Romney ordered to drop out. By whom?
Submitted by Ronpaulican on Fri, 02/08/2008 - 00:32
I think Romney was taken to a room and made an offer he couldn't refuse, so to speak. If anyone had a chance to win a brokered convention it would have been Romney. He must have been ordered to drop out. You can tell by the pained look on his face when he fed that line about not surrendering to terror. My question is, who told him to stand down?
»
CFR
I always thought that MITT was the one with least ties to the CFR. McPain is a member and Huck's Senior Policy Advisor is Richard Haas, CFR PResident. Huck's polls went up and his media attention is directly linked to that fact. Th CFR is on to our little attempt at stealing the convention and are hard at work overcoming it. Huck will be in. Romney SUSPENDED his campaign. Thus, he can speak at the convention. This whole thing is a mess. We must be close.
Does my burka make my butt look fatwa?
Well
Mitt's advisor was Vin Weber and he is CFR. And if you read Mitt on foreign relations, he says he follows Bush's policies on foreign relations.
Hilarious
What's funny is that everyone including Romney supporters tacitly assume that he lied about why he dropped out!
Here is your answer
Go to www.youtube
After you are in there put in search moneymasters
and then you will see a series of videos
watch them and you will know who!!!
Liberty is our campaigns gift to the world it is our manifest destiny.
Freedom is a movement who's time has come. Our campaign will lead world wide freedom.
IMF & World Bank?
Guess I found the "moneymasters" from google.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pbzcj1YPR58
IMF & World Bank?
Maybe he didn't really want
Maybe he didn't really want to be President! He was just playing
this "rich people" game. It was just a play thing. They get bored with their fancy cars, houses in boats. Afterall, they get all this attention that "they" know that they deserve for bein' such a great 'n wonderful person.
Reguardless, his "out" reasoning was fabricated, as in, "dung".
Ron Paul told 'em to "sit", "sit boy sit". GRRRR, "Make fun buddy"!
Team Player
I doubt that anyone ordered him to drop out. Rather, he is demonstrating to the Council on Foreign Relations that he is a team player. He thinks that he will be rewarded in the future.
with all due respect
speculate all you want,
no matter what the reason is
it won't help RP get more votes
5-10% is not enough
consider proactive solutions over speculative reactions
I think Romney should go to Michigan...
... and make good on all of his promises!
Probably ordered by his wife and kids.
They were worried about their inheratance.
I'd be pissed
If my dad just spent $30,000,000 of my inheretance that I'd have to share with 4 other bros.
Oh wait, Romney's got over a quarter of a million, JACKPOT!
Yet another conspiracy theory
Will it ever end?
there are NEVER conspiracies
Yeah, it's sad. We all know that there are NEVER conspiracies of people corrupted by absolute power. I have great faith in the government and, especially, the media to hold our leaders accountable.
And if you believe that, I'm trying to sell some real estate in a quiet neighborhood in Baghdad.
"We don't have to start a brand new revolution...All we have to do is restore the original Constitution." -Ron Paul
----
"...a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." -John F. Kennedy
The provide some proof
on the newest conspiracy theory here.
Wait, you can't because there isn't any proof, just another kooky RP supporter.
I'm a non-kooky Paul supporter
I think this forum of who ordered Romney off is rediculous.
He still has a political strategy. The guy is young enough to wait it out 4 years from now and swoop in to steal the election from his bet of a Democrat. His bet is on if the Democrats win the General Election he'll come in and say "I told you Washington was broken!", because if a Democrat gets in it will be near the end of our dollar.
wclass, I agree with you here, this is all kooky nonsense. But don't generalize every single last one of Paul's supporters because of this.
Romney has f' you money, and he's saying f' you, that's all.
30 million dollars sounds like a lot, but not to someone that has 250 million and more than that in assets.
you are right
Romney dropped out because he wasn't going to win. This sets him up for the future. He does not want to spend any more of his millions in a battle he won't win.
"wclass, I agree with you here, this is all kooky nonsense. But don't generalize every single last one of Paul's supporters because of this."
