to establish high-level talks aimed at getting Iran to accept the package but Tehran refuses to suspend enrichment as a precondition for negotiating.
Iran insists it has the right to enrich uranium to make nuclear fuel to help meet its electricity needs and has so far defied three sets of Security Council resolutions which demand it halt the process.
At highly refined levels, such work can also make the fissile core of an atomic bomb but Iran says its nuclear program is peaceful and has vehemently denied that it is seeking to make weapons with it.
In Paris, French foreign ministry spokeswoman Pascale Andreani said the details mentioned in the report "could be the sign of a possible military dimension of the Iranian nuclear program."
In Berlin, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said the report "leaves open a number of questions that we will have to examine very quickly."
Hosted by Google
Copyright © 2008 AFP. All rights reserved. More » []
Bush 'plans Iran air strike by August'
No need for either party's conventions, then, right?
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JE28Ak01.html
Bush 'plans Iran air strike by August'
Two key US senators briefed on the attack planned to go public with their opposition to the move, according to the source, but their projected New York Times op-ed piece has yet to appear.
The source, a retired US career diplomat and former assistant secretary of state still active in the foreign affairs community, speaking anonymously
-snip-
04/06/08: Gulf in fresh push to hit single currency deadline
http://www.arabianbusiness.com/515736
Gulf in fresh push to hit single currency deadline
by Daliah Merzaban on Sunday, 06 April 2008
Gulf Arab states agreed on Sunday on fresh impetus for efforts to create a single currency by 2010 and resist pressure to revalue currencies or drop their dollar pegs unilaterally to offset soaring inflation.
Central bank governors from the six-member GCC will meet again in two months to "complete the legislation and the matters relating to monetary union as we march to reach 2010", GCC Secretary-General Abdul-Rahman Al-Attiyah said after a meeting of the governors in the Qatari capital, Doha.
The governors' regular twice-yearly meeting on Sunday discussed removing obstacles to the single currency plans.
Of the six countries, Oman said in 2006 it would not join by a January 1, 2010 target and Kuwait dropped its dollar peg in May, throwing the plan into disarray.
"We are going to review the date in 2009," Qatari Central Bank Governor Sheikh Abdullah bin Saud Al-Thani told reporters at the end of the meeting, of which Qatar currently holds the revolving chair.
Of the 2010 target, he said: "It is realistic. We are committed to working towards that target."
The comments contrast with statements last year which indicated the monetary union project would probably be delayed several years as the economies of the region diverged, particularly on inflation.
"They are trying to take speculation away from GCC currency-reform talk after last year, when so many comments were made that increased speculation," said Monica Malik, Middle East economist for Cairo-based investment bank EFG-Hermes.
Qatar's Sheikh Abdullah said the six countries will have to work more closely together to resist going their separate ways on currency policy as interest rates fall and the US dollar weakens.
The dollar has lost almost 8% of its value against the euro this year alone, helping fuel record or near-record Gulf inflation by making some imports more expensive.
Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar are among the oil producers that have come under pressure to revalue their currencies or drop their pegs as the link forces them to track declining US interest rates when their own economies are surging. Oil prices have surged five-fold during the last six years.
"We meet today against the backdrop of very difficult and complicated developments, in terms of their impact on our economic conditions in general, and fiscal and monetary in particular," Sheikh Abdullah said earlier on Sunday.
"The pressure on our economies has piled up in the last year, be it in terms of interest rates or exchange rates," he said. "These pressures appear to be likely to continue over the current year in a manner that requires us to deal with them with the greatest level of coordination and consultation."
This is "so that these developments do not push us away from our common aspirations and our march that leads to the achievement of monetary union", he said.
Several Gulf states are determined to meet the 2010 deadline, GCC Secretary-General Attiyah said earlier on Sunday, without identifying them. Others could follow later, he said.
UAE inflation hit a 19-year high of 9.3% in 2006 and probably accelerated to more than 10% last year. In Qatar, the world's largest exporter of liquefied natural gas, it was 13.7% in the fourth quarter. (Reuters)
I'm starting to wonder if
I'm starting to wonder if our central bankers purposefully caused our dollar to weaken in order to help create a "Gulf Union"?
Think about it. Not so long ago, Greenspan went overseas to the oil producing countries in the Middle East and suggested that they dump the dollar... Why would he say that?
http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSL2515874520080225
Not to mention that it also opens the opportunity to create a new North American currency.
