Hey, cool. According to State Department, McCain not natural born Citizen
Submitted by Rewind on Sat, 02/09/2008 - 02:54
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/citizenship.php
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86755.pdf
"7 FAM 1116.1-4 Not Included in the Meaning of "In the United
States"
(TL:CON-64; 11-30-95)
...c. Despite widespread popular belief, U.S. military installations abroad and U.S. diplomatic or consular facilities are not part of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. A child born on the premises of such a facility is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and does not acquire U.S. citizenship."
So, legally, it's between Paul and Huckabee now =)
»




















I'm not sure this applies to him.
Normally when a child is born overseas to at least one US citizen parent, that child is "covered" under that parent's citizenship and some basic forms are filled out soon after the child's birth to make it "official". Most countries do not have birthright citizenship, so if an American baby is born in one of these countries it must take on the citizenship of one or both of its parents or it will be stateless. This wouldn't be "allowed". The way the world works for the most part is you must "belong" to a country. You cannot walk into a US consulate in Tahiti and renounce your US citizenship unless you have a second passport. The US consulate will refuse your declaration and continue to "claim" you.
To make a long story short, I don't foresee this as being a problem for MeCain as it would be for Arnold.
Just my rambling opinion.
________________
Good luck to us all,
Lisa C.
www.women4ronpaul.com
Ron Paul "Sign Wave Across the USA" -- November 5th!
Born?
I didn't know he was born?? I thought bush and cheney bumped into each other in the WH men's room and he popped out of one of their a**es!
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot." -Mark Twain
McCain was not naturally born...
He was hatched. Why do think the Vietnamese called him "Songbird"?
McCain's also known as.....
'Ace' and not because he shot down so many "enemy" planes during Vietnam. I believe everyone knows why.
Hehe if only it were that simple.
The 14th amendment reads:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
Note it does not say only persons born or naturalized in the USA; it says all persons born or naturalized. The amendment clearly establishes a minimum threshold for determining when citizenship and naturalization is automatically conferred upon an individual, however it never states that such rules cannot be extended beyond said minimum.
Now keeping that in mind, the document you reference goes on to discuss alternate methods of obtaining citizenship and naturalization. One of those methods is called "Jus Sanguinis" (AKA "derivative citizenship"). Jus Sanguinis is the legal jargon for the idea that the nationality of an individuals parents determines their citizenship. Therefore, barring some gross oversight in the language of the laws that grant this sort of citizenship in the USA, McCain would in all likelihood have been a naturalized citizen from birth. Which in turn would probably qualify him as a "natural born" citizen of the USA. (I only say most likely because the Supreme Court has never ruled on the meaning of the phrase "Natural Born").
Now I'm no legal student, and I don't have THAT much time on my hands, so its quite possible I am wrong, but if you're going to carry on about how McCain is not eligible to hold the office of commander in chief then you're going to have to do some research on the precise conditions under which Jus Sanguinis comes into effect, paying particular attention to the language relative to when the citizenship is granted to the eligible party.
Go read my much longer and detailed post on this.
link below.
uh, he/she...
wrote this on the 9th, before your post... Besides, its not a race, relax. And even if it was, you lost!
Uh, not really,
It's not a race at all, but they didn't cover all of the bases by a long shot.
You're behind the curve some
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/37509
Here is the Bottom Line
I'm sure this matter has been brought up to most of the candidates, Romney, Huckabee, and Paul, through supporters letters to them. This has been talked about in other groups as well as RP groups. If there was indeed a case to be made, without a doubt, Romney or Huckabee would be addressing it. I have little doubt that if there was a LEGITIMATE CASE, than it WOULD have been filed. Fact is NO ONE in ANY campaign, including Clinton or Obama, have brought such a case to be heard. I would therefore assume the reason that such case has NOT been brought to be heard is because there are NO SUCH GROUNDS for such case.
Now, can we get back to something more productive like canvassing and making calls?