I certainly don't, but it is obvious that some of these folks see a conspiracy in almost everything. Is it any wonder why some of the RP supporters are perceived as kooky? Google kooky Ron Paul supporters vs the other candidates and that is one category where RP does lead vs the other candidates. That perception has been one of the biggest liabilities of this campaign.
kooky RP supporter here
Excuse me? I'm a "kooky RP supporter" because I posited that conspiracies exist between people corrupted by absolute power?
You are either knowingly or unknowingly reinforcing the limits of "acceptable opinion" and arguing against debate with your ad hominem tactic of calling me "kooky." The Corporate Military-Industrial Government-Media has trained you well.
Tell me. Do you believe that the North American Union is a "conspiracy theory"? What about the New World Order? Is that also a "conspiracy theory"?
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it." -Patrick Henry
----
"...a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." -John F. Kennedy
I'm still waiting for your proof.
"Excuse me? I'm a "kooky RP supporter" because I posited that conspiracies exist between people corrupted by absolute power?"
I never said that, you did. My reference are about this thread and how there is a conspiracy about Romney dropping out. Now you can provide proof on this subject and prove me wrong or once again you can provide nothing and prove me right. You weren't exactly captain of your high school debate team were you?
Ball is in your court, provide me proof of that Romney was told to drop out and by whom.
I wasn't arguing either for or against a conspiracy
I wasn't arguing either for or against a conspiracy about Romney dropping out.
Again, I posited that conspiracies exist between people corrupted by absolute power. For example, ever heard of Watergate? Since I wasn't arguing for a "conspiracy theory" that you have somehow assigned to me, I will not be offering any "proof" to pacify an adolescent tantrum from a one-worlder tool.
Now you have the intellectual dishonesty to pretend that you were not indicting me as a "kooky RP supporter" with your reply to my post.
The Stalinists over at redstate.com would really appreciate your anti-Ron Paul rhetoric.
"We don't have to start a brand new revolution...All we have to do is restore the original Constitution." -Ron Paul
----
"...a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." -John F. Kennedy
You come up empty once again
You weren''t even on the high school debate team. LOL!
It's easy to be paranoid when everyone is against you
What is hard to stay factual, honest, and diligent when they are with you.
Just the facts, man.
Even Rhetorical facts are fine, like:
Liberal Media Coverage:
Coverage of Paul = 0
Coverage of Huckabee = 10
Coverage of McCain = 1,000
Coverage of Hillary and Obama = 1,000,000,000
State the obvious, and they can't disagree with you or even bother asking for facts. There is a massive liberal agendal. Amnesty, higher spending, more taxes, and foreign entanglements are in our future unless we do something now and vote for Paul.
two sides of the same coin
I don't put my faith in the false left-right paradigm. What difference does it make what you label it? Liberal, Democrat, Conservative, Republican, it's all there to control you, two sides of the same coin.
Constitutional principles, integrity, honesty, these are the virtues that should frame our political discourse. But we have very little of these from either D or R, "liberal" or "conservative."
We have ONE honest statesman in the Honorable Dr. Ron Paul.
The state-run media is merely a propaganda arm of the one-worlders. I don't believe that "liberal" or "conservative" properly characterizes the One World agenda, do you?
"We don't have to start a brand new revolution...All we have to do is restore the original Constitution." -Ron Paul
----
"...a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." -John F. Kennedy
Romeny's Money
The election isn't until November. At the rate Romney was spending money, he can't do that until November, and he's not getting contributions...so...he's pulled out for now so he doesn't have to spend money. It's all financial...he can get back into the race at any time, and I'm sure he will.
WE ARE GOING TO WIN!
___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")
I don't know
But I watched the video of Kerry conceding and I have never seen such a happy conceder and a wife trying to look disappointing and supportive of her husband and not doing a very convincing job of it. Kerry was a happy, happy guy and his supporters were left wondering what happened because they thought they were pushing for a recount. They had the recount started and going and on the verge of happening and he threw in the towel--happily. I speculated myself that he had an offer.
Months later, low and behold, I read that he had been offered $50mil. Right or wrong is anyones guess.
So Romney probably came out of his campaign not much the worse for money spent on his campaign. It just seems very, very strange that he would choose to drop out when he was going back and forth as the lead.
Although, they are probably very aware of how "their" system works without our help in figuring it out.