As clueless as they seem with their current policies, I'm pretty sure the bankers know that our current monetary system is doomed for failure. They've obviously planned for the future and came up with a strategy to keep and maintain their control of a currency... Doesn't matter what currency.
This all could be very possible...
---------------------------------------
The pursuit of liberty is addictive... Let's make it contagious.
Does this sound familiar?
http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSL25658177200...
Wait a minute, I thought we were going to bomb Iran for daring to move their oil away from dollars. But now the dollar is strong enough to stand on its own without the support of Arab oil? Really?
OIl Hits $126.25 On Concerns Over US/Venezuela Relations
Friday, May 9, 2008. (AP Photo/David Karp)
By JOHN WILEN
AP Business Writer
NEW YORK (AP) - Oil rose above $126 a barrel for the first time Friday, bringing its advance this week to nearly $10, as investors questioned whether a possible confrontation between the U.S. and Venezuela could cut exports from the OPEC member. Gas prices, meanwhile, rose above an average $3.67 a gallon at the pump, following oil's recent path higher.
On Friday, The Wall Street Journal published a report that suggested closer ties between Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and rebels attempting to overthrow Colombia's government. Chavez has been linked to Colombian rebels previously, but the paper reported it had reviewed computer files indicating concrete offers by Venezuela's leader to arm guerillas. That appears to heighten the chances that the U.S. could impose sanctions on one of its biggest oil suppliers.
"If we put on sanctions, I'm sure Chavez would threaten to cut off our oil supply," said Phil Flynn, an analyst at Alaron Trading Corp. "Obviously that would have a major impact on oil prices."
Light, sweet crude for June delivery vaulted to a new record of $126.25 on the New York Mercantile Exchange before retreating slightly to settle up $2.27 at a record $125.96. Oil futures set new records for the fifth straight day, and ended the week up $9.64, or 8.3 percent.
Even if Chavez cut oil shipments to the U.S., Venezuelan oil would still make its way to the U.S. via middle men, who would buy it from Venezuela and resell it to the U.S., Flynn said. But that new layer in the supply chain would bump up costs.
www.wtopnews.com/?nid=111&sid=577994
Lebanon Teeters On Brink Of Civil War
Published: Saturday, 10 May, 2008, 02:08 AM Doha Time
BEIRUT: Hezbollah fighters, their guns blazing, seized control of west Beirut yesterday after three days of deadly street battles with pro-government foes pushed Lebanon dangerously close to all-out civil war.
The US warned that the Shia movement must be held accountable for the violence and said it was working with Lebanon’s neighbours and the UN Security Council on steps to do so. Convoys of triumphant opposition gunmen firing into the air and flashing victory signs took to the streets after routing fighters loyal to the Western-backed government of the divided nation.
As the fighting eased, the army and police moved across areas now in the hands of opposition forces which have been locked in an 18-month power struggle with the ruling coalition. But as foreigners scrambled to leave it was unclear what the immediate future would hold, amid fears the protracted political feud could plunge Lebanon back to the dark days of the 1975-1990 civil war. Although the guns had largely fallen silent in the besieged capital last night, a security official said two opposition militants were killed in fighting south of Beirut.
Both sides appeared unwilling to give any further ground yesterday, with Hezbollah insisting that the roadblocks that have paralysed much of the nation would remain until the government meets its demands. “We are not carrying out a coup — all of this is related to the government’s decisions,” an opposition official said. “We are offering partnership... and they want to monopolise power and limit our share.”
But Youth and Sports Minister Ahmed Fatfat ruled out any chance of the government going back on its decision to probe Hezbollah’s private communications network — the trigger for the latest unrest.
“It would be easier for the government to resign than to revoke its decision,” Fatfat said.
The unrest triggered urgent international appeals for calm, amid fears that any possible civil war could spread to the region.
The White House called the fighting proof of the danger Hezbollah poses to the region.
“Hezbollah’s relationship with Iran and Syria, as well as its history of international terrorism and provision of lethal support and training to Iraqi-based extremist groups, demonstrates the threat it poses to international peace and security,” White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe said.
“The US is consulting with other governments in the region and with the UN Security Council about measures that must be taken to hold those responsible for the violence in Beirut accountable,” he said.
US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Washington would support Lebanese Prime Minister Fuad Siniora in the standoff. “Seeking to protect their state within a state, Hezbollah has... demonstrated its contempt for its fellow Lebanese,” she added. In Brussels EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana also assured Siniora of the European Union’s “full support.”
Earlier Christian Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea accused Hezbollah of launching “an armed coup... that is counter to the constitution... and democratic principles”.
Hezbollah, the most powerful armed group in Lebanon, was the only faction allowed to keep its weapons after the civil war to fight Israeli forces occupying the south.
In west Beirut, most shops and businesses remained shuttered while tanks rolled through the streets and riot police and troops patrolled but with orders not to intervene in the conflict. – AFP
www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=2...
Iran/US Proxy War In Lebanon "Another American Humiliation"
Hizbollah rules west Beirut in Iran's proxy war with US
By Robert Fisk in Beirut
Saturday, 10 May 2008
Another American humiliation. The Shia gunmen who drove past my apartment in west Beirut yesterday afternoon were hooting their horns, making V-signs, leaning out of the windows of SUVs with their rifles in the air, proving to the Muslims of the capital that the elected government of Lebanon has lost.
And it has. The national army still patrols the streets, but solely to prevent sectarian killings or massacres. Far from dismantling the pro-Iranian Hizbollah's secret telecommunications system – and disarming the Hizbollah itself – the cabinet of Fouad Siniora sits in the old Turkish serail in Beirut, denouncing violence with the same authority as the Iraqi government in Baghdad's green zone.
The Lebanese army watches the Hizbollah road-blocks. And does nothing. As a Tehran versus Washington conflict, Iran has won, at least for now. Walid Jumblatt, the Druze leader and MP and a pro-American supporter of Mr Siniora's government, is isolated in his home in west Beirut, but has not been harmed. The same applies to Saad Hariri, one of the most prominent government MPs and the son of the murdered former prime minister Rafik Hariri. He remains in his west Beirut palace in Koreitem, guarded by police and soldiers but unable to move without Hizbollah's approval. The symbolism is everything.
When Hamas became part of the Palestinian government, the West rejected it. So Hamas took over Gaza. When the Hizbollah became part of the Lebanese government, the Americans rejected it. Now Hizbollah has taken over west Beirut. The parallels are not exact, of course. Hamas won a convincing electoral victory. Hizbollah was a minority in the Lebanese government; its withdrawal from cabinet seats with other Shias was occasioned by Mr Siniora's American-defined policies and by their own electoral inability to change these. The Lebanese don't want an Islamic republic any more than the Palestinians. But when Sayed Hassan Nasrallah, the Hizbollah chairman, told a press conference that this was a "new era" for Lebanon, he meant what he said.
Mr Hariri's Future Television offices were invested by the army after Hizbollah surrounded it on Thursday night, its staff evacuated and the station switched off. When I turned up there yesterday morning, I joined a queue for manouche – Lebanon's hot cheese breakfast sandwiches – at Eyman's bakery in Watwat Street. I patiently waited behind four black-hooded gunmen from Hizbollah's allied (but highly venal) Amal movement only to find uniformed Lebanese soldiers representing the government patiently queuing at the next window. Law and disorder, it seems, both have to eat.
But I found far more powerful symbolism in Hamra Street, one of west Beirut's two main commercial thoroughfares. More than 100 Hizbollah men were standing or patrolling the highway, clad in new camouflage fatigues, wearing new black flak jackets and new black, peaked, American-style baseball caps and – more to the point – what appeared to be equally new American sniper rifles..
No, this is not a revolution. No, this is not a "hijacking" of west Beirut or the airport, which remains cut off by burning tyres on roads guarded by Hizbollah militiamen. But the government's supporters deserve some space. Several pointed out that the Israelis closed Beirut airport in 2006. So what right did Hizbollah have to do the same to the Lebanese now? And, according to Saad Hariri, Mr Nasrallah – when he called Mr Jumblatt "a thief and a killer" – was "authorising his murder and clearly stating that, 'I am the state and the state is me'." No wonder, then, that Mr Jumblatt fears for his life and that Mr Hariri claims the Hizbollah's coup de folie is a form of fitna, the Arabic for chaos. "I invite you, Sayed Nasrallah, to take back your fighters from the streets and to lift the siege of Beirut to protect the unity of Muslims," he said. "Israel will be rejoicing at the blockade of the country and the collapse of its economy."
Marwan Hamade, Mr Siniora's Telecommunications Minister – and victim of an attempted assassination in 2004 – admitted he had turned a blind eye to Hizbollah's underground phone system but could no longer when he realised that Hizbollah now maintains 99,000 numbered lines.
Mr Nasrallah also insisted on the reinstallation of Brigadier General Wafiq Chucair as head of security at Beirut airport, since he was not a member of Hizbollah. General Chucair was suspended after Mr Jumblatt claimed he worked for Mr Nasrallah's outfit, a demand which prompted Mr Jumblatt to say he did not know General Chucair was so important to Mr Nasrallah that it was worth closing the international airport.
And so it goes on. There was an unusually good editorial in the French-language daily L'Orient Le Jour, which asked how the Hizbollah – literally "the party of God" in Arabic – could have war as its raison d'etre yet be a factor of stability and security in Lebanese domestic affairs. "And this party, can it really call itself the 'Party of God' without creating, in the long term, the distrust of all those other children who count themselves to be from the same unique and one God?"
No, this is not a civil war. Nor is it a coup d'etat, though it meets some of the criteria. It is part of the war against America in the Middle East. The Hizbollah "must stop sowing trouble," the White House said rather meekly. Yes, like the Taliban. And al-Qa'ida. And the Iraqi insurgents. And Hamas. And who else?
www.independent.co.uk/news/fisk/hizbollah-rules-west-beirut-...
Iran Attack May Be Closer Than You Think
Better Squish This One In Too...Thanks to Remember5th For The Link
War With Iran Might Be Closer Than You Think
Posted on May 9th, 2008 by Philip Giraldi
There is considerable speculation and buzz in Washington today suggesting that the National Security Council has agreed in principle to proceed with plans to attack an Iranian al-Qods-run camp that is believed to be training Iraqi militants. The camp that will be targeted is one of several located near Tehran. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was the only senior official urging delay in taking any offensive action. The decision to go ahead with plans to attack Iran is the direct result of concerns being expressed over the deteriorating situation in Lebanon, where Iranian ally Hezbollah appears to have gained the upper hand against government forces and might be able to dominate the fractious political situation. The White House contacted the Iranian government directly yesterday through a channel provided by the leadership of the Kurdish region in Iraq, which has traditionally had close ties to Tehran. The US demanded that Iran admit that it has been interfering in Iraq and also commit itself to taking steps to end the support of various militant groups. There was also a warning about interfering in Lebanon. The Iranian government reportedly responded quickly, restating its position that it would not discuss the matter until the US ceases its own meddling employing Iranian dissident groups. The perceived Iranian intransigence coupled with the Lebanese situation convinced the White House that some sort of unambiguous signal has to be sent to the Iranian leadership, presumably in the form of cruise missiles. It is to be presumed that the attack will be as “pinpoint” and limited as possible, intended to target only al-Qods and avoid civilian casualties. The decision to proceed with plans for an attack is not final. The President will still have to give the order to launch after all preparations are made.
www.amconmag.com/blog/2008/05/09/war-with-iran-might-be-clos...
Secret Meeting Convenes on Iran War Senario
Report: US Convenes on Iran War Scenario
Wed, 07 May 2008 17:52:35
The White House, Washington, DC
High-ranking US officials have reportedly held a special meeting to study options for a military strike against the Islamic Republic.
The secret meeting was reportedly held on Tuesday either at the White House or at the US Department of Defense.
In response to questions by reporters regarding the subject of the meeting, Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said he would not disclose any details.
Morrell said White House officials frequently hold sessions to discuss issues related to Iran. He, however, refused to reveal the details of Tuesday's meeting, informed sources told Press TV.
When asked about the secret meeting, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack declined to comment and referred reporters to the US Department of Defense.
The Pentagon spokesman claimed in an address to reporters that Washington was seeking to fight the fatal interference of the Iranian government in Iraq and went on to say that the US had 'conclusive evidence of Tehran's support for Iraq insurgency'.
Morrell also accused Tehran of double standard policies claiming that while the Islamic Republic claims it supports the Iraqi government, it funnels arms to those who destabilize the administration.
Washington continues to accuse Iran of supplying and training Iraqi militants; however, it has so far failed to provide 'smoking gun evidence' for its allegations.
Iran categorically denies such allegations, asserting that the country has vowed to help Iraq restore security and stability in the war-torn country.
Although US officials have recently rejected the possibility of an imminent attack on Iran, many critics inside and outside the US government harbor serious doubts about the Bush administration's claims and fear that despite the relentless war in neighboring Iraq, it is preparing for a war on Iran.
www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=54656§ionid=351020101
O ya, just like they had
O ya, just like they had conclusive evidence of Nuclear Weapons! Liars!
Fourth Fleet Established/Navy Deploys/Latin America
I filed this as an individual post however, I'm going to file this here as well in that Chavez did say that if the US attacked Iran He'd be sure to raise oil to $200 pb....It may be indicative of impending action in Iran....It may not....Time to Keep an Eye on Things Down South....
"It’s now official: The Pentagon is going to resuscitate its Fourth Fleet, with the mission of patrolling Latin American and Caribbean waters. Created during the Second World War to protect traffic in the South Atlantic, the structure was dissolved in 1950. “By reestablishing the Fourth Fleet, we acknowledge the immense importance of maritime security in this region,” declared Adm. Gary Roughead, head of the Pentagon’s naval operations. Based in Mayport, Florida, the fleet will operate under the double orders of the American Navy and the Army’s Southern Command, responsible for Latin America and the Caribbean. Vice Adm. Joseph Kernan will command the fleet, which should include a nuclear aircraft carrier.
According to Alejandro Sanchez, an analyst at the Council on Hemispheric Affairs, a research center on Latin America based in Washington, “the reestablishment of the Fourth Fleet is more of a political than a military gesture, designed to confront the rise in power of left-leaning governments in the region.” The Pentagon does not trouble to camouflage its intentions: “the message is clear: whether local governments like it or not, the United States is back after the war in Iraq,” Sanchez explains.
“New Threats”
De facto,, Washington’s military influence in the region has diminished considerably since September 11, 2001, and the launch of the “war against terrorism.” Concentrated on the Middle Eastern arc of crisis, the Pentagon did not pay much attention to the political upsets in its own backyard. Leftist governments, now broadly in the majority in Latin America, reproach the United States with the support it gave the dictatorships that reigned over several decades and to the ultra-neo-liberal policies those dictatorships applied."
"While Washington assures that its sole interest in the region is combating “new threats” (terrorism, drug trafficking and the Maras gangs of Central America), Latin American people often see it as the pursuit of “imperialist” interests dictated by energy needs. The tensions between Washington and the radical presidents of the sub-continent’s main oil and gas producers (Venezuela, Equator and Bolivia) accentuate that perception."
Continues
http://rinf.com/alt-news/war-terrorism/us-navy-deploys-aroun...
EDIT
*
John Bolton (Ex Un Ambassador): US Should Attack Iranian Camps
John Bolton, America’s ex-ambassador to the United Nations, has called for US air strikes on Iranian camps where insurgents are trained for war in Iraq.
Mr Bolton said that striking Iran would represent a major step towards victory in Iraq. While he acknowledged that the risk of a hostile Iranian response harming American’s overseas interests existed, he said the damage inflicted by Tehran would be “far higher” if Washington took no action.
“This is a case where the use of military force against a training camp to show the Iranians we’re not going to tolerate this is really the most prudent thing to do,” he said. “Then the ball would be in Iran’s court to draw the appropriate lesson to stop harming our troops.”
Mr Bolton, an influential former member of President George W Bush’s inner circle, dismissed as “dead wrong” reported British intelligence conclusions that the US military had overstated the support that Iran was providing to Iraqi fighters.
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1931520/John-Bolton-US-should-bomb-...
US Draws Up Attack Plan
www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article3868...
May 4, 2008
United States is drawing up plans to strike on Iranian insurgency campMichael Smith
Read Mick Smith's defence blog at www.timesonline.co.uk/micksmith
The US military is drawing up plans for a “surgical strike” against an insurgent training camp inside Iran if Republican Guards continue with attempts to destabilise Iraq, western intelligence sources said last week. One source said the Americans were growing increasingly angry at the involvement of the Guards’ special-operations Quds force inside Iraq, training Shi’ite militias and smuggling weapons into the country.
Despite a belligerent stance by Vice-President Dick Cheney, the administration has put plans for an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities on the back burner since Robert Gates replaced Donald Rumsfeld as defence secretary in 2006, the sources said.
However, US commanders are increasingly concerned by Iranian interference in Iraq and are determined that recent successes by joint Iraqi and US forces in the southern port city of Basra should not be reversed by the Quds Force.
“If the situation in Basra goes back to what it was like before, America is likely to blame Iran and carry out a surgical strike on a militant training camp across the border in Khuzestan,” said one source, referring to a frontier province.
They acknowledged Iran was unlikely to cease involvement in Iraq and that, however limited a US attack might be, the fighting could escalate.
Although American defence chiefs are firmly opposed to any attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, they believe a raid on one of the camps training Shi’ite militiamen would deliver a powerful message to Tehran.
British officials believe the US military tends to overestimate the effect of the Iranian involvement in Iraq.
But they say there is little doubt that the Revolutionary Guard exercises significant influence over splinter groups of the radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army, who were the main targets of recent operations in Basra.
The CBS television network reported last week that plans were being drawn up for an attack on Iran, citing an officer who blamed the “increasingly hostile role” Iran was playing in Iraq.
The American news reports were unclear about the precise target of such an action and referred to Iran’s nuclear facilities as the likely objective.
According to the intelligence sources there will not be an attack on Iran’s nuclear capacity. “The Pentagon is not keen on that at all. If an attack happens it will be on a training camp to send a clear message to Iran not to interfere.”
President George W Bush is known to be determined that he should not hand over what he sees as “the Iran problem” to his successor. A limited attack on a training camp may give an impression of tough action, while at the same time being something that both Gates and the US commander in Iraq, General David Petraeus, could accept.
Great Article From Political Lore
www.politicallore.com/writers/shaun-booth/us-beats-war-drum-...
Itaqis Urge Iran to Stop Backing Militias
Busy "Iran" day new wise...May is on horizon
US official: Iraqis to urge Iran to stop backing militias
By LOLITA C. BALDOR – 2 hours ago
MEXICO CITY (AP) — Iraqi leaders are hoping to pressure Iran to stop aiding militias in Iraq by presenting Tehran with the latest evidence of weapons and training crossing the border, a senior defense official said Wednesday.
It is not known yet whether the Iranians agreed to the meeting. But the official said the Iraqis want to try let Iran know that the support is not helpful and should be stopped. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information.
According to the official, plans to roll out the evidence of Iranian support for the militias during a public briefing have been delayed to give the Iraqis time to speak directly to Tehran about the problem.
U.S. officials have recently escalated their complaints about the weapons and training that Iran — largely members of Tehran's elite Republican Guard — is providing to militants. The problem was underscored during the recent fighting in Basra.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who is meeting with Mexican leaders, said Tuesday that the U.S. is not laying the groundwork for an attack against Iran. And his spokesman Geoff Morrell told reporters Wednesday that he is not aware of any "ramping up or revision" of war plans for Iran at the Pentagon.
U.S. Military officials have said that the evidence includes caches of weapons that have date stamps showing they were produced in Iran this year.
The weapons to be presented will include mortars, rockets, small arms, roadside bombs and armor-piercing explosives — known as explosively formed penetrators or EFPs — that troops have discovered in recent months, according to another senior military official who spoke on condition of anonymity because the evidence has not yet been made public.
The U.S. very briefly had two Navy aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf this week — a move that Gates said Tuesday could be seen as a "reminder" to Iran. The Pentagon has routinely said that moving ships to the Gulf is a way of showing countries there that the U.S. remains committed to the region.
At the Pentagon, defense officials said the USS Abraham Lincoln entered the Gulf in a normal rotation of forces, not as an addition of force. The carrier that the Lincoln replaced, the USS Harry Truman, has now left the Gulf and is en route to its home base at Norfolk, Va. The two carriers were together in the Gulf for only one day, as is common during a rotation, the officials said.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because details about ship movements are considered classified.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iVp6OcsznLJpeFv8SenE_EhxI...
Iran Replaces US Dollar In All Oil Transactions
Tehran, April 30
(Xinhua) Iran has replaced the US dollar with other currencies in its oil transactions, an oil ministry official said Wednesday. “The dollar has completely been removed from our oil trade. Crude oil customers have agreed with us to use other currencies. Our future oil business will be in euro in Europe, yen in Asia,” he added.
In the wake of worsening relations with Washington in the past years over the nuclear disputes and the latest depreciation of the US dollar, Iran has vowed to scale down the use of the greenback in its foreign trade. The Iranian central bank has also reduced its dollar reserves.
During the last summit of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) in Saudi Arabia, Iran proposed that it was necessary to replace the US dollar with other major hard currencies in oil trading.
Iranian Oil Minister Gholam Hossein Nozari declared last December that Tehran had completely stopped selling its oil in dollars, according to a report by the semi-official ISNA news agency at that time.
www.thaindian.com/newsportal/business/iran-replaces-us-dolla...