----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" B.Bunny "Scwewy Wabbit!"E. Fudd
People's Awareness Coalition: Deprogramming Sequence
Unfortunately, the general
Unfortunately, the general population of America doesn't seem to care whether the federal government follows the Constitution or not.
This clause is considered particularly arcane by a large portion of the small percentage of Americans who are aware of it. There is even a push to repeal that clause so that Arnold Schwarzenegger can run for President.
The American people don't need arcane clauses from the Constitution enforced, taking away things they want or like. That will only make them angry, leading to cries from more talking heads that the Constitution is out of date and no longer reflects the desires of American society.
What we need to do is educate people about the Constitution and why some of these clauses were put in there. What was the reason the founders decided only "Natural Born Citizens" could be president? Use that answer for making your case about McCain. Arguing the constitution alone isn't effective anymore and would probably end up hurting the Constitution more than McCain.
Hello?
Just because the constitution guarantees that individuals born on soil are citizens doesn't mean that there aren't other ways to have birthright citizenship. Even though McCain was born in PCZ, both his parents were american citizens, and congress (which has the power to deterimine citizenship) and the courts has always ruled that jus soli and jus sanguinis BOTH provide valid claims for birthright citizenship.
even if were unconstitutional, his citizenship cannot legally or morally be revoked based on ex post facto review of the constitutionality of the citizenship rules. Similarly, it would be wrong to suddenly decide that he cannot be president since the all along the rules have said he could.
I disagree
How can you say that even it were unconstitutional that his citizenship cannot be legally or morally be revoked. The constitution is the law. This is exactly we are in the mess we are in right now. Because our government kept on breaking the constitution and allowing exceptions to the constitution. And how can you say that it would be wrong to suddenly decide that he cannot be president since the rules said he could. If the constitution says he can't then the law says he can't.
And requirements for presidency is to be a natural born citizen. Which McCain is not. He acquired citizenship through his parents, but he wasn't born in the United States, which is what a natural born citizen is.
Every single part of the
Every single part of the Constitution needs to be enforced, that is why it is the Supreme Law Of The Land.
"Natural citizens can be
"Natural citizens can be subdivided into two groups; those who acquired their citizenship by having been born in the United States, and those who acquired their citizenship by been born to parents that are citizens of the United States. Those individuals who are born on U.S. soil are said to have received their citizenship under the doctrine of "jus soli" or by the "right of the land". Natural citizens who are not born within the United States, but who are born from parents who were citizens of the United States at the time of their birth acquire their citizenship under the "jus sanguinis" doctrine or by the "right through blood"" From Vote Utah ( http://www.voteutah.org/learning/citizenship/become.html )
I guess the question for me would be, since IANAL, what is teh difference between jus soli and "jus sanguinis" in how it applies to being a "natural-born" or naturalized citizen
We cold also ponder the difference between who is a "citizen by birth" versus a "citizen at birth"
bah, forgot the rest of what I was going to write...
IMO John McCain would be a citizen by by jus saguinis and not jus soli so it would come down to the court ruling whether or not a natual born citizen is a citizen based on jus soli, jus sanguinis or both/either of the two.
Nope.
Read my blog. Your source has it completely wrong.
which United States
Original
Description
union of the several states
the states united
united states in Congress assembled
these united States of America
The united states of America
The United States of America
The United States
(defined as the original or organic)
Started with Declaration of Independence in
1776, Articles of Confederation in 1778,
and the Constitution in 1787
a "Republic"
having its beginning with the colonial resistance
against England's tyrannical government.
Major opposition against British control began
with The Stamp Act, established by British
parliament on March 22, 1765--Taxation without
representation, followed by the Declaratory Act,
the Boston Massacre of 1770, and the Tea Act
passed by Parliament on May 10, 1773 to save
the East Indian Company from bankruptcy.
Resistance continued with the Quartering Act
established by Parliament on June 2, 1774,
requiring American colonists to provide shelter to
British troops and horses when requested.
From September 5 to October 25, 1774 Twelve
colonies, all but Georgia, sent 56 delegates to
Philadelphia to participate in the First
Continental Congress. The purpose of the First
Continental Congress was to debate and plan a
unified response to British policy and actions.
On March 25, 1775, Patrick Henry delivered his
"give me liberty or give me death" speech to the
Virginia Assembly in Richmond.
Various conflicts took place and blood continued
to be shed.
On May 10, 1775, The Second Continental
Congress convened in Philadelphia. All thirteen
colonies were represented.
After signing the Declaration of Independence on
July 4, 1776, and winning the revolutionary war
which ended with the Paris Peace Treaty signed
September 3, 1783, all American colonists
became free, Sovereign people, endowed with
the same rights that the King of England had.
having a de jure form of government
Of right; legitimate; lawful; by right and just title;
"by law"
--Black's Law Dictionary sixth edition
for more info on the corporate united states
go: http://www.usavsus.info/
The Constitution makes clear
The Constitution makes clear differentiation of "Citizen" and "Natural Citizen".
To qualify to be a Senator the Constitution reads, "been nine Years a Citizen of the United States".
To qualify to be the President the Constitution reads, "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution".
Notice distinct difference in the two?
So the definition of "natural born citizen" is the question, not the definition of citizen.
----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" B.Bunny "Scwewy Wabbit!"E. Fudd
People's Awareness Coalition: Deprogramming Sequence
McCain is a citizen of the
McCain is a citizen of the united states, whether natural born or not. He can run for president legally.
You are wrong.
Do you even know the constitution and the rules. YOU HAVE TO BE A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT. How can you say it doesn't matter whether your natural born or not. The rules are in the constitution.
McCane- pettiness?
I opinionate but only from an outsiders view,- and you'd be right in saying to me 'keep your nose out' but it does sound a bit petty. One day you may get the chance to elect the best president ever (after Ron Pauls presidency, obviously) that was born under similar circumstances to McCane? The fact that he is who he is and may well be not worthy owing to his record, nonetheless he is of fine naval pedigree, could have contributed to the common good and has led the life of an american since birth to american parentage. That makes him worthy in that sense but not of course his presidential qualifications which goes without saying.
'I always think of all you canvassors and precinct leaders at the front line.
Good luck out there &Thank you. It's appreciated'.-fip -U.K
'I always thank of all you canvassors and precinct leaders and delegates who were at the front line and caucuses.
Good luck out there &Thank you. You're a gift.
just for your information
we are still a British colony
If my wife and I were vacationing in France and she delivered
there, would the baby be a natural born citizen eligible to run for President? (Wife and I are both natural born citizens of US) Or would the baby be a citizen by birth right but not as a result of having been born on American soil?
If two Mexicans illegals have a baby on American soil, is the baby eligible to be President by being a natural born cirtizen?
I don't think anyone is
I don't think anyone is disputing McCain's citizenship. The question is whether or not he is a natural-born citizen. My personal belief is that the founders intent was that the person must be born within the borders of the United States, on U.S. soil.
The Panama Canal zone absolutely was not part of the United States. The U.S. had lease rights, not territorial rights.
I agree that McCain is definitely a citizen. But I am a bit unsure as to whether he is truly a natural-born citizen since he was not born on U.S. soil.
...
I'm glad someone gets it
dead on.
Mathew 5:9 Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
As much as I'd wish it to be true...
It just isn't. I personally was a U.S. citizen at birth, even though I was also born in a South American country. My mother is an American citizen and my dad is a Canadian citizen. I therefore was born with three natural citizenships which are all recognized to this day by all three countries.
This law would ONLY apply to him had he not had at least one American citizen parent.
Again, I wish it were true, but this has been addressed many other times before. There are MANY other reasons to go after McCain... hopefully some of them will come to light very soon.
It's good to have options.
.
Nah can not be true,
Nah can not be true, McCain's father and grandfather were both US Navy Admirals, thats why it was so shocking when he was making videos for the Viet-Con when he was in captivity. People were saying is that the Admirals son Johney??!
I'm still trying to figure
I'm still trying to figure out how a reptile can become a citizen.
ha
good one
Lot's of quotes come to mind...