I think he was let go because his "bosses" read what we say and know where we stand on the convention. I really think we have messed up laying it out so clearly for everyone.
First Get Some Evidence
I understand your suspicions, but before you act on them, you need to prove them - or at least gather enough evidence to provide a reasonable lead. Let's not take the scant evidence of Romney's concession speech and extrapolate all sorts of theories based only on our intuition. Hard evidence rules the roost. If we get some, we can pursue our claims. If not, then we're just Chicken Little.
Not with these conspiracy nots
"I understand your suspicions, but before you act on them, you need to prove them - or at least gather enough evidence to provide a reasonable lead."
And that is where these kooky nuts fail.
Suspicions? Act On Them? Scant Evidence?
Vote RON PAUL 2008
__________
I believe stepping back and taking a good look at what is going on around us in our country today, all the truly screwed up happenings that have been laid at the feet of who is truly running (ruining) our government -- I mean what kind of proof beyond 1001 suspicions are there that's truly needed when it comes to the guy we now have in charge // there's no reasonable way in the world that man of such poor judgement and everything related we have come to understand about him should ever have become our President -- but he did (twice). And if you don't have any mounting suspicions about something (??) certainly manipulating the strings (ROMNEY included) -- well, so be it. I call it an abundance of suspicions leaning heavily in the direction of PROOF; no other way to state it since those in control refuse to investigate and/or hold any hearings regarding proving it as to how that election alone happened and/or other related matters that continue to require attention -- then Heaven Help You. You're asleep and someone needs to gently wake you up. Something (??) is not quite right, considering all we know. All we have come to see and understand.
-- But what do you mean exactly by commenting 'before you act on them' ??
What kind of 'act' has anyone suggested here? All I have been hearing (and contributing myself ) is an opinion. Is it not TIME to voice an opinion when things are generally screwed up and the boat we're all riding upon is surely sinking -- don't you think (??) somebody ought to perhaps be voicing an opinion about 'that' before way before we have any solid PROOF that we've sunk and find ourself sitting on the bottom of the ocean floor? Of course that's just me expressing my opinion ;-)
Vote RON PAUL 2008
My 2 Cents
After sleeping on the events from Thursday I have come to the conclusion that George Bush is going to expand the war in the Middle East. Why does Mitt devote so much of his speech to the war on terror and how the Democrats are weak on defense ? I think the Neo Cons feel the only way they can cling to power is to expand the war. McCain is the perfect war time President in their eyes. I can hear the words now ,"We can't change horses in mid stream". I think the expansion of the war will have to happen by April or my theory will be wrong. I hope I am WRONG. Please Mitt, send one of your bust out sons over in the Middle East. I hear that depleted uranium is good for your health.
Seems fishy.
.
I don't think anybody knows the real story behind the suspension of the Romney campaign. It is fun to speculate, but in the end pulls us off point - helping Ron Paul.
One of the other posters, further down, talked about a coup: that it has already happened. He may be right, but it hasn't happened yet, and more people are waking up to the message of freedom and Constitutional government.
What is also notable is that, no matter what the "establishment" tries to do - whether it is manipulating voting machines or keeping RP out of the spotlight - the Revolution is very likely to continue.
As we have seen, many former RP supporters threw in the towel and went back to school, or elsewhere, because they figured it was a lost cause. But, as Trevor Lymon wisely stated in the PBS program (Ron Paul and the Internet), this is really not about Ron Paul. This is about taking back our Republic. Ron Paul has provided the spark and the hope, but if he should not win the nomination or the presidency, then the Revolution MUST continue.
The forces of darkness (the CFR/NWO gang) are very powerful, but what they do not have is our hearts and minds. It may be that only a few of us remain to carry the battle forward, but it is well worth the effort. If we do not, or take the safe route out of activism, then we can look forward to the things Ron Paul talked about: National I.D. Cards, implanted microchips, the suspension of the Constitution (what's left of it) and the likely merger with Canada and Mexico into the North Amercian Union. Not a pleasant thought.
So friends, it is important to keep the focus on Ron Paul, and the message. You can always speculate about Mitt Romney after hours when you're in the pub. But for now, we have our work cut out for us.
.
John Galt got to him!
John Galt got to him!
We